Aurora D. Pryor

Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Computer Simulator Versus Usage of Box Trainer for Endoscopic Surgery Training of Novices

OBJECTIVE Teaching of laparoscopic skills is a challenge in surgical training programs. Because of the highly technical nature and the steep learning curve, students and residents must learn laparoscopic skills before performing them in the operating room. To improve efficiency of learning and patient safety, research in simulation is essential. Two types of simulators currently in use include virtual reality and box trainers. Our study examined which simulator technique was most effective in teaching novice trainees laparoscopic techniques. DESIGN This is a prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled trial that enrolled fourth-year medical students and surgical interns to participate in a supervised 6-month laparoscopic training program with either computer simulators or box trainers. Subjects were randomized and trained on appropriate laparoscopic camera skills, instrument handling, object positioning, dissection, ligation, suturing, and knot tying. Students within one group were not allowed to practice, learn or train on the opposing trainers. At time points 0, 2, and 6 months all subjects completed a series of laparoscopic exercises in a live porcine model, which were captured on DVD and scored by blinded expert investigators. RESULTS Scores improved overall from the pretest to subsequent tests after training with no difference between the virtual reality and box simulator groups. In the medical students specifically, there was overall improvement, and improvement in the needle-transfer and knot-tying skills specifically, with no difference between the box simulator and virtual reality groups. For the interns, both groups showed significant overall improvement with no difference between the virtual reality and box simulator groups or on individual skills. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that laparoscopic simulator training improves surgical skills in novice trainees. We found both the box trainers and the virtual reality simulators are equally effective means of teaching laparoscopic skills to novice learners.

VersaStep™ trocar hernia rate in unclosed fascial defects in bariatric patients

ObjectiveUse of the VersaStepTM trocar system (US Surgical, Norwalk, CT) has the perceived advantage of minimal trocar-related hernias in patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (RYGB). We performed a retrospective review of our last 747 consecutive operative procedures using these trocars.Methods and proceduresThe patient population was 747 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic RYGB at Duke University Health System Weight Loss Surgery Center from January 2002 through April 2005. A total of 3735 radially expanded trocar sites were used. VersaStepTM trocars were used in all cases. The port configuration included one supraumbilical Hasson port, two 12-mm ports, and three 5-mm ports. The Hasson port was closed with a figure-of-eight number 1 Polysorb suture. All other trocar sites had no fascial closure. Intestinal anastomoses were created with a linear stapler in all of the laparoscopic cases, with hand suturing of the residual enterotomy. The fascial incisions were therefore not extended to accommodate an EEA stapler. The charts were reviewed for occurrence of subsequent trocar site hernias.ResultsThere were no hernias at any of the VersaStepTM trocar sites—an incidence of 0%. There were nine incisional hernias at the Hasson port site which later required surgical repair—an incidence of 1.20%.ConclusionsThere were no hernias detected at any of the 1494 12-mm or 2241 5-mm VersaStepTM trocar sites, despite lack of suture closure. At the Hasson port site, there was a hernia incidence of 1.20%. In the bariatric RYGB population, routine suture closure of the fascia or muscle is not necessary when using radially expanding VersaStepTM trocars.

Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with splenic preservation

BackgroundThe technique of distal pancreatectomy has been well described, both with en bloc resection of the spleen and with splenic preservation. Splenic preservation during pancreatic tail resection is desirable when oncologically appropriate, yet it is technically challenging, particularly with laparoscopic approaches. Skeletonization of the splenic artery and vein is associated with longer operative times and greater potential for bleeding. The authors report their experience with splenic preservation during laparoscopic pancreatic resection using ligation of the splenic vessels and preservation of the short gastric vessels.MethodsA retrospective chart review was performed for all patients who underwent attempted laparoscopic pancreatic resection at Duke University Medical Center from July 2002 to October 2005. Charts were analyzed for demographic information, length of hospital stay, conversion, splenic preservation, and postoperative complications.ResultsA total of 12 laparoscopic distal pancreatic resections were attempted for three men and nine women with a mean age was 55.8 years (range, 33–74 years). All 12 patients underwent distal pancreatectomy, 8 with splenic preservation. The spleen was removed from three patients using splenic hilar lesions that prevented splenic salvage. One patient required splenectomy secondary to more than 50% ischemia of the spleen. No patients with preoperatively diagnosed malignancy underwent splenic salvage. The final pathologic diagnosis included neuroendocrine tumors (n = 2), cystic serous (n = 4) and mucinous (n = 2) neoplasms, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) (n = 1), pancreatitis (n = 2), and adenocarcinoma (n = 1). Two patients underwent conversion to open surgery for thickened parenchyma secondary to chronic pancreatitis (17%). There were no other conversions. There were three chemical leaks (25%) diagnosed by elevated drain amylase and low volume output, which were managed with intraoperatively placed drains removed at the initial postoperative clinic visit. There were three higher volume leaks (25%) that required extended or percutaneous drainage, with eventual removal. The average blood loss was 215 ml (range, 50–700 ml). The average operative time was 3 h and 41 min (range, 2 h 15 min to 5 h 58 min). The average length of hospital stay was 4 days (range, 2–7 days).ConclusionSplenic preservation should be performed when technically possible to decrease the morbidity of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. The choice to ligate the splenic vessels allows for shorter operative times with minimal perioperative morbidity and blood loss while maintaining the spleen.

An electrocardiographic acuteness score for quantifying the timing of a myocardial infarction to guide decisions regarding reperfusion therapy.

Abstract The method of determining the acuteness score presented in the present study is suggested for use in automated electrocardiographic analysis systems. A potential use of the acuteness score is in combination with historical timing as a guideline for decisions regarding thrombolytic therapy. Patients with an acuteness score above a certain threshold and a brief time from symptom onset may benefit most from thrombolytic therapy. The relation between the levels of acuteness score and the quantity of myocardium salvaged was not determined in the present study because no measure of salvage was available in this population. A future study is suggested in which this relation is determined. An additional use of the acuteness score may be to assess myocardial reperfusion and salvage by examining the time course of progression in score between the ECGs before and sequentially after administration of thrombolytic therapy.

Preoperative weight gain does not predict failure of weight loss or co-morbidity resolution of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity

BACKGROUND Success with preoperative weight loss (PWL) is often mandated by the bariatric team to assess patient compliance and has been suggested to correlate with improved postoperative weight loss outcomes. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of 1629 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass at Duke University Medical Center. Patients with a preoperative weight gain (PWG) or loss of > or =10 lb were compared. Patients with <12 months of follow-up were excluded. RESULTS We found no difference between the 2 groups (PWG, n = 115, PWL, n = 88) with regard to age, gender, race, preoperative body mass index, presence of co-morbidities, or interval between the initial program-entry weight and surgery (149 versus 141 d). No difference was found in the percentage of excess weight loss (EWL) at 12 months, when calculated using the patients immediate preoperative weight (PWG group, 63.5% EWL versus PWL group, 63.9% EWL, P = NS). If the %EWL was calculated using the initial program-entry weight, the PWL did confer a transient postoperative weight loss advantage; however, this did not persist past 24 months postoperatively. At both 12 and 24 months, the resolution rates of diabetes (82% versus 83% at 2 yr; P = NS), hypertension (48% versus 42% at 2 yr, P = NS), and continuous positive airway pressure discontinuation (87% versus 87% at 1 yr, P = NS) were equivalent. No differences in perioperative complications or conversion rates were detected. The operative time was slightly longer for the PWG group (119.7 versus 104.9 min, P = .02). CONCLUSION The results of our study have shown that weight loss before laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is not mandatory and might deter patients from considering weight loss surgery. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass can be performed safely with equivalent co-morbidity resolution and %EWL regardless of PWG or PWL.

Endoluminal revision of gastric bypass for weight regain—a systematic review

BACKGROUND Weight recidivism after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a challenging problem for patients and bariatric surgeons alike. Traditional operative strategies to combat weight regain are technically challenging and associated with a high morbidity rate. Endoluminal interventions are thus an attractive alternative that may offer a good combination of results coupled with lower periprocedure risk that might one day provide a solution to this increasingly prevalent problem. The purpose of this article is to systematically review the available literature on endoluminal procedures used to address weight regain after RYGB, with specific attention to the safety profile, efficacy, cost, and current availability. This review focuses only on endoluminal procedures that are performed for weight regain after RYGB, as opposed to primary endoluminal obesity procedures. METHODS This study was a retrospective review. RESULTS Several methods of endoluminal intervention for weight regain are reviewed, ranging from injection of inert substances to suturing and clipping devices. The literature review shows the procedures on the whole to be well tolerated with limited efficacy. The majority of the literature is limited to small case series. Most of the reviewed devices are no longer commercially available. CONCLUSIONS Endoluminal therapy represents an intriguing strategy for weight regain after RYGB. However, the current and future technologies must be rigorously studied and improved such that they offer durable, repeatable, cost-effective solutions.

Combined historical and electrocardiographic timing of acute anterior and inferior myocardial infarcts for prediction of reperfusion acheivable size limitation

The historical time of acute symptom onset is not always an accurate indication of the timing of onset of an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Consideration of electrocardiographic (ECG) timing parameters could supplement historical timing alone as a clinical guide for decisions regarding the use of reperfusion therapy. Three hundred ninety-five patients from 4 trials of thrombolytic therapy conducted in the northwestern United States and western Canada are included in the present study. A total of 316 patients received either streptokinase or tissue plasminogen activator, and 79 received no reperfusion therapy. Historical time of symptom onset was acquired by emergency or cardiology department personnel and recorded on patient report forms. An ECG method for estimating the timing of the AMI, the Anderson-Wilkins (AW) acuteness score, was calculated from the initial standard 12-lead recording by investigators blinded to the knowledge of symptom duration or any other study variables. Tomographic thallium-201 imaging 7 weeks after hospital admission was used to measure final AMI size. The ECG timing method achieved a relation with final AMI size similar to that previously reported for historical timing. The AW acuteness score proved most useful for anterior AMI location when there was a > or = 2 hour delay following symptom onset, but was most useful for the inferior AMI location when there was a < 2 hour delay. Despite a longer delay, patients with high AW acuteness scores had 50% lower final anterior AMI size than those with low scores; and despite a shorter delay, those with low ECG acuteness scores had 50% greater final inferior AMI size than those with high scores. The AW acuteness score combined with the historical estimation of symptom duration should provide a more accurate basis for predicting the potential for limitation of final AMI size than either method alone. These results could potentially provide the basis for developing a new method for noninvasive guidance of clinical decisions regarding administration of reperfusion therapy in the initial evaluation of patients with AMI.

Endoluminal procedures for bariatric patients: expectations among bariatric surgeons

BACKGROUND Primary and revisional bariatric endoluminal procedures are currently being developed. Acceptable levels of risk and weight loss for these procedures have not yet been established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the expectations and concerns among bariatric surgeons regarding these procedures. METHODS The American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Emerging Technologies Committee developed a questionnaire that was distributed to the membership. Risk tolerance was assessed with comparison to commonly performed endoscopic and bariatric procedures. The percentage of excess weight loss (EWL) ranges were provided to assess the expectations for results 1 year after the procedure. RESULTS A total of 214 responses were returned. The acceptable level of risk to achieve 10-20% EWL after primary and revisional procedures was equivalent to, or less than, that of a therapeutic endoscopic procedure for 81% and 76% of respondents, respectively. The acceptable level of risk to achieve 30-40% EWL after primary and revisional procedures was equivalent to that after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for 45% and 35% of respondents, respectively and equivalent to that after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for 8% and 22%, respectively. In addition, 62% of respondents responded that 10-30% EWL would be acceptable for revisional procedures, and 35% responded that 10-30% EWL would be acceptable after a primary procedure. The primary concern was unproven efficacy, followed by durability, poor weight loss, availability of equipment, and procedural risk. Finally, 58% would not be willing to recommend an endoluminal procedure until the efficacy has been established, regardless of the risk. CONCLUSION Risk tolerance and weight loss expectations among bariatric surgeons are different for primary and revisional endoscopic procedures. Most surgeons were unwilling to consider endoluminal procedures for their patients until the efficacy has been proven.

The effect of national hospital accreditation in bariatric surgery on perioperative outcomes and long-term mortality

BACKGROUND Controversy exists regarding the relevance of Center of Excellence accreditation to bariatric surgery outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of national hospital accreditation on perioperative and long-term outcomes following bariatric surgery. METHODS Retrospective, longitudinal study using 2004-2010 data from the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative longitudinal administrative database (n = 47,342). Multivariable logistic regression analyzed outcomes following laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Accredited hospitals and accreditation year were identified from the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare website. Outcomes were analyzed with and without temporal correlation to accreditation year.>30-day mortality was determined from social security death records. RESULTS Risk of perioperative morbidity OR 1.4 (range 1.2-1.6, P<.001), mortality OR 2.6 (range 1.3-5.4, P = .01) and all-cause long-term mortality OR 1.4 (range 1.2-1.7, P = .0002) were significantly increased in unaccredited versus accredited hospitals on univariate analysis. In accredited hospitals, significant changes in payor and patient mix, operation, perioperative, and long-term outcomes were demonstrated following accreditation. A significant decrease in operations performed on black patients, Hispanic patients, and Medicare patients was also identified. Controlling for patient demographics, co-morbidity, insurance, and operative procedure, multivariable logistic regression demonstrated accreditation as independently associated with fewer major complications versus unaccredited hospitals OR 0.72 (range .63-.83, P<.001) and within the same hospital following accreditation OR .86 (range 0.77-0.96, P = .01). Following multiple cox proportional hazard model analysis, long-term mortality differences were not significant. CONCLUSION In New York State, bariatric hospital accreditation improved patient outcomes as compared to unaccredited hospitals and within the same hospital compared to preaccreditation. Significant changes were identified for some underserved at-risk populations. Measures to ensure equitable health care for at-risk populations following institutional accreditation are imperative.

Rates and risk factors for unplanned emergency department utilization and hospital readmission following bariatric surgery

Objective:To identify unplanned emergency resource utilization in the perioperative period following bariatric surgery. Summary of Background Data:Avoidable emergency department (ED) utilization and hospital readmissions pose a significant economic burden to our healthcare system. The extent of this problem is poorly studied in the bariatric literature. Methods:Using New York statewide longitudinal administrative data, 38,776 patients, who underwent primary bariatric surgery from 2010 to 2013, were analyzed. Multiple logistic regression models analyzed all variables with P < 0.05 on univariate models. Results:The 30-day unplanned ED utilization rate was 11.3% and 30-day hospital readmission rate was 5.3%. ED visits resulted in an inpatient admission 34.9% of the time. In total, 17.5% had 2 or more 30-day unplanned ED presentations. Patients presenting to the ED were more likely to be black, have pulmonary disease, be insured by the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services, travel further distances for index procedure, and have a surgical procedure other than gastric banding. In total, 46.7% presented to a nonindex hospital and 32.5% were admitted. Patients presenting to a nonindex hospital were significantly less likely to be admitted than those presenting to an index hospital. Conclusions:Unplanned perioperative healthcare utilization is a significant burden incurred by the bariatric population. A clear opportunity is identified for improvement in healthcare delivery—particularly for high-risk and high-frequency utilizers. Presentation to nonindex hospitals has important implications to the accuracy of current patient safety and quality outcomes measures. System measures designed to capture all unplanned resource utilization, not just those to index hospitals, are crucial for accurate evaluation.