Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Avi Ostfeld is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Avi Ostfeld.


Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management | 2010

State of the Art for Genetic Algorithms and Beyond in Water Resources Planning and Management

John W. Nicklow; Patrick M. Reed; Dragan Savic; Tibebe Dessalegne; Laura J. Harrell; Amy Chan-Hilton; Mohammad Karamouz; Barbara S. Minsker; Avi Ostfeld; Abhishek Singh; Emily M. Zechman

During the last two decades, the water resources planning and management profession has seen a dramatic increase in the development and application of various types of evolutionary algorithms (EAs). This observation is especially true for application of genetic algorithms, arguably the most popular of the several types of EAs. Generally speaking, EAs repeatedly prove to be flexible and powerful tools in solving an array of complex water resources problems. This paper provides a comprehensive review of state-of-the-art methods and their applications in the field of water resources planning and management. A primary goal in this ASCE Task Committee effort is to identify in an organized fashion some of the seminal contributions of EAs in the areas of water distribution systems, urban drainage and sewer systems, water supply and wastewater treatment, hydrologic and fluvial modeling, groundwater systems, and parameter identification. The paper also identifies major challenges and opportunities for the future, ...


Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management | 2014

Battle of the Water Networks II

Angela Marchi; Elad Salomons; Avi Ostfeld; Zoran Kapelan; Angus R. Simpson; Aaron C. Zecchin; Holger R. Maier; Zheng Yi Wu; Samir A. Mohamed Elsayed; Yuan Song; Thomas M. Walski; Christopher S. Stokes; Wenyan Wu; Graeme C. Dandy; Stefano Alvisi; Enrico Creaco; Marco Franchini; Juan Saldarriaga; Diego Páez; David Hernandez; Jessica Bohórquez; Russell Bent; Carleton Coffrin; David R. Judi; Tim McPherson; Pascal Van Hentenryck; José Pedro Matos; António Monteiro; Natercia Matias; Do Guen Yoo

The Battle of the Water Networks II (BWN-II) is the latest of a series of competitions related to the design and operation of water distribution systems (WDSs) undertaken within the Water Distribution Systems Analysis (WDSA) Symposium series. The BWN-II problem specification involved a broadly defined design and operation problem for an existing network that has to be upgraded for increased future demands, and the addition of a new development area. The design decisions involved addition of new and parallel pipes, storage, operational controls for pumps and valves, and sizing of backup power supply. Design criteria involved hydraulic, water quality, reliability, and environmental performance measures. Fourteen teams participated in the Battle and presented their results at the 14th Water Distribution Systems Analysis conference in Adelaide, Australia, September 2012. This paper summarizes the approaches used by the participants and the results they obtained. Given the complexity of the BWN-II problem and the innovative methods required to deal with the multiobjective, high dimensional and computationally demanding nature of the problem, this paper represents a snap-shot of state of the art methods for the design and operation of water distribution systems. A general finding of this paper is that there is benefit in using a combination of heuristic engineering experience and sophisticated optimization algorithms when tackling complex real-world water distribution system design problems


Water Resources Research | 2015

The future of water resources systems analysis: Toward a scientific framework for sustainable water management

Casey Brown; Jay R. Lund; Ximing Cai; Patrick M. Reed; Edith Zagona; Avi Ostfeld; Jim W. Hall; Gregory W. Characklis; Winston Yu; Levi D. Brekke

This paper presents a short history of water resources systems analysis from its beginnings in the Harvard Water Program, through its continuing evolution toward a general field of water resources systems science. Current systems analysis practice is widespread and addresses the most challenging water issues of our times, including water scarcity and drought, climate change, providing water for food and energy production, decision making amid competing objectives, and bringing economic incentives to bear on water use. The emergence of public recognition and concern for the state of water resources provides an opportune moment for the field to reorient to meet the complex, interdependent, interdisciplinary, and global nature of todays water challenges. At present, water resources systems analysis is limited by low scientific and academic visibility relative to its influence in practice and bridled by localized findings that are difficult to generalize. The evident success of water resource systems analysis in practice (which is set out in this paper) needs in future to be strengthened by substantiating the field as the science of water resources that seeks to predict the water resources variables and outcomes that are important to governments, industries, and the public the world over. Doing so promotes the scientific credibility of the field, provides understanding of the state of water resources and furnishes the basis for predicting the impacts of our water choices.


Urban Water | 2002

Reliability simulation of water distribution systems - single and multiquality

Avi Ostfeld; Dimitri Kogan; Uri Shamir

An application of stochastic simulation for the reliability analysis of single and multiquality water distribution systems (MWDS) is formulated and demonstrated. MWDS refers to systems in which waters of different qualities are taken from sources, possibly treated, mixed in the system, and supplied as a blend. The stochastic simulation framework was cast in a reliability analysis program (RAP), based on EPANET, and quantifying three reliability measures: the fraction of delivered volume (FDV), the fraction of delivered demand (FDD), and the fraction of delivered quality (FDQ). RAP is demonstrated on two example applications: a simple illustrative, and a more ‘‘real-life’’ complex one. The results quantify the reliability of the systems and provide lower bounds for the reliability measures adopted. 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.


Journal of Environmental Management | 2013

Multi-objective optimization of water quality, pumps operation, and storage sizing of water distribution systems.

W. Kurek; Avi Ostfeld

A multi-objective methodology utilizing the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm (SPEA2) linked to EPANET for trading-off pumping costs, water quality, and tanks sizing of water distribution systems is developed and demonstrated. The model integrates variable speed pumps for modeling the pumps operation, two water quality objectives (one based on chlorine disinfectant concentrations and one on water age), and tanks sizing cost which are assumed to vary with location and diameter. The water distribution system is subject to extended period simulations, variable energy tariffs, Kirchhoffs laws 1 and 2 for continuity of flow and pressure, tanks water level closure constraints, and storage-reliability requirements. EPANET Example 3 is employed for demonstrating the methodology on two multi-objective models, which differ in the imposed water quality objective (i.e., either with disinfectant or water age considerations). Three-fold Pareto optimal fronts are presented. Sensitivity analysis on the storage-reliability constraint, its influence on pumping cost, water quality, and tank sizing are explored. The contribution of this study is in tailoring design (tank sizing), pumps operational costs, water quality of two types, and reliability through residual storage requirements, in a single multi-objective framework. The model was found to be stable in generating multi-objective three-fold Pareto fronts, while producing explainable engineering outcomes. The model can be used as a decision tool for both pumps operation, water quality, required storage for reliability considerations, and tank sizing decision-making.


Engineering Optimization | 2007

An adaptive heuristic cross-entropy algorithm for optimal design of water distribution systems

Lina Perelman; Avi Ostfeld

The optimal design problem of a water distribution system is to find the water distribution system component characteristics (e.g. pipe diameters, pump heads and maximum power, reservoir storage volumes, etc.) which minimize the systems capital and operational costs such that the system hydraulic laws are maintained (i.e. Kirchhoffs first and second laws), and constraints on quantities and pressures at the consumer nodes are fulfilled. In this study, an adaptive stochastic algorithm for water distribution systems optimal design based on the heuristic cross-entropy method for combinatorial optimization is presented. The algorithm is demonstrated using two well-known benchmark examples from the water distribution systems research literature for single loading gravitational systems, and an example of multiple loadings, pumping, and storage. The results show the cross-entropy dominance over previously published methods.


Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems | 2008

Genetic algorithm for contaminant source characterization using imperfect sensors

Ami Preis; Avi Ostfeld

Abstract A simple, straightforward, modified genetic algorithm scheme for contaminant source characterization using imperfect sensors is presented and demonstrated in this study. Previous work on this subject concentrated on developing source-inversion models using sensors that provide accurate, unbiased, contamination concentration measurements. The developed contamination source-detection model is implemented using three sensor types: (1) perfect sensors providing accurate, unbiased, contamination concentration measurements; (2) sensors transmitting fuzzy measured information (i.e., high, medium, and low contamination); and (3) ‘0–1’ (Boolean) sensors indicating only a contamination presence. A comparison between the three sensor types is explored taking into consideration thesystems response time (i.e., the time elapsed between a contaminant detection and a decision-makers response action). The methodology capabilities are demonstrated using two example applications of increasing complexity, showing the trade-offs between the sensor types and the model abilities to receive a unique solution to the source-detection problem.


Environmental Modelling and Software | 2013

Limited multi-stage stochastic programming for managing water supply systems

Mashor Housh; Avi Ostfeld; Uri Shamir

Decision-making processes often involve uncertainty. A common approach for modeling uncertain scenario-based decision-making progressions is through multi-stage stochastic programming. The size of optimization problems derived from multi-stage stochastic programs is frequently too large to be addressed by a direct solution technique. This is due to the size of the optimization problems, which grows exponentially as the number of scenarios and stages increases. To cope up with this computational difficulty, solution schemes turn to decomposition methods for defining smaller and easier to solve equivalent sub-problems, or through using scenario-reduction techniques. In our study a new methodology is proposed, titled Limited Multi-stage Stochastic Programming (LMSP), in which the number of decision variables at each stage remains constant and thus the total number of decision variables increases only linearly as the number of scenarios and stages grows. The LMSP employs a decision-clustering framework, which utilizes the optimal decisions obtained by solving a set of deterministic optimization problems to identify decision nodes, which have similar decisions. These nodes are clustered into a preselected number of clusters, where decisions are made for each cluster instead of for each individual decision node. The methodology is demonstrated on a multi-stage water supply system operation problem, which is optimized for flow and salinity decisions. LMSP performance is compared to that of classical multi-stage stochastic programming (MSP) method.


Urban Water | 2001

Reliability analysis of regional water distribution systems

Avi Ostfeld

Abstract Reliability analysis of water distribution systems is a complex task. A review of the literature reveals that there is currently no universally acceptable definition or measure for the reliability of water distribution systems as it requires both the quantification of reliability measures and criteria that are meaningful and appropriate, while still computationally feasible. This paper focuses on a tailor-made reliability methodology for the reliability assessment of regional water distribution systems in general, and its application to the regional water supply system of Nazareth, in particular. The methodology is comprised of two interconnected stages: (1) analysis of the storage–conveyance properties of the system, and (2) implementation of stochastic simulation through use of the US Air Force Rapid Availability Prototyping for Testing Operational Readiness (RAPTOR) software.


Engineering Optimization | 2006

Conjunctive optimal scheduling of pumping and booster chlorine injections in water distribution systems

Avi Ostfeld; Elad Salomons

This article extends previous work on optimal booster chlorination injection design and operation in water distribution systems by solving the scheduling problem of pumping units in conjunction with the design and operation problem of booster chlorination stations. Two models are formulated and solved using a genetic algorithm scheme tailor-made to EPANET: Min Cost—for minimizing the costs of pumping and the chlorine booster design and operation, and Max Protection—for maximizing the system protection by maximizing the injected chlorine dose. An example application is explored through a base run and sensitivity analysis showing that the algorithm proposed is robust and reliable, and that the pump and chlorine injection scheduling are mutually connected.

Collaboration


Dive into the Avi Ostfeld's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lina Perelman

Technion – Israel Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Elad Salomons

Technion – Israel Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ami Preis

Technion – Israel Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Uri Shamir

Technion – Israel Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nurit Oliker

Technion – Israel Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Olya Skulovich

Technion – Israel Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eyal Price

Technion – Israel Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ori Lahav

Technion – Israel Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jonathan Arad

Technion – Israel Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge