Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Art Small is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Art Small.


Journal of Oncology Practice | 2016

Care for a Patient With Cancer As a Project: Management of Complex Task Interdependence in Cancer Care Delivery

Julia Rachel Trosman; Ruth C. Carlos; Melissa A. Simon; Debra Madden; William J. Gradishar; Al B. Benson; Bruce D. Rapkin; Elisa S. Weiss; Ilana F. Gareen; Lynne I. Wagner; Seema A. Khan; Mikele Bunce; Art Small; Christine B. Weldon

Cancer care is highly complex and suffers from fragmentation and lack of coordination across provider specialties and clinical domains. As a result, patients often find that they must coordinate care on their own. Coordinated delivery teams may address these challenges and improve quality of cancer care. Task interdependence is a core principle of rigorous teamwork and is essential to addressing the complexity of cancer care, which is highly interdependent across specialties and modalities. We examined challenges faced by a patient with early-stage breast cancer that resulted from difficulties in understanding and managing task interdependence across clinical domains involved in this patients care. We used team science supported by the project management discipline to discuss how various task interdependence aspects can be recognized, deliberately designed, and systematically managed to prevent care breakdowns. This case highlights how effective task interdependence management facilitated by project management methods could markedly improve the course of a patients care. This work informs efforts of cancer centers and practices to redesign cancer care delivery through innovative, practical, and patient-centered approaches to management of task interdependence in cancer care. Future patient-reported outcomes research will help to determine optimal ways to engage patients, including those who are medically underserved, in managing task interdependence in their own care.


Journal of The American College of Radiology | 2016

Radiology as the Point of Cancer Patient and Care Team Engagement: Applying the 4R Model at a Patient’s Breast Cancer Care Initiation

Christine B. Weldon; Sarah M. Friedewald; Swati Kulkarni; Melissa A. Simon; Ruth C. Carlos; Jonathan B. Strauss; Mikele Bunce; Art Small; Julia Rachel Trosman

Radiologists aspire to improve patient experience and engagement, as part of the Triple Aim of health reform. Patient engagement requires active partnerships among health providers and patients, and rigorous teamwork provides a mechanism for this. Patient and care team engagement are crucial at the time of cancer diagnosis and care initiation but are complicated by the necessity to orchestrate many interdependent consultations and care events in a short time. Radiology often serves as the patient entry point into the cancer care system, especially for breast cancer. It is uniquely positioned to play the value-adding role of facilitating patient and team engagement during cancer care initiation. The 4R approach (Right Information and Right Care to the Right Patient at the Right Time), previously proposed for optimizing teamwork and care delivery during cancer treatment, could be applied at the time of diagnosis. The 4R approach considers care for every patient with cancer as a project, using project management to plan and manage care interdependencies, assign clear responsibilities, and designate a quarterback function. The authors propose that radiology assume the quarterback function during breast cancer care initiation, developing the care initiation sequence, as a project care plan for newly diagnosed patients, and engaging patients and their care teams in timely, coordinated activities. After initial consultations and treatment plan development, the quarterback function is transitioned to surgery or medical oncology. This model provides radiologists with opportunities to offer value-added services and solidifies radiologys relevance in the evolving health care environment. To implement 4R at cancer care initiation, it will be necessary to change the radiology practice model to incorporate patient interaction and teamwork, develop 4R content and local adaption approaches, and enrich radiology training with relevant clinical knowledge, patient interaction competence, and teamwork skill set.


Journal of Medical Economics | 2018

Does site-of-care for oncology infusion therapy influence treatment patterns, cost, and quality in the United States?

Sari Hopson; Adrianne Waldman Casebeer; Stephen Stemkowski; Dana Drzayich Antol; Zhuliang Tao; Andrew M. Howe; Jeffrey Patton; Art Small; Anthony Masaquel

Abstract Background: The increase in hospital acquisition of community oncology clinics in the US has led to a shift in the site-of-care (SOC) for infusion therapy from the physician office (PO) to the hospital outpatient (HO) setting. Objective: To investigate differences by SOC in treatment patterns, quality, and cost among patients with cancer undergoing first-line infusion therapy. Research design and methods: This retrospective analysis identified adult patients from Humana medical claims who initiated infusion therapy from 2008–2012 for five common cancer types in which infusion therapy is likely, including early stage breast cancer; metastatic breast, lung, and colorectal cancers; and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Differences by SOC in first-line treatment patterns and quality of care at end-of-life, defined as infusions or hospitalizations 30 days prior to death, were evaluated using Wilcoxon-Rank Sum and Chi-square tests where appropriate. Differences in cost by SOC were evaluated using risk-adjusted generalized linear models. Main outcome measures: Treatment patterns, quality of care at end of life, healthcare costs. Results: There were differences in duration of therapy and number of infusions for some therapy regimens by SOC, in which patients in the HO had shorter duration of therapy and fewer infusions. There were no differences in quality of care at end-of-life by SOC. Total healthcare costs were 15% higher among patients in HO (


Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing | 2017

Tools for Communication: Novel Infrastructure to Address Patient-Perceived Gaps in Oncology Care

Suzanne McMullen; Shelagh M. Szabo; Ronald J. Halbert; Catherine Lai; Aparna Parikh; Mikele Bunce; Raya Khoury; Art Small; Anthony Masaquel

55,965) compared with PO (


Oncologist | 2013

Oncology Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Multistakeholder Perspective on Principles for Conduct and Reporting

Scott D. Ramsey; Sean D. Sullivan; Shelby D. Reed; Ya Chen Tina Shih; Ken Schaecher; Rahul Dhanda; Debra Patt; Kelly Pendergrass; Mark S. Walker; Jennifer Malin; Lee S. Schwartzberg; Kurt Neumann; Elaine Yu; Arliene Ravelo; Art Small

48,439), p < .0001. Limitations: Analyses was restricted to a claims-based population of cancer patients within a health plan. Conclusion: This study, in an older, predominantly Medicare Advantage oncology cohort, found differences by SOC in treatment patterns and cost, but not quality. Where differences were found, patients receiving care in the HO had shorter duration of therapy and fewer infusions for specific treatment regimens, but higher healthcare costs than those treated in a PO.


Journal of Cancer Therapy | 2014

Differences in Treatment Patterns and Health Care Costs among Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients Receiving Rituximab in the Hospital Outpatient Setting versus the Office/Clinic Setting

Stacey Dacosta Byfield; Art Small; Laura Becker; Carolina Reyes

BACKGROUND: Healthcare providers (HCPs) and patient communication are integral to high‐quality oncology care. The patient and HCP perspectives are needed to identify gaps in care and develop communication tools. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to understand patient‐ and HCP‐perceived elements of and gaps in high‐quality care to develop novel communication tools to improve care. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were conducted among 16 patients with cancer and 10 HCPs in the United States. Trained interviewers elicited patients’ and HCPs’ concerns, views, and perceived needs for communication tools. A thematic analysis was used to identify four quality of care domains, depicted in a conceptual model, and two draft communication tools were developed to address identified gaps. FINDINGS: No patients reported previously using a communication tool, and gaps in communication regarding treatment aims and education were evident. Two tools were developed to assess patients’ life and treatment goals and the importance of ongoing education.


Journal of Oncology Practice | 2015

In response to L.N. Newcomer et al.

Art Small; Melissa Brammer


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017

The impact of site of care (office clinic versus hospital outpatient) on treatment patterns in HER2-positive breast cancer.

Anju Parthan; Deepa Lalla; Art Small; Melissa Brammer


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017

Comparative health care (HC) costs and quality of care in five cancer types by physician office (PO) and hospital outpatient (HOP) settings.

Maxine D. Fisher; Yeun Mi Yim; Art Small; Rakesh Luthra; Joseph Singer; Jay Schukman; Barbara L. McAneny; Rajeshjwari Punekar; Jennifer Malin


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017

Baseline demographic characteristics and treatment patterns by cancer site of care: Physician office versus hospital outpatient.

Andrew M. Howe; Stephen Stemkowski; Yong Li; Sari Hopson; Joseph Dye; Jeffrey Patton; Anthony Masaquel; Art Small

Collaboration


Dive into the Art Small's collaboration.

Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge