Ashley M. Stephens
National Institute of Informatics
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ashley M. Stephens.
Physical Review A | 2009
Austin G. Fowler; Ashley M. Stephens; Peter Groszkowski
We present a comprehensive and self-contained simplified review of the quantum computing scheme of Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 190504 (2007), which features a 2-D nearest neighbor coupled lattice of qubits, a threshold error rate approaching 1%, natural asymmetric and adjustable strength error correction and low overhead arbitrarily long-range logical gates. These features make it by far the best and most practical quantum computing scheme devised to date. We restrict the discussion to direct manipulation of the surface code using the stabilizer formalism, both of which we also briefly review, to make the scheme accessible to a broad audience.
New Journal of Physics | 2009
Simon J. Devitt; Austin G. Fowler; Ashley M. Stephens; Andrew D. Greentree; Lloyd C. L. Hollenberg; William J. Munro; Kae Nemoto
The development of a large scale quantum computer is a highly sought after goal of fundamental research and consequently a highly non-trivial problem. Scalability in quantum information processing is not just a problem of qubit manufacturing and control but it crucially depends on the ability to adapt advanced techniques in quantum information theory, such as error correction, to the experimental restrictions of assembling qubit arrays into the millions. In this paper, we introduce a feasible architectural design for large scale quantum computation in optical systems. We combine the recent developments in topological cluster state computation with the photonic module, a simple chip-based device that can be used as a fundamental building block for a large-scale computer. The integration of the topological cluster model with this comparatively simple operational element addresses many significant issues in scalable computing and leads to a promising modular architecture with complete integration of active error correction, exhibiting high fault-tolerant thresholds.
Nature Photonics | 2010
William J. Munro; Keith Alexander Harrison; Ashley M. Stephens; Simon J. Devitt; Kae Nemoto
Our objective was to design a quantum repeater capable of achieving one million entangled pairs per second over a distance of 1000km. We failed, but not by much. In this letter we will describe the series of developments that permitted us to approach our goal. We will describe a mechanism that permits the creation of entanglement between two qubits, connected by fibre, with probability arbitrarily close to one and in constant time. This mechanism may be extended to ensure that the entanglement has high fidelity without compromising these properties. Finally, we describe how this may be used to construct a quantum repeater that is capable of creating a linear quantum network connecting two distant qubits with high fidelity. The creation rate is shown to be a function of the maximum distance between two adjacent quantum repeaters.
Physical Review X | 2014
Kae Nemoto; Michael Trupke; Simon J. Devitt; Ashley M. Stephens; Burkhard Scharfenberger; Kathrin Buczak; Tobias Nöbauer; Mark S. Everitt; Jörg Schmiedmayer; William J. Munro
Building a quantum computer has long been thought to require futuristic technologies. New calculations reveal that physical qubits can be assembled that are scalable and function at the readily accessible temperature of 4 K.
Physical Review A | 2008
Ashley M. Stephens; Zachary W. E. Evans; Simon J. Devitt; Andrew D. Greentree; Austin G. Fowler; William J. Munro; Jeremy L. O'Brien; Kae Nemoto; Lloyd C. L. Hollenberg
The optical quantum computer is one of the few experimental systems to have demonstrated small scale quantum information processing. Making use of cavity quantum electrodynamics approaches to operator measurements, we detail an optical network for the deterministic preparation of arbitrarily large two-dimensional cluster states. We show that this network can form the basis of a large scale deterministic optical quantum computer that can be fabricated entirely on chip
Physical Review A | 2008
Ashley M. Stephens; Zachary W. E. Evans; Simon J. Devitt; Lloyd C. L. Hollenberg
In many physical systems it is expected that environmental decoherence will exhibit an asymmetry between dephasing and relaxation that may result in qubits experiencing discrete phase errors more frequently than discrete bit errors. In the presence of such an error asymmetry, an appropriately asymmetric quantum code - that is, a code that can correct more phase errors than bit errors - will be more efficient than a traditional, symmetric quantum code. Here we construct fault tolerant circuits to convert between an asymmetric subsystem code and a symmetric subsystem code. We show that, for a moderate error asymmetry, the failure rate of a logical circuit can be reduced by using a combined symmetric asymmetric system and that doing so does not preclude universality.
Canadian Journal of Physics | 2008
Austin G. Fowler; William Thompson; Zhizhong Yan; Ashley M. Stephens; B.L.T. Plourde; Frank K. Wilhelm
Constructing a fault-tolerant quantum computer is a daunting task. Given any design, it is possible to determine the maximum error rate of each type of component that can be tolerated while still permitting arbitrarily large-scale quantum computation. It is an underappreciated fact that including an appropriately designed mechanism enabling long-range qubit coupling or transport substantially increases the maximum tolerable error rates of all components. With this thought in mind, we take the superconducting flux qubit coupling mechanism described by Plourde et al. [Phys. Rev. B 70, 140501(R) (2004)] and extend it to allow approximately
Nature Communications | 2013
Simon J. Devitt; Ashley M. Stephens; William J. Munro; Kae Nemoto
500\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{MHz}
Physical Review A | 2014
Ashley M. Stephens
coupling of square flux qubits,
Physical Review A | 2009
Ashley M. Stephens; Zachary W. E. Evans
50\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\ensuremath{\mu}\mathrm{m}