Asahi Sato

Nutritional support and therapy in pancreatic surgery: A position paper of the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS)

Background The optimal nutritional therapy in the field of pancreatic surgery is still debated. Methods An international panel of recognized pancreatic surgeons and pancreatologists decided that the topic of nutritional support was of importance in pancreatic surgery. Thus, they reviewed the best contemporary literature and worked to develop a position paper to provide evidence supporting the integration of appropriate nutritional support into the overall management of patients undergoing pancreatic resection. Strength of recommendation and quality of evidence were based on the approach of the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation Working Group. Results The measurement of nutritional status should be part of routine preoperative assessment because malnutrition is a recognized risk factor for surgery‐related complications. In addition to patients weight loss and body mass index, measurement of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity should be considered in the preoperative evaluation because they are strong predictors of poor short‐term and long‐term outcomes. The available data do not show any definitive nutritional advantages for one specific type of gastrointestinal reconstruction technique after pancreatoduodenectomy over the others. Postoperative early resumption of oral intake is safe and should be encouraged within enhanced recovery protocols, but in the case of severe postoperative complications or poor tolerance of oral food after the operation, supplementary artificial nutrition should be started at once. At present, there is not enough evidence to show the benefit of avoiding oral intake in clinically stable patients who are complicated by a clinically irrelevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (a so‐called biochemical leak), while special caution should be given to feeding patients with clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula orally. When an artificial nutritional support is needed, enteral nutrition is preferred whenever possible over parenteral nutrition. After the operation, regardless of the type of pancreatic resection or technique of reconstruction, patients should be monitored carefully to assess for the presence of endocrine and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. Although fecal elastase‐1 is the most readily available clinical test for detection of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency, its sensitivity and specificity are low. Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy should be initiated routinely after pancreatoduodenectomy and in patients with locally advanced disease and continued for at least 6 months after surgery, because untreated pancreatic exocrine insufficiency may result in severe nutritional derangement. Conclusion The importance of this position paper is the consensus reached on the topic. Concentrating on nutritional support and therapy is of utmost value in pancreatic surgery for both short‐ and long‐term outcomes.

Computer tomographic assessment of postoperative peripancreatic collections after distal pancreatectomy

BackgroundPeripancreatic collections occur frequently after distal pancreatectomy. However, the sequelae of peripancreatic collections vary from case to case, and their clinical impact is uncertain. In this study, the correlations between CT findings of peripancreatic collections and complications after distal pancreatectomy were investigated.MethodsNinety-six consecutive patients who had undergone distal pancreatectomy between 2010 and 2015 were retrospectively investigated. The extent and heterogeneity of peripancreatic collections and background clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed. The extent of peripancreatic collections was calculated based on three-dimensional computed tomography images, and the degree of heterogeneity of peripancreatic collections was assessed based on the standard deviation of their density on computed tomography.ResultsOf 85 patients who underwent postoperative computed tomography imaging, a peripancreatic collection was detected in 77 (91%). Patients with either a large extent or a high degree of heterogeneity of peripancreatic collection had a significantly higher rate of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula than those without (odds ratio 5.95, 95% confidence interval 2.12–19.72, p = 0.001; odds ratio 8.0, 95% confidence interval 2.87–24.19, p = 0.0001, respectively).ConclusionsA large and heterogeneous peripancreatic collection was significantly associated with postoperative complications, especially clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula. A small and homogenous peripancreatic collection could be safely observed.

Rhabdomyosarcoma of the duodenum: report of a case

This report presents a case of primary pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma arising in the duodenum. A 63-year-old male with persistent melena was referred for a solid tumor in his right upper abdomen detected using ultrasonography. Gastrofiberscopy revealed a protrusion in the upper part of the duodenum, with a large ulcer on the top of it. Enhanced computed tomography showed that the tumor extended to the pancreas. Pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed, despite the absence of malignant cells in the biopsy specimen, with a preoperative diagnosis of duodenal cancer. The tumor consisted of multiple cell types, and immunohistochemical staining was positive for desmin, HHF-35 and alpha smooth muscle actin. Electron microscopy revealed primitive Z-band structures in the tumor. The final diagnosis was pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma of the duodenum. This is the first report of primary rhabdomyosarcoma occurring in the duodenum, confirmed by immunohistochemical staining and electron microscopy.