Avinash Bonda
Tata Memorial Hospital
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Avinash Bonda.
Transplant Infectious Disease | 2018
Saurabh Zanwar; Punit Jain; Anant Gokarn; Santhosh Kumar Devadas; Sachin Punatar; Sachin Khurana; Avinash Bonda; Ritesh Pruthy; Vivek Bhat; Sajid Qureshi; Navin Khattry
Central venous catheters (CVCs) represent a significant source of infection in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and can add to the cost of care, morbidity, and mortality. Organisms forming biofilms on the inner surface of catheters require a much higher local antibiotic concentration to clear the pathogen growth. Antibiotic lock therapy (ALT) represents one such strategy to achieve such high intraluminal concentrations of antibiotics and can facilitate catheter salvage. Patients with catheter colonization (CC) or hemodynamically stable catheter‐related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) received ALT per institutional policy. We analyzed the incidence of CC and CRBSI and salvage rate of tunneled CVCs (Hickman) with ALT in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant in this retrospective study. Catheter colonization was noted in 9.8% and CRBSI in 10.7% patients. Gram‐negative bacilli (GNB) accounted for 45% and 83% of isolates in CC and CRBSI, respectively. In patients with CRBSI, the rate of catheter salvage with the use of ALT in addition to systemic antibiotics was 86% compared to 55% in patients with systemic antibiotics use only (P = 0.06). There was no CRBSI related mortality, and no increase in resistant strains was noted at subsequent CRBSI. In conclusion, ALT represents an important strategy for catheter salvage, especially for gram‐negative infections, in a carefully selected patient population.
Journal of Blood & Lymph | 2018
Selma Zenia D Silva; Pankaj Diwedi; Sachin Punatar; Anant Gokarn; Avinash Bonda; Manisha Tambe; Sunil B. Rajadhyaksha; Navin Khattry; Meenakshi Singh
Background: Killer Immunoglobulin like receptor (KIR) genes that modulate Natural Killer cell alloreactivity have been linked with predicting haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplant outcomes. Study design and methods: We present two haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HHSCT) scenarios, wherein after engraftment there was graft loss. We hypothesized that this phenomenon was due to KIR ligand matches/mismatches. The KIR ligand matches/mismatches were examined in both patient donor pairs. Results: Patient 1 and 2 were 11/12 and 12/12 match for HLA A, B, C, DRB1, DQB1 and DPB1 in GvH respectively, and their donors were 6/12 and 7/12 HLA match in HvG directions. It was observed that there was KIR activating receptor (aKIR) match and stronger KIR inhibitory receptor (iKIR) mismatch in GvH direction which resulted in removal of leukemic cells. Moreover, in the HvG direction, the stronger aKIR match led to graft rejection. Conclusion: This study highlights the implication of KIR-HLA interaction in predicting graft survival. Citation: D’Silva SZ, Diwedi P, Punatar S, Gokarn A, Bonda A, et al. (2018) Killer Immunoglobulin like Receptor-Human Leukocyte Antigen Ligand Match/Mismatch in Graft Loss Post Transplant Cyclophosphamide Based Hap loidentical Transplant. J Blood Lymph 8: 225. doi: 10.4172/2165-7831.1000225
Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion | 2018
Kalasekhar Vijaysekharan; Sachin Punatar; Avinash Bonda; Aniket Mohite; Kartthik Shanmugam; Lingaraj Nayak; Anant Gokarn; Navin Khattry
Musculoskeletal involvement in chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) can be extremely crippling. Manifestations of musculoskeletal cGVHD are varied and can include fasciitis, myositis, weakness, cramping, joint stiffness and contractures. Pathogenetically, in musculoskeletal GVHD there is accumulation of alloimmune donor T-cells in the muscles, joints, and soft tissues. Release of cytokines by these activated T-cells results in fibroblast proliferation and activation. Cross talk between these alloimmune T-cells with macrophage will further augment the fibrosis. Alloimmune donor T cells also activate B-cells resulting in the production of auto antibodies directed against joints and muscular tissues [1]. Thus, pathophysiology of musculoskeletal GVHD closely mimics many autoimmune disorders. Though systemic steroids may improve clinical manifestations of musculoskeletal GVHD, prolonged usage of steroids is associated with several long term complications and predisposition to infections. Steroid sparing agents like Cyclosporine, Tacrolimus, Sirolimus, Mycophenolate mofetil, Etanercept, Low dose Methotrexate have been used with variable success. Olivieri et al. [2] described the role of Imatinib in chronic GVHD associated with fibrotic changes. Many of these drugs are associated with adverse effects like reactivation of infections, organ toxicities and some of them are costly. Leflunomide with its anti-T cell proliferative action has shown to be useful in rheumatoid arthritis [3]. Leflunomide has been shown to be effective in prevention and treatment of GVHD in various animal models [4, 5]. We describe our patient with Musculoskeletal GVHD who responded to single agent Leflunomide. A 46 year old female with Myelodysplastic syndrome (RAEB2) with progression to acute myeloid leukemia underwent haploidentical stem cell transplant with her 8/10 HLA matched son. Her baseline comorbidities included remote hepatits B infection for which she was on prophylaxis with lamivudine. Her conditioning regimen was reduced intensity with fludarabine, and treosulfan. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine (CsA), mycofenolate mofetil (MMF) and post-transplant cyclophosphamide. Her immediate post-transplant period was complicated by febrile neutropenia, voriconazole induced visual hallucinations and CsA related headache. She engrafted on day ? 11 and developed engraftment related fever needing low dose steroids for few days. MMF was stopped on day ? 36 and CsA tapering was started from day ? 91. On Day ? 125 her liver enzymes were found to be mildly elevated on routine blood workup. Virology testing did not show any seroconversion. HBV DNA and HCV RNA PCR were negative. She was continued on lamivudine. Suspecting liver GVHD, cyclosporine tapering was withheld temporarily. Her liver enzymes showed a declining trend by day ? 130. On day ? 133 she started having bilateral shoulder pain with some restriction of movements. This worsened gradually and 2 weeks later (day ? 144), she had severe restriction of movements, increased pain, joint stiffness in small joints of hand and difficulty in getting up from sitting position. MRI of shoulder joints ruled out avascular necrosis. A clinical diagnosis of musculoskeletal GVHD was made. Her baseline PROM score was 21 and NIH joint score was 2. Since her manifestations resembled rheumatoid arthritis, she was started on oral leflunomide (100 mg once a day for first 3 days followed by 20 mg & Navin Khattry [email protected]
Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia | 2018
Bhausaheb Bagal; Tanmoy Mandal; Avinash Bonda; Sachin Punatar; Anant Gokarn; Prashant Tembhare; Hasmukh Jain; Nikhil Patkar; Sridhar Epari; Manju Sengar; Navin Khattry; Tanuja Shet; Sumit Gujral; Shripad Banavali
S282 Context: Castleman ’s Disease (CD) is the rare lymphoproliferative disease masking a number of hematologic, oncological and autoimmune diseases. Objective: To determine the frequency of occurrence of the diseases which are followed by Castleman-like similar changes in lymph nodes. Materials and methods: Medical records of the 48 patients with preliminary diagnosis CD directed in outpatient department from 2016 to 2017. All patients were examined according to the recommendations of the international working group on the study of CD. Morphological study of lymph node tissue biopsies included the assessment of regressed or hyperplastic germinal centers, follicular dendritic cell prominence, vascularization and polytypic plasmacytosis in the interfollicular spaces by the point system from 0 to 3 grades. Results: Morphological picture in 24 lymph node tissue biopsies, from 24 of 48 patients corresponded to the first large criterion of diagnosis of CD. In these cases, comparison of clinical and laboratory data allowed to confirm the diagnosis of C D. The greatest divergence was observed in cases with a generalized lymphadenopathy. From 15 patients with the preliminary diagnosis multicentric CD the diagnosis has been confirmed in 20%. Diagnosis CD was changed to the Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) in three cases, to NHL in three cases, to the connective tissue disease and solid tumors in two cases respectively, to primary amyloidosis in one patient, and to multiple myeloma in one patient. In cases with local specific involvement the diagnosis of CD has been confirmed in 63.6%. The range of the revealed diseases included: a reactive lymphadenopathy in 6 cases, a tumor not of the lymphoid nature in two cases, HL at the one patient and NHL at the three patients. Conclusion: Inspection of patients with suspected diagnosis of CD according to the recommendations of the international working group has shown that the frequency of occurrence of the diseases which are followed by Castleman-like similar changes in lymph nodes varies from 36,4 to 80% and depends on prevalence of process. The range of the diseases demanding an exception includes HL and NHL, connective tissue disease, other neoplastic processes and reactive conditions.
Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia | 2018
Sachin Punatar; Avinash Bonda; Anant Gokarn; Lingaraj Nayak; Aniket Mohite; Kartthik Shanmugam; Navin Khattry
Christophe Willekens, Alina Danu, Julien Lazarovici, David Ghez, Eric Solary, Vincent Ribrag, Jean-Henri Bourhis, Cristina Castilla-Llorente Department of Hematology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, Villejuif, France; Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, INSERM U1170, Villejuif, France; Faculty of Medicine, Université Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France Context: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) represents a curative option in elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. Reduced intensity conditioning regimens (RIC) have decreased treatment related toxicity. In 2014, Sorror et al., proposed a risk-adapted approach integrating AML-, HCTand patient-specific risk factors guiding decisions about HCT versus no HCT in elderly patients. Objective: To determine overall survival (OS); Relapse-free survival (RFS); Non-relapse mortality (NRM) and cumulative incidence of relapse (RI). To evaluate, after stratifying patients according to the risk-adapted approach, the NRM, relapse and survival rates according to the HCT-CI comorbidity score. Design: In our center, we analyzed retrospectively, between 2010 and 2016, a cohort of AML patients aged more than 60 years. We classified them according to the risk-adapted model into 3 categories: favorable, intermediate and unfavorable risk. Results: 47 patients were included. Median age was 64 years. The median follow-up was 6 years. At 3 years, OS was 63% (95% CI: 48-79%), RFS 57% (95% CI: 42-72%), RI 30% (95% CI: 18-49%) and NRM 16% (95% CI: 8-31%). Using the risk-adapted strategy, two patients had a favorable risk, 17 patients an intermediate and 28 patients an unfavorable risk. In the intermediate risk group, all patients had low HCT-CI (score 0-2). The NRM was 25% (4 patients). 75% (13 patients) were still alive, free from disease. In the unfavorable risk group, 20 patients had a low and 8 patients a high (score>3) HCT-CI. In patients with a low HCT-CI, the relapse and NRM were 21% (n1⁄46) and 7% (n1⁄42) respectively, and 43% (n1⁄4 12) were still alive at the last follow-up. In patients with a high HCT-CI, the relapse and NRM were 4% (n1⁄41) and 11% (n1⁄43) respectively, and 14% (n1⁄44) were still alive at the last followup. Conclusion: Our study shows a low transplant-related toxicity with promising long-term outcome in elderly patients. The observed RFS and OS, especially in the unfavorable risk AML patients, compares favorably with the results obtained with chemotherapy alone and suggest clear benefits from allogeneic HCT regardless of the HCT-CI comorbidity score.
Bone Marrow Transplantation | 2018
Avinash Bonda; Sachin Punatar; Anant Gokarn; Aniket Mohite; Kartthik Shanmugam; Lingaraj Nayak; Mounika Bopanna; Badira Cheriyalinkal Parambil; Navin Khattry
Adult ALL is a heterogeneous disease both clinically and genetically. The management of ALL in adults remains a daunting task. The therapeutic options in relapsed / refractory setting post allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are limited. The emergence of targeted immunotherapeutic strategies in cancers paved way for the detection of suitable targets and drugs with cytotoxic abilities. However no safe and effective immunotherapies have been developed for T ALL. CD 38, also referred to as T10, was identified in 1980 in a project investigating cell surface molecules of human WBC using thymocyte-specific murine monoclonal antibodies [1]. It is recognized as a marker of both differentiation and activation of lymphocytes. It is expressed at high levels on the cell surface of activated T cells and terminally differentiated B cells, but at relatively low levels on normal lymphoid and myeloid cells [2]. Most notably, CD 38 is expressed in a large number of hematological malignancies [3–12]. Daratumumab is a human IgG1κ monoclonal antibody that binds to a unique CD 38 epitope and recently FDA approved for the treatment of refractory multiple myeloma. Preclinical studies have shown that CD 38 is a relevant target in T ALL and its surface expression does not change with chemotherapy [13]. Hence daratumumab with its broad antitumor spectrum may be used in T ALL. We report a patient with early precursor T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia who relapsed post allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and was salvaged with daratumumab. A 32-year-old lady presented to our center in June 2013, with generalized lymphadenopathy. On evaluation she was diagnosed to have an acute leukemia of ambiguous lineage (CD 13, CD 33, CD 38, CD 45 and CD 7 positive). She received induction chemotherapy with 3+ 7 (cytarabine and daunorubicin) followed by three cycles of high dose cytarabine consolidation. She was in morphological complete remission. After a treatment-free interval of 2 months, she relapsed with an early precursor T cell phenotype (CD 1a negative, TdT, CD 10, CD 34, CD 38 positive). She was then given ALL like induction therapy and achieved a complete remission without measurable residual disease (MRD negative). She underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation from a matched sibling donor with myeloablative conditioning (cyclophosphamide with total body irradiation) in January 2014. She relapsed after 21 months. The marrow revealed 76% lymphoid blasts expressing CD 34, CD 7, CD 10, CD 38 and negative for CD 1a, CD 4, and CD8. She received salvage induction with vincristine, etoposide, bortezomib, dexamethasone, adriamycin and L asparaginase. With this, she did not achieve remission. This was followed by one cycle of FLAG IDA with which she achieved complete remission morphologically (but with MRD of 0.17% by flow cytometry). As she had another fully HLA matched sibling donor, she underwent second allogeneic stem cell transplant with reduced intensity conditioning (fludarabine+ treosulfan) in February 2016. In view of a high risk of relapse, she received prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) on day +94 along with lenalidomide 10 mg per day subsequently. She developed skin and liver GVHD which was managed with systemic steroids and topical tacrolimus. Bone marrow studies done at day 90 and 1 year after 2nd allogeneic transplant showed MRD negativity. She developed a relapse after 18 months with marrow showing 86% lymphoid blasts with CD 7 bright, CD 1a negative, CD 20 negative, CD 34 bright, and CD 38 bright while CD 4 and CD 8 were negative. In view of her young age and good performance status, she received salvage chemotherapy with pegylated L asparaginase, dexamethasone, bortezomib and vincristine. During this chemotherapy she developed sub-acute bilateral lower * Navin Khattry [email protected]
South Asian Journal of Cancer | 2017
Amit Joshi; V. Patil; Vanita Noronha; Anant Ramaswamy; Sudeep Gupta; Atanu Bhattacharjee; Avinash Bonda; Mv Chandrakanth; Vikas Ostwal; Navin Khattry; Shripad Banavali; Kumar Prabhash
Background: We are a tertiary care cancer center and have approximately 1000–1500 emergency visits by cancer patients undergoing treatment under the adult medical oncology unit each month. However, due to the lack of a systematic audit, we are unable to plan steps toward the improvement in quality of emergency services, and hence the audit was planned. Methods: All emergency visits under the adult medical oncology department in the month of July 2015 were audited. The cause of visit, the demographic details, cancer details, and chemotherapy status were obtained from the electronic medical records. The emergency visits were classified as avoidable or unavoidable. Descriptive statistics were performed. Reasons for avoidable emergency visits were sought. Results: Out of 1199 visits, 1168 visits were classifiable. Six hundred and ninety-six visits were classified as unavoidable (59.6%, 95% CI: 56.7–62.4), 386 visits were classified as probably avoidable visit (33.0%, 95% CI: 30.4–35.8) whereas the remaining 86 (7.4%, 95% CI: 6.0–9.01) were classified as absolutely avoidable. Two hundred and ninety-seven visits happened on weekends (25.6%) and 138 visits converted into an inpatient admission (11.9%). The factors associated with avoidable visits were curative intention of treatment (odds ratio - 2.49), discontinued chemotherapy status (risk ratio [RR] - 8.28), and private category file status (RR – 1.89). Conclusion: A proportion of visits to emergency services can be curtailed. Approximately one-fourth of patients are seen on weekends, and only about one-tenth of patients get admitted.
Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia | 2017
Anant Gokarn; Avinash Bonda; Libin Mathew; Bhausaheb Bagal; Deepa Philip; Sadhana Kannan; Navin Khattry
Indian Journal of Cancer | 2018
Navin Khattry; Siddhartha Laskar; Manju Sengar; Venkatesh Rangarajan; Tanuja Shet; Pg Subramanian; Sridhar Epari; Bhausaheb Bagal; Jayantsastri Goda; Archi Agarwal; Hasmukh Jain; Prashant Tembhare; Nikhil Patkar; Nehal Khanna; Sachin Punatar; Anant Gokarn; Dhanlakshmi Shetty; Hemani Jain; Avinash Bonda; Vikram Gota; Syed Khizer Hasan; Jyoti Kode; Shilpee Dutt; Suyash Kulkarni; Nitin Shetty; Nilesh Sable; Jayita Deodhar; Sunita Jadhav; Preeti Pawaskar; Libin Mathew
Blood | 2016
Davinder Paul; Anant Gokarn; Vasudev Bhat; Vivek Bhat; Avinash Bonda; Saurabh Zanwar; Libin Mathew; Sadhana Kannan; Deepa Susan; Tapan Saikia; Navin Khattry