Avak Kahvejian

Structure and function of the C-terminal PABC domain of human poly(A)-binding protein

We have determined the solution structure of the C-terminal quarter of human poly(A)-binding protein (hPABP). The protein fragment contains a protein domain, PABC [for poly(A)-binding protein C-terminal domain], which is also found associated with the HECT family of ubiquitin ligases. By using peptides derived from PABP interacting protein (Paip) 1, Paip2, and eRF3, we show that PABC functions as a peptide binding domain. We use chemical shift perturbation analysis to identify the peptide binding site in PABC and the major elements involved in peptide recognition. From comparative sequence analysis of PABC-binding peptides, we formulate a preliminary PABC consensus sequence and identify human ataxin-2, the protein responsible for type 2 spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA2), as a potential PABC ligand.

Dual interactions of the translational repressor Paip2 with poly(A) binding protein.

ABSTRACT The cap structure and the poly(A) tail of eukaryotic mRNAs act synergistically to enhance translation. This effect is mediated by a direct interaction of eukaryotic initiation factor 4G and poly(A) binding protein (PABP), which brings about circularization of the mRNA. Of the two recently identified PABP-interacting proteins, one, Paip1, stimulates translation, and the other, Paip2, which competes with Paip1 for binding to PABP, represses translation. Here we studied the Paip2-PABP interaction. Biacore data and far-Western analysis revealed that Paip2 contains two binding sites for PABP, one encompassing a 16-amino-acid stretch located in the C terminus and a second encompassing a larger central region. PABP also contains two binding regions for Paip2, one located in the RNA recognition motif (RRM) region and the other in the carboxy-terminal region. A two-to-one stoichiometry for binding of Paip2 to PABP with two independentKd s of 0.66 and 74 nM was determined. Thus, our data demonstrate that PABP and Paip2 could form a trimeric complex containing one PABP molecule and two Paip2 molecules. Significantly, only the central Paip2 fragment, which binds with high affinity to the PABP RRM region, inhibits PABP binding to poly(A) RNA and translation.

Paip1 Interacts with Poly(A) Binding Protein through Two Independent Binding Motifs

ABSTRACT The 3′ poly(A) tail of eukaryotic mRNAs plays an important role in the regulation of translation. The poly(A) binding protein (PABP) interacts with eukaryotic initiation factor 4G (eIF4G), a component of the eIF4F complex, which binds to the 5′ cap structure. The PABP-eIF4G interaction brings about the circularization of the mRNA by joining its 5′ and 3′ termini, thereby stimulating mRNA translation. The activity of PABP is regulated by two interacting proteins, Paip1 and Paip2. To study the mechanism of the Paip1-PABP interaction, far-Western, glutathione S-transferase pull-down, and surface plasmon resonance experiments were performed. Paip1 contains two binding sites for PABP, PAM1 and PAM2 (for PABP-interacting motifs 1 and 2). PAM2 consists of a 15-amino-acid stretch residing in the N terminus, and PAM1 encompasses a larger C-terminal acidic-amino-acid-rich region. PABP also contains two Paip1 binding sites, one located in RNA recognition motifs 1 and 2 and the other located in the C-terminal domain. Paip1 binds to PABP with a 1:1 stoichiometry and an apparent Kd of 1.9 nM.

Structural basis of ligand recognition by PABC, a highly specific peptide-binding domain found in poly(A)-binding protein and a HECT ubiquitin ligase

The C‐terminal domain of poly(A)‐binding protein (PABC) is a peptide‐binding domain found in poly(A)‐binding proteins (PABPs) and a HECT (homologous to E6‐AP C‐terminus) family E3 ubiquitin ligase. In protein synthesis, the PABC domain of PABP functions to recruit several translation factors possessing the PABP‐interacting motif 2 (PAM2) to the mRNA poly(A) tail. We have determined the solution structure of the human PABC domain in complex with two peptides from PABP‐interacting protein‐1 (Paip1) and Paip2. The structures show a novel mode of peptide recognition, in which the peptide binds as a pair of β‐turns with extensive hydrophobic, electrostatic and aromatic stacking interactions. Mutagenesis of PABC and peptide residues was used to identify key protein–peptide interactions and quantified by isothermal calorimetry, surface plasmon resonance and GST pull‐down assays. The results provide insight into the specificity of PABC in mediating PABP–protein interactions.

Poly(A) binding protein (PABP) homeostasis is mediated by the stability of its inhibitor, Paip2

The poly(A)‐binding protein (PABP) is a unique translation initiation factor in that it binds to the mRNA 3′ poly(A) tail and stimulates recruitment of the ribosome to the mRNA at the 5′ end. PABP activity is tightly controlled by the PABP‐interacting protein 2 (Paip2), which inhibits translation by displacing PABP from the mRNA. Here, we describe a close interplay between PABP and Paip2 protein levels in the cell. We demonstrate a mechanism for this co‐regulation that involves an E3 ubiquitin ligase, EDD, which targets Paip2 for degradation. PABP depletion by RNA interference (RNAi) causes co‐depletion of Paip2 protein without affecting Paip2 mRNA levels. Upon PABP knockdown, Paip2 interacts with EDD, which leads to Paip2 ubiquitination. Supporting a critical role for EDD in Paip2 degradation, knockdown of EDD expression by siRNA leads to an increase in Paip2 protein stability. Thus, we demonstrate that the turnover of Paip2 in the cell is mediated by EDD and is regulated by PABP. This mechanism serves as a homeostatic feedback to control the activity of PABP in cells.

Poly(A)-binding protein binds to A-rich sequences via RNA-binding domains 1+2 and 3+4.

Poly(A) binding protein (PABP) binds non-protein-coding BC1 RNA and BC200 RNA, which contain adenosine-rich domains. Two combinations of the four PABP RNA recognition motifs (RRMs), RRMs 1+2 and RRMs 3+4, bind with very strong affinities to various transcripts with long stretches of adenosine residues, whereas RRMs 2+3 bind weakly. While RRMs 1+2 preferentially bind to stretches that contain only adenosines, RRMs 3+4 exhibit relatively high affinities towards sequences that are interspersed with other nucleotides. Binding studies with oligoribonucleotide(A)65 and oligoribonucleotide(A)25 showed that the shorter RNA is not an ideal substrate for binding studies to model the interactions with mRNAs, which in general harbor long poly(A) tails.