Audette Sylvestre

Systematic Review of the Literature on Characteristics of Late-Talking Toddlers.

BACKGROUND Research has investigated late-talking toddlers because they are at great risk of continuing to experience language-learning difficulties once they enter school and hence are candidates for early intervention. It is also important to consider this group of children with regards to the immediate characteristics which are detrimental to their development and for which early intervention has become increasingly available. AIMS To review the literature on late-talking toddlers in order to identify the characteristics of this population whose importance has been clearly demonstrated, identify sources of incongruence in findings, and to underscore aspects of language delay at 2 years of age and characteristics about which additional knowledge is needed. MAIN CONTRIBUTION The review highlights the need to define the language difficulties found in late-talking toddlers based on clinical profiles that go beyond the criterion of an expressive vocabulary delay. It also underscores the association between vocabulary delay and characteristics of the child such as social-emotional development and characteristics of the socio-familial environment such as language stimulation. CONCLUSIONS Future research should take into account the lack of homogeneity observed within the population of children with a vocabulary delay at 2 years of age and attempt to identify subgroups within late-talking toddlers. It should also consider a multifactorial perspective of child development to further the understanding of this phenomenon.

Language delay in severely neglected children: a cumulative or specific effect of risk factors?

OBJECTIVES This research sought to determine if the language delay (LD) of severely neglected children under 3 years old was better explained by a cumulative risk model or by the specificity of risk factors. The objective was also to identify the risk factors with the strongest impact on LD among various biological, psychological, and environmental factors. METHODS Sixty-eight severely neglected children and their mothers participated in this cross-sectional study. Children were between 2 and 36 months of age. Data included information about the childs language development and biological, psychological, and environmental risk factors. RESULTS Prevalence of LD is significantly higher in this subgroup of children than in the population as a whole. Although we observed that the risk of LD significantly increased with an increase in the cumulative count of the presence of the childs biological-psychological risk factors, the one-by-one analysis of the individual factors revealed that the cumulative effect mainly reflected the specific impact of the childs cognitive development. When we considered also the environmental risk factors, multivariate logistic regression established that cognitive development, the mothers own physical and emotional abuse experience as a child, and the mothers low acceptability level towards her child are linked to LD in severely neglected children. CONCLUSIONS Language development is the result of a complex interaction between risk factors. LD in severely neglected children is better explained by the specificity of risk factors than by the cumulative risk model. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Most prevention and early intervention programs promote and target an increase in the quantity and quality of language stimulation offered to the child. Our results suggest that particular attention should be given to other environmental factors, specifically the mothers psychological availability and her sensitivity towards the child. It is essential to suggest interventions targeting various ecological dimensions of neglectful mothers to help break the intergenerational neglect transmission cycle. It is also important to develop government policies and ensure that efforts among the various response networks are concerted since in-depth changes to neglect situations can only come about when all interested parties become involved.

Social participation by children with developmental coordination disorder compared to their peers

Abstract Purpose: Two objectives are being pursued: (1) to describe and compare the level of social participation of children aged 5–13 with developmental coordination disorder (DCD) to children of the same age with typical development (TD) and (2) to describe and compare the level of social participation of two subgroups of youths with DCD, e.g. children with dyspraxia affecting both the motor sphere and the verbal sphere (mixed dyspraxia) and children with developmental dyspraxia. Method: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 27 youngsters with DCD: 9 having developmental dyspraxia and 18 having mixed dyspraxia, compared to 27 same-age peers with TD. Life habits (LIFE-H) for children was used to measure social participation. Results: Levels of lifestyle achievements among youngsters with DCD are significantly lower than those of TD youngsters in all categories. Noteworthy differences were found between subgroups of youngsters with DCD in the categories of life habits related to communication and education. The group with mixed dyspraxia obtained the lowest scores. Conclusions: The achievement of a normal lifestyle by youngsters with DCD is upset in all spheres of life. The impact of DCD on the level of participation of these youngsters is quite significant and affects all lifestyles measured in this study. Children with mixed dyspraxia are particularly affected. These facts must be taken into consideration by anyone involved in the lives of these youngsters. Implications for Rehabilitation It is necessary to encourage social participation of DCD sufferers aged 5–13 in all spheres of life. Special attention should be paid to those who have a speech disorder. Life habits concerning communication and education may be related; greater efforts should be made to limit the negative impact on other lifestyles. Social participation of DCD sufferers should be measured periodically and appropriate resources must be made available to promote training and support for clinicians. It is important to provide tools to measure social participation for both stakeholders and parents.

Language problems among abused and neglected children: a meta-analytic review

Research data show that exposure to abuse and neglect has detrimental effects on a child’s language development. In this meta-analysis, we analyze studies (k = 23), to compare the language skills (receptive language, expressive language, pragmatics) of children who have experienced abuse and/or neglect with the language skills of children who have not experienced abuse and/or neglect and to examine whether age or type of maltreatment moderate the relationship between maltreatment and language skills. Results confirm that the language skills of children who have experienced abuse and/or neglect are delayed when compared to children who have not experienced abuse and/or neglect. Compared to older children, young children seem particularly vulnerable to abuse and neglect. No significant differences were demonstrated concerning the type of maltreatment suffered by the child. These findings support the necessity of early detection of language problems in abused and neglected children as well as early intervention in order to implement interventions that will positively stimulate their development.

Social participation of children age 8-12 with SLI.

Abstract Purpose: Two objectives are being pursued: (1) to describe the level of social participation of children aged 8–12 presenting a specific language impairment (SLI) and (2) to identify personal and family factors associated with their level of social participation. Method: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 29 children with SLI and one of their parents. Parental stress and family adversity were measured as risk factors. The measure of life habits (LIFE-H) adapted to children aged 5-3 was used to measure social participation. Results: The assumption that social participation of these children is impaired in relation to the communication dimension was generally confirmed. The statements referring to the “communication in the community” and “written communication” are those for which the results are weaker. “Communication at home” is made easier albeit with some difficulties, while “telecommunication” is totally preserved. A high level of parental stress is also confirmed, affecting the willingness of parents to support their child’s autonomy. Conclusions: The achievement of a normal lifestyle of children with SLI is upset in many spheres of life. Methods of intervention must better reflect the needs and realities experienced by these children in their various living environments, in order to optimize social participation, and consequently, to improve their well-being and that of their families. The need to develop strategies to develop childrens independence and to reduce parental stress must be recognized and all stakeholders need to be engaged in the resolution of this challenge. Implications for Rehabilitation The realization of life habits of SLI children is compromised at various levels, especially in the domain related to “communication in the community” and “written communication”. Speech-language pathologists must consider providing ongoing support throughout the primary years of these children and during adolescence, to promote and facilitate the continued realization of life habits of SLI persons. Providing ongoing support throughout the primary years and thereafter is needed to facilitate the continuing realization of life habits of SLI persons. Parents of children with SLI experience considerable stress in relation to the exercise of their parental roles. It is important to intervene and to support parents to promote autonomy for their SLI children.

Prediction of the outcome of children who had a language delay at age 2 when they are aged 4: Still a challenge

Abstract Purpose: This study investigated the role that variables related to children and their environment play in the prediction of outcomes at 4 years of age for children with a language delay at 2 years. Method: A longitudinal study was undertaken where 64 children (45 boys, 19 girls; mean age = 53.3 months; SD = 4.4) with language delay at age 2 years were re-evaluated at age 4 years. Three developmental trajectories were analysed. Result: The early stages of grammar, as estimated by mean length of utterance at 3.5 years, are an important prognosis factor of subsequent language impairment (LI). Children who are exposed to several risk factors simultaneously are more likely to have a language delay (LD) or a LI, but the profile of LD children is more akin to that of the typically developing (TD) children. Children with LI tend to have profiles with a greater number of risk factors. Conclusion: The results of this study encourage different intervention approaches depending on the child’s language profile at 2 years, due to differing language prognosis. The results also point to the need to assess the child’s environment. Future studies with large diverse population samples may give more precise information on potential risk factors and their cumulative effect.