Asami Hotta

Changes in computed tomography values of mandibular condyle and temporomandibular joint disc position after sagittal split ramus osteotomy

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate change in computed tomography (CT) value of condyle and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc position after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) setback surgery, retrospectively. SUBJECTS AND METHODS The subjects were 76 patients (152 condyles) who underwent bilateral SSRO setback surgery. They were divided into 2 groups (43 symmetric patients and 33 asymmetric patients). CT values (pixel values) of 5 sites of the condyle and condylar width, length, horizontal angle were measured pre-operatively and 1 year post-operatively. Disc position was classified as anterior disc displacement, anterior type, fully covered type and posterior type, preoperatively and postoperatively using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). RESULTS In maximum CT value at the center of the condyle, post-operative value was significantly lower than pre-operative value bilaterally (Deviation side: P = 0.0003, Non-deviation side: P = 0.0003) in asymmetry group. In minimum CT value at the center of the condyle, the post-operative value was significantly lower than the pre-operative value bilaterally (Deviation side: P = 0.0309, Non-deviation side: P = 0.0004) in the symmetry group. With regard to maximum CT value at the lateral site of the condyle in the deviation side, the value for the anterior disc displacement group was significantly larger than that of the posterior type pre-operatively (P = 0.0123). CT value of the anterior disc displacement group was significantly larger than those of some other areas pre- and post-operatively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION This study suggested that CT value of condylar bone changes after 1 year in SSRO and anterior disc displacement may partially affect the CT value of the condyle in the TMJ in mandibular prognathism patients.

Comparison of the computed tomography values of the bone fragment gap after sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular prognathism with and without asymmetry.

The purpose of this study was to compare computed tomography (CT) Hounsfield unit values of bone fragment gaps after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) in patients with and without asymmetry, and to evaluate differences between the deviated and non-deviated sides in asymmetric patients. Thirty-two patients who underwent a bilateral SSRO were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into symmetric and asymmetric groups by cephalometric analysis. CT values of the bone fragment gap were measured at 1 week and at 1 year after surgery. There were significant differences between CT values obtained at 1 week and at 1 year after surgery for all measurement points. However, there were no significant differences in CT values between symmetric and asymmetric patients at either 1 week or 1 year after surgery. Among asymmetric patients, there were no significant differences between the deviated and non-deviated sides at 1 week or 1 year after surgery. This study showed ossification of the bone fragments and adaptation to change the mandible form in patients with and without asymmetry following SSRO.

The amount of mandibular setback influence on occlusal force following sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to examine the influence between the magnitude of setback in sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) and occlusal contact area and bite force without relapse after surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS Sixty female patients with a diagnosis of mandibular prognathism were divided into 3 groups according to the magnitude of setback: group 1 (≤5 mm), group 2 (>5 mm but <10 mm), and group 3 (≥10 mm). All patients underwent skeletal analysis by lateral and frontal cephalogrammetry and measured the occlusal contact area and bite force by the pressure-sensitive system (Dental Prescale, Dental Occlusion Pressuregraph FDP-705; Fuji Photo Film Co., Tokyo, Japan) preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. RESULTS There were no significant differences in occlusal contact area and bite force between the 3 groups. Only group 3 showed a significant difference in occlusal contact area and bite force between the preoperative and 1-year measurements. CONCLUSION The results indicate that the magnitude of setback did not influence the bite force or occlusal contact area in SSRO.

Comparison of skeletal stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with and without extraction of the third molar in patients with mandibular prognathism.

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate, through cephalometric analysis, the skeletal stability following BSSRO performed with and without extraction of the third molar, and to examine the healing of the extraction sockets through computed tomography (CT). PATIENTS AND METHODS Sixty Japanese patients (male: 14, female: 46) diagnosed with mandibular prognathism were included in this study. While 30 patients underwent BSSRO along with extraction of the third molar (extraction group), the other 30 patients underwent BSSRO alone (non-extraction group). Skeletal stability was assessed using axial, frontal, and lateral cephalograms. CT scans were obtained 1 week after surgery and at the 1-year follow-up for all the patients. CT value was measured at the point of the extraction socket on the horizontal plane parallel to the Frankfurt plane using computer software (SimPlant 2011; Materialise Dental, Leuven, Belgium). The region of interest (ROI) was approximately 4 mm(2) and the mean value was recorded. Healing of the extraction sockets was examined through CT 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS There were no significant differences between the groups for any of the parameters at any observation interval. In the extraction group, there were significant differences between the values of CT obtained 1 week postoperatively and 1 year postoperatively in the extraction socket (P = 0.0003). CONCLUSION The results of this study indicate that there is no significant difference in the skeletal stability between BSSRO performed with and without third molar extraction.

A Case Report of Cervical Dystonia Complicated by Oromandibular Dystonia

Here, we report a case of stiff neck as a symptom of cervical dystonia and oromandibular dystonia as a symptom of trismus. The patient was a 37-year-old male who was examined at a nearby dental clinical after noticing some stiffness of the neck and trismus at the same time. However, the cause was unknown and the symptoms were neglected. Thereafter, the symptoms worsened and mouth opening became strongly restricted, making dental treatment impossible. He was thus referred to our institution where he was examined. The maximum mouth opening at the first examination was 28mm. He received mouth opening training, and at the mental department, the dose of tranquilizer was reduced and he was treated with a muscle relaxant. Presently, the maximum mouth opening has improved to 40mm and his progress is under observation.