Arun D. Singh

History, indications, techniques and limitations.

Relatively little has been published in the cytology or ophthalmology literature about the role and accuracy of fine needle aspiration (FNA) in the diagnosis of ophthalmic tumors [1– 4]. In this article we explore various aspects of intraocular tumor FNA including historical aspects, indications, contraindications, techniques and surgical instruments, complications, and the limitations of the ophthalmic FNA cytology. A brief but critical appraisal of the literature is also included.

Uveal Melanoma: Diagnostic Features

Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) has widespread acceptance as an effective diagnostic test for uveal melanoma, albeit indicated in only a small minority of cases [1– 3]. Clinical examination, including ophthalmoscopic evaluation, almost always establishes the diagnosis (fig. 1). For example only 2.5% of patients with ocular tumors required diagnostic FNAB in a large series [1]. This increased to 7% in a series of iris lesions [4]. FNAB is effective and indicated in the rare clinically ambiguous cases, especially those with melanoma and metastasis in the differential diagnosis. In fact approximately two thirds of all diagnostic ocular FNABs are performed to confirm a clinical impression of melanoma or metastasis [1].

Dual institution experience of extranodal marginal zone lymphoma reveals excellent long-term outcomes

Extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (EMZL) is a B‐cell lymphoma arising from mucosa‐associated lymphoid tissue (MALT). The disease characteristics, clinical course and treatment vary considerably based on site of involvement. Because long‐term outcome data for EMZL are limited, we sought to describe the clinical details of a large number of patients with EMZL evaluated at the Case Comprehensive Cancer Center over a 12‐year period to identify prognostic markers including the impact of site of involvement. We identified 211 cases of EMZL involving the stomach (30%), ocular adnexa (19%), lungs (16%) and intestines (9%). Initial treatment included antibiotics (18%), radiation (21%), rituximab (20%), chemotherapy (3%), rituximab + chemotherapy (7%), surgery (17%) or observation (8%). After a median follow‐up of 44·3 months (range 2·2–214·9), median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 68·2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 54·5–111·3) and median overall survival (OS) has not been reached. Age >60 years, elevated lactate dehydrogenase level (LDH), ≥4 lymph node groups involvement, and high follicular lymphoma international prognostic index (FLIPI) were associated with inferior PFS/OS. In summary, patients with EMZL have excellent prognosis with median OS in excess of 10 years. Age, elevated LDH, advanced disease, and high FLIPI score are associated with worse outcomes.

iTRAQ Quantitative Proteomic Comparison of Metastatic and Non-Metastatic Uveal Melanoma Tumors.

Background Uveal melanoma is the most common malignancy of the adult eye. The overall mortality rate is high because this aggressive cancer often metastasizes before ophthalmic diagnosis. Quantitative proteomic analysis of primary metastasizing and non-metastasizing tumors was pursued for insights into mechanisms and biomarkers of uveal melanoma metastasis. Methods Eight metastatic and 7 non-metastatic human primary uveal melanoma tumors were analyzed by LC MS/MS iTRAQ technology with Bruch’s membrane/choroid complex from normal postmortem eyes as control tissue. Tryptic peptides from tumor and control proteins were labeled with iTRAQ tags, fractionated by cation exchange chromatography, and analyzed by LC MS/MS. Protein identification utilized the Mascot search engine and the human Uni-Prot/Swiss-Protein database with false discovery ≤ 1%; protein quantitation utilized the Mascot weighted average method. Proteins designated differentially expressed exhibited quantitative differences (p ≤ 0.05, t-test) in a training set of five metastatic and five non-metastatic tumors. Logistic regression models developed from the training set were used to classify the metastatic status of five independent tumors. Results Of 1644 proteins identified and quantified in 5 metastatic and 5 non-metastatic tumors, 12 proteins were found uniquely in ≥ 3 metastatic tumors, 28 were found significantly elevated and 30 significantly decreased only in metastatic tumors, and 31 were designated differentially expressed between metastatic and non-metastatic tumors. Logistic regression modeling of differentially expressed collagen alpha-3(VI) and heat shock protein beta-1 allowed correct prediction of metastasis status for each of five independent tumor specimens. Conclusions The present data provide new clues to molecular differences in metastatic and non-metastatic uveal melanoma tumors. While sample size is limited and validation required, the results support collagen alpha-3(VI) and heat shock protein beta-1 as candidate biomarkers of uveal melanoma metastasis and establish a quantitative proteomic database for uveal melanoma primary tumors.