Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Aubrey Miller is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Aubrey Miller.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2011

Erionite exposure in North Dakota and Turkish villages with mesothelioma

Michele Carbone; Y. Izzettin Baris; Pietro Bertino; Brian Brass; Sabahattin Comertpay; A. Umran Dogan; Giovanni Gaudino; Sandro Jube; Shreya Kanodia; Charles R. Partridge; Harvey I. Pass; Zeyana Rivera; Ian M. Steele; Murat Tuncer; Steven Way; Haining Yang; Aubrey Miller

Exposure to erionite, an asbestos-like mineral, causes unprecedented rates of malignant mesothelioma (MM) mortality in some Turkish villages. Erionite deposits are present in at least 12 US states. We investigated whether increased urban development has led to erionite exposure in the United States and after preliminary exploration, focused our studies on Dunn County, North Dakota (ND). In Dunn County, ND, we discovered that over the past three decades, more than 300 miles of roads were surfaced with erionite-containing gravel. To determine potential health implications, we compared erionite from the Turkish villages to that from ND. Our study evaluated airborne point exposure concentrations, examined the physical and chemical properties of erionite, and examined the hallmarks of mesothelial cell transformation in vitro and in vivo. Airborne erionite concentrations measured in ND along roadsides, indoors, and inside vehicles, including school buses, equaled or exceeded concentrations in Boyali, where 6.25% of all deaths are caused by MM. With the exception of outdoor samples along roadsides, ND concentrations were lower than those measured in Turkish villages with MM mortality ranging from 20 to 50%. The physical and chemical properties of erionite from Turkey and ND are very similar and they showed identical biological activities. Considering the known 30- to 60-y latency for MM development, there is reason for concern for increased risk in ND in the future. Our findings indicate that implementation of novel preventive and early detection programs in ND and other erionite-rich areas of the United States, similar to efforts currently being undertaken in Turkey, is warranted.


Journal of Thoracic Oncology | 2016

Consensus Report of the 2015 Weinman International Conference on Mesothelioma

Michele Carbone; Shreya Kanodia; Ann Chao; Aubrey Miller; Anil Wali; David N. Weissman; Alex A. Adjei; Francine Baumann; Paolo Boffetta; Brenda J. Buck; Marc de Perrot; A. Umran Dogan; Alessandro F. Gualtieri; Raffit Hassan; Mary Hesdorffer; Fred R. Hirsch; David E. Larson; Weimin Mao; Scott A. Masten; Harvey I. Pass; Julian Peto; Enrico Pira; Ian M. Steele; Anne Tsao; Gavitt Woodard; Haining Yang; Shakun Malik

ABSTRACT On November 9 and 10, 2015, the International Conference on Mesothelioma in Populations Exposed to Naturally Occurring Asbestiform Fibers was held at the University of Hawaii Cancer Center in Honolulu, Hawaii. The meeting was cosponsored by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the agenda was designed with significant input from staff at the U.S. National Cancer Institute and National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. A multidisciplinary group of participants presented updates reflecting a range of disciplinary perspectives, including mineralogy, geology, epidemiology, toxicology, biochemistry, molecular biology, genetics, public health, and clinical oncology. The group identified knowledge gaps that are barriers to preventing and treating malignant mesothelioma (MM) and the required next steps to address barriers. This manuscript reports the groups efforts and focus on strategies to limit risk to the population and reduce the incidence of MM. Four main topics were explored: genetic risk, environmental exposure, biomarkers, and clinical interventions. Genetics plays a critical role in MM when the disease occurs in carriers of germline BRCA1 associated protein 1 mutations. Moreover, it appears likely that, in addition to BRCA1 associated protein 1, other yet unknown genetic variants may also influence the individual risk for development of MM, especially after exposure to asbestos and related mineral fibers. MM is an almost entirely preventable malignancy as it is most often caused by exposure to commercial asbestos or mineral fibers with asbestos‐like health effects, such as erionite. In the past in North America and in Europe, the most prominent source of exposure was related to occupation. Present regulations have reduced occupational exposure in these countries; however, some people continue to be exposed to previously installed asbestos in older construction and other settings. Moreover, an increasing number of people are being exposed in rural areas that contain noncommercial asbestos, erionite, and other mineral fibers in soil or rock (termed naturally occurring asbestos [NOA]) and are being developed. Public health authorities, scientists, residents, and other affected groups must work together in the areas where exposure to asbestos, including NOA, has been documented in the environment to mitigate or reduce this exposure. Although a blood biomarker validated to be effective for use in screening and identifying MM at an early stage in asbestos/NOA‐exposed populations is not currently available, novel biomarkers presented at the meeting, such as high mobility group box 1 and fibulin‐3, are promising. There was general agreement that current treatment for MM, which is based on surgery and standard chemotherapy, has a modest effect on the overall survival (OS), which remains dismal. Additionally, although much needed novel therapeutic approaches for MM are being developed and explored in clinical trials, there is a critical need to invest in prevention research, in which there is a great opportunity to reduce the incidence and mortality from MM.


International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health | 2016

Integrating Health Research into Disaster Response: The New NIH Disaster Research Response Program.

Aubrey Miller; Kevin Yeskey; Stavros Garantziotis; Stacey J. Arnesen; April Bennett; Liam R. O’Fallon; Claudia Thompson; Les Reinlib; Scott A. Masten; James Remington; Cindy Love; Steve Ramsey; Richard T. Rosselli; Betsy Galluzzo; Joy Lee; Richard K. Kwok; Joseph Hughes

The need for high quality and timely disaster research has been a topic of great discussion over the past several years. Recent high profile incidents have exposed gaps in knowledge about the health impacts of disasters or the benefits of specific interventions—such was the case with the 2010 Gulf Oil Spill and recent events associated with lead-contaminated drinking water in Flint, Michigan, and the evolving health crisis related to Zika virus disease. Our inability to perform timely research to inform the community about health and safety risks or address specific concerns further heightens anxiety and distrust. Since nearly all disasters, whether natural or man-made, have an environmental health component, it is critical that specialized research tools and trained researchers be readily available to evaluate complex exposures and health effects, especially for vulnerable sub-populations such as the elderly, children, pregnant women, and those with socioeconomic and environmental disparities. In response, the National Institute of Environmental Health Science has initiated a Disaster Research Response Program to create new tools, protocols, networks of researchers, training exercises, and outreach involving diverse groups of stakeholders to help overcome the challenges of disaster research and to improve our ability to collect vital information to reduce the adverse health impacts and improve future preparedness.


Environmental Health Perspectives | 2015

Current Research and Opportunities to Address Environmental Asbestos Exposures

Danielle J. Carlin; Theodore C. Larson; Jean C. Pfau; Stephen H. Gavett; Arti Shukla; Aubrey Miller; Ronald Hines

Summary Asbestos-related diseases continue to result in approximately 120,000 deaths every year in the United States and worldwide. Although extensive research has been conducted on health effects of occupational exposures to asbestos, many issues related to environmental asbestos exposures remain unresolved. For example, environmental asbestos exposures associated with a former mine in Libby, Montana, have resulted in high rates of nonoccupational asbestos-related disease. Additionally, other areas with naturally occurring asbestos deposits near communities in the United States and overseas are undergoing investigations to assess exposures and potential health risks. Some of the latest public health, epidemiological, and basic research findings were presented at a workshop on asbestos at the 2014 annual meeting of the Society of Toxicology in Phoenix, Arizona. The following focus areas were discussed: a) mechanisms resulting in fibrosis and/or tumor development; b) relative toxicity of different forms of asbestos and other hazardous elongated mineral particles (EMPs); c) proper dose metrics (e.g., mass, fiber number, or surface area of fibers) when interpreting asbestos toxicity; d) asbestos exposure to susceptible populations; and e) using toxicological findings for risk assessment and remediation efforts. The workshop also featured asbestos research supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Better protection of individuals from asbestos-related health effects will require stimulation of new multidisciplinary research to further our understanding of what constitutes hazardous exposures and risk factors associated with toxicity of asbestos and other hazardous EMPs (e.g., nanomaterials).


Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology | 2015

Commentary on the contributions and future role of occupational exposure science in a vision and strategy for the discipline of exposure science

Martin Harper; Christopher P. Weis; Joachim D. Pleil; Benjamin C. Blount; Aubrey Miller; Mark D. Hoover; Steven Jahn

Exposure science is a holistic concept without prejudice to exposure source. Traditionally, measurements aimed at mitigating environmental exposures have not included exposures in the workplace, instead considering such exposures to be an internal affair between workers and their employers. Similarly, occupational (or industrial) hygiene has not typically accounted for environmental contributions to poor health at work. Many persons spend a significant amount of their lifetime in the workplace, where they maybe exposed to more numerous chemicals at higher levels than elsewhere in their environment. In addition, workplace chemical exposures and other exogenous stressors may increase epigenetic and germline modifications that are passed on to future generations. We provide a brief history of the development of exposure science from its roots in the assessment of workplace exposures, including an appendix where we detail current resources for education and training in exposure science offered through occupational hygiene organizations. We describe existing successful collaborations between occupational and environmental practitioners in the field of exposure science, which may serve as a model for future interactions. Finally, we provide an integrated vision for the field of exposure science, emphasizing interagency collaboration, the need for complete exposure information in epidemiological studies, and the importance of integrating occupational, environmental, and residential assessments. Our goal is to encourage communication and spur additional collaboration between the fields of occupational and environmental exposure assessment. Providing a more comprehensive approach to exposure science is critical to the study of the “exposome”, which conceptualizes the totality of exposures throughout a person’s life, not only chemical, but also from diet, stress, drugs, infection, and so on, and the individual response.


Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health | 2017

The Gulf Long-Term Follow-Up Study (GuLF STUDY): Biospecimen collection at enrollment

Lawrence S. Engel; Richard K. Kwok; Aubrey Miller; Aaron Blair; Matthew D. Curry; John A. McGrath; Dale P. Sandler

ABSTRACT The 2010 Deepwater Horizon (DWH) explosion in the Gulf of Mexico led to the largest ever marine oil spill by volume. The GuLF STUDY is investigating possible adverse human health effects associated with oil spill activities. One objective of the study was to utilize biological specimens from study participants to examine spill-related adverse health effects. This study describes the methods for collecting, processing, shipping, and storing specimens during the enrollment phase of the study. GuLF STUDY participants living in Gulf States (Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and eastern Texas) were eligible to complete a home visit at enrollment, one to three years after the DWH explosion. During this visit, blood, urine, toenail and hair clippings, and house dust samples were collected. Specimens were shipped overnight to a central processing laboratory in containers with cold and ambient temperature compartments. Most blood and urine specimens were then aliquoted and stored in liquid nitrogen vapor or at -80°C, with some samples stored at -20°C. A total of 11,193 participants completed a home visit, and over 99% provided at least one biospecimen. Most participants provided blood (93%), urine (99%), and toenail clippings (89%), and 40% provided hair. Nearly all participants (95%) provided house-dust samples. Most samples were received by the laboratory one (58%) or two (25%) days after collection. These biospecimens enable investigation of a range of biomarkers of spill-related adverse health effects, and possibly some biomarkers of spill-related exposures. The biospecimen collection, handling, and storage protocols were designed to maximize current and future scientific value within logistical and budgetary constraints and might serve as a template for future studies conducted in similar time-critical and geographically dispersed settings.


International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health | 2017

Exposure to naturally occurring mineral fibers due to off-road vehicle use: A review

Christopher Wolfe; Brenda J. Buck; Aubrey Miller; James E. Lockey; Christopher Weis; David N. Weissman; Alexander Jonesi; Patrick H. Ryan

BACKGROUND The use of off-road vehicles (ORVs) is a popular source of outdoor recreation in the United States. While personal injury has been the focus of most epidemiologic investigations regarding ORV use to date, other health effects associated with ORV use have not been adequately examined. ORVs have been designed to operate in rugged, unpaved terrain, and ORVs can produce copious amounts of fugitive dust. ORV use in geographic regions with naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) and erionite (NOE) may result in the liberation of these minerals from underlying rocks and soil, which may put ORV participants at risk to potentially hazardous inhalation exposures. METHODS A comprehensive narrative review of existing literature and reports relevant to off-road recreation and mineral fiber exposure was conducted. Manuscripts and reports included in the review were limited to those that contained quantitative data regarding concentrations of mineral fibers recorded during vehicular traffic on an unpaved road and publication in a peer-reviewed journal, official report composed by a government agency, or a report generated under the endorsement of a government agency. In addition, the potential public health impact of ORV use in regions with NOA/NOE was estimated by calculating the proximity of known mineral fiber occurrences to areas of ORV use. RESULTS A total of 15 publications met inclusion criteria. Exposures to NOA/NOE observed from personal sampling in the included studies ranged from less than 0.01-5.6 f/cc. ORV position while riding in a group and vehicle speed were frequent determinants of measured concentrations. Multiple studies also suggest that children may experience higher exposures to mineral fibers in comparison to adult ORV riders. Information on ORV trails and 665 known occurrences of NOA/NOE was available for five states located in the western United States. Of these 665 known occurrences, approximately 80% (n=515) were located within 20 miles of an ORV trail, and nearly a third were located within one mile. CONCLUSIONS Individuals who operate ORVs in regions where NOA/NOE is a component of the underlying soil or unpaved road may experience elevated exposures to mineral fibers. Given the prevalence of ORV trails in close proximity to these natural fiber occurrences, epidemiologic and surveillance studies of individuals who frequently engage in ORV use are recommended. Public health initiatives should concentrate on increasing awareness of these risks, allowing ORV users to make informed choices and take appropriate measures to limit these risks where possible.


Environmental Health Perspectives | 2016

Ethical Issues in Environmental Health Research Related to Public Health Emergencies: Reflections on the GuLF STUDY

David B. Resnik; Aubrey Miller; Richard K. Kwok; Lawrence S. Engel; Dale P. Sandler

Summary Health research in the context of an environmental disaster with implications for public health raises challenging ethical issues. This article explores ethical issues that arose in the Gulf Long-term Follow-up Study (GuLF STUDY) and provides guidance for future research. Ethical issues encountered by GuLF STUDY investigators included a) minimizing risks and promoting benefits to participants, b) obtaining valid informed consent, c) providing financial compensation to participants, d) working with vulnerable participants, e) protecting participant confidentiality, f) addressing conflicts of interest, g) dealing with legal implications of research, and h) obtaining expeditious review from the institutional review board (IRB), community groups, and other committees. To ensure that ethical issues are handled properly, it is important for investigators to work closely with IRBs during the development and implementation of research and to consult with groups representing the community. Researchers should consider developing protocols, consent forms, survey instruments, and other documents prior to the advent of a public health emergency to allow for adequate and timely review by constituents. When an emergency arises, these materials can be quickly modified to take into account unique circumstances and implementation details.


Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology | 2018

Predictors of blood volatile organic compound levels in Gulf coast residents

Emily Werder; Kaitlyn B. Gam; Lawrence S. Engel; Richard K. Kwok; Christine C. Ekenga; Matthew D. Curry; David M. Chambers; Aaron Blair; Aubrey Miller; Linda S. Birnbaum; Dale P. Sandler

To address concerns among Gulf Coast residents about ongoing exposures to volatile organic compounds, including benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, o-xylene, and m-xylene/p-xylene (BTEX), we characterized current blood levels and identified predictors of BTEX among Gulf state residents. We collected questionnaire data on recent exposures and measured blood BTEX levels in a convenience sample of 718 Gulf residents. Because BTEX is rapidly cleared from the body, blood levels represent recent exposures in the past 24 h. We compared participants’ levels of blood BTEX to a nationally representative sample. Among nonsmokers we assessed predictors of blood BTEX levels using linear regression, and predicted the risk of elevated BTEX levels using modified Poisson regression. Blood BTEX levels in Gulf residents were similar to national levels. Among nonsmokers, sex and reporting recent smoky/chemical odors predicted blood BTEX. The change in log benzene was −0.26 (95% CI: −0.47, −0.04) and 0.72 (0.02, 1.42) for women and those who reported odors, respectively. Season, time spent away from home, and self-reported residential proximity to Superfund sites (within a half mile) were statistically associated with benzene only, however mean concentration was nearly an order of magnitude below that of cigarette smokers. Among these Gulf residents, smoking was the primary contributor to blood BTEX levels, but other factors were also relevant.


Occupational and Environmental Medicine | 2014

0217 The NIEHS GuLF STUDY: Mental Health Symptoms Among Participants Involved in the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Clean-up

Richard K. Kwok; Lawrence S. Engel; Christine C. Ekenga; Aubrey Miller; Aaron Blair; Dale P. Sandler

Objectives Workers and communities impacted by previous oil spills have shown increases in adverse mental health outcomes. The GuLF STUDY is investigating potential health effects among workers involved in the Deepwater Horizon oil spill clean-up response. Participants confronted physical and psychosocial stressors including exposures to oil and dispersants, income uncertainties, and challenges of family and community disruption. Method Information on demographics, health, and clean-up experience was collected by telephone. Standardised surveys administered to 11 210 participants during home visits captured mental health outcomes including depression, anxiety, PTSD, resiliency, and perceived stress. A summary measure of adverse mental health was defined as having a poor outcome on at least one of the five standardised scales. Mental health outcomes were evaluated in relation to clean-up jobs in models that excluded individuals with pre-existing doctor-diagnosed mental health conditions and controlled for socioeconomic and other factors that contribute to mental well-being. Results Preliminary analysis using the summary mental health measure indicate that persons who worked on oil-spill cleanup were more likely to report adverse mental health outcomes than those who did not, with ORs of 1.4 (95% CI: 1.1–1.9) for rig and barge workers who worked closer to the source of the oil spill and 1.3 (95% CI: 1.1–1.5) for those with land-based clean-up jobs compared to those who did not actively work on the clean-up effort. Conclusions Adverse mental health outcomes were found among individuals in the GuLF STUDY population but further work is necessary to clarify the factors leading to these outcomes.

Collaboration


Dive into the Aubrey Miller's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard K. Kwok

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dale P. Sandler

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lawrence S. Engel

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christopher P. Weis

United States Environmental Protection Agency

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Aaron Blair

Research Triangle Park

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dan Middleton

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David N. Weissman

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kaitlyn B. Gam

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge