Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Arno Lataster is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Arno Lataster.


Pain Practice | 2010

12. Pain Originating from the Lumbar Facet Joints

Maarten van Kleef; Pascal Vanelderen; Steven P. Cohen; Arno Lataster; Jan Van Zundert; Nagy Mekhail

Although the existence of a “facet syndrome” had long been questioned, it is now generally accepted as a clinical entity. Depending on the diagnostic criteria, the zygapophysial joints account for between 5% and 15% of cases of chronic, axial low back pain. Most commonly, facetogenic pain is the result of repetitive stress and/or cumulative low‐level trauma, leading to inflammation and stretching of the joint capsule. The most frequent complaint is axial low back pain with referred pain perceived in the flank, hip, and thigh. No physical examination findings are pathognomonic for diagnosis. The strongest indicator for lumbar facet pain is pain reduction after anesthetic blocks of the rami mediales (medial branches) of the rami dorsales that innervate the facet joints. Because false‐positive and, possibly, false‐negative results may occur, results must be interpreted carefully. In patients with injection‐confirmed zygapophysial joint pain, procedural interventions can be undertaken in the context of a multidisciplinary, multimodal treatment regimen that includes pharmacotherapy, physical therapy and regular exercise, and, if indicated, psychotherapy. Currently, the “gold standard” for treating facetogenic pain is radiofrequency treatment (1 B+). The evidence supporting intra‐articular corticosteroids is limited; hence, this should be reserved for those individuals who do not respond to radiofrequency treatment (2 B±).


Pain Practice | 2010

11. Lumbosacral Radicular Pain

Jianguo Cheng; Jacob Patijn; Maarten van Kleef; Arno Lataster; Nagy Mekhail; Jan Van Zundert

Lumbosacral radicular pain is characterized by a radiating pain in one or more lumbar or sacral dermatomes; it may or may not be accompanied by other radicular irritation symptoms and/or symptoms of decreased function. The annual prevalence in the general population, described as low back pain with leg pain traveling below the knee, varied from 9.9% to 25%, which means that it is presumably the most commonly occurring form of neuropathic pain.


Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | 2012

Diffusion‐tensor MRI reveals the complex muscle architecture of the human forearm

Martijn Froeling; Aart J. Nederveen; Dennis F.R. Heijtel; Arno Lataster; Clemens Bos; Klaas Nicolay; Mario Maas; Maarten R. Drost; Gustav J. Strijkers

To design a time‐efficient patient‐friendly clinical diffusion tensor MRI protocol and postprocessing tool to study the complex muscle architecture of the human forearm.


Pain Practice | 2010

8. Occipital Neuralgia

Pascal Vanelderen; Arno Lataster; Robert M. Levy; Nagy Mekhail; Maarten van Kleef; Jan Van Zundert

Occipital neuralgia is defined as a paroxysmal shooting or stabbing pain in the dermatomes of the nervus occipitalis major and/or nervus occipitalis minor. The pain originates in the suboccipital region and radiates over the vertex. A suggestive history and clinical examination with short‐term pain relief after infiltration with local anesthetic confirm the diagnosis. No data are available about the prevalence or incidence of this condition. Most often, trauma or irritation of the nervi occipitales causes the neuralgia. Imaging studies are necessary to exclude underlying pathological conditions. Initial therapy consists of a single infiltration of the culprit nervi occipitales with local anesthetic and corticosteroids (2 C+). The reported effects of botulinum toxin A injections are contradictory (2 C±). Should injection of local anesthetic and corticosteroids fail to provide lasting relief, pulsed radio‐frequency treatment of the nervi occipitales can be considered (2 C+). There is no evidence to support pulsed radio‐frequency treatment of the ganglion spinale C2 (dorsal root ganglion). As such, this should only be done in a clinical trial setting. Subcutaneous occipital nerve stimulation can be considered if prior therapy with corticosteroid infiltration or pulsed radio‐frequency treatment failed or provided only short‐term relief (2 C+).


Pain Practice | 2010

4. Cervical radicular pain.

Jan Van Zundert; Marc A. Huntoon; Jacob Patijn; Arno Lataster; Nagy Mekhail; Maarten van Kleef

Cervical radicular pain is defined as pain perceived as arising in the arm caused by irritation of a cervical spinal nerve or its roots. Approximately 1 person in 1,000 suffers from cervical radicular pain. In the absence of a gold standard, the diagnosis is based on a combination of history, clinical examination, and (potentially) complementary examination. Medical imaging may show abnormalities, but those findings may not correlate with the patients pain. Electrophysiologic testing may be requested when nerve damage is suspected but will not provide quantitative/qualitative information about the pain. The presumed causative level may be confirmed by means of selective diagnostic blocks. Conservative treatment typically consists of medication and physical therapy. There are no studies assessing the effectiveness of different types of medication specifically in patients suffering cervical radicular pain. Cochrane reviews did not find sufficient proof of efficacy for either education or cervical traction. When conservative treatment fails, interventional treatment may be considered. For subacute cervical radicular pain, the available evidence on efficacy and safety supports a recommendation (2B+) of interlaminar cervical epidural corticosteroid administration. A recent negative randomized controlled trial of transforaminal cervical epidural corticosteroid administration, coupled with an increasing number of reports of serious adverse events, warrants a negative recommendation (2B−). Pulsed radiofrequency treatment adjacent to the cervical dorsal root ganglion is a recommended treatment for chronic cervical radicular pain (1B+). When its effect is insufficient or of short duration, conventional radiofrequency treatment is recommended (2B+). In selected patients with cervical radicular pain, refractory to other treatment options, spinal cord stimulation may be considered. This treatment should be performed in specialized centers, preferentially study related.


Pain Practice | 2010

13. Sacroiliac joint pain

Pascal Vanelderen; Karolina Szadek; Steven P. Cohen; Jan De Witte; Arno Lataster; Jacob Patijn; Nagy Mekhail; Maarten van Kleef; Jan Van Zundert

The sacroiliac joint accounts for approximately 16% to 30% of cases of chronic mechanical low back pain. Pain originating in the sacroiliac joint is predominantly perceived in the gluteal region, although pain is often referred into the lower and upper lumbar region, groin, abdomen, and/ or lower limb(s). Because sacroiliac joint pain is difficult to distinguish from other forms of low back pain based on history, different provocative maneuvers have been advocated. Individually, they have weak predictive value, but combined batteries of tests can help ascertain a diagnosis. Radiological imaging is important to exclude “red flags” but contributes little in the diagnosis. Diagnostic blocks are the diagnostic gold standard but must be interpreted with caution, because false‐positive as well as false‐negative results occur frequently. Treatment of sacroiliac joint pain is best performed in the context of a multidisciplinary approach. Conservative treatments address the underlying causes (posture and gait disturbances) and consist of exercise therapy and manipulation. Intra‐articular sacroiliac joint infiltrations with local anesthetic and corticosteroids hold the highest evidence rating (1 B+). If the latter fail or produce only short‐term effects, cooled radiofrequency treatment of the lateral branches of S1 to S3 (S4) is recommended (2 B+) if available. When this procedure cannot be used, (pulsed) radiofrequency procedures targeted at L5 dorsal ramus and lateral branches of S1 to S3 may be considered (2 C+).


Pain Practice | 2011

23.Pain in Patients with Cancer

Kris Vissers; Kees Besse; M. F. M. Wagemans; Wouter W. A. Zuurmond; Maurice J.M.M. Giezeman; Arno Lataster; Nagy Mekhail; Allen W. Burton; Maarten van Kleef; Frank Huygen

Abstract:  Pain in patients with cancer can be refractory to pharmacological treatment or intolerable side effects of pharmacological treatment may seriously disturb patients’ quality of life. Specific interventional pain management techniques can be an effective alternative for those patients. The appropriate application of these interventional techniques provides better pain control, allows the reduction of analgesics and hence improves quality of life. Until recently, the majority of these techniques are considered to be a fourth consecutive step following the World Health Organization’s pain treatment ladder. However, in cancer patients, earlier application of interventional pain management techniques can be recommended even before considering the use of strong opioids.


Pain Practice | 2011

20. Meralgia Paresthetica

Jacob Patijn; Nagy Mekhail; Salim M. Hayek; Arno Lataster; Maarten van Kleef; Jan Van Zundert

Meralgia paresthetica (MP) is a neurological disorder of the nervus cutaneous femoris lateralis (lateral femoral cutaneous nerve) (LFCN) characterized by a localized area of paresthesia and numbness on the anterolateral aspect of the thigh. Medical history and neurological examination are essential in making the diagnosis. However, red flags such as tumor and lumbar disc herniations must be ruled out. While the diagnosis of MP is essentially a clinical diagnosis, sensory nerve conduction velocity studies are a useful additional diagnostic tool.


Pain Practice | 2010

5. Cervical Facet Pain

Maarten van Eerd; Jacob Patijn; Arno Lataster; Richard W. Rosenquist; Maarten van Kleef; Nagy Mekhail; Jan Van Zundert

More than 50% of patients presenting to a pain clinic with neck pain may suffer from facet‐related pain. The most common symptom is unilateral pain without radiation to the arm. Rotation and retroflexion are frequently painful or limited. The history should exclude risk factors for serious underlying pathology (red flags). Radiculopathy may be excluded with neurologic testing. Direct correlation between degenerative changes observed with plain radiography, computerized tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging and pain has not been proven.


Pain Practice | 2010

10. Thoracic Pain

Maarten van Kleef; Robert Jan Stolker; Arno Lataster; José W. Geurts; Honorio T. Benzon; Nagy Mekhail

Approximately 5% of the patients referred to outpatient pain clinics suffer thoracic pain. Thoracic pain in this article is limited to thoracic radicular pain and pain originating from the thoracic facet joints. Thoracic radicular pain is characterized by radiating pain in the localized area of a nervus intercostalis. The diagnosis of thoracic facet pain should be considered if the patient complains of paravertebral pain that is aggravated by prolonged standing, hyperextension, or rotation of the thoracic spinal column.

Collaboration


Dive into the Arno Lataster's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jan Van Zundert

Maastricht University Medical Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Frank Huygen

Erasmus University Rotterdam

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pascal Vanelderen

Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge