Arthur I. Rothman
University of Toronto
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Arthur I. Rothman.
Medical Education | 2000
Linda Snell; Susan Tallett; Steven A. Haist; Richard Hays; John J. Norcini; Katinka J.A.H. Prince; Arthur I. Rothman; Richard Rowe
This article discusses the importance of the process of evaluation of clinical teaching for the individual teacher and for the programme. Measurement principles, including validity, reliability, efficiency and feasibility, and methods to evaluate clinical teaching are reviewed.
Medical Education | 2000
David Prideaux; Heather Alexander; A. Bower; Jane Dacre; Steven A. Haist; Brian Jolly; J. Norcini; Trudie Roberts; Arthur I. Rothman; Richard Rowe; Susan Tallett
Good clinical teaching is central to medical education but there is concern about maintaining this in contemporary, pressured health care environments. This paper aims to demonstrate that good clinical practice is at the heart of good clinical teaching.
Academic Medicine | 1996
Richard K. Reznick; David Blackmore; W D Dauphinee; Arthur I. Rothman; Sydney Smee
No abstract available.
Academic Medicine | 1993
Richard K. Reznick; Sydney Smee; Baumber J; Cohen R; Arthur I. Rothman; David Blackmore; Bérard M
A major impediment to the use of the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is that it is a labor-intensive and costly form of assessment. The cost of an OSCE is highly dependent on the particular model used, the extent to which hidden costs are reported, and the purpose of the examination. The authors detail hypothetical costs of running a four-hour OSCE for 120 medical students at one medical school. Costs are reported for four phases of this process: development, production, administration, and post-examination reporting and analysis. Costs are reported at two ends of the spectrum: the high end, where it is assumed that little is paid for by the institution and that faculty receive honoraria for work put into the examination; and the low end, where it is assumed that the sponsoring institution defrays basic costs and that faculty do not receive honoraria for their participation. The total costs reported for a first-time examination were
Academic Medicine | 1991
Cohen R; Arthur I. Rothman; Poldre P; John Ross
104,400 and
Academic Medicine | 1993
Reznick Rk; Blackmore D; Cohen R; Baumber J; Arthur I. Rothman; Smee S; Chalmers A; Poldre P; Birtwhistte R; Walsh P
59,460 (Canadian dollars) at the high and low ends, respectively. These translate to per-student costs of
Journal of General Internal Medicine | 1993
Peter Singer; Robert Cohen; Anja Robb; Arthur I. Rothman
870 and
Academic Medicine | 2003
Bart J. Harvey; Arthur I. Rothman; Richard C. Frecker
496. The cost of running an OSCE is high. However, the OSCE is uniquely capable of assessing many fundamental clinical skills that are presently not being assessed in a rigorous way in most medical schools.
Academic Medicine | 2003
Michael D. Cusimano; Arthur I. Rothman
Abstract The performance of foreign medical graduates on multistation standardized patient‐based tests was used to determine the validity and generalizability of global ratings of their clinical competence made by expert examiners. Data were derived from the entrance examinations of the 1989 and 1990 applicants to the Ontario Pre‐Internship Program and the exit examination of 24 participants from the 1989 cohort. For each candidate, the examiners completed a detailed checklist and two five‐point global ratings dealing with the candidates approach to the patients problem and attitude toward the patient. Generalizability coefficients for both ratings were satisfactory and stable across cohorts. Construct validity of the global ratings was demonstrated by comparing entry and exit ratings and by evidence of significant and positive correlations between the global ratings and total test scores. Tentative evidence of criterion validity of the global ratings was demonstrated. These findings suggest that global ratings by expert examiners can be used as an effective form of assessment in multistation standardized patient examinations. Acad. Med. 66(1991):545–548.
Academic Medicine | 1991
Robert Cohen; Peter Singer; Arthur I. Rothman; Anja Robb
No abstract available.