Attilio Castellarin
University of Bologna
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Attilio Castellarin.
Journal of Hydrology | 2001
Attilio Castellarin; Donald H. Burn; Armando Brath
This paper evaluates the relative performance of four hydrological similarity measures that are used to form homogeneous pooling groups for regional frequency analysis. One pair of similarity measures is based on seasonality indexes that reflect the timing of extreme events. A further pair of measures considers a characterisation, at the basin scale, of the frequency distribution of rainfall extremes and the extent of the impervious portion of the catchment. The measures are applied to a case study encompassing a large area in Northern-Central Italy. The similarity measures are examined in the context of a pooling scheme that is designed to identify hierarchical, focused pooling groups. The performance of the similarity measures is quantified using a Monte Carlo experiment. The results demonstrate that similarity measures based on seasonality indexes are effective for estimating extreme flow quantiles for the study area. For ungauged catchments, a similarity measure incorporating both rainfall statistics and permeability information is most effective.
Hydrological Sciences Journal-journal Des Sciences Hydrologiques | 2009
G. Di Baldassarre; Attilio Castellarin; Armando Brath
Abstract The effects of human activities on flood propagation, during the period 1878–2005, in a 190-km reach of the middle—lower portion of the River Po (Northern Italy) are investigated. A series of topographical, hydrological and inundation data were collected for the 1878 River Po geometry and the June 1879 flood event, characterised by an inundated area of 432 km2. The aim of the study is two-fold: (1) to show the applicability of flood inundation models in reconstructing historical inundation events, and (2) to assess the effects of human activities during the last century on flood propagation in the middle—lower portion of the River Po. Numerical simulations were performed by coupling a two-dimensional finite element code, TELEMAC-2D, with a one-dimensional finite difference code, HEC-RAS.
Hydrological Sciences Journal-journal Des Sciences Hydrologiques | 2001
Armando Brath; Attilio Castellarin; Marco Franchini; Giorgio Galeati
Abstract Three indirect techniques for index flood estimation are analysed in order to evaluate their applicability and effectiveness. These indirect techniques, based on both statistical and conceptual approaches, are applied to a set of 33 hydrometric stations, located in a large area in northern-central Italy. The results show that the statistical model, due to its flexible structure, has a better descriptive ability than the physically-based models, which are rigidly structured as they conceptualize the rainfall-runoff transformation. However, the rigid structure of the conceptual approaches reduces their dependence on the specific information of the single stations and therefore increases their robustness. Finally, the results highlight that direct estimation techniques could be advisable for catchments with peculiar geomorphoclimatic properties; that is to say properties which differ substantively from those of the majority of the basins considered in the identification of the indirect models. This conclusion seems to hold even when a very limited amount of hydrometric information is available.
Science | 2017
Günter Blöschl; Julia Hall; Juraj Parajka; Rui A. P. Perdigão; Bruno Merz; Berit Arheimer; Giuseppe T. Aronica; Ardian Bilibashi; Ognjen Bonacci; Marco Borga; Ivan Čanjevac; Attilio Castellarin; Giovanni Battista Chirico; Pierluigi Claps; Károly Fiala; N. A. Frolova; Liudmyla Gorbachova; Ali Gül; Jamie Hannaford; Shaun Harrigan; M. B. Kireeva; Andrea Kiss; Thomas R. Kjeldsen; Silvia Kohnová; Jarkko Koskela; Ondrej Ledvinka; Neil Macdonald; Maria Mavrova-Guirguinova; Luis Mediero; Ralf Merz
Flooding along the river Will a warming climate affect river floods? The prevailing sentiment is yes, but a consistent signal in flood magnitudes has not been found. Blöschl et al. analyzed the timing of river floods in Europe over the past 50 years and found clear patterns of changes in flood timing that can be ascribed to climate effects (see the Perspective by Slater and Wilby). These variations include earlier spring snowmelt floods in northeastern Europe, later winter floods around the North Sea and parts of the Mediterranean coast owing to delayed winter storms, and earlier winter floods in western Europe caused by earlier soil moisture maxima. Science, this issue p. 588 see also p. 552 Climate change is affecting the timing of river flooding across Europe. A warming climate is expected to have an impact on the magnitude and timing of river floods; however, no consistent large-scale climate change signal in observed flood magnitudes has been identified so far. We analyzed the timing of river floods in Europe over the past five decades, using a pan-European database from 4262 observational hydrometric stations, and found clear patterns of change in flood timing. Warmer temperatures have led to earlier spring snowmelt floods throughout northeastern Europe; delayed winter storms associated with polar warming have led to later winter floods around the North Sea and some sectors of the Mediterranean coast; and earlier soil moisture maxima have led to earlier winter floods in western Europe. Our results highlight the existence of a clear climate signal in flood observations at the continental scale.
Water Resources Research | 2016
Ida Westerberg; Thorsten Wagener; Gemma Coxon; Hilary McMillan; Attilio Castellarin; Alberto Montanari; Jim E Freer
Reliable information about hydrological behavior is needed for water-resource management and scientific investigations. Hydrological signatures quantify catchment behavior as index values, and can be predicted for ungauged catchments using a regionalization procedure. The prediction reliability is affected by data uncertainties for the gauged catchments used in prediction and by uncertainties in the regionalization procedure. We quantified signature uncertainty stemming from discharge data uncertainty for 43 UK catchments and propagated these uncertainties in signature regionalization, while accounting for regionalization uncertainty with a weighted-pooling-group approach. Discharge uncertainty was estimated using Monte Carlo sampling of multiple feasible rating curves. For each sampled rating curve, a discharge time series was calculated and used in deriving the gauged signature uncertainty distribution. We found that the gauged uncertainty varied with signature type, local measurement conditions and catchment behavior, with the highest uncertainties (median relative uncertainty ±30–40% across all catchments) for signatures measuring high- and low-flow magnitude and dynamics. Our regionalization method allowed assessing the role and relative magnitudes of the gauged and regionalized uncertainty sources in shaping the signature uncertainty distributions predicted for catchments treated as ungauged. We found that 1) if the gauged uncertainties were neglected there was a clear risk of over-conditioning the regionalization inference, e.g. by attributing catchment differences resulting from gauged uncertainty to differences in catchment behavior, and 2) uncertainty in the regionalization results was lower for signatures measuring flow distribution (e.g. mean flow) than flow dynamics (e.g. autocorrelation), and for average flows (and then high flows) compared to low flows. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Water Resources Research | 2012
Alberto Viglione; Attilio Castellarin; M. Rogger; Ralf Merz; Günter Blöschl
[1] The depth-duration envelope curves (DDECs) are regional upper bounds on observed rainfall maxima for several durations. Recently, a probabilistic interpretation has been proposed in the literature in order to associate a recurrence interval T to the DDECs and, consequently, to retrieve point rainfall quantiles for ungauged sites. Alternatively, extreme rainfall quantiles can be retrieved from long synthetic rainfall series obtained with stochastic rainfall generators calibrated to local time series of rainfall events. While DDECs are sensitive to outliers and data errors, the stochastic rainfall generator performance is affected by the limited record lengths used for calibration. The objective of this study is to assess the reliability of the two alternative methods by verifying if they give consistent results for a wide study region in Austria. Relative to previous studies, we propose some generalizations of the DDEC procedure in order to better represent the Austrian data. The comparison of rainfall quantiles estimated with the two methods for large T shows an excellent agreement for intermediate durations (from 1 to 6 h), while the agreement worsen for very short (15 min) and long (24 h) durations. The results are scrupulously analyzed and discussed in light of the exceptionality of rainfall events that set the regional envelopes and the characteristics of the stochastic generator used. Our study points out that the combined use of these regional and local methods can be very useful for estimating reliable point rainfall quantiles associated with large T within regions where many rain gauges are available, but with limited record lengths.
Hydrological Sciences Journal-journal Des Sciences Hydrologiques | 2017
Alessio Ciullo; Alberto Viglione; Attilio Castellarin; Massimiliano Crisci; Giuliano Di Baldassarre
ABSTRACT This work aims to provide a dynamic assessment of flood risk and community resilience by explicitly accounting for variable human behaviour, e.g. risk-taking and awareness-raising attitudes. We consider two different types of socio-hydrological systems: green systems, whereby societies deal with risk only via non-structural measures, and technological systems, whereby risk is dealt with also by structural measures, such as levees. A stylized model of human–flood interactions is first compared to real-world data collected at two test sites (People’s Republic of Bangladesh and the city of Rome, Italy) and then used to explore plausible trajectories of flood risk. The results show that flood risk in technological systems tends to be significantly lower than in green systems. However, technological systems may undergo catastrophic events, which lead to much higher losses. Furthermore, green systems prove to be more resilient than technological ones, which makes them more capable of withstanding environmental and social changes. EDITOR D. Koutsoyiannis ASSOCIATE EDITOR not assigned
Hydrological Sciences Journal-journal Des Sciences Hydrologiques | 2016
Serena Ceola; Alberto Montanari; Tobias Krueger; Fiona Dyer; Heidi Kreibich; Ida Westerberg; Gemma Carr; Christophe Cudennec; Amin Elshorbagy; Hubert H. G. Savenije; Pieter van der Zaag; Dan Rosbjerg; Hafzullah Aksoy; Francesco Viola; Guido Petrucci; K MacLeod; Barry Croke; Daniele Ganora; Leon M. Hermans; María José Polo; Zongxue Xu; Marco Borga; Jörg Helmschrot; Elena Toth; Roberto Ranzi; Attilio Castellarin; Anthony J. Hurford; Mitija Brilly; Alberto Viglione; Günter Blöschl
ABSTRACT We explore how to address the challenges of adaptation of water resources systems under changing conditions by supporting flexible, resilient and low-regret solutions, coupled with on-going monitoring and evaluation. This will require improved understanding of the linkages between biophysical and social aspects in order to better anticipate the possible future co-evolution of water systems and society. We also present a call to enhance the dialogue and foster the actions of governments, the international scientific community, research funding agencies and additional stakeholders in order to develop effective solutions to support water resources systems adaptation. Finally, we call the scientific community to a renewed and unified effort to deliver an innovative message to stakeholders. Water science is essential to resolve the water crisis, but the effectiveness of solutions depends, inter alia, on the capability of scientists to deliver a new, coherent and technical vision for the future development of water systems. EDITOR D. Koutsoyiannis; ASSOCIATE EDITOR not assigned
Archive | 2013
Dan Rosbjerg; Günter Blöschl; Donald H. Burn; Attilio Castellarin; Barry Croke; Giuliano Di Baldassarre; Vito Iacobellis; Thomas R. Kjeldsen; George Kuczera; Ralf Merz; Alberto Montanari; David L. Morris; Taha B. M. J. Ouarda; Liliang Ren; Magdelena Rogger; J. L. Salinas; Elena Toth; Alberto Viglione
List of contributors Foreword Thomas Dunne Preface Gunter Bloschl, Murugesu Sivapalan, Thorsten Wagener, Alberto Viglione and Hubert Savenije 1. Introduction Gunter Bloschl, Murugesu Sivapalan, Thorsten Wagener, Alberto Viglione and Hubert Savenije 2. A synthesis framework for runoff predictions in ungauged basins Thorsten Wagener, Gunter Bloschl, David Goodrich, Hoshin V. Gupta, Murugesu Sivapalan, Yasuto Tachikawa, Peter Troch and Markus Weiler 3. A data acquisition framework for predictions of runoff in ungauged basins Brian McGlynn, Gunter Bloschl, Marco Borga, Helge Bormann, Ruud Hurkmans, Jurgen Komma, Lakshman Nandagiri, Remko Uijlenhoet and Thorsten Wagener 4. Process realism: flow paths and storage Dorthe Tetzlaff, Ghazi Al-Rawas, Gunter Bloschl, Sean K. Carey, Ying Fan, Markus Hrachowitz, Robert Kirnbauer, Graham Jewitt, Hjalmar Laudon, Kevin J. McGuire, Takahiro Sayama, Chris Soulsby, Erwin Zehe and Thorsten Wagener 5. Prediction of annual runoff in ungauged basins Thomas McMahon, Gregor Laaha, Juraj Parajka, Murray C. Peel, Hubert Savenije, Murugesu Sivapalan, Jan Szolgay, Sally Thompson, Alberto Viglione, Ross Woods and Dawen Yang 6. Prediction of seasonal runoff in ungauged basins R. Weingartner, Gunter Bloschl, David Hannah, Danny Marks, Juraj Parajka, Charles Pearson, Magdalena Rogger, Jose Luis. Salinas, Eric Sauquet, Sri Srikanthan, Sally Thompson and Alberto Viglione 7. Prediction of flow duration curves in ungauged basins Attilio Castellarin, Gianluca Botter, Denis A. Hughes, Suxia Liu, Taha B. M. J. Ouarda, Juraj Parajka, David Post, Murugesu Sivapalan, Christopher Spence, Alberto Viglione and Richard Vogel 8. Prediction of low flows in ungauged basins Gregor Laaha, Siegfried Demuth, Hege Hisdal, Charles N. Kroll, Henny A. J. van Lanen, Thomas Nester, Magdalena Rogger, Eric Sauquet, Lena M. Tallaksen, Ross Woods and Andy Young 9. Prediction of floods in ungauged basins Dan Rosbjerg, Gunter Bloschl, Donald H. Burn, Attilio Castellarin, Barry Croke, Guliano Di Baldassarre, Vito Iacobellis, Thomas Kjeldsen, George Kuczera, Ralf Merz, Alberto Montanari, David Morris, Taha B. M. J. Ouarda, Liliang Ren, Magdalena Rogger, Jose Luis Salinas, Elena Toth and Alberto Viglione 10. Predictions of runoff hydrographs in ungauged basins Juraj Parajka, Vazken Andreassian, Stacey Archfield, Andras Bardossy, Francis Chiew, Qingyun Duan, Alexander Gelfan, Kamila Hlavcova, Ralf Merz, Neil McIntyre, Ludovic Oudin, Charles Perrin, Magdalena Rogger, Jose Luis Salinas, Hubert Savenije, Jon Olav Skoien, Thorsten Wagener, Erwin Zehe and Yongqiang Zhang 11. Case studies Hubert Savenije, Murugesu Sivapalan, Trent Biggs, Shaofeng Jia, Leonid M. Korytny, E.A.Ilyichyova, Boris Gartsman, John W. Pomeroy, Kevin Shook, Xing Fang, Tom Brown, Denis A. Hughes, Stacey Archfield, Jos Samuel, Paulin Coulibaly, Robert A. Metcalfe, Attilio Castellarin, Ralf Merz, Gunter Humer, Ataur Rahman, Khaled Haddad, Erwin Weinmann, George Kuczera, Theresa Blume, Armand Crabit, Francois Colin, Roger Moussa, Hessel Winsemius, Hubert Savenije, Jens Liebe, Nick van de Giesen, M. Todd Walter, Tammo S. Steenhuis, Jeffrey R. Kennedy, David Goodrich, Carl L. Unkrich, Dominic Mazvimavi, Neil R. Viney, Kuniyoshi Takeuchi, H. A. P. Hapuarachchi, Anthony S. Kiem, Hiroshi Ishidaira, Tianqi Ao, Jun Magome, Maichun C. Zhou, Mikhail Georgievski, Guoqiang Wang, Chihiro Yoshimura, Berit Arheimer, Goran Lindstrom and Shijun Lin 12. Synthesis across processes, places and scales Hoshin V. Gupta, Gunter Bloschl, Jeffrey McDonnell, Hubert Savenije, Murugesu Sivapalan, Alberto Viglione and Thorsten Wagener 13. Recommendations Kuniyoshi Takeuchi, Gunter. Bloschl, Hubert Savenije, John Schaake, Murugesu Sivapalan, Alberto Viglione, Thorsten Wagener and Gordon Young Appendix: summary of studies used in the comparative assessments References Index.This book is devoted to predicting runoff in ungauged basins (PUB), i.e., predicting runoff at those locations where no runoff data are available. It aims at a synthesis of research on predictions of runoff in ungauged basins across processes, places and scales as a response to the dilemma of fragmentation in hydrology. It takes a comparative approach to learning from the differences and similarities between catchments around the world. The book also provides a comparative performance assessment (in the form of blind testing) of methods that are being used for predictions in ungauged basins, interpreted in a hydrologically meaningful way. It therefore throws light on the status of PUB at the present moment and can serve as a benchmark against which future progress on PUB can be judged. In so doing, the book has also come out with a new scientific framework that can guide the advances that are needed to underpin PUB and to advance the science of hydrology as a whole. The synthesis presented in the book is built on the collective experience of a large number of researchers around the world inspired by the PUB initiative of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences, which makes it truly a community effort. It has provided insights into the scientific, technical and societal factors that contribute to PUB. On the basis of the synthesis presented in this book, recommendations are made on the predictive, scientific and community aspects of PUB and of hydrology as a whole. www.cambridge.org
Hydrological Sciences Journal-journal Des Sciences Hydrologiques | 2017
Francesca Carisi; Alessio Domeneghetti; Maria Gabriella Gaeta; Attilio Castellarin
ABSTRACT We investigate possible changes in flood hazard over a 77-km2 area around the city of Ravenna. The subsidence rate in the area, naturally a few mm year−1, increased dramatically after World War II because of groundwater and natural gas extraction, exceeding 110 mm year−1 and resulting in cumulative drops larger than 1.5 m. The Montone–Ronco river system flows in the southern portion of the area, which is protected against frequent flooding by levees. We performed two-dimensional simulations of inundation events associated with levee breaching by considering four different terrain configurations: current topography and a reconstruction of ground elevations before anthropogenic land subsidence, both neglecting and representing the main linear infrastructures (e.g. roads, artificial channels). Results show that flood-hazard changes due to anthropogenic land subsidence (e.g. significant changes in computed water depth and velocity) are observed over less than 10% of the study area and are definitely less important than those resulting from construction of the linear infrastructures.