Ashley D. Spear
University of Utah
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ashley D. Spear.
Data in Brief | 2018
Kristoffer E. Matheson; Kory K. Cross; Matthew M. Nowell; Ashley D. Spear
Three stochastic open-cell aluminum foam samples were incrementally compressed and imaged using X-ray Computed Tomography (CT). One of the samples was created using conventional investment casting methods and the other two were replicas of the same foam that were made using laser powder bed fusion. The reconstructed CT data were then examined in Paraview to identify and highlight the types of failure of individual ligaments. The accompanying sets of Paraview state files and STL files highlight the different ligament failure modes incrementally during compression for each foam. Ligament failure was classified as either “Fracture” (red) or “Collapse” (blue). Also, regions of neighboring ligaments that came into contact that were not originally touching were colored yellow. For further interpretation and discussion of the data, please refer to Matheson et al. (2017) [1].
AIAA Journal | 2011
Ashley D. Spear; Amanda R. Priest; M G Veilleux; Anthony R. Ingraffea; Jacob D. Hochhalter
A surrogate model methodology is described for predicting in real time the residual strength of flight structures with discrete-source damage. Starting with design of experiment, an artificial neural network is developed that takes as input discrete-source damage parameters and outputs a prediction of the structural residual strength. Target residual strength values used to train the artificial neural network are derived from 3D finite element-based fracture simulations. A residual strength test of a metallic, integrally-stiffened panel is simulated to show that crack growth and residual strength are determined more accurately in discrete-source damage cases by using an elastic-plastic fracture framework rather than a linear-elastic fracture mechanics-based method. Improving accuracy of the residual strength training data would, in turn, improve accuracy of the surrogate model. When combined, the surrogate model methodology and high-fidelity fracture simulation framework provide useful tools for adaptive flight technology.
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics | 2012
C. M. Ramirez; Abbie B. Liel; Judith Mitrani-Reiser; Curt B. Haselton; Ashley D. Spear; J. Steiner; Gregory G. Deierlein; Eduardo Miranda
Acta Materialia | 2014
Ashley D. Spear; Shiu Fai Li; Jonathan Lind; Robert M. Suter; Anthony R. Ingraffea
Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures | 2016
Ashley D. Spear; Jacob D. Hochhalter; A. R. Cerrone; S. F. Li; Jonathan Lind; Robert M. Suter; Anthony R. Ingraffea
Corrosion Science | 2013
Ashley D. Spear; Anthony R. Ingraffea
Materials Science and Engineering A-structural Materials Properties Microstructure and Processing | 2017
Kristoffer E. Matheson; Kory K. Cross; Matthew M. Nowell; Ashley D. Spear
Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures | 2016
Ashley D. Spear; Jacob D. Hochhalter; Albert Cerrone; S. F. Li; Jonathan Lind; Robert M. Suter; Anthony R. Ingraffea
Procedia Engineering | 2011
Ashley D. Spear; Anthony R. Ingraffea
Materials Characterization | 2018
Jayden C. Plumb; Jonathan Lind; Joseph C. Tucker; Ron Kelley; Ashley D. Spear