Astrid Gjelstad

Low-voltage electromembrane extraction of basic drugs from biological samples

The present work has for the first time demonstrated electromembrane extraction (EME) at voltages obtainable by common batteries. Five basic drugs were extracted from acidified aqueous sample solutions, across a supported liquid membrane (SLM) consisting of 1-isopropyl-4-nitrobenzene impregnated in the walls of a hollow fiber, and into an acidified aqueous acceptor solution present inside the lumen of the hollow fiber with potential differences of 1-10 V applied over the SLM. Extractions from 1 ml standard solutions prepared in 10mM HCl for 5 min and with a potential of 10 V demonstrated analyte recoveries of 50-93% in 25 microl of 10mM HCl as acceptor solution. This corresponds to enrichment factors of 20-37. Similar results were obtained with a common 9 V battery as power supply. Recoveries from low-voltage EME on human plasma, urine, and breast milk diluted with acetate buffer (pH 4) demonstrated recoveries in the range of 37-55% after 5 min of extraction. Excellent selectivity was demonstrated as no interfering peaks were detected. Standard curves in the range of 0.0625-0.62 5 microg/ml demonstrated correlation coefficients of 0.994-0.999. Extraction recoveries from human plasma, urine or breast milk were not found to be sensitive towards individual variations. The results show that low-voltage EME has a future potential as a simple, selective, and time-efficient sample preparation technique of biological fluids.

Parameters affecting electro membrane extraction of basic drugs

Thirty-five different basic drugs were extracted by electro membrane extraction (EME), from acidified samples containing HCl as the BGE, through an organic solvent immobilized in the pores in the wall of a porous hollow fiber (supported liquid membrane, SLM), and into an acidified acceptor solution (HCl) in the lumen of the hollow fiber by the application of an electrical potential difference of 50 V. With 2-nitrophenyl pentyl ether (NPPE) as the SLM, and with 10 mM HCl as BGE in the sample and acceptor solution, singly charged basic drugs with log P >2 were extracted with recoveries in the range 30-81% within 5 min. For doubly charged basic drugs, extraction was effectively enhanced by decreasing the concentration of HCl in the sample from 10 to 0.1 mM, reducing the ionization of the analytes. For medium polar analytes (1 < log P < 2), an ion balance of 0.01 was combined with addition of tris-(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate (TEHP) to the SLM, and this provided recoveries in the range 36-70%. The ion balance was defined as the concentration ratio of BGE between the sample and the acceptor solution. For the most polar drugs (log P <1), EME was accomplished with an ion balance of 0.01 and with di-(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate (DEHP) added to the SLM, but in spite of this, recoveries were in the range of only 4-17%.

Kinetic electro membrane extraction under stagnant conditions—Fast isolation of drugs from untreated human plasma

Amitriptyline, citalopram, fluoxetine, and fluvoxamine were isolated by electro membrane extraction (EME) from 70microl of untreated plasma (pH 7.4), through a supported liquid membrane (SLM) of 1-ethyl-2-nitrobenzene immobilized in the pores of a porous polypropylene hollow fiber, and into 30microl of 10mM HCOOH as acceptor solution inside the lumen of the hollow fiber. The driving force of the extraction was a 9V potential sustained over the SLM with a common battery, with the positive electrode placed in the plasma sample and the negative electrode placed in the acceptor solution. Extractions were performed under totally stagnant conditions with a very simple device for 1min (kinetic regime), and subsequently the acceptor solution was analyzed directly by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Recoveries were 12, 13, 22, and 17% for fluoxetine, amitriptyline, citalopram, and fluvoxamine, respectively. Sample clean-up was comparable to reversed-phase solid-phase extraction (SPE), but EME required substantially less time than SPE. The time advantage of EME was further improved by parallel extraction of three samples (for 1min) with the same 9V battery. EME from plasma combined with LC-MS provided limits of quantification (S/N=10) in the range 0.4-2.3ng/ml, linearity in the range 1-1000ng/ml with r(2)-values of 0.998-0.999, and repeatability in the range 3.2-8.9% RSD in the mid-therapeutic window (100ng/ml).

Recent developments in electromembrane extraction

Electromembrane extraction (EME) was published for the first time in 2006, and is a liquid-phase microextraction technique intended for analytical sample preparation. In EME, charged analytes are extracted in an electrical field, from the aqueous sample solution, through a supported liquid membrane and into an aqueous acceptor phase. EME is still in an early stage of development, although nearly 80 research papers have been published on the subject. The current paper reviews the EME literature with focus on applications and technical development, and critically discusses the future of the technology.

Exhaustive electromembrane extraction of some basic drugs from human plasma followed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry

Citalopram, loperamide, methadone, paroxetine, pethidine, and sertraline were extracted exhaustively with electromembrane extraction (EME) by increasing the number of hollow fibers from one to three. Experiments reported recoveries in the range 97-115% from 1000μl spiked water samples. EME was accomplished with 200V as extraction voltage, the extraction time was set to 10min (equilibrium), and the extraction unit was subjected to 1200 revolutions per minute (rpm). The same experiment with different geometry in a stagnant system conducted with 21μl acceptor solution provided recoveries from 50μl undiluted human plasma (pH 7.4) in the range of 56-102% for the six basic model substances. In each experiment the acceptor solution was distributed into three separately hollow fibers in the same sample vial. The importance of an electrical field was verified by comparing EME with liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) under optimal conditions and demonstrated that the time needed to reach equilibrium was reduced by EME. EME-LC/MS provided linearity >0.99 (r(2) values) for the six basic model substances, and the repeatability within the low therapeutic range (10ng/ml) was in the range 5.1-21.4% RSD. LC-MS provided estimated limit of quantification (S/N=10) in the range 0.6-3.2ng/ml. Eventually, patient samples from a reference laboratory were analyzed and provided reliable results with a relative difference <14% compared to stated values from the reference laboratory.

Kinetic aspects of hollow fiber liquid-phase microextraction and electromembrane extraction

In this paper, extraction kinetics was investigated experimentally and theoretically in hollow fiber liquid-phase microextraction (HF-LPME) and electromembrane extraction (EME) with the basic drugs droperidol, haloperidol, nortriptyline, clomipramine, and clemastine as model analytes. In HF-LPME, the analytes were extracted by passive diffusion from an alkaline sample, through a (organic) supported liquid membrane (SLM) and into an acidic acceptor solution. In EME, the analytes were extracted by electrokinetic migration from an acidic sample, through the SLM, and into an acidic acceptor solution by application of an electrical potential across the SLM. In both HF-LPME and EME, the sample (donor solution) was found to be rapidly depleted for analyte. In HF-LPME, the mass transfer across the SLM was slow, and this was found to be the rate limiting step of HF-LPME. This finding is in contrast to earlier discussions in the literature suggesting that mass transfer across the boundary layer at the donor-SLM interface is the rate limiting step of HF-LPME. In EME, mass transfer across the SLM was much more rapid due to electrokinetic migration. Nevertheless, mass transfer across the SLM was rate limiting even in EME. Theoretical models were developed to describe the kinetics in HF-LPME, in agreement with the experimental findings. In HF-LPME, the extraction efficiency was found to be maintained even if pH in the donor solution was lowered from 10 to 7-8, which was below the pK(a)-value for several of the analytes. Similarly, in EME, the extraction efficiency was found to be maintained even if pH in the donor solution increased from 4 to 11, which was above the pK(a)-value for several of the analytes. The two latter experiments suggested that both techniques may be used to effectively extract analytes from samples in a broader pH range as compared to the pH range recommended in the literature.

Hollow fiber-liquid-phase microextraction of fungicides from orange juices

Liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) based on polypropylene hollow fibers was evaluated for the extraction of the post-harvest fungicides thiabendazole (TBZ), carbendazim (CBZ) and imazalil (IMZ) from orange juices. Direct LPME was performed without any sample pretreatment prior to the extraction, using a simple home-built equipment. A volume of 500 microL of 840 mM NaOH was added to 3 mL of orange juice in order to compensate the acidity of the samples and to adjust pH into the alkaline region. Analytes were extracted in their neutral state through a supported liquid membrane (SLM) of 2-octanone into 20 microL of a stagnant aqueous solution of 10 mM HCl inside the lumen of the hollow fiber. Subsequently, the acceptor solution was directly subjected to analysis. Capillary electrophoresis (CE) was used during the optimization of the extraction procedure. Working under the optimized extraction conditions, LPME effectively extracted the analytes from different orange juices, regardless of different pH or solid material (pulp) present in the sample, with recoveries that ranged between 17.0 and 33.7%. The analytical performance of the method was evaluated by liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (LC/MS). This technique provided better sensitivity than CE and permitted the detection below the microg L(-1) level. The relative standard deviations of the recoveries (RSDs) ranged between 3.4 and 10.6%, which are acceptable values for a manual microextraction technique without any previous sample treatment, using a home-built equipment and working under non-equilibrium conditions (30 min extraction). Linearity was obtained in the range 0.1-10.0 microg L(-1), with r=0.999 and 0.998 for TBZ and IMZ, respectively. Limits of detection were below 0.1 microg L(-1) and are consistent with the maximum residue levels permitted for pesticides in drinking water, which is the most restrictive regulation applicable for these kinds of samples. It has been demonstrated the suitability of three-phase LPME for the extraction of pesticides from citrus juices, suppressing any pretreatment step such as filtration or removal of the solid material from the sample, that may potentially involve a loss of analyte.

Electromembrane extraction of stimulating drugs from undiluted whole blood

For the first time, electromembrane extraction (EME) of six basic drugs of abuse from undiluted whole blood and post mortem blood in a totally stagnant system is reported. Cathinone, methamphetamine, 3,4-methylenedioxy-amphetamine (MDA), 3,4-methylenedioxy-methamphet-amine (MDMA), ketamine and 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine (DOI) were extracted from the whole blood sample, through a supported liquid membrane (SLM) consisting of 1-ethyl-2-nitrobenzene (ENB) immobilized in the pores of a hollow fiber, and into an aqueous acceptor solution inside the lumen of the hollow fiber. The SLM acts as a barrier with efficient exclusion of all macromolecules and acidic substances in the sample. Due to the application of the electrical field, only the cationic compounds of interest are extracted efficiently across the membrane, thus providing extremely clean extracts for analysis with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, LC-MS. Recoveries in the range 10-30% were obtained from 80 μl whole blood within 5 min extraction time and an applied voltage of 15V across the SLM. The optimized technique was tested on real forensic whole blood samples taken from three forensic autopsy cases and on five forensic whole blood samples from living persons. The results were in agreement with the analysis using standard sample preparation methods (liquid-liquid extraction) performed on the same samples by Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH), Division of Forensic Toxicology and Drug Abuse Research. Evaluation data were acceptable, with limit of detections (LODs) in the range 40-2610 pg/mL, well below concentrations associated with drug abuse; linearites in the range between 10 and 250 ng/mL with r(2) values above 0.9939, and with repeatability (RSD) of 7-32%.

Selective electromembrane extraction at low voltages based on analyte polarity and charge.

Electromembrane extraction (EME) at low voltage (0-15 V) of 29 different basic model drug substances was investigated. The drug substances with logP<2.3 were not extracted at voltages less than 15 V. Extraction of drug substances with logP≥2.3 and with two basic groups were also effectively suppressed by the SLM at voltages less than 15 V. Drug substances with logP≥2.3 and with one basic group were all extracted at low voltages and with a strong compound selectivity which appeared to have some influence from the polar surface area of the compound. For this group of substances, recoveries varied between 0 and 23% at 5 V, whereas, recoveries varied between 5.5 and 51% at 15 V. Based on mass transfer differences related to charge, polarity, and polar surface, highly selective extractions of drug substances were demonstrated from human plasma, urine, and breast milk. An initial evaluation at low voltage (5 V) was compared with similar extractions at a more normal voltage level (50 V), and this supported that reliable data can be obtained under these low-voltage (mild) conditions by EME.

Development of a flat membrane based device for electromembrane extraction: a new approach for exhaustive extraction of basic drugs from human plasma.

In this work, a single-well electromembrane extraction (EME) device was developed based on a thin (100μm) and flat porous membrane of polypropylene supporting a liquid membrane. The new EME device was operated with a relatively large acceptor solution volume to promote a high recovery. Using this EME device, exhaustive extraction of the basic drugs quetiapine, citalopram, amitriptyline, methadone and sertraline was investigated from both acidified water samples and human plasma. The volume of acceptor solution, extraction time, and extraction voltage were found to be important factors for obtaining exhaustive extraction. 2-Nitrophenyl octyl ether was selected as the optimal organic solvent for the supported liquid membrane. From spiked acidified water samples (600μl), EME was carried out with 600μl of 20mM HCOOH as acceptor solution for 15min and with an extraction voltage of 250V. Under these conditions, extraction recoveries were in the range 89-112%. From human plasma samples (600μl), EME was carried out with 600μl of 20mM HCOOH as acceptor solution for 30min and with an extraction voltage of 300V. Under these conditions, extraction recoveries were in the range of 83-105%. When combined with LC-MS, the new EME device provided linearity in the range 10-1000ng/ml for all analytes (R(2)>0.990). The repeatability at low (10ng/ml), medium (100ng/ml), and high (1000ng/ml) concentration level for all five analytes were less than 10% (RSD). The limits of quantification (S/N=10) were found to be in the range 0.7-6.4ng/ml.