Arnold Huurnink

Corrigendum to “The effect of the stability threshold on time to stabilization and its reliability following a single leg drop jump landing” [J. Biomech. 49(3) (2016) 496–501]

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.07.036 DOI of original article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.12.048 ⇑ Corresponding author at: MOVE Research Institute Amsterdam, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Van der Boechorststraat 9, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail address: dpfransz@gmail.com (D.P. Fransz). Duncan P. Fransz a,b,⇑, Arnold Huurnink , Vosse A. de Boode , Idsart Kingma , Jaap H. van Dieën a

Time series of ground reaction forces following a single leg drop jump landing in elite youth soccer players consist of four distinct phases

The single leg drop jump landing test may assess dynamic and static balance abilities in different phases of the landing. However objective definitions of different phases following landing and associated reliability are lacking. Therefore, we determined the existence of possible distinct phases of single leg drop jump landing on a force plate in 82 elite youth soccer players. Three outcome measures were calculated over moving windows of five sizes: center of pressure (COP) speed, COP sway and horizontal ground reaction force (GRF). Per outcome measure, a Factor Analysis was employed with all windows as input variables. It showed that four factors (patterns of variance) largely (>75%) explained the variance across subjects/trials along the 12s time series. Each factor was highly associated with a distinct phase of the time series signal: dynamic (0.4-2.7s), late dynamic (2.5-5.0s), static 1 (5.0-8.3s) and static 2 (8.1-11.7s). Intra-class correlations (ICC) between trials were lower for the dynamic phases (0.45-0.68) than for the static phases (0.60-0.86). The COP speed showed higher ICCs (0.63-0.86) than COP sway (0.45-0.61) and GRF (0.57-0.71) for all four phases. In conclusion, following a drop jump landing unique information is available in four distinct phases. The COP speed is most reliable, with higher reliability in the static phases compared to the dynamic phases. Future studies should assess the sensitivity of information from dynamic, late dynamic and static phases.