Avishag Laish-Farkash
Sheba Medical Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Avishag Laish-Farkash.
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology | 2010
Avishag Laish-Farkash; Michael Glikson; Dovrat Brass; Dina Marek-Yagel; Elon Pras; Nathan Dascal; Charles Antzelevitch; Eyal Nof; Haya Reznik; Michael Eldar; David M. Luria
Novel HCN4 Mutation.u2002Objectives: To conduct a clinical, genetic, and functional analysis of 3 unrelated families with familial sinus bradycardia (FSB).
American Journal of Cardiology | 2011
Alon Barsheshet; Ilan Goldenberg; Moshe Garty; Shmuel Gottlieb; Amir Sandach; Avishag Laish-Farkash; Michael Eldar; Michael Glikson
There is controversy regarding type of bundle branch block (BBB) that is associated with increased mortality risk in patients with heart failure (HF). The present study was designed to explore the association between BBB pattern and long-term mortality in hospitalized patients with systolic HF. Risk of 4-year all-cause mortality was assessed in 1,888 hospitalized patients with systolic HF (left ventricular ejection function <50%) without a pacemaker in a prospective national survey. Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to compare mortality risk in patients with right BBB (RBBB; 10%), left BBB (LBBB; 14%), and no BBB (76%) on admission electrocardiogram. At 4 years of follow up, mortality rates were highest in patients with RBBB (69%), intermediate in those with LBBB (63%), and lowest in those without BBB (50%, p <0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated a significant 36% increased mortality risk in patients with RBBB versus no BBB (p = 0.002) but no significant difference in mortality risk for patients with LBBB versus no BBB (hazard ratio 1.04, p = 0.66). RBBB versus LBBB was associated with a 29% (p = 0.035) increased risk for 4-year mortality in the total population and with a 58% (p = 0.015) increased risk in patients with ejection fraction <30%. In conclusion, RBBB but not LBBB on admission electrocardiogram is associated with a significant increased long-term mortality risk in hospitalized patients with systolic HF. Deleterious effects of RBBB compared to LBBB appear to be more pronounced in patients with more advanced left ventricular dysfunction.
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology | 2018
Eran Leshem; Mahmoud Suleiman; Avishag Laish-Farkash; Moti Haim; Michael Geist; David Luria; Michael Glikson; Ilan Goldenberg; Yoav Michowitz
BackgroundCardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective treatment for heart failure (HF); however, a third of patients are non-responders. The development of quadripolar left ventricular (LV) lead was shown, mainly in single manufactures’ registry, to improve LV remodeling and overall mortality. However, limited reports exist on the impact of quadripolar LV leads on HF hospitalization rates in real-life cohorts. We evaluated the clinical outcomes associated with quadripolar LV leads in a large nation-wide registry including all patients implanted with a cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D).MethodsBetween July 2010 and October 2016, 2913 consecutive patients were implanted with a CRT-D and all were prospectively enrolled in the Israeli ICD Registry. Quadripolar LV leads were implanted in 973 (33.4%) patients during this period, and their clinical outcomes were compared to CRT-D recipients implanted with a bipolar LV lead. Primary endpoint was HF hospitalization rate.ResultsQuadripolar leads were implanted more in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and for primary prevention indication and less in post-infarction patients and for secondary prevention of sudden death. Longer QRS duration was observed with quadripolar leads (147u2009±u200923 vs 143u2009±u200925; pu2009<u20090.001). Outcome event rate for 100 patient years revealed no difference in HF hospitalization rates between bipolar and quadripolar LV leads. Quadripolar lead implant led to lower cardiac mortality, with no influence on overall mortality. Multivariate analysis revealed no significant differences in study endpoints between bipolar and quadripolar LV leads.ConclusionIn a large real-life registry, implantation of quadripolar LV leads in patients with CRT-D did not influence HF hospitalization rates.
Journal of Atrial Fibrillation | 2017
Avishag Laish-Farkash; Mahmoud Suleiman
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has become the mainstay of therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) and one of the most frequently performed procedures in the cardiac electrophysiology laboratory. PVI by a single-tip radiofrequency (RF) ablation catheter remains a complex and time-consuming procedure, especially in centers with limited experience. In order to simplify the PVI procedure, to shorten it and reduce the complication rate, circular multi-electrode catheters were introduced for simultaneous mapping and ablation. The common concept of these single-shot AF ablation technologies is the creation of circular lesions for PVI by placing the ablation device at the antrum of the pulmonary veins without the need for continuous repositioning. In this review we describe the main features of two circular non-balloon ablation catheters- PVAC®, which is based on the phased RF, duty-cycled ablation technology, and nMARQ™, the irrigated multi-electrode electro-anatomically guided catheter - and compare the clinical outcomes of these technologies, mainly for paroxysmal AF patients, based on current available data.
American Journal of Cardiology | 2017
Ido Goldenberg; Alon Barsheshet; Avishag Laish-Farkash; Moshe Swissa; Jorge E. Schliamser; Yoav Michowitz; Michael Glikson; Mahmoud Suleiman
Anemia was shown to be associated with increased risk for adverse events in patients with heart failure (HF). However, there are limited data on the association between anemia and the risk for ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). The present study population comprised 2,352 patients who were enrolled and prospectively followed up in the Israeli ICD Registry. The risk for a first appropriate ICD shock for VA was assessed by the presence of anemia, categorized at the lower tertile of hemoglobin distribution (≤12u2009g/dL [nu2009=u2009753]). Patients who had anemia displayed higher risk clinical characteristics including older age, more advanced HF symptoms, and atrial fibrillation (pu2009<0.01 for all). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that at 2.5 years of follow-up the rate of appropriate shocks was significantly higher in patients with low (11%) versus high (6%) hemoglobin (log-rank pu2009<0.005). Multivariate analysis showed that anemia was independently associated with a significant 56% increased risk for first appropriate ICD shock (pu2009<0.026). When hemoglobin was assessed as a continuous measure, each 1u2009g/dL reduction in hemoglobin was independently associated with a significant 8% increased risk for first appropriate shock (pu2009<0.03). Anemia was also associated with increased risk for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4 to 2.27], pu2009<0.001), HF hospitalizations or death (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.48 to 1.13, pu2009<0.001), but not with inappropriate ICD shocks (HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.70 to 2.21, pu2009=u20090.47). In conclusion, our findings suggest that the presence of anemia in patients with ICD is associated with increased risk for VA during long-term follow-up.
Archive | 2016
Avishag Laish-Farkash; Amos Katz; Ornit Cohen; Evgeny Fishman; Chaim Yosefy; Vladimir Khalameizer
Journal of Cardiology & Current Research | 2017
Avishag Laish-Farkash; Vladimir Khalameizer; Amos Katz
/data/revues/00029149/unassign/S0002914917314613/ | 2017
Ido Goldenberg; Alon Barsheshet; Avishag Laish-Farkash; Moshe Swissa; Jorge E. Schliamser; Yoav Michowitz; Michael Glikson; Mahmoud Suleiman
Europace | 2016
Avishag Laish-Farkash; Sharon Bruoha; Ilan Goldenberg; Mahmoud Suleiman; Yoav Michowitz; Vladimir Khalameizer; Amos Katz
Circulation | 2016
Eran Leshem; Michael Rahkovich; Anna Mazo; Mahmoud Suleiman; Miri Blich; Avishag Laish-Farkash; Yuval Konstantino; Rami Fogelman; Boris Strasberg; Michael Geist; Israel Chetboun; Moshe Swissa; Michael Ilan; Yoav Michowitz; Raphael Rosso; Michael Glikson; Bernard Belhassen