Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Atul Humar is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Atul Humar.


Transplantation | 2010

Updated International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Cytomegalovirus in Solid-Organ Transplantation

Camille N. Kotton; Deepali Kumar; Angela M. Caliendo; Anders Åsberg; Sunwen Chou; David R. Snydman; Upton Allen; Atul Humar

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains one of the most common infections after solid organ transplantation, resulting in significant morbidity, graft loss, and occasional mortality. Management of CMV varies considerably among transplant centers. A panel of experts on CMV and solid organ transplant was convened by The Infectious Diseases Section of The Transplantation Society to develop evidence and expert opinion-based consensus guidelines on CMV management including diagnostics, immunology, prevention, treatment, drug resistance, and pediatric issues.


American Journal of Transplantation | 2004

Efficacy and safety of valganciclovir vs. oral ganciclovir for prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients.

Carlos V. Paya; Atul Humar; Ed Dominguez; Kenneth Washburn; Emily A. Blumberg; Barbara D. Alexander; Richard B. Freeman; Nigel Heaton; Mark D. Pescovitz

We compared the efficacy and safety of valganciclovir with those of oral ganciclovir in preventing cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in high‐risk seronegative solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients of organs from seropositive donors (D+/R‐). In this randomised, prospective, double‐blind, double‐dummy study, 364 CMV D+/R‐ patients received valganciclovir 900 mg once daily or oral ganciclovir 1000 mg three times a day (tid) within 10 days of transplant and continued through 100 days. CMV disease, plasma viremia, acute graft rejection, graft loss and safety were analyzed up to 6 and 12 months post‐transplant. Endpoint committee‐defined CMV disease developed in 12.1% and 15.2% of valganciclovir and ganciclovir patients, respectively, by 6 months, though with a difference in the relative efficacy of valganciclovir and ganciclovir between organs (i.e. an organ type‐treatment interaction). By 12 months, respective incidences were 17.2% and 18.4%, and the incidence of investigator‐treated CMV disease events was comparable in the valganciclovir (30.5%) and ganciclovir (28.0%) arms. CMV viremia during prophylaxis was significantly lower with valganciclovir (2.9% vs. 10.4%; p = 0.001), but was comparable by 12 months (48.5% valganciclovir vs 48.8% ganciclovir). Time‐to‐onset of CMV disease and to viremia were delayed with valganciclovir; rates of acute allograft rejection were generally lower with valganciclovir. Except for a higher incidence of neutropenia with valganciclovir (8.2%, vs 3.2% ganciclovir) the safety profile was similar for both drugs. Overall, once‐daily oral valganciclovir was as clinically effective and well‐tolerated as oral ganciclovir tid for CMV prevention in high‐risk SOT recipients.


American Journal of Transplantation | 2010

The Efficacy and Safety of 200 Days Valganciclovir Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in High-Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients

Atul Humar; Yvon Lebranchu; Flavio Vincenti; Emily A. Blumberg; Jeffrey D. Punch; Ajit P. Limaye; Daniel Abramowicz; Alan G. Jardine; Athina Voulgari; Jane Ives; Ingeborg A. Hauser; Patrick Peeters

Late‐onset cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease is a significant problem with a standard 3‐month prophylaxis regimen. This multicentre, double‐blind, randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy and safety of 200 days’ versus 100 days’ valganciclovir prophylaxis (900 mg once daily) in 326 high‐risk (D+/R–) kidney allograft recipients. Significantly fewer patients in the 200‐day group versus the 100‐day group developed confirmed CMV disease up to month 12 posttransplant (16.1% vs. 36.8%; p < 0.0001). Confirmed CMV viremia was also significantly lower in the 200‐day group (37.4% vs. 50.9%; p = 0.015 at month 12). There was no significant difference in the rate of biopsy‐proven acute rejection between the groups (11% vs. 17%, respectively, p = 0.114). Adverse events occurred at similar rates between the groups and the majority were rated mild‐to‐moderate in intensity and not related to study medication. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that extending valganciclovir prophylaxis (900 mg once daily) to 200 days significantly reduces the incidence of CMV disease and viremia through to 12 months compared with 100 days’ prophylaxis, without significant additional safety concerns associated with longer treatment. The number needed to treat to avoid one additional patient with CMV disease up to 12 months posttransplant is approximately 5.


American Journal of Transplantation | 2007

Oral Valganciclovir Is Noninferior to Intravenous Ganciclovir for the Treatment of Cytomegalovirus Disease in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Anders Åsberg; Atul Humar; Halvor Rollag; Alan G. Jardine; H. Mouas; Mark D. Pescovitz; D. Sgarabotto; M. Tuncer; I. L. Noronha; Anders Hartmann

Intravenous ganciclovir is the standard treatment for cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients. Oral valganciclovir is a more convenient alternative. In a randomized, international trial, recipients with cytomegalovirus disease were treated with either 900 mg oral valganciclovir or 5 mg/kg i.v. ganciclovir twice daily for 21 days, followed by 900 mg daily valganciclovir for 28 days. A total of 321 patients were evaluated (valganciclovir [n = 164]; i.v. ganciclovir [n = 157]). The success rate of viremia eradication at Day 21 was 45.1% for valganciclovir and 48.4% for ganciclovir (95% CI –14.0% to +8.0%), and at Day 49; 67.1% and 70.1%, respectively (p = NS). Treatment success, as assessed by investigators, was 77.4% versus 80.3% at Day 21 and 85.4% versus 84.1% at Day 49 (p = NS). Baseline viral loads were not different between groups and decreased exponentially with similar half‐lives and median time to eradication (21 vs. 19 days, p = 0.076). Side‐effects and discontinuations of assigned treatment (18 of 321 patients) were comparable.


American Journal of Transplantation | 2013

Cytomegalovirus in Solid Organ Transplantation

R. R. Razonable; Atul Humar

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a ubiquitousherpes virus that infects the majority of humans (1). The seroprevalence rates of CMV ranges from 30–97% (2,3). Primary infection manifests as an asymptomatic or self-limited febrile illness in immunocompetent individuals, after which CMV establishes life-long latency in various cells (2,3), which serve as reservoirs for reactivation and as carriers of infection to susceptible individuals (4,5).


Lancet Infectious Diseases | 2010

Outcomes from pandemic influenza A H1N1 infection in recipients of solid-organ transplants: a multicentre cohort study

Deepali Kumar; Marian G. Michaels; Michele I. Morris; Michael Green; Robin K. Avery; Catherine Liu; Lara Danziger-Isakov; Valentina Stosor; Michele M. Estabrook; Soren Gantt; Kieren A. Marr; Stanley I. Martin; Fernanda P. Silveira; Raymund R. Razonable; Upton Allen; Marilyn E. Levi; G. Marshall Lyon; Lorraine Bell; Shirish Huprikar; Gopi Patel; Kevin Gregg; Kenneth Pursell; Doug Helmersen; Kathleen G. Julian; Kevin T. Shiley; Bartholomew Bono; Vikas R. Dharnidharka; Gelareh Alavi; Jayant S Kalpoe; Shmuel Shoham

BACKGROUND There are few data on the epidemiology and outcomes of influenza infection in recipients of solid-organ transplants. We aimed to establish the outcomes of pandemic influenza A H1N1 and factors leading to severe disease in a cohort of patients who had received transplants. METHODS We did a multicentre cohort study of adults and children who had received organ transplants with microbiological confirmation of influenza A infection from April to December, 2009. Centres were identified through the American Society of Transplantation Influenza Collaborative Study Group. Demographics, clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes were assessed. Severity of disease was measured by admission to hospital and intensive care units (ICUs). The data were analysed with descriptive statistics. Proportions were compared by use of chi(2) tests. We used univariate analysis to identify factors leading to pneumonia, admission to hospital, and admission to an ICU. Multivariate analysis was done by use of a stepwise logistic regression model. We analysed deaths with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. FINDINGS We assessed 237 cases of medically attended influenza A H1N1 reported from 26 transplant centres during the study period. Transplant types included kidney, liver, heart, lung, and others. Both adults (154 patients; median age 47 years) and children (83; 9 years) were assessed. Median time from transplant was 3.6 years. 167 (71%) of 237 patients were admitted to hospital. Data on complications were available for 230 patients; 73 (32%) had pneumonia, 37 (16%) were admitted to ICUs, and ten (4%) died. Antiviral treatment was used in 223 (94%) patients (primarily oseltamivir monotherapy). Seven (8%) patients given antiviral drugs within 48 h of symptom onset were admitted to an ICU compared with 28 (22.4%) given antivirals later (p=0.007). Children who received transplants were less likely to present with pneumonia than adults, but rates of admission to hospital and ICU were similar. INTERPRETATION Influenza A H1N1 caused substantial morbidity in recipients of solid-organ transplants during the 2009-10 pandemic. Starting antiviral therapy early is associated with clinical benefit as measured by need for ICU admission and mechanical ventilation. FUNDING None.


American Journal of Transplantation | 2009

Cytomegalovirus in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Atul Humar; David R. Snydman

CMV infection is a major cause of morbidity in patients receiving solid organ transplants. CMV is widely distributed in the general population with seroprevalence ranging from 30 to 97% (1–3). After primary infection, CMV establishes life-long latency. Without some form of prevention, CMV infection primarily occurs in the first 3 months following transplant. Onset may be delayed in patients receiving CMV prophylaxis.


American Journal of Transplantation | 2005

Clinical Impact of Community‐Acquired Respiratory Viruses on Bronchiolitis Obliterans After Lung Transplant

Deepali Kumar; Dean D. Erdman; Shaf Keshavjee; Teresa C. T. Peret; Raymond Tellier; Denis Hadjiliadis; Grant Johnson; Melissa Ayers; Deborah Siegal; Atul Humar

Community‐acquired viral respiratory tract infections (RTI) in lung transplant recipients may have a high rate of progression to pneumonia and can be a trigger for immunologically mediated detrimental effects on lung function. A cohort of 100 patients was enrolled from 2001 to 2003 in which 50 patients had clinically diagnosed viral RTI and 50 were asymptomatic. All patients had nasopharyngeal and throat swabs taken for respiratory virus antigen detection, culture and RT‐PCR. All patients had pulmonary function tests at regular intervals for 12 months. Rates of rejection, decline in forced expiratory volume (L) in 1 s (FEV‐1) and bacterial and fungal superinfection were compared at the 3‐month primary endpoint. In the 50 patients with RTI, a microbial etiology was identified in 33 of 50 (66%) and included rhinovirus (9), coronavirus (8), RSV (6), influenza A (5), parainfluenza (4) and human metapneumovirus (1). During the 3‐month primary endpoint, 8 of 50 (16%) RTI patients had acute rejection versus 0 of 50 non‐RTI patients (p = 0.006). The number of patients experiencing a 20% or more decline in FEV‐1 by 3 months was 9 of 50 (18%) RTI versus 0 of 50 non‐RTI (0%) (p = 0.003). In six of these nine patients, the decline in FEV‐1 was sustained over a 1‐year period consistent with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). Community‐acquired respiratory viruses may be associated with the development of acute rejection and BOS.


Transplantation | 1999

Clinical utility of quantitative cytomegalovirus viral load determination for predicting cytomegalovirus disease in liver transplant recipients

Atul Humar; Daniel Gregson; Angela M. Caliendo; Allison McGeer; Geeta Malkan; Mel Krajden; Paul Corey; Paul D. Greig; Sharon Walmsley; Gary A. Levy; Tony Mazzulli

BACKGROUND The early detection of cytomegalovirus (CMV) after liver transplantation may form the basis of a preemptive strategy for prevention of active CMV disease. METHODS We prospectively analyzed the clinical use of weekly quantitative polymerase chain reaction-(PCR) based plasma viral load determinations and the antigenemia assay for predicting the development of active CMV disease in 97 consecutive liver transplant recipients. RESULTS CMV disease occurred in 21/97 patients. Using a positive cut-off of >400 copies/ml plasma, PCR had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity 47.4%, positive predictive value 34.4% and negative predictive value 100% for prediction of CMV disease. Respective values for a positive antigenemia (>0 positive cells/slide) were 95.2, 55.3, 37.0, and 97.7%. Different cut-off points for a positive test were analyzed using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The optimal cut-off for viral load was in the range of 2000-5000 copies/ml (sensitivity 85.7%, specificity 86.8%, PPV 64.3%, NPV 95.7% for >5000 copies/ml). The optimal cut-off for antigenemia was in the range of four to six positive cells/slide. Mean peak viral load in symptomatic patients was 73,715 copies per/ml versus 3615 copies/ml in patients with asymptomatic CMV reactivation (P<0.001). In a multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors for CMV disease (CMV serostatus, acute rejection, and induction immunosuppression), peak viral load and peak antigenemia emerged as the only significant independent predictors of CMV disease (for PCR, odds ratio=1.40/1000 copy/ml increase in viral load, P=0.0001; for antigenemia odds ratio=1.17/1 positive cell/slide). CONCLUSIONS Plasma viral load by quantitative PCR is useful for predicting CMV disease and could be used in a preemptive strategy.


Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2005

An immune reconstitution syndrome-like illness associated with Cryptococcus neoformans infection in organ transplant recipients.

Nina Singh; Olivier Lortholary; Barbara D. Alexander; Krishan L. Gupta; George T. John; Kenneth Pursell; Patricia Muñoz; Goran B. Klintmalm; Valentina Stosor; Ramon Del Busto; Ajit P. Limaye; Jyoti Somani; Marshall Lyon; Sally Houston; Andrew A. House; Timothy L. Pruett; Susan L. Orloff; Atul Humar; Lorraine A. Dowdy; Julia Garcia-Diaz; Andre C. Kalil; Robert A. Fisher; Shahid Husain

BACKGROUND We describe an immune reconstitution syndrome (IRS)-like entity in the course of evolution of Cryptococcus neoformans infection in organ transplant recipients. METHODS The study population comprised a cohort of 83 consecutive organ transplant recipients with cryptococcosis who were observed for a median of 2 years in an international, multicenter study. RESULTS In 4 (4.8%) of the 83 patients, an IRS-like entity was observed a median of 5.5 weeks after the initiation of appropriate antifungal therapy. Worsening of clinical manifestations was documented, despite cultures being negative for C. neoformans. These patients were significantly more likely to have received tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone as the regimen of immunosuppressive therapy than were all other patients (P = .007). The proposed basis of this phenomenon is reversal of a predominantly Th2 response at the onset of infection to a Th1 proinflammatory response as a result of receipt of effective antifungal therapy and a reduction in or cessation of immunosuppressive therapy. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that an IRS-like entity occurs in organ transplant recipients with C. neoformans infection. Furthermore, this entity may be misconstrued as a failure of therapy. Immunomodulatory agents may have a role as adjunctive therapy in such cases.

Collaboration


Dive into the Atul Humar's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Deepali Kumar

University Health Network

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Shahid Husain

University Health Network

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anders Åsberg

Oslo University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tony Mazzulli

University Health Network

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge