Aurelio Rodriguez

Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST): results from an international consensus conference.

OBJECTIVE To assemble an international panel of experts to develop consensus recommendations on selected important issues on the use of ultrasonography (US) in trauma care. SETTING R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, Md. The conference was held on December 4, 1997. PARTICIPANTS A committee of two co-directors and eight faculty members, in the disciplines of surgery and emergency medicine, representing four nations. Each faculty member had made significant contributions to the current understanding of US in trauma. RESULTS Six broad topics felt to be controversial or to have wide variation in practice were discussed using the ad hoc process: (1) US nomenclature and technique; (2) US for organ-specific injury; (3) US scoring systems; (4) the meaning of positive and negative US studies; (5) US credentialing issues; and (6) future applications of US. Consensus recommendations were made when unanimous agreement was reached. Majority viewpoints and minority opinions are presented for unresolved issues. CONCLUSION The consensus conference process fostered an international sharing of ideas. Continued communication is needed to advance the science and technology of US in trauma care.

Blunt thoracic trauma. Analysis of 515 patients.

A retrospective analysis of 515 cases of blunt chest trauma is presented. The overall thoracic morbidity rate was 36% and mortality rate was 15.5%. Atelectasis was the most common complication. Severe chest trauma can be present in the absence of rib or other thoracic bony fractures. Emergency thoracotomies for resuscitation of the patient with blunt chest trauma with absent vital signs proved unsuccessful in 39 of 39 patients. A high index of suspicion for blunt chest injury occurring in blunt trauma, coupled with an aggressive diagnostic and therapeutic approach, remains the cornerstone of treatment to minimize the morbidity and mortality of such injuries.

The impact of hyperglycemia on patients with severe brain injury.

BACKGROUND This study aimed to analyze the relation of hyperglycemia to outcome in cases of severe traumatic brain injury, and to examine factors that may be responsible for the hyperglycemic state. METHODS A retrospective analysis in an intensive care unit of a level 1 trauma center investigated 77 patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 8 or lower who survived more than 5 days were reviewed. Serum glucose, base deficit, GCS, use of steroids, and amounts of insulin and carbohydrates were recorded for 5 days, along with age. The Injury Severity Score (ISS) and the Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) for the head, chest, and abdomen also were recorded. A hyperglycemia score (HS) was calculated as follows. A value of 1 was assigned each day the glucose exceeded 170 mg/dL (range, 0-5). A hyperglycemia score for days 3, 4, and 5 (HS day 3-5) also was calculated (range, 0-3). Outcomes included mortality, day 5 GCS, intensive care unit length of stay, and hospital length of stay. RESULTS Of the 77 patients, 24 (31.2%) died. Nonsurvivors had higher glucose levels each day. The HS was higher for those who died: 2.4 +/- 1.7 versus 1.5 +/- 1.4 (p = 0.02). Univariate analysis showed that only HS and ISS correlated with all four outcome variables studied. Coxs regression analysis showed that mortality was related to age and ISS. Head AIS and HS were independent predictors of lower day 5 GCS, whereas HS 3-5 and day 4 GCS were related to prolonged hospital length of stay. Older age, diabetes, and lower day 1 GCS were associated with higher HS, whereas carbohydrate infusion rate, ISS, head AIS, and steroid administration were not. CONCLUSIONS Early hyperglycemia is associated with poor outcomes for patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Tighter control of serum glucose without reduction of nutritional support may improve the prognosis for these critically ill patients.

Harbingers of poor outcome the day after severe brain injury: hypothermia, hypoxia, and hypoperfusion.

BACKGROUND Traumatic brain injury (TBI) can be compounded by physiologic derangements that produce secondary brain injury. The purpose of this study is to elucidate the frequency with which physiologic factors that are associated with secondary brain injury occur in patients with severe closed head injuries and to determine the impact of these factors on outcome. METHODS The records of 81 adult blunt trauma patients with Glasgow Coma Scale scores < or = 8 and transport times < 2 hours to a Level I trauma center were retrospectively reviewed searching for the following 11 secondary brain injury factors (SBIFs) in the first 24 hours postinjury: hypotension, hypoxia, hypercapnia, hypocapnia, hypothermia, hyperthermia, metabolic acidosis, seizures, coagulopathy, hyperglycemia, and intracranial hypertension. We recorded the worst SBIF during six time periods: hours 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 to 14, and 16 to 24. Occurrence of each SBIF was then correlated with outcome. RESULTS Hypocapnia, hypotension, and acidosis occurred more frequently than other SBIFs (60-80%). Hypotension, hyperglycemia, and hypothermia were associated with increased mortality rate. Patients with episodes of hypocapnia, acidosis, and hypoxia had significantly longer intensive care unit length of stay (LOS). These three SBIFs and hyperglycemia related to longer hospital LOS as well. Hypotension and acidosis were associated with discharge to a rehabilitation facility rather than home. Finally, multivariate regression analysis revealed that hypotension, hypothermia, and Abbreviated Injury Scale score of the head were independently related to mortality, whereas other SBIFs, age, Injury Severity Score, and Glasgow Coma Scale score were not. Metabolic acidosis and hypoxia were related to longer intensive care unit and hospital LOS. CONCLUSION Our early management of head-injured patients stresses avoidance and correction of SBIFs at all costs. Nonetheless, SBIFs occur frequently in the first 24 hours after traumatic brain injury. Six of the 11 factors studied are associated with significantly worse outcomes. Hypotension and hypothermia are independently related to mortality. Because these SBIFs are potentially preventable, protocols could be developed to decrease their frequency.

Abdominal injuries without hemoperitoneum: a potential limitation of focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST)

BACKGROUND Focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) relies on hemoperitoneum to identify patients with injury. Blunt trauma victims (BTVs) with abdominal injury, but without hemoperitoneum, on admission are at risk for missed injury. METHODS Clinical, radiologic, and FAST data were collected prospectively on BTVs over a 12-month period. All patients with FAST-negative for hemoperitoneum were further analyzed. Examination findings and associated injuries were evaluated for association with abdominal lesions. RESULTS Of 772 BTVs undergoing FAST, 52 (7%) had abdominal injury. Fifteen of 52 (29%) had no hemoperitoneum by admission computed tomographic scan, and all had FAST interpreted as negative. Four patients with splenic injury underwent laparotomy. Six other patients with splenic injury and five patients with hepatic injury were managed nonoperatively. Clinical risk factors significantly associated with abdominal injury in BTVs without hemoperitoneum include: abrasion, contusion, pain, or tenderness in the lower chest or upper abdomen; pulmonary contusion; lower rib fractures; hemo- or pneumothorax; hematuria; pelvic fracture; and thoracolumbar spine fracture. CONCLUSIONS Up to 29% of abdominal injuries may be missed if BTVs are evaluated with admission FAST as the sole diagnostic tool. Consideration of examination findings and associated injuries should reduce the risk of missed abdominal injury in BTVs with negative FAST results.

Pre-existing disease in trauma patients: a predictor of fate independent of age and injury severity score.

Improvement in trauma management requires a better understanding of the effect of a patients preinjury health status on outcome. Specific historical findings and laboratory criteria were used to define pre-existing disease (PED) states and determine if they were independent predictors of fate in trauma victims. Of 7,798 adult patients admitted to a level I trauma center from July 1986 through June 1990, 16.0% (1,246) had greater than or equal to 1 PED. The PED+ and PED- patients had no significant difference in Injury Severity Scores (ISSs) (15.7 versus 15.6) and admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores (13.9 versus 13.8). The PED+ patients were older (49.2 versus 30.6 years) (p less than 0.001) and had a higher mortality rate (9.2% versus 3.2%) (p less than 0.001) than PED- patients. Mortality rates were also elevated for patients with greater than or equal to 2 PEDs (18%) and for those with renal disease (38%), malignancy (20%), and cardiac disease (18%) (p less than 0.001) compared with PED- patients. Controlling for age and ISS, there was an association between PED and mortality (Mantel-Haenszel p less than 0.03). Multivariate regression showed that PED is an independent predictor of mortality (R2 = 0.1918; p less than 0.0001). The greatest increases in mortality were found among patients less than 55 years and with ISS less than 20. Changes in prehospital triage criteria and outcome scoring are needed. Improvements in the management of trauma victims with chronic disease may decrease their mortality rate.

Penetrating colon injuries requiring resection: Diversion or primary anastomosis? An AAST prospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND The management of colon injuries that require resection is an unresolved issue because the existing practices are derived mainly from class III evidence. Because of the inability of any single trauma center to accumulate enough cases for meaningful statistical analysis, a multicenter prospective study was performed to compare primary anastomosis with diversion and identify the risk factors for colon-related abdominal complications. METHODS This was a prospective study from 19 trauma centers and included patients with colon resection because of penetrating trauma, who survived at least 72 hours. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to compare outcomes in patients with primary anastomosis or diversion and identify independent risk factors for the development of abdominal complications. RESULTS Two hundred ninety-seven patients fulfilled the criteria for inclusion and analysis. Overall, 197 patients (66.3%) were managed by primary anastomosis and 100 (33.7%) by diversion. The overall colon-related mortality was 1.3% (four deaths in the diversion group, no deaths in the primary anastomosis group, p = 0.012). Colon-related abdominal complications occurred in 24% of all patients (primary repair, 22%; diversion, 27%; p = 0.373). Multivariate analysis including all potential risk factors with p values < 0.2 identified three independent risk factors for abdominal complications: severe fecal contamination, transfusion of > or = 4 units of blood within the first 24 hours, and single-agent antibiotic prophylaxis. The type of colon management was not found to be a risk factor. Comparison of primary anastomosis with diversion using multivariate analysis adjusting for the above three identified risk factors or the risk factors previously described in the literature (shock at admission, delay > 6 hours to operating room, penetrating abdominal trauma index > 25, severe fecal contamination, and transfusion of > 6 units blood) showed no statistically significant difference in outcome. Similarly, multivariate analysis and comparison of the two methods of colon management in high-risk patients showed no difference in outcome. CONCLUSION The surgical method of colon management after resection for penetrating trauma does not affect the incidence of abdominal complications, irrespective of associated risk factors. Severe fecal contamination, transfusion of > or = 4 units of blood within the first 24 hours, and single-agent antibiotic prophylaxis are independent risk factors for abdominal complications. In view of these findings, the reduced quality of life, and the need for a subsequent operation in colostomy patients, primary anastomosis should be considered in all such patients.

Blunt traumatic rupture of the heart and pericardium. A ten-year experience (1979-1989)

Blunt traumatic rupture of the heart and pericardium, rarely diagnosed preoperatively, carries a high mortality rate. From 1979 to 1989, more than 20,000 patients were admitted to a Level I trauma center. A retrospective review identified 59 patients requiring emergency surgery for this condition. Injuries resulted from vehicular accidents (68%), motorcycle crashes (10%), pedestrians being struck by vehicles (7%), falls (5%), crushing (7%), and being struck by a horse (2%) or crane (2%). Seventeen patients (29%) had isolated rupture of the pericardium; 37 (63%) had ruptures of one or more cardiac chambers. All patients had signs of life at the scene or during transportation, but only 29 (49%) had vital signs on admission: 15 with chamber injury, 12 with pericardial rupture, and two with combined injuries. Diagnosis was established by emergency thoracotomy in the 30 patients who arrived in cardiac arrest. In the remaining 29 patients, diagnosis was made by urgent thoracotomy (41%), by subxiphoid pericardial window (34%), during laparotomy (21%), or by chest radiography (3%). The overall mortality rate was 76% (45 patients), but only 52% for those with vital signs on admission. Rapid transportation and expeditious surgical treatment can save many patients with these injuries.

Use of spiral computed tomography for the assessment of blunt trauma patients with potential aortic injury.

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to prospectively examine the accuracy of contrast-enhanced spiral thoracic computed tomography (CEST-CT) for direct detection of traumatic aortic injury resulting from blunt thoracic trauma. METHODS During a 25-month period, all blunt trauma patients who had abnormal mediastinal contours on admission chest radiographs underwent CEST-CT. The presence and location of mediastinal blood and any direct signs of aortic injury, such as pseudoaneurysm, were recorded. Computed tomographic results were compared with results of aortography, when performed, surgery, or clinical status at discharge. RESULTS There were 7,826 patients classified as having blunt trauma admitted during the study. Of these, 1,104 (14.3%) had CEST-CT performed. Mediastinal hemorrhage was detected on 118 (10.7%) of all thoracic computed tomographic scans. Direct evidence of aortic injury was detected in 24 patients (20.3%) with mediastinal hemorrhage and 2.2% of all patients undergoing CEST-CT. In this prospective series, CEST-CT was 100% sensitive based on clinical follow-up; it was 99.7% specific, with 89% positive and 100% negative predictive values and an overall diagnostic accuracy of 99.7%. CONCLUSION CEST-CT is a valuable ancillary study for the detection of traumatic aortic injury. Spiral computed tomography is accurate for the detection and localization of both hemomediastinum and direct signs of aortic injury.

Role of ultrasonography in penetrating abdominal trauma: A prospective clinical study

BACKGROUND Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) is rapidly establishing its place in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma. However, no prospective study specifically evaluates its role in penetrating abdominal trauma. METHODS Data were collected prospectively in 75 consecutive stable patients with penetrating trauma to the abdomen, flank, or back, from December 1998 to June 1999. Those with an obvious need for emergent laparotomy were excluded. FAST was performed as the initial diagnostic study on all patients. Wound location, type of weapon, and findings of diagnostic peritoneal lavage, triple-contrast computed tomographic scan, or laparotomy were recorded. The presence of peritoneal blood was noted. Data were analyzed using the chi(2) test. RESULTS Of the 75 patients, there were 32 stab and 43 gunshot wounds. There were 66 male patients and 9 female patients; the mean age was 30 years; 41 had proven abdominal injury and 34 had no injury; and 21 patients had a positive FAST. Nineteen had peritoneal blood and injuries requiring repair at the time of laparotomy. There were two false-positive studies. Fifty-four patients had a negative FAST. In 32 patients, this was a true-negative study. Thirteen patients had a false-negative FAST and had peritoneal blood and significant injury on further evaluation. Nine patients had a negative FAST and no peritoneal blood but still had abdominal injuries requiring operative repair, including liver (four), small bowel (four), diaphragm (three), colon (three), and stomach (one). The overall sensitivity of FAST was 46% and the specificity was 94%. The positive predictive value was 90%, and the negative predictive value was 60%. CONCLUSION FAST can be a useful initial diagnostic study after penetrating abdominal trauma. A positive FAST is a strong predictor of injury, and patients should proceed directly to laparotomy. If negative, additional diagnostic studies should be performed to rule out occult injury.