Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Atul K. Jain is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Atul K. Jain.


Nature | 1998

Energy implications of future stabilization of atmospheric CO2 content

Martin I. Hoffert; Ken Caldeira; Atul K. Jain; Erik F. Haites; L. D. Danny Harvey; Seth Potter; Michael E. Schlesinger; Stephen H. Schneider; Robert G. Watts; Tom M. L. Wigley; Donald J. Wuebbles

The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change calls for “stabilization of greenhouse-gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system . . . ”. A standard baseline scenario, that assumes no policy intervention to limit greenhouse-gas emissions has 10 TW (10 × 1012 watts) of carbon-emission-free power being produced by the year 2050, equivalent to the power provided by all todays energy sources combined. Here we employ a carbon-cycle/energy model to estimate the carbon-emission-free power needed for various atmospheric CO2 stabilization scenarios. We find that CO2 stabilization with continued economic growth will require innovative, cost-effective and carbon-emission-free technologies that can provide additional tens of terawatts of primary power in the coming decades, and certainly by the middle of the twenty-first century, even with sustained improvement in the economic productivity of primary energy. At progressively lower atmospheric CO2-stabilization targets in the 750–350 p.p.m.v. range, implementing stabilization will become even more challenging because of the increasing demand for carbon-emission-free power. The magnitude of the implied infrastructure transition suggests the need for massive investments in innovative energy research.


Science | 2015

The dominant role of semi-arid ecosystems in the trend and variability of the land CO2 sink

Anders Ahlström; Michael R. Raupach; Guy Schurgers; Benjamin Smith; Almut Arneth; Martin Jung; Markus Reichstein; Josep G. Canadell; Pierre Friedlingstein; Atul K. Jain; Etsushi Kato; Benjamin Poulter; Stephen Sitch; Benjamin Stocker; Nicolas Viovy; Ying Ping Wang; Andy Wiltshire; Soenke Zaehle; Ning Zeng

The difference is found at the margins The terrestrial biosphere absorbs about a quarter of all anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions, but the amount that they take up varies from year to year. Why? Combining models and observations, Ahlström et al. found that marginal ecosystems—semiarid savannas and low-latitude shrublands—are responsible for most of the variability. Biological productivity in these semiarid regions is water-limited and strongly associated with variations in precipitation, unlike wetter tropical areas. Understanding carbon uptake by these marginal lands may help to improve predictions of variations in the global carbon cycle. Science, this issue p. 895 Semi-arid regions cause most of the interannual variability of the terrestrial carbon dioxide sink. The growth rate of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations since industrialization is characterized by large interannual variability, mostly resulting from variability in CO2 uptake by terrestrial ecosystems (typically termed carbon sink). However, the contributions of regional ecosystems to that variability are not well known. Using an ensemble of ecosystem and land-surface models and an empirical observation-based product of global gross primary production, we show that the mean sink, trend, and interannual variability in CO2 uptake by terrestrial ecosystems are dominated by distinct biogeographic regions. Whereas the mean sink is dominated by highly productive lands (mainly tropical forests), the trend and interannual variability of the sink are dominated by semi-arid ecosystems whose carbon balance is strongly associated with circulation-driven variations in both precipitation and temperature.


New Phytologist | 2014

Evaluation of 11 terrestrial carbon-nitrogen cycle models against observations from two temperate Free-Air CO2 Enrichment studies

Soenke Zaehle; Belinda E. Medlyn; Martin G. De Kauwe; Anthony P. Walker; Michael C. Dietze; Thomas Hickler; Yiqi Luo; Ying-Ping Wang; Bassil El-Masri; Peter E. Thornton; Atul K. Jain; Shusen Wang; David Wårlind; Ensheng Weng; William J. Parton; Colleen M. Iversen; Anne Gallet-Budynek; Heather R. McCarthy; Adrien C. Finzi; Paul J. Hanson; I. Colin Prentice; Ram Oren; Richard J. Norby

We analysed the responses of 11 ecosystem models to elevated atmospheric [CO2] (eCO2) at two temperate forest ecosystems (Duke and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Free-Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) experiments) to test alternative representations of carbon (C)–nitrogen (N) cycle processes. We decomposed the model responses into component processes affecting the response to eCO2 and confronted these with observations from the FACE experiments. Most of the models reproduced the observed initial enhancement of net primary production (NPP) at both sites, but none was able to simulate both the sustained 10-yr enhancement at Duke and the declining response at ORNL: models generally showed signs of progressive N limitation as a result of lower than observed plant N uptake. Nonetheless, many models showed qualitative agreement with observed component processes. The results suggest that improved representation of above-ground–below-ground interactions and better constraints on plant stoichiometry are important for a predictive understanding of eCO2 effects. Improved accuracy of soil organic matter inventories is pivotal to reduce uncertainty in the observed C–N budgets. The two FACE experiments are insufficient to fully constrain terrestrial responses to eCO2, given the complexity of factors leading to the observed diverging trends, and the consequential inability of the models to explain these trends. Nevertheless, the ecosystem models were able to capture important features of the experiments, lending some support to their projections.


Gcb Bioenergy | 2010

An integrated biogeochemical and economic analysis of bioenergy crops in the Midwestern United States.

Atul K. Jain; Madhu Khanna; Matthew Erickson; Haixiao Huang

This study integrates a biophysical model with a county‐specific economic analysis of breakeven prices of bioenergy crop production to assess the biophysical and economic potential of biofuel production in the Midwestern United States. The bioenergy crops considered in this study include a genotype of Miscanthus, Miscanthus×giganteus, and the Cave‐in‐Rock breed of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum). The estimated average peak biomass yield for miscanthus in the Midwestern states ranges between 7 and 48 metric tons dry matter per hectare per year ( t DM ha−1 yr−1), while that for switchgrass is between 10 and 16 t DM ha−1 yr−1. With the exception of Minnesota and Wisconsin, where miscanthus yields are likely to be low due to cold soil temperatures, the yield of miscanthus is on average more than two times higher than yield of switchgrass. We find that the breakeven price, which includes the cost of producing the crop and the opportunity cost of land, of producing miscanthus ranges from


Global Change Biology | 2016

Global change pressures on soils from land use and management

Pete Smith; Joanna Isobel House; Mercedes M. C. Bustamante; Jaroslava Sobocká; R.J. Harper; Genxing Pan; Paul C. West; Joanna M. Clark; Tapan Kumar Adhya; Cornelia Rumpel; Keith Paustian; P.J. Kuikman; M. Francesca Cotrufo; Jane A. Elliott; R. W. McDowell; Robert I. Griffiths; Susumu Asakawa; Alberte Bondeau; Atul K. Jain; Jeroen Meersmans; Thomas A. M. Pugh

53 t−1 DM in Missouri to


New Phytologist | 2014

Where does the carbon go? A model-data intercomparison of vegetation carbon allocation and turnover processes at two temperate forest free-air CO2 enrichment sites.

Martin G. De Kauwe; Belinda E. Medlyn; Sönke Zaehle; Anthony P. Walker; Michael C. Dietze; Ying Ping Wang; Yiqi Luo; Atul K. Jain; Bassil El-Masri; Thomas Hickler; David Wårlind; Ensheng Weng; William J. Parton; Peter E. Thornton; Shusen Wang; I. Colin Prentice; Shinichi Asao; Benjamin Smith; Heather R. McCarthy; Colleen M. Iversen; Paul J. Hanson; Jeffrey M. Warren; Ram Oren; Richard J. Norby

153 t−1 DM in Minnesota in the low‐cost scenario. Corresponding costs for switchgrass are


Global Biogeochemical Cycles | 2009

Nitrogen attenuation of terrestrial carbon cycle response to global environmental factors

Atul K. Jain; Xiaojuan Yang; Haroon S. Kheshgi; A. David McGuire; Wilfred M. Post; David W. Kicklighter

88 t−1 DM in Missouri to


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2000

Radiative forcings and global warming potentials of 39 greenhouse gases

Atul K. Jain; Bruce P. Briegleb; K. Minschwaner; Donald J. Wuebbles

144 t−1 DM in Minnesota. In the high‐cost scenario, the lowest cost for miscanthus is


Nature | 2017

Compensatory water effects link yearly global land CO2 sink changes to temperature.

Martin Jung; Markus Reichstein; Christopher R. Schwalm; Chris Huntingford; Stephen Sitch; Anders Ahlström; Almut Arneth; Gustau Camps-Valls; Philippe Ciais; Pierre Friedlingstein; Fabian Gans; Kazuhito Ichii; Atul K. Jain; Etsushi Kato; Dario Papale; Ben Poulter; Botond Ráduly; Christian Rödenbeck; Gianluca Tramontana; Nicolas Viovy; Ying-Ping Wang; Ulrich Weber; Sönke Zaehle; Ning Zeng

85 t−1 DM and for switchgrass is


Global Change Biology | 2013

CO2 emissions from land‐use change affected more by nitrogen cycle, than by the choice of land‐cover data

Atul K. Jain; Prasanth Meiyappan; Yang Song; Joanna Isobel House

118 t−1 DM, both in Missouri. These two scenarios differ in their assumptions about ease of establishing the perennial crops, nutrient requirements and harvesting costs and losses. The differences in the breakeven prices across states and across crops are mainly driven by bioenergy and row crop yields per hectare. Our results suggest that while high yields per unit of land of bioenergy crops are critical for the competitiveness of bioenergy feedstocks, the yields of the row crops they seek to displace are also an important consideration. Even high yielding crops, such as miscanthus, are likely to be economically attractive only in some locations in the Midwest given the high yields of corn and soybean in the region.

Collaboration


Dive into the Atul K. Jain's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Benjamin Poulter

Goddard Space Flight Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Philippe Ciais

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joshua B. Fisher

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anna M. Michalak

Carnegie Institution for Science

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jiafu Mao

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Akihiko Ito

National Institute for Environmental Studies

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge