Asmita Mishra

Validation of the revised International Prognostic Scoring System in treated patients with myelodysplastic syndromes

The International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) was recently revised (IPSS‐R) under the auspices of the MDS Foundation as a collaborative international effort to refine its prognostic power. Our purpose was to externally validate this new risk model using a large single‐institution cohort, determine its prognostic power in patients receiving active treatment, and explore its utility in guiding therapeutic decisions. Data were collected retrospectively from our myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) database and verified by chart review. Of the data available for 1,088 patients, 152 (14%), 353 (32%), 237 (22%), 190 (18%), and 156 (14%) patients were classified as very low, low, intermediate, high, and very high risk, respectively, with median overall survival (OS) of 90 (95%CI 71–109), 54 (95%CI 50–59), 34 (95%CI 26–43), 21 (95%CI 17–25), and 13 months (95%CI 11–15), respectively (P < 0.005). We found that the IPSS‐R further refined prognostic discrimination in all IPSS risk categories, particularly in the intermediate 1 and 2 groups. Among high and very high IPSS‐R patients receiving azacitidine, OS was significantly improved versus patients not receiving azacitidine, with corresponding median OS of 25 versus 18 months (P = 0.028) and 15 versus 9 months (P = 0.005), respectively. Similarly, patients with IPSS‐R high‐ and very high‐risk disease who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation had significantly improved OS versus nontransplant approaches (P < 0.005). High and very high IPSS‐R patients derived a survival advantage from disease‐modifying therapies. Our data validate the prognostic value of the proposed IPSS‐R and show that its refined IPSS prognostic discrimination can be applied to actively treated patients. Am. J. Hematol. 88:566–570, 2013.

Pretransplantation 5-Azacitidine in High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome

We prospectively evaluated the allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) outcomes in high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients who received pretransplantation 5-azacitidine. Twenty-five patients evaluated for allogeneic HCT consult and considered medically eligible for a donor search were enrolled. Azacitidine was administered at 75 mg/m(2) for 5 to 7 days every 4 weeks until a suitable donor was found. A median of 3 (range, 0 to 6) cycles of 5-azacitidine were administered. Preallogeneic HCT responses to 5-azacitidine, based on the International Working Group criteria, were 48% partial response, 33% stable disease, and 19% progressive disease. Four patients did not proceed to allogeneic HCT. Twenty-one patients, a median age of 55 (range, 25 to 67) years, received allogeneic HCT after myeloablative pharmacokinetically targeted i.v. busulfan and fludarabine conditioning regimen. Donors were either HLA-matched related or unrelated, except for 1 mismatch unrelated donor. With a median follow-up of 30 months, 1-year relapse-free and overall survivals were 52% (95% confidence interval [CI], 30% to 71%) and 62% (95% CI, 38% to 79%), respectively. Preallogeneic HCT 5-azacitidine administration was well tolerated and provided reasonable disease control before allogeneic HCT. (Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00660400).

Clotrimazole troches induce supratherapeutic blood levels of sirolimus and tacrolimus in an allogeneic hematopoietic cell-transplant recipient resulting in acute kidney injury

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is a potential curative treatment option for various malignant and nonmalignant hematologic disorders. Patients undergoing an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant are prescribed immune-suppressant therapies to facilitate hematopoietic donor-cell engraftment and prevent graft-versus-host disease. Drug-drug interactions may occur, owing to exposure to complex multidrug regimens with narrow therapeutic windows and high toxicity profiles. Here, we describe a unique case of a 65-year-old man with poor-risk acute myeloid leukemia who underwent a matched-sibling hematopoietic cell allograft. Sirolimus and tacrolimus were used for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. He developed oral thrush requiring treatment with clotrimazole troches, which subsequently resulted in serious renal toxicity attributed to supratherapeutic levels of sirolimus and tacrolimus. Patient renal function improved after temporarily holding both immune suppressants, and administering phenytoin to help induce sirolimus and tacrolimus metabolism. This case highlights sudden and serious toxicities that resulted from clotrimazole-sirolimus and clotrimazole-tacrolimus drug-drug interactions, even when administered topically.

Prolonged sirolimus administration after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is associated with decreased risk for moderate-severe chronic graft-versus-host disease.

Effective pharmacological strategies employed in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation should prevent serious chronic graft-versus-host disease and facilitate donor-recipient immune tolerance. Based on demonstrated pro-tolerogenic activity, sirolimus (rapamycin) is an agent with promise to achieve these goals. In a long-term follow-up analysis of a randomized phase II trial comparing sirolimus/tacrolimus versus methotrexate/tacrolimus for graft-versus-host disease prevention in matched sibling or unrelated donor transplant, we examined the impact of prolonged sirolimus administration (≥ 1 year post-transplant). Median follow-up time for surviving patients at time of this analysis was 41 months (range 27–60) for sirolimus/tacrolimus and 49 months (range 29–63) for methotrexate/tacrolimus. Sirolimus/tacrolimus patients had significantly lower National Institutes of Health Consensus moderate-severe chronic graft-versus-host disease (34% vs. 65%; P=0.004) and late acute graft-versus-host disease (20% vs. 43%; P=0.04). While sirolimus/tacrolimus patients had lower prednisone exposure and earlier discontinuation of tacrolimus (median time to tacrolimus discontinuation 368 days vs. 821 days; P=0.002), there was no significant difference in complete immune suppression discontinuation (60-month estimate: 43% vs. 31%; P=0.78). Prolonged sirolimus administration represents a viable approach to mitigate risk for moderate-severe chronic and late acute graft-versus-host disease. Further study of determinants of successful immune suppression discontinuation is needed.

Sirolimus, tacrolimus and antithymocyte globulin as GVHD prophylaxis in HLA-mismatched unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation: a single institution experience.

Sirolimus, tacrolimus and antithymocyte globulin as GVHD prophylaxis in HLA-mismatched unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation: a single institution experience

Predictors of overall survival among patients treated with sirolimus/tacrolimus vs methotrexate/tacrolimus for GvHD prevention.

Sirolimus (SIR)/tacrolimus (TAC) is an alternative to methotrexate (MTX)/TAC. However, rational selection among these GvHD prophylaxis approaches to optimize survival of individual patients is not possible based on current evidence. We compared SIR/TAC (n=293) to MTX/TAC (n=414). The primary objective was to identify unique predictors of overall survival (OS). Secondary objective was to compare acute and chronic GvHD, relapse, non-relapse mortality, thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD/SOS), and acute kidney injury. Day 100 grades II–IV acute GvHD was significantly reduced in SIR/TAC vs MTX/TAC group (63 vs 73%, P=0.02). An interaction between GvHD prophylaxis groups and comorbidity index (hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)-CI) significantly impacted OS. Patients with HCT-CI⩾4 had significantly worse OS with MTX/TAC (HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.14–3.04, P=0.01) while no such effect was seen for SIR/TAC (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.48–1.26, P=0.31). Other end points did not significantly differ between groups except TMA and VOD/SOS were increased in the SIR/TAC group, but excess death from these complications was not observed. We conclude, GvHD prophylaxis approach of SIR/TAC is associated with reduced grades II–IV acute GvHD, comparable toxicity profile to MTX/TAC, and improved OS among patients with HCT-CI⩾4.

IL-2 promotes early Treg reconstitution after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) remains a major cause of transplant-related mortality. Interleukin-2 (IL-2) plus sirolimus (SIR) synergistically reduces acute GvHD in rodents and promotes regulatory T cells. This phase II trial tested the hypothesis that IL-2 would facilitate STAT5 phosphorylation in donor T cells, expand regulatory T cells, and ameliorate GvHD. Between 16th April 2014 and 19th December 2015, 20 patients received IL-2 (200,000 IU/m2 thrice weekly, days 0 to +90) with SIR (5–14 ng/mL) and tacrolimus (TAC) (3–7 ng/mL) after HLA-matched related or unrelated allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The study was designed to capture an increase in regulatory T cells from 16.0% to more than 23.2% at day +30. IL-2/SIR/TAC significantly increased regulatory T cells at day +30 compared to our published data with SIR/TAC (23.8% vs. 16.0%, P=0.0016; 0.052 k/uL vs. 0.037 k/uL, P=0.0163), achieving the primary study end point. However, adding IL-2 to SIR/TAC led to a fall in regulatory T cells by day +90 and did not reduce acute or chronic GvHD. Patients who discontinued IL-2 before day +100 showed a suggested trend toward less grade II-IV acute GvHD (16.7% vs. 50%, P=0.1475). We surmise that the reported accumulation of IL-2 receptors in circulation over time may neutralize IL-2, lead to progressive loss of regulatory T cells, and offset its clinical efficacy. The amount of phospho-STAT3+ CD4+ T cells correlated with donor T-cell activation and acute GvHD incidence despite early T-cell STAT5 phosphorylation by IL-2. Optimizing IL-2 dosing and overcoming cytokine sequestration by soluble IL-2 receptor may sustain lasting regulatory T cells after transplantation. However, an approach to target STAT3 is needed to enhance GvHD prevention. (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 01927120).

Selection of Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a potentially curative option for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Because MDS predominantly affects an older population, age-associated comorbidities can preclude patients from cure. HSCT is associated with the risk of morbidity and mortality; however, with safer conditioning regimens and improved supportive care, eligible patients with an appropriately matched donor can receive this therapy without exclusion by older age alone. We discuss the role of improved MDS prognostic scoring systems and molecular testing for selection for HSCT, and review the pre-HSCT tolerability assessment required for this advanced aged population.

Impact of tobacco usage on disease outcome in myelodysplastic syndromes

We hypothesized that tobacco usage is an independent prognostic factor in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). To evaluate the impact of tobacco usage in this population, we identified patients diagnosed with MDS in our Centers MDS database and reviewed individual charts retrospectively. Of the 767 MDS patients identified, 743 patients (97%) had a known tobacco usage history. Given that the majority of tobacco users were smokers, we stratified patients as having never smoked (never-smoker group) versus current or former smokers (ever-smoker group). Greater than 60% of ever-smokers were risk stratified as having low or intermediate-1 (int-1) risk at diagnosis based on the International Prognostic Scoring System for MDS. In patients with lower-risk MDS, we found that ever-smokers had an increased proportion of poor-risk karyotypes (8.8%) compared with never-smokers (2.4%) (P=0.003). The adverse effect of smoking was greatest in the low-risk and int-1-risk groups, where median overall survival was 69 months (95% CI 42-96) in never-smokers versus 48 months (95% CI 41-55) in ever-smokers (P=0.006). The median overall survival for never-smokers, former smokers, and current smokers was 69 months (95% CI 42-96), 50 months (95% CI 43-57), and 38 months (95% CI 23-53), respectively, in patients risk stratified as lower-risk MDS (P=0.01). Our findings suggest that tobacco usage negatively impacts overall survival in patients with lower-risk MDS.

Phase I trial of histone deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat in addition to glucocorticoids for primary therapy of acute graft-versus-host disease

Glucocorticoids for primary therapy of acute GVHD have limited responses. A phase I/II trial tested 4 weeks of deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat started within 48 h of glucocorticoids (1 mg/kg/day prednisone or equivalent) as primary treatment for patients with either classic acute GVHD (n = 16) or acute GVHD overlapping with chronic (n = 6). Four patients received 2.5 mg/m2 IV three times a week (TIW). Subsequent to discontinuation of IV panobinostat, patients received oral doses (PO). Two patients treated with 10 mg TIW (PO level 1) had progressive GVHD, after which patients were treated with 5 mg TIW (PO level −1; n = 16); 31/41 adverse events were possibly related, including thrombocytopenia (n = 13), leukopenia (n = 7), hypercholesterolemia (n = 3), hypertriglyceridemia (n = 5), anemia (n = 1), fatigue (n = 1), and hepatobiliary disorder (n = 1). GVHD responses were complete (n = 12) or partial (n = 3), with 1 progression at PO level −1. T-regulatory cells increased at day 8, CD4/CD8 and monocytes exhibited enhanced H3 acetylation, and CD4 or CD8 numbers remained unchanged with a decreased interleukin 12p40 plasma level. Panobinostat in combination with prednisone is safe and warrants further testing in GVHD.