Atle Harby
SINTEF
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Atle Harby.
Regulated Rivers-research & Management | 1996
Larry Greenberg; Pål Svendsen; Atle Harby
Availability of microhabitats and their use by brown trout (Salmo trutta) and grayling (Thymallus thymallus)
North American Journal of Fisheries Management | 2005
D. A. Scruton; Curtis J. Pennell; M. Robertson; L. M. N. Ollerhead; Keith D. Clarke; Knut Alfredsen; Atle Harby; R. S. McKinley
Abstract Variable hydropower production leads to hydropeaking, which causes discharge fluctuations that are potentially harmful to aquatic organisms. In this study, an experimental approach was used to investigate hydropeaking effects and associated hydraulic and habitat conditions on the home range and movement of juvenile Atlantic salmon Salmo salar. Prior studies examined the responses of Atlantic salmon and brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis to experimental hydropeaking during summer and autumn. The present study focused on Atlantic salmon, involved more rapid and extreme discharge manipulation, and included winter experiments to reflect influences of reduced temperature, ice conditions, and seasonal differences in behavior and habitat selection. Experiments were conducted over a range in discharge (0.5–5.0 m3/s) that resulted in dramatic habitat changes in the wide, shallow, boulder-strewn study reach. Experiments were repeated in summer and winter; however, the winter range in discharge was narrower ...
Science of The Total Environment | 2011
Vincent Chanudet; Stéphane Descloux; Atle Harby; Håkon Sundt; Bjørn Henrik Hansen; Odd Gunnar Brakstad; Dominique Serça; Frédéric Guérin
Gross CO2 and CH4 emissions (degassing and diffusion from the reservoir) and the carbon balance were assessed in 2009-2010 in two Southeast Asian sub-tropical reservoirs: the Nam Ngum and Nam Leuk Reservoirs (Lao PDR). These two reservoirs are within the same climatic area but differ mainly in age, size, residence time and initial biomass stock. The Nam Leuk Reservoir was impounded in 1999 after partial vegetation clearance and burning. However, GHG emissions are still significant 10 years after impoundment. CH4 diffusive flux ranged from 0.8 (January 2010) to 11.9 mmol m(-2) d(-1) (April 2009) and CO2 diffusive flux ranged from -10.6 (October 2009) to 38.2 mmol m(-2) d(-1) (April 2009). These values are comparable to other tropical reservoirs. Moreover, degassing fluxes at the outlet of the powerhouse downstream of the turbines were very low. The tentative annual carbon balance calculation indicates that this reservoir was a carbon source with an annual carbon export (atmosphere+downstream river) of about 2.2±1.0 GgC yr(-1). The Nam Ngum Reservoir was impounded in 1971 without any significant biomass removal. Diffusive and degassing CO2 and CH4 fluxes were lower than for other tropical reservoirs. Particularly, CO2 diffusive fluxes were always negative with values ranging from -21.2 (April 2009) to -2.7 mmol m(-2) d(-1) (January 2010). CH4 diffusive flux ranged from 0.1 (October 2009) to 0.6 mmol m(-2) d(-1) (April 2009) and no degassing downstream of the turbines was measured. As a consequence of these low values, the reservoir was a carbon sink with an estimated annual uptake of - 53±35 GgC yr(-1).
Hydrobiologia | 2007
Morten Stickler; Knut Alfredsen; David A. Scruton; Curtis J. Pennell; Atle Harby; Finn Økland
A telemetry study in a Norwegian regulated river was conducted through a 12-day period in mid-winter 2003. The objective was to study activity (defined as number of movement per hour) and movement (defined as distance moved per hour) during different ice formation events. Twenty-four Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) parr were radio tagged and continuously monitored by both manually tracking (N = 24) and by fixed recording stations (N = 15). Detailed data on climate, flow and ice formation and its spatial distribution were collected and used in the analyses. Fish activity was not found to be affected by their size (L F). There was a significant difference in activity between diel periods with highest activity during dusk (5–6 p.m.). Between high and low flow (mean ± SD, 21.1 m3 s−1 ± 1.7 SD and 11.1 m3 s−1 ± 1.7 SD, respectively) no significant difference in activity was found. During the experiment extensive anchor ice growth occurred mainly in the riffle part with thickness up to 50 cm. Juveniles tend to avoid riffle section during anchor ice formation and exploited ice covered areas, indicating critical and preferable habitats respectively. Further, a significant difference in movement was found between five selected ice events with highest mean movement during an anchor ice event and lowest mean movement during an ice break up with no anchor ice formation. No significant difference in activity or movement between parr exposed to frazil ice and parr not exposed were found.
Ecosystems | 2018
Yves T. Prairie; Jukka Alm; Jake J. Beaulieu; Nathan Barros; Tom J. Battin; Jonathan J. Cole; Paul A. del Giorgio; Tonya DelSontro; Frédéric Guérin; Atle Harby; John A. Harrison; Sara Mercier-Blais; Dominique Serça; Sebastian Sobek; Dominic Vachon
Freshwater reservoirs are a known source of greenhouse gas (GHG) to the atmosphere, but their quantitative significance is still only loosely constrained. Although part of this uncertainty can be attributed to the difficulties in measuring highly variable fluxes, it is also the result of a lack of a clear accounting methodology, particularly about what constitutes new emissions and potential new sinks. In this paper, we review the main processes involved in the generation of GHG in reservoir systems and propose a simple approach to quantify the reservoir GHG footprint in terms of the net changes in GHG fluxes to the atmosphere induced by damming, that is, ‘what the atmosphere sees.’ The approach takes into account the pre-impoundment GHG balance of the landscape, the temporal evolution of reservoir GHG emission profile as well as the natural emissions that are displaced to or away from the reservoir site resulting from hydrological and other changes. It also clarifies the portion of the reservoir carbon burial that can potentially be considered an offset to GHG emissions.
Regulated Rivers-research & Management | 2001
Svein Jakob Saltveit; Jo H. Halleraker; Jo Vegar Arnekleiv; Atle Harby
River Research and Applications | 2003
D. A. Scruton; L. M. N. Ollerhead; Keith D. Clarke; Curtis J. Pennell; Knut Alfredsen; Atle Harby; D. Kelley
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering Sustainability | 2009
Mike Acreman; J. Aldrick; C. Binnie; Andrew R. Black; Ian G. Cowx; H. Dawson; Michael J. Dunbar; Chris A. Extence; Jamie Hannaford; Atle Harby; N. Holmes; N. Jarritt; Gareth H. Old; G. Peirson; J. Webb; Paul J. Wood
Hydrobiologia | 2008
D. A. Scruton; Curtis J. Pennell; L. M. N. Ollerhead; Knut Alfredsen; Morten Stickler; Atle Harby; M. Robertson; Keith D. Clarke; L. J. LeDrew
Hydroécologie Appliquée | 2004
P. Borsányi; Knut Alfredsen; Atle Harby; O. Ugedal; C. Kraxner