Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Arnoud van Rooij is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Arnoud van Rooij.


Archive | 1997

Open and Closed Sets

Gerard Buskes; Arnoud van Rooij

Proof: (O1) ∅ is open because the condition (1) is vacuously satisfied: there is no x ∈ ∅. X is open because any ball is by definition a subset of X. (O2) Let Si be an open set for i = 1, . . . , n, and let x ∈ ∩i=1Si. We must find an > 0 for which B(x, ) ⊆ ∩i=1Si. For each i there is an i such that B(x, i) ⊆ Si, because each Si is open. Let = min{ 1, . . . , n}. Then 0 < 5 i for each i; therefore B(x, ) ⊆ B(x, i) ⊆ Si for each i — i.e., B(x, ) ⊆ ∩i=1Si. (O3) Let x ∈ ∪α∈ASα; we must find an > 0 for which B(x, ) ⊆ ∪α∈ASα. Since x ∈ ∪α∈ASα, we have x ∈ Sᾱ for some ᾱ. Since Sᾱ is open, there is an > 0 such that B(x, ) ⊆ Sᾱ ⊆ ∪α∈ASα. ‖


Archive | 1997

Transition to Topology

Gerard Buskes; Arnoud van Rooij

We start working on the program that was indicated in the preceding chapter: We wish to reorganize and extend the theory of metric spaces, suppressing the metric and emphasizing the collection of the open sets. There will be much talk of convergence of nets. In case you are still wary of nets, you can mitigate the culture shock by mentally substituting “sequence” for “net.” For the time being, the difference will be irrelevant. You will be fairly warned as soon as the nets become essential to the plot.


Archive | 1997

Curves in the Plane

Gerard Buskes; Arnoud van Rooij

So far, our arguments mainly dealt with analysis. In this chapter, we make a bigger step in the direction of topology. In fact, we will prove a famous topological theorem (Brouwer’s Fixed Point Theorem) and formulate a second one (Jordan’s Closed Curve Theorem). A complete proof of the latter will be given in Chapter 16.


Archive | 1997

Axioms for ℝ

Gerard Buskes; Arnoud van Rooij

As you have seen in the previous chapter, continuity and convergence are basic for topology, and calculus is not sufficient as a background. The latter statement has a double meaning. We need more calculus-like theorems, especially on functions of several variables, but that is not all: Topology also requires a more precise kind of reasoning than an introductory Calculus course. We will have to prove all of our theory and we cannot afford to rely on pictures (although they will be an invaluable aid). In this chapter, we lay the foundations for a rigorous theory in the form of a system of axioms.


Educational Studies in Mathematics | 2000

Learning to prove by investigations: a promising approach in Dutch secondary education

Louis Van Schalkwijk; T.C.M. Bergen; Arnoud van Rooij


Archive | 1997

The Hahn-Tietze-Tong-Urysohn Theorems

Gerard Buskes; Arnoud van Rooij


Archive | 1997

A Smorgasbord for Further Study

Gerard Buskes; Arnoud van Rooij


Archive | 1997

Products and Quotients

Gerard Buskes; Arnoud van Rooij


Archive | 1997

Compactness and the Hausdorff Property

Gerard Buskes; Arnoud van Rooij


Archive | 1997

Convergent Sequences and Continuity

Gerard Buskes; Arnoud van Rooij

Collaboration


Dive into the Arnoud van Rooij's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gerard Buskes

University of Mississippi

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

T.C.M. Bergen

Radboud University Nijmegen

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge