Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Assaad El-Hakim is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Assaad El-Hakim.


BJUI | 2002

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate can be taught: the first learning experience

Assaad El-Hakim; Mostafa M. Elhilali

Objective  To present the initial experience of a senior urology resident with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and to address the difficulties encountered while learning this technique, describing the detailed operative technique and pitfalls.


BJUI | 2012

Impact of tumour location versus multifocality in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with nephroureterectomy and bladder cuff excision: a homogeneous series without perioperative chemotherapy

Faysal A. Yafi; Giacomo Novara; Shahrokh F. Shariat; Amit Gupta; Kazumasa Matsumoto; Thomas J. Walton; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Assaad El-Hakim; Stefan Trischler; Juan I. Martínez-Salamanca; Christian Seitz; Vincenzo Ficarra; Filiberto Zattoni; Pierre I. Karakiewicz; Wassim Kassouf

Study Type – Prognosis (case series)


BJUI | 2012

Prospective randomized trial of barbed polyglyconate suture to facilitate vesico-urethral anastomosis during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Time reduction and cost benefit

Kevin C. Zorn; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Claudio Jeldres; Jan Schmitges; Hugues Widmer; Jean Baptiste Lattouf; Jesse D. Sammon; Dan Liberman; Maxine Sun; Marco Bianchi; Pierre I. Karakiewicz; Ronald Denis; Gagan Gautam; Assaad El-Hakim

Study Type – RCT (randomized trial)


Cuaj-canadian Urological Association Journal | 2015

Predictors of early continence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Hugo Lavigueur-Blouin; Alina Camacho Noriega; Roger Valdivieso; Pierre-Alain Hueber; Marc Bienz; Naif Al-Hathal; Mathieu Latour; Assaad El-Hakim; Kevin C. Zorn

INTRODUCTION Functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) greatly influence patient quality of life. Data regarding predictors of early continence, especially 1 month following RARP, are limited. Previous reports mainly address immediate or 3-month postoperative continence rates. We examine preoperative predictors of pad-free continence recovery at the first follow-up visit 1 month after RARP. METHODS Between January 2007 and January 2013, preoperative and follow-up data were prospectively collected for 327 RARP patients operated on by 2 fellowship-trained surgeons (AEH and KCZ). Patient and operative characteristics included age, body mass index (BMI), staging, preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate weight, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) score and type of nerve-sparing performed. Continence was defined by 0-pad usage at 1 month follow-up. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess for predictors of early continence. RESULTS Overall, 44% of patients were pad-free 1 month post-RARP. In multivariate regression analysis, age (odds ratio [OR] 0.946, confidence interval [CI] 95%: 0.91, 0.98) and IPSS (OR: 0.953, CI 95%: 0.92, 0.99) were independent predictors of urinary continence 1 month following RARP. Other variables (BMI, staging, preoperative PSA, SHIM score, prostate weight and type of nerve-sparing) were not statistically significant predictors of early continence. Limitations of this study include missing data for comorbidities, patient use of pelvic floor exercises and patient maximal activity. Moreover, patient-reported continence using a 0-pad usage definition represents a semiquantitative and subjective measurement. CONCLUSION In a broad population of patients who underwent RARP at our institution, 44% of patients were pad-free at 1 month. Age and IPSS were independent predictors of early continence after surgery. Men of advanced age and those with significant lower urinary tract symptoms prior to RARP should be counselled on the increased risk of urinary incontinence in the early stages.


Urologia Internationalis | 2010

Outcome of Surgical Treatment of Patients with Upper versus Lower Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Stage-by-Stage Comparison

S. Moussa; Faysal A. Yafi; Assaad El-Hakim; Nader Fahmy; Armen Aprikian; Simon Tanguay; M. Anidjar; Wassim Kassouf

Objectives: It remains controversial whether we can apply similar principles in the management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UUT-UC) based on the behavior of bladder urothelial carcinoma (B-UC). We sought to assess whether UUT-UC and B-UC have similar biology and performed a stage-by-stage comparative analysis of outcome between the 2 groups. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent nephroureterectomy for UUT-UC and radical cystectomy for B-UC from 1991 to 2006. Standard variables were collected and recurrence-free and overall survival (OS) rates were calculated. Results: 280 patients with a median age of 69 years were included (99 UUT-UC treated via nephroureterectomy and 181 B-UC treated via radical cystectomy). Median follow-up was 29 months. None received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with UUT-UC presented less commonly with invasive disease compared to those with B-UC (44 vs. 77% were >pT2). Overall, 5-year OS for the B-UC group was significantly lower than for the UUT-UC group (60.8 vs. 74.5%, p = 0.02). However, when patients were stratified by stage (>pT2), patients with B-UC had similar OS compared to those with UUT-UC (54.6 vs. 60.8%, p = 0.74). Conclusion: Invasive UUT-UC appears to have similar tumor biology compared to B-UC. Whether we can safely extrapolate on the benefit of neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies to patients with UUT-UC requires further investigation.


Cuaj-canadian Urological Association Journal | 2015

Factors predicting prolonged operative time for individual surgical steps of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP): A single surgeon’s experience

Abdullah M. Alenizi; Roger Valdivieso; Emad Rajih; Malek Meskawi; Cristian Toarta; Marc Bienz; Mounsif Azizi; Pierre-Alain Hueber; Hugo Lavigueur-Blouin; Vincent Trudeau; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Assaad El-Hakim; Kevin C. Zorn

INTRODUCTION We evaluated the average time required to complete individual steps of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) by an expert RARP surgeon. The intent is to help establish a time-based benchmark to aim for during apprenticeship. In addition, we aimed to evaluate preoperative patient factors, which could prolong the operative time of these individual steps. METHODS We retrospectively identified 247 patients who underwent RARP, performed by an experienced robotic surgeon at our institution. Baseline patient characteristics and the duration of each step were recorded. Multivariate analysis was performed to predict factors of prolonged individual steps. RESULTS In multivariable analysis, obesity was a significant predictor of prolonged operative time of: docking (odds ratio [OR] 1.96), urethral division (OR 3.13), and vesico-urethral anastomosis (VUA) (OR 2.63). Prostate volume was also a significant predictor of longer operative time in dorsal vein complex ligation (OR 1.02), bladder neck division (OR 1.03), pedicle control (OR 1.04), urethral division (OR 1.02), and VUA (OR 1.03). A prolonged bladder neck division was predicted by the presence of a median lobe (OR 5.03). Only obesity (OR 2.56) and prostate volume (OR 1.04) were predictors of a longer overall operative time. CONCLUSIONS Obesity and prostate volume are powerful predictors of longer overall operative time. Furthermore, both can predict prolonged time of several individual RARP steps. The presence of a median lobe is a strong predictor of a longer bladder neck division. These factors should be taken into consideration during RARP training.


Cuaj-canadian Urological Association Journal | 2017

Error reporting from the da Vinci surgical system in robotic surgery: A Canadian multispecialty experience at a single academic centre

Emad Rajih; Côme Tholomier; Beatrice Cormier; Vanessa Samouëlian; Thomas Warkus; Moishe Liberman; Hugues Widmer; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Abdullah M. Alenizi; Malek Meskawi; Roger Valdivieso; Pierre-Alain Hueber; Pierre I. Karakewicz; Assaad El-Hakim; Kevin C. Zorn

INTRODUCTION The goal of the study is to evaluate and report on the third-generation da Vinci surgical (Si) system malfunctions. METHODS A total of 1228 robotic surgeries were performed between January 2012 and December 2015 at our academic centre. All cases were performed by using a single, dual console, four-arm, da Vinci Si robot system. The three specialties included urology, gynecology, and thoracic surgery. Studied outcomes included the robotic surgical error types, immediate consequences, and operative side effects. Error rate trend with time was also examined. RESULTS Overall robotic malfunctions were documented on the da Vinci Si systems event log in 4.97% (61/1228) of the cases. The most common error was related to pressure sensors in the robotic arms indicating out of limit output. This recoverable fault was noted in 2.04% (25/1228) of cases. Other errors included unrecoverable electronic communication-related in 1.06% (13/1228) of cases, failed encoder error in 0.57% (7/1228), illuminator-related in 0.33% (4/1228), faulty switch in 0.24% (3/1228), battery-related failures in 0.24% (3/1228), and software/hardware error in 0.08% (1/1228) of cases. Surgical delay was reported only in one patient. No conversion to either open or laparoscopic occurred secondary to robotic malfunctions. In 2015, the incidence of robotic error rose to 1.71% (21/1228) from 0.81% (10/1228) in 2014. CONCLUSIONS Robotic malfunction is not infrequent in the current era of robotic surgery in various surgical subspecialties, but rarely consequential. Their seldom occurrence does not seem to affect patient safety or surgical outcome.


Investigative and Clinical Urology | 2016

Standardized 4-step technique of bladder neck dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Mansour Alnazari; Marc Zanaty; Emad Rajih; Assaad El-Hakim; Kevin C. Zorn

Bladder neck (BN) dissection is considered one of the most challenging steps during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Better understanding of the BN anatomy, coupled with a standardized approach may facilitate dissection while minimizing complications. We describe in this article the 4 anatomic spaces during standardized BN dissection, as well other technical maneuvers of managing difficult scenarios including treatment of a large median lobe or patients with previous transurethral resection of the prostate. The first step involves the proper identification of the BN followed by slow horizontal dissection of the first layer (the dorsal venous complex and perivesicle fat). The second step proceeds with reconfirming the location of the BN followed by midline dissection of the second anatomical layer (the anterior bladder muscle and mucosa) using the tip of the monopolar scissor until the catheter is identified. The deflated catheter is then grasped by the assistant to apply upward traction on the prostate from 2 directions along with downward traction on the posterior bladder wall by the tip of the suction instrument. This triangulation allows easier, and safer visual, layer by layer, dissection of the third BN layer (the posterior bladder mucosa and muscle wall). The forth step is next performed by blunt puncture of the fourth layer (the retrotrigonal fascia) aiming to enter into the previously dissected seminal vesical space. Finally, both vas deferens and seminal vesicles are pulled through the open BN and handed to the assistant for upper traction to initiate Denovilliers dissection and prostate pedicle/neurovascular bundle control.


Cuaj-canadian Urological Association Journal | 2015

Penile fracture with two ipsilateral corporal tears and delayed presentation: A case report

Emad Rajih; Abdullah M. Alenizi; Assaad El-Hakim

Although penile fracture is an infrequent injury, it is a well-described urologic emergency. It results from the rupture of the tunica albuginea of corpora cavernosa by blunt strain that mandates immediate surgical exploration. Reported cases are usually single tear unless contralateral corporal tear is present. We present a case of 56-year-old with intraoperative findings of two separate tears in the same corpus cavernosum. Clinical presentation was also delayed for 4 days post-injury and repair was performed on day 7. This case accentuates the need for a high index of suspicion to rule out concomitant ipsilateral tear. Delayed repair was possible, and full recovery ensued.


Biomarkers in Medicine | 2018

Prognostic utility of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelets-to-lymphocyte ratio in predicting biochemical recurrence post robotic prostatectomy

Marc Zanaty; Khaled Ajib; Mansour Alnazari; Elie El Rassy; Fouad Aoun; Kevin C. Zorn; Assaad El-Hakim

AIM Utility of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in predicting biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients with localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS & METHODS Retrospective analysis of patients operated by robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Variables included were: NLR, PLR pre-operative prostate specific antigen, pathological Gleason score, surgical margins status, extracapsular extension, seminal vesical invasion, and lymph node status. RESULTS Out of 321 patients, no association between NLR or PLR and BCR was detected. Predictors of BCR were pathological Gleason score, extracapsular extension and positive surgical margins. On multivariate analysis, the Gleason Score, extracapsular extension and positive surgical margins remained the only predictors of BCR. CONCLUSION Neither elevated NLR nor PLR predicted an increased risk of BCR.

Collaboration


Dive into the Assaad El-Hakim's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kevin C. Zorn

Université de Montréal

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marc Zanaty

Université de Montréal

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Emad Rajih

Université de Montréal

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Khaled Ajib

Université de Montréal

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marc Bienz

Université de Montréal

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Naif Al-Hathal

Université de Montréal

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge