Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Aurélie Gauchet is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Aurélie Gauchet.


International Journal of Behavioral Medicine | 2007

Psychosocial predictors of medication adherence among persons living with HIV.

Aurélie Gauchet; Cyril Tarquinio; Gustave Nicolas Fischer

Background: Since the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), many have learned to live with HIV as a chronic illness. Adherence to medical regimens is extremely important for HIV patients. Purpose: To examine the extent to which medication adherence among HIV patients is related to social and psychological variables. Method: Data were gathered among 127 HIV patients (aged from 18 & #x2013;65 years) recruited at their quarterly consultation at Metz Hospital (France). Subjects completed a self-report adherence to medication scale, the Illness PerceptionQuestionnaire (IPQ), the Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ), a French Value System Scale, a treatment satisfaction scale, and sociodemographic measures. Results: Analyses revealed significant associations between adherence and patients’ beliefs about treatment, satisfaction with treatment, confidence in the physician, some values (“other people, ” “god and children”), and duration of treatment and illness. Conclusion: The data suggest that patients’ beliefs about treatment are formed to a certain degree in the patients’ relationship with the physician. Furthermore, adherence seems to be related to personal values.


Psychology & Health | 2016

Implementation intention and planning interventions in Health Psychology: Recommendations from the Synergy Expert Group for research and practice

Martin S. Hagger; Aleksandra Luszczynska; John de Wit; Yael Benyamini; Silke Burkert; Pier-Eric Chamberland; Angel M. Chater; Stephan U Dombrowski; Anne van Dongen; David P. French; Aurélie Gauchet; Nelli Hankonen; Maria Karekla; Anita Y. Kinney; Dominika Kwasnicka; Siu Hing Lo; Sofía López-Roig; Carine Meslot; Marta Moreira Marques; Efrat Neter; Anne Marie Plass; Sebastian Potthoff; Laura Rennie; Urte Scholz; Gertraud Stadler; Elske Stolte; Gill A. ten Hoor; Aukje A.C. Verhoeven; Monika Wagner; Gabriele Oettingen

The current article details a position statement and recommendations for future research and practice on planning and implementation intentions in health contexts endorsed by the Synergy Expert Group. The group comprised world-leading researchers in health and social psychology and behavioural medicine who convened to discuss priority issues in planning interventions in health contexts and develop a set of recommendations for future research and practice. The expert group adopted a nominal groups approach and voting system to elicit and structure priority issues in planning interventions and implementation intentions research. Forty-two priority issues identified in initial discussions were further condensed to 18 key issues, including definitions of planning and implementation intentions and 17 priority research areas. Each issue was subjected to voting for consensus among group members and formed the basis of the position statement and recommendations. Specifically, the expert group endorsed statements and recommendations in the following areas: generic definition of planning and specific definition of implementation intentions, recommendations for better testing of mechanisms, guidance on testing the effects of moderators of planning interventions, recommendations on the social aspects of planning interventions, identification of the preconditions that moderate effectiveness of planning interventions and recommendations for research on how people use plans.


The Journal of Rheumatology | 2016

Why Do Patients with Chronic Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases Discontinue Their Biologics? An Assessment of Patients' Adherence Using a Self-report Questionnaire.

Anne-Laure Betegnie; Aurélie Gauchet; Audrey Lehmann; Laurent Grange; Matthieu Roustit; Magalie Baudrant; Pierrick Bedouch; B. Allenet

Objective. Concerns have been raised about nonadherence behavior among patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (CIRD) receiving biologics. This nonadherence may be caused by various factors. The main objective was to explain why patients discontinue their biologics of their own accord. Methods. A quantitative and descriptive study was performed using a self-report questionnaire that was sent through the Internet to members of different patient associations. Sociodemographic data, medical and therapeutic history, management of biologic administration, previous experiences, and patients’ beliefs and perceptions about treatment efficacy and side effects were studied to explain self-discontinuation (SD). Results. A total of 581 patients answered the questionnaire between June 16, 2012, and July 4, 2012, including patients with ankylosing spondylitis (351/581, 60.4%), rheumatoid arthritis (196/581, 33.7%), psoriatic arthritis (30/581, 5.2%), and other CIRD (4/581, 0.7%). More than 1000 different biologics were described by the 581 patients, with a median of 2 lines per patient. Eighty-six patients discontinued their biologics of their own accord (14.8%). In a multivariate analysis, factors that were significantly related to SD were low level of pain, more than 1 line of biologics tried, self-administration of biologics, negative beliefs about the treatment, and a lack of medical and social support. Conclusion. Five predictive factors of this SD were identified, which should be assessed in routine with patients with CIRD receiving biologic treatment: pain, treatment history, self-administration of injections, negative beliefs about treatment, and a lack of perceived medical and social support.


Health Expectations | 2017

How best to use and evaluate Patient Information Leaflets given during a consultation: a systematic review of literature reviews

Mélanie Sustersic; Aurélie Gauchet; Alison Foote; Jean-Luc Bosson

In the past, several authors have attempted to review randomized clinical trials (RCT) evaluating the impact of Patient Information Leaflets (PILs) used during a consultation and draw some general conclusions. However, this proved difficult because the clinical situations, size and quality of RCTs were too heterogeneous to pool relevant data.


Gastroenterologie Clinique Et Biologique | 2009

Management of psychiatric disorders and addictive behaviors in patients with viral hepatitis C in France.

J.-P. Lang; L. Michel; Pascal Melin; M. Schoeffler; Aurélie Gauchet; C. Rousseaux; V. Cartier; C. Henry

INTRODUCTION Guidelines concerning the management of psychiatric disorders and addictive behaviors in patients with chronic hepatitis C and the conditions of collaboration between hepatogastroenterologists, infectiologists, psychiatrists and psychologists have not been published. This has a negative influence on optimal therapeutic management of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The aim of this study was to describe the current clinical practices for ambulatory management of psychiatric disorders and addictions, and the influence of a possible psychiatric and/or psychological collaboration. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective survey was conducted among 101 clinicians treating patients with chronic hepatitis C. Data were collected from personal interviews with the managing clinicians and from the files of patients with chronic hepatitis C patients who presented psychiatric disorders. RESULTS Analysis of the 101 interviews and 598 patient files showed that 19% of patients had not received an optimal treatment for their HCV infection because of a psychiatric problem, and that less than 50% of the managing clinicians were working in collaboration with a psychiatrist or a psychologist. In conclusion, lack of collaboration between hepatogastroenterologists and psychiatrists could be deleterious for the optimal treatment of HCV infected patients. Improvement is required.


Frontiers in Psychology | 2016

Theory-Based Interventions Combining Mental Simulation and Planning Techniques to Improve Physical Activity: Null Results from Two Randomized Controlled Trials

Carine Meslot; Aurélie Gauchet; B. Allenet; Olivier François; Martin S. Hagger

Interventions to assist individuals in initiating and maintaining regular participation in physical activity are not always effective. Psychological and behavioral theories advocate the importance of both motivation and volition in interventions to change health behavior. Interventions adopting self-regulation strategies that foster motivational and volitional components may, therefore, have utility in promoting regular physical activity participation. We tested the efficacy of an intervention adopting motivational (mental simulation) and volitional (implementation intentions) components to promote a regular physical activity in two studies. Study 1 adopted a cluster randomized design in which participants (n = 92) were allocated to one of three conditions: mental simulation plus implementation intention, implementation intention only, or control. Study 2 adopted a 2 (mental simulation vs. no mental simulation) × 2 (implementation intention vs. no implementation intention) randomized controlled design in which fitness center attendees (n = 184) were randomly allocated one of four conditions: mental simulation only, implementation intention only, combined, or control. Physical activity behavior was measured by self-report (Study 1) or fitness center attendance (Study 2) at 4- (Studies 1 and 2) and 19- (Study 2 only) week follow-up periods. Findings revealed no statistically significant main or interactive effects of the mental simulation and implementation intention conditions on physical activity outcomes in either study. Findings are in contrast to previous research which has found pervasive effects for both intervention strategies. Findings are discussed in light of study limitations including the relatively small sample sizes, particularly for Study 1, deviations in the operationalization of the intervention components from previous research and the lack of a prompt for a goal intention. Future research should focus on ensuring uniformity in the format of the intervention components, test the effects of each component alone and in combination using standardized measures across multiple samples, and systematically explore effects of candidate moderators.


PLOS ONE | 2018

A scale assessing doctor-patient communication in a context of acute conditions based on a systematic review

Mélanie Sustersic; Aurélie Gauchet; Anaïs Kernou; Charlotte Gibert; Alison Foote; Céline Vermorel; Jean-Luc Bosson

Background There is no validated generic tool to measure Doctor-Patient-Communication (DPC) in a context of acute conditions. Objective To create and validate such a scale in a real population. Materials and method We performed a systematic review of validated DPC scales available in English. From these, using a theoretical model based on a multidisciplinary approach, we selected pertinent items that met the inclusion criteria and included them in a simple questionnaire. This tool based on a synthesis of the literature was then validated in a prospective study in two hospital emergency departments. Results We found 22 pertinent questionnaires and scoring systems. From these, we extracted items and built a scale based on 15 questions with graded responses (Likert from 1 to 4). The mean time for questionnaire completion was 3 minutes. We included 189 adults and adolescents in the study and analyzed complete responses to the questionnaire by 149 patients, gathered over the phone one week after their consultation. The scale had high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.89) and good external validity. Two questions were removed due to redundancy giving a scale based on 13 questions. Conclusions We have created an easy-to-use and validated generic questionnaire to assess DPC in a context of acute conditions, usable both in clinical research and in routine practice.


The Open Aids Journal | 2016

Influence of the First Consultation on Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV-infected Patients.

Marion Peyre; Aurélie Gauchet; Matthieu Roustit; Pascale Leclercq; Olivier Epaulard

Background: Physician attitude influences the way patients cope with diagnosis and therapy in chronic severe diseases such as cancer. Previous studies showed that such an effect exists in HIV care; it is likely that it begins with the first contact with a physician. Objective: We aimed to explore in HIV-infected persons their perception of the first consultation they had with an HIV specialist (PFC-H), and whether this perception correlates with adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Method: The study was conducted in Grenoble University Hospital, France, a tertiary care center. Every antiretroviral-experienced patient was asked to freely complete a self-reported, anonymous questionnaire concerning retrospective PFC-H, present adherence (Morisky scale), and present perceptions and beliefs about medicine (BMQ scale). Results: One hundred and fifty-one questionnaires were available for evaluation. PFC-H score and adherence were correlated, independently from age, gender, and numbers of pill(s) and of pill intake(s) per day. BMQ score also correlated with adherence; structural equation analysis suggested that the effect of PFC-H on adherence is mediated by positive beliefs. Conclusion: These results suggest that for HIV-infected persons, the perceptions remaining from the first consultation with an HIV specialist physician influence important issues such as adherence and perception about medicine. Physicians must be aware of this potentially long-lasting effect.


International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy | 2014

Assessing medication adherence: options to consider

Audrey Lehmann; Parisa Aslani; Rana Ahmed; Jennifer Celio; Aurélie Gauchet; Pierrick Bedouch; Olivier Bugnon; B. Allenet; Marie-Paule Schneider


Annales pharmaceutiques françaises | 2013

Comment évaluer l'adhésion médicamenteuse ? Le point sur les méthodes

B. Allenet; Magalie Baudrant; Audrey Lehmann; Aurélie Gauchet; Matthieu Roustit; Pierrick Bedouch; A. Golay

Collaboration


Dive into the Aurélie Gauchet's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

B. Allenet

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pierrick Bedouch

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Carine Meslot

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Magalie Baudrant

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anne-Laure Betegnie

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge