Atsushi Amemiya

DOSE DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS OF AXILLARY LYMPH NODES FOR THREE-DIMENSIONAL CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY WITH A FIELD-IN-FIELD TECHNIQUE FOR BREAST CANCER

PURPOSE We previously reported that most of axillary regions could be irradiated by the modified tangential irradiation technique (MTIT). The purpose of this study was to determine whether the three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) with a field-in-field technique improves dosimetry for the breast and axillary nodes. METHODS AND MATERIALS Fifty patients with left-sided breast cancer were enrolled. With MTIT, we planned the radiation field to be wider in the cranial direction than the standard tangential fields to include the axillary regions. With 3D-CRT, a field-in-field technique was used to spare the heart and contralateral breast to the extent possible by applying the multileaf collimator manually. Dose-volume histograms were compared for the breast, axillary region, heart, lung, and other normal tissues. RESULTS There were no significant differences in the percent volume of the breast receiving >90% of the prescribed dose (V90) between MTIT and 3D-CRT. The mean V90 of the level I to III axillary regions were increased from 93.7%, 48.2%, and 41.3% with MTIT to 97.6%, 85.8%, and 82.8% with 3D-CRT. 3D-CRT significantly reduced the volume of the heart receiving >30 Gy (mean, 7.6 vs. 15.9 mL), the percent volume of the bilateral lung receiving >20 Gy (7.4% vs. 8.9%), and the volume of other normal tissues receiving >107% of the prescribed dose (0.1 vs. 2.9 mL). CONCLUSION The use of 3D-CRT with a field-in-field technique improves axillary node coverage, while decreasing doses to the heart, lungs, and the other normal tissues, compared with MTIT.

The modified tangential irradiation technique for breast cancer: how to cover the entire axillary region

PURPOSE The two-portal tangential irradiation technique has usually been applied to breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery (1, 2) and is expected to irradiate the axillary lymph node region to some extent (3). We investigated the range of the axillary region covered by this technique and tried to devise an optimal irradiation technique (modified tangential irradiation) that would cover the axillary lymph node region properly. METHODS AND MATERIALS We checked the status of the surgical clips left at axillary lymph node sites by reviewing the simulator films and planning CT scans of 63 patients who underwent axillary dissection of level I, I-II, or I-III lymph nodes. Then we created the modified tangential irradiation technique and applied this technique to 16 patients and checked the irradiation volume by CT scans. RESULTS We found that all of the surgical clips on lateral-view simulator films were on the ventral side of the dorsal edge line of the humeral head. All but one clip were on the caudal side of the caudal edge line of the humeral head. Accordingly, it is possible to irradiate almost all axillary lymph node regions by setting the dorsal edge of the irradiation field on lateral-view simulator films at the dorsal edge of the humeral head and the cranial edge at the caudal edge of the humeral head. CONCLUSIONS All breast tissue and the entire axillary lymph node region can be covered by the modified tangential irradiation technique without increasing the lung volume irradiated.

Outcomes of Clinically Node-Negative Breast Cancer Without Axillary Dissection: Can Preserved Axilla Be Safely Treated With Radiation After a Positive Sentinel Node Biopsy?

PURPOSE We analyzed whether axillary nodal irradiation could control clinically node-negative disease, including those patients with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), most of whom received regional nodal irradiation. We also evaluated toxicity profiles that resulted from nodal irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS From 1988 to 2011, 2107 patients with cT1-T2N0M0 breast cancer underwent breast conservation therapy in the absence of axillary dissection: nx group (n = 1548), without any axillary surgery; the sn(-) group (n = 518), with a negative SLNB; and sn(+) group (n = 104), with a positive SLNB. RESULTS The median follow-up times were 88, 56, and 55 months for the nx, sn(-), and sn(+) groups, respectively. The nx group had more risk factors than did the other 2 groups in terms of age, grade, or T stage. Ninety-eight percent of the sn(-)group received only tangent irradiation, and 100% and 83% of the sn(+) and nx group, respectively, received additional regional nodal irradiation. The 5-year cumulative incidences of axillary failure and regional nodal failure were 34, 3, and 0 (2.7%, 0.7%, and 0%; P = .02, log-rank test) and 57, 4, and 0 (4.4, 1%, and 0; P = .04), respectively. Overall survival rates in 5 years were 96.4%, 98.9%, and 97.6% (P = .03), respectively. Symptomatic but transient radiation pneumonitis developed in 31, 16, and 6 (2.0%, 3.1%, and 5.7%). Mild arm edema was observed in 1, 4, and 0 (0.06%, 0.8%, and 0%) in the nx, sn(-), sn(+) groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Treatment without axillary dissection showed excellent outcomes with negligible toxicity for patients with clinically node negative, including those with a positive SLNB. Regional nodal irradiation after a positive SLNB is a reasonable alternative to axillary dissection.

Axillary Irradiation with High Tangent Fields for Clinically Node-Negative Breast Cancer: Can 3-D Conformal Radiotherapy with a Field-in-Field Technique Better Control the Axilla?

Background: The target volume for postoperative breast irradiation is the remaining breast tissue, and the axillary region is not an intentional target volume. Patients and Methods: Between 2001 and 2009, eligible women with pT1-2cN0/pN0(sn) breast cancer underwent breast-conserving therapy without axillary dissection. Treatment outcomes between 2 radiotherapy planning groups, high tangent fields with 2-dimensional (2-D) simulation-based planning and 3-dimensional (3-D) computed tomography-based planning with a field-in-field technique, were compared. The correlating factors for axillary failure were also calculated. Results: In total, 678 patients were eligible. As of May 2009, the median follow-up times for the 2-D (n = 346) and 3-D (n = 332) groups were 94 and 52 months, respectively. Patient characteristics were balanced, except for a younger population in the 2-D group and more lymphovascular invasion in the 3-D group. On multivariate analysis, 2-D planning was the only risk factor for axillary failure. In the 2-D and 3-D groups, the 5-year cumulative incidences of axillary failure were 8 (3.1%) and 1 (0.3%) (log-rank p = 0.009), respectively. The respective 5-year overall survival rates were 97.4 and 98.4% (p = 0.4). Conclusion: High tangent irradiation with 3-D planning improved axillary control compared to that with 2-D planning, suggesting that optimizing axillary dose distribution may impact outcomes.

Radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery without axillary disection for T1-2, no breast cancer patients: comparison of the tangential and three-field irradiation technique

150 patients, HER2/neu epxression was not associated with estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) status (p 0.98 and 0.62 respectively). HER2/neu status did not significantly impact either the incidence of local recurrence (LC)(p 0.13) or the type of first failure (p 1.0). Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival (OS), cause-specific survival (CSS) and freedom from distant metastases (FFDM) did not show a significant difference in outcome between HER2/neu positive and negative patient groups (p 0.86, 0.42, and 0.63 respectively).