Ashley Nisbet
Royal Melbourne Hospital
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Ashley Nisbet.
Heart Rhythm | 2014
A. McLellan; Liang-Han Ling; Diego Ruggiero; M. Wong; Tomos E. Walters; Ashley Nisbet; Anoop K. Shetty; S. Azzopardi; Andrew J. Taylor; Joseph B. Morton; Jonathan M. Kalman; Peter M. Kistler
BACKGROUND Circumferential pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is the cornerstone of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF); however, PV reconnection remains problematic. OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of PV anatomy on outcome after AF ablation. METHODS One hundred two patients with paroxysmal AF underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (60%) or computed tomography (40%) before AF ablation. PV anatomy was classified according to the presence of common PVs, accessory PVs, PV branching pattern, and the dimensions of the PV ostia, intervenous ridges (IVRs), and the left PV-left atrial appendage ridge. RESULTS Four discrete PVs were present in 48(47%) of the patients: a left common PV in 38(37%), a right common PV in 2(2%), an accessory right PV in 20(20%), and left PV in 4(4%). At a mean follow-up of 12 ± 4 months, 75 of 102 (74%) patients were free of recurrent AF. A LCPV was associated with an increase in freedom from AF (87% vs 66% for 4 PV anatomy; P = .03). Greater left IVR length (16.9 ± 3.5 mm vs 14.0 ± 3.0 mm; P ≤ .001) and width (1.4 ± 0.6 mm vs 1.1 ± 0.6 mm; P = .02) were associated with increased AF recurrence. After multivariate analysis, abnormal anatomy (LCPV or accessory PV) and left IVR length were found to be the only independent predictors of freedom from AF. CONCLUSIONS Four discrete PVs are present in the minority of patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing PV isolation. The presence of a LCPV is associated with an increased freedom from AF after catheter ablation. PV anatomy may in part explain the variable outcome to electrical isolation in patients with paroxysmal AF.
Heart Rhythm | 2016
Tomos E. Walters; Ashley Nisbet; Gwilym M. Morris; Gabriel Tan; Megan Mearns; Eliza Teo; Nigel Lewis; AiVee Ng; Paul A. Gould; Geoffrey Lee; S. Joseph; Joseph B. Morton; Dominica Zentner; Prashanthan Sanders; Peter M. Kistler; Jonathan M. Kalman
BACKGROUND Advanced atrial remodeling predicts poor clinical outcomes in human atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to define the magnitude and predictors of change in left atrial (LA) structural remodeling over 12 months of AF. METHODS Thirty-eight patients with paroxysmal AF managed medically (group 1), 20 undergoing AF ablation (group 2), and 25 control patients with no AF history (group 3) prospectively underwent echocardiographic assessment of strain variables of LA reservoir function at baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 months. In addition, P-wave duration (Pmax,, Pmean) and dispersion (Pdis) were measured. AF burden was quantified by implanted recorders. Twenty patients undergoing ablation underwent electroanatomic mapping (mean 333 ± 40 points) for correlation with LA strain. RESULT Group 1 demonstrated significant deterioration in total LA strain (26.3% ± 1.2% to 21.7% ± 1.2%, P < .05) and increases in Pmax (132 ± 3 ms to 138 ± 3 ms, P < .05) and Pdis (37 ± 2 ms to 42 ± 2 ms, P < .05). AF burden ≥10% was specifically associated with decline in strain and with P-wave prolongation. Conversely, group 2 manifest improvement in total LA strain (21.3% ± 1.7% to 28.6% ± 1.7%, P <.05) and reductions in Pmax (136 ± 4 ms to 119 ± 4 ms, P < .05) and Pdis (47 ± 3 ms to 32 ± 3 ms, P < .05). Change was not significant in group 3. LA mean voltage (r = 0.71, P = .0005), percent low voltage electrograms (r = -0.59, P = .006), percent complex electrograms (r = -0.68, P = .0009), and LA activation time (r = -0.69, P = .001) correlated with total strain as a measure of LA reservoir function. CONCLUSION High-burden AF is associated with progressive LA structural remodeling. In contrast, AF ablation results in significant reverse remodeling. These data may have implications for timing of ablative intervention.
Europace | 2017
A. McLellan; S. Prabhu; A. Voskoboinik; M. Wong; Tomos E. Walters; Bhupesh Pathik; Gwilym M. Morris; Ashley Nisbet; Geoffrey Lee; Joseph B. Morton; Jonathan M. Kalman; Peter M. Kistler
Aims Catheter ablation to achieve posterior left atrial wall (PW) isolation may be performed as an adjunct to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to determine whether routine adenosine challenge for dormant posterior wall conduction improved long-term outcome. Methods and results A total of 161 patients with persistent AF (mean age 59 ± 9 years, AF duration 6 ± 5 years) underwent catheter ablation involving circumferential PVI followed by PW isolation. Posterior left atrial wall isolation was performed with a roof and inferior wall line with the endpoint of bidirectional block. In 54 patients, adenosine 15 mg was sequentially administered to assess reconnection of the pulmonary veins and PW. Sites of transient reconnection were ablated and adenosine was repeated until no further reconnection was present. Holter monitoring was performed at 6 and 12 months to assess for arrhythmia recurrence. Posterior left atrial wall isolation was successfully achieved in 91% of 161 patients (procedure duration 191 ± 49 min, mean RF time 40 ± 19 min). Adenosine-induced reconnection of the PW was demonstrated in 17%. The single procedure freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmia was superior in the adenosine challenge group (65%) vs. no adenosine challenge (40%, P < 0.01) at a mean follow-up of 19 ± 8 months. After multiple procedures, there was significantly improved freedom from AF between patients with vs. without adenosine PW challenge (85 vs. 65%, P = 0.01). Conclusion Posterior left atrial wall isolation in addition to PVI is a readily achievable ablation strategy in patients with persistent AF. Routine adenosine challenge for dormant posterior wall conduction was associated with an improvement in the success of catheter ablation for persistent AF.
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery | 2016
Thomas Carins; William Y. Shi; Ajay J. Iyengar; Ashley Nisbet; Victoria Forsdick; Diana Zannino; Thomas L. Gentles; Dorothy J. Radford; Robert Justo; David S. Celermajer; Andrew Bullock; David S. Winlaw; Gavin Wheaton; Leeanne Grigg; Yves d'Udekem
Heart Lung and Circulation | 2016
A. McLellan; S. Prabhu; A. Voskoboinik; M. Wong; Tomos E. Walters; B. Pathik; Gwilym M. Morris; Ashley Nisbet; Geoffrey Lee; Joseph B. Morton; Jonathan M. Kalman; Peter M. Kistler
Heart Lung and Circulation | 2015
Tomos E. Walters; K. Wick; G. Tan; Ashley Nisbet; Gwilym M. Morris; Megan Mearns; Joseph B. Morton; Christina Bryant; Peter M. Kistler; J. Kalman
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology | 2018
Benjamin M. Moore; Robert D. Anderson; Ashley Nisbet; Manish Kalla; Karin du Plessis; Yves d’Udekem; Andrew Bullock; Rachael Cordina; Leeanne Grigg; David S. Celermajer; Jonathan M. Kalman; Mark A. McGuire
Heart Lung and Circulation | 2015
Tomos E. Walters; K. Wick; Ashley Nisbet; Gwilym M. Morris; Megan Mearns; Joseph B. Morton; Christina Bryant; Peter M. Kistler; J. Kalman
Heart Lung and Circulation | 2015
A. McLellan; S. Prabhu; A. Voskoboinik; M. Wong; Tomos E. Walters; B. Pathik; Gwilym M. Morris; Ashley Nisbet; Geoffrey Lee; Joseph B. Morton; Jonathan M. Kalman; Peter M. Kistler
Heart Lung and Circulation | 2015
Tomos E. Walters; K. Wick; Ashley Nisbet; Gwilym M. Morris; Joseph B. Morton; Christina Bryant; Peter M. Kistler; J. Kalman