Axel Hanauske

Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Escalated Doses of Weekly Intravenous Infusion of CCI-779, a Novel mTOR Inhibitor, in Patients With Cancer

PURPOSEnTo establish the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic parameters of CCI-779, a selective inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin, in patients with advanced cancer.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnUsing a modified continuous reassessment method, we performed a phase I with pharmacokinetic study of CCI-779 given as a weekly 30 minutes intravenous (I.V.) infusion.nnnRESULTSnTwenty-four patients received CCI-779 at doses ranging 7.5 to 220 mg/m(2). No immunosuppressive effect was reported. Dose-limiting thrombocytopenia occurred in two patients at 34 or 45 mg/m(2). At 220 mg/m(2), dose-limiting toxicities consisted of manic-depressive syndrome, stomatitis, and asthenia in two of nine patients, preventing further dose escalation. The most frequent drug-related toxicities were acne-like, maculopapular rashes and mucositis or stomatitis. All toxicities were reversible on treatment discontinuation. Maximum concentration and area under the concentration-time curve increase sub-proportionally with dose. Mean steady-state volume of distribution ranged from 127 to 385L. Sirolimus was a major metabolite (metabolite-to-parent ratio range, 2.5 to 3.5). Whole blood clearance was nonlinear, ranging from 19 to 51 L/h (34 to 220 mg/m(2)). Variability predicted with flat doses appears comparable with data based on body-surface area-normalized treatment. Partial responses were observed in one patient with renal clear-cell carcinoma and in one patient with breast adenocarcinoma.nnnCONCLUSIONnCCI-779 displayed no immunosuppressive effects with manageable and reversible adverse events at doses up to 220 mg/m(2), the highest dose tested. Based on our results, weekly doses of 25, 75, and 250 mg CCI-779 not based on classical definitions of maximum-tolerated dose are being tested in phase II trials in patients with breast and renal cancer.

Phase III Trial of Pemetrexed Plus Best Supportive Care Compared With Best Supportive Care in Previously Treated Patients With Advanced Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

PURPOSEnThis multicenter, phase III study compared overall survival (OS) of second-line pemetrexed plus best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC alone in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Secondary end points included response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), time to tumor progression (TTP), time to treatment failure (TTF), and toxicity.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnPatients with relapsed MPM after first-line chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) plus BSC (P+BSC) every 21 days or BSC alone.nnnRESULTSnThe study enrolled 243 patients (123 on P+BSC arm and 120 on BSC arm). Median OS time was not significantly different between the arms (8.4 months for P+BSC and 9.7 months for BSC; P = .74). Cox regression modeling suggested a trending survival benefit for patients who responded to first-line therapy. Time-to-event measures significantly favored P+BSC (median PFS, TTP, and TTF). Partial response was achieved in 18.7% and 1.7% of patients in P+BSC and BSC arms, respectively (P < .0001), and a disease control rate (partial response plus stable disease) was achieved in 59.3% and 19.2% of patients in P+BSC and BSC arms, respectively (P < .0001). Use of postdiscontinuation chemotherapy was significantly greater among BSC patients compared with P+BSC patients (51.7% v 28.5%, respectively; P = .0002), with more BSC patients receiving pemetrexed (18.3% v 3.3%, respectively; P = .0001). Postdiscontinuation therapy was initiated earlier for BSC than P+BSC patients (median time to initiation, 4.3 v 15.7 months, respectively; log-rank P < .0001). Chemotherapy was well tolerated, with expected modest (4% to 7%) grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities.nnnCONCLUSIONnSecond-line pemetrexed elicited significant tumor response and delayed disease progression compared with BSC alone in patients with advanced MPM. Improvement in OS was not seen in this study, possibly because of the significant imbalance in postdiscontinuation chemotherapy between the arms.

Clinical and Pharmacokinetic Phase I Study of Multitargeted Antifolate (LY231514) in Combination With Cisplatin

PURPOSEnMultitargeted antifolate (MTA; LY231514) has broad preclinical antitumor activity and inhibits a variety of intracellular enzymes involved in the folate pathways. This study was designed to (1) determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), and pharmacokinetics of MTA combined with cisplatin; (2) determine a recommended dose for phase II studies; and (3) collect anecdotal information on the antitumor activity of MTA combined with cisplatin.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnPatients with solid tumors received MTA intravenously over 10 minutes and cisplatin over 2 hours once every 21 days. In cohort 1, both agents were administered on day 1 starting with MTA 300 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 60 mg/m(2). In cohort 2, MTA (500 or 600 mg/m(2)) was administered on day 1, followed by cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)) on day 2.nnnRESULTSnIn cohort 1, 40 assessable patients received 159 courses of treatment. The MTD was MTA 600 mg/m(2)/cisplatin 100 mg/m(2). DLTs were reversible leukopenia/neutropenia and delayed fatigue. Hydration before cisplatin therapy did not influence MTA pharmacokinetics. Eleven objective remissions included one complete response in a patient with relapsed squamous cell head and neck carcinoma, and partial responses in four of ten patients with epithelial pleural mesothelioma. In cohort 2, 11 assessable patients received 23 courses of treatment. The MTD was MTA 600 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2). DLTs were neutropenic sepsis, diarrhea, and skin toxicity. Two patients died of treatment-related complications during the study. Two patients had objective remissions (one mesothelioma patient, one colon cancer patient).nnnCONCLUSIONnThe combination of MTA and cisplatin is clinically active, and administering both agents on day 1 is superior to a split schedule. Further development of this combination for mesothelioma is warranted.

Phase III Study of Pemetrexed Plus Carboplatin Compared With Etoposide Plus Carboplatin in Chemotherapy-Naive Patients With Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSEnFollowing a phase II trial in which pemetrexed-platinum demonstrated similar activity to that of historical etoposide-platinum controls, a phase III study was conducted to compare pemetrexed-carboplatin with etoposide-carboplatin for the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnChemotherapy-naive patients with ES-SCLC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of zero to 2 were randomly assigned to receive pemetrexed-carboplatin (pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) on day 1; carboplatin at area under the serum concentration-time curve [AUC] 5 on day 1) or etoposide-carboplatin (etoposide 100 mg/m(2) on days 1 through 3; carboplatin AUC 5 on day 1) every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. The primary objective of the study was noninferiority of pemetrexed-carboplatin overall survival with a 15% margin.nnnRESULTSnAccrual was terminated with 908 of 1,820 patients enrolled after results of a planned interim analysis. In the final analysis, pemetrexed-carboplatin was inferior to etoposide-carboplatin for overall survival (median, 8.1 v 10.6 months; hazard ratio [HR],1.56; 95% CI, 1.27 to 1.92; log-rank P < .01) and progression-free survival (median, 3.8 v 5.4 months; HR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.58 to 2.17; log-rank P < .01). Objective response rates were also significantly lower for pemetrexed-carboplatin (31% v 52%; P < .001). Pemetrexed-carboplatin had lower grade 3 to 4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and leukopenia than etoposide-carboplatin; grade 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia was comparable between arms and anemia was higher in the pemetrexed-carboplatin arm.nnnCONCLUSIONnPemetrexed-carboplatin is inferior for the treatment of ES-SCLC. Planned translational research and pharmacogenomic analyses of tumor and blood samples may help explain the study results and provide insight into new treatment strategies.

A phase II trial of pemetrexed in advanced breast cancer: clinical response and association with molecular target expression.

Purpose: This phase II trial of pemetrexed explored potential correlations between treatment outcome (antitumor activity) and molecular target expression. Experimental Design: Chemonaïve patients with advanced breast cancer received up to three cycles of pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 (10-minute i.v. infusion) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle, with folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation. Tumors were surgically removed after the last cycle of pemetrexed as clinically indicated. Biopsies were taken at baseline, 24 hours after infusion in cycle 1, and after cycle 3. Results: Sixty-one women (median age, 46 years; range, 32-72 years) were treated and were evaluable for response. Objective response rate was 31%. Simple logistic regression suggested a potential relationship between mRNA expression of thymidylate synthase (TS) and pemetrexed response (P = 0.103). Based on threshold analysis, patients with “low” baseline TS (≤71) were more likely to respond to pemetrexed than patients with “high” baseline TS (>71). Expression of baseline dihydrofolate reductase and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyl transferase tended to be higher in responders but this association was not significant (P > 0.311). TS expression increased significantly between baseline and biopsy 2 (P = 0.004) and dropped to near baseline levels at biopsy 3. Conversely, dihydrofolate reductase and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyl transferase decreased after pemetrexed chemotherapy. Conclusions: Our results suggest a potential association between “low” pretreatment TS expression levels and response to pemetrexed chemotherapy. Future trials examining expression levels of other genes important to the folate pathway and/or breast cancer may identify a more robust multigene profile that can better predict response to this novel antifolate.

Phase I Trial of 6-Hour Infusion of Glufosfamide, a New Alkylating Agent With Potentially Enhanced Selectivity for Tumors That Overexpress Transmembrane Glucose Transporters: A Study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Early Clinical Studies Group

PURPOSEnTo determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), the principal toxicities, and the pharmacokinetics of 6-hour infusion of glufosfamide (beta-D-glucosylisophosphoramide mustard; D-19575), a novel alkylating agent with the potential to target the glucose transporter system.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnTwenty-one patients (10 women and 11 men; median age, 56 years) with refractory solid tumors were treated with doses ranging from 800 to 6,000 mg/m(2). Glufosfamide was administered every 3 weeks as a two-step (fast/slow) intravenous infusion over a 6-hour period. All patients underwent pharmacokinetic sampling at the first course.nnnRESULTSnThe MTD was 6,000 mg/m(2). At this dose, two of six patients developed a reversible, dose-limiting renal tubular acidosis and a slight increase in serum creatinine the week after the second and third courses of treatment, respectively, whereas three of six patients experienced short-lived grade 4 neutropenia/leukopenia. Other side effects were generally mild. Pharmacokinetics indicated linearity of area under the time-versus-concentration curve against dose over the dose range studied and a short elimination half-life. There was clear evidence of antitumor activity, with a long-lasting complete response of an advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma and minor tumor shrinkage of two refractory colon carcinomas and one heavily pretreated breast cancer.nnnCONCLUSIONnThe principal toxicity of 6-hour infusion of glufosfamide is reversible renal tubular acidosis, the MTD is 6,000 mg/m(2), and the recommended phase II dose is 4, 500 mg/m(2). Close monitoring of serum potassium and creatinine levels is suggested for patients receiving glufosfamide for early detection of possible renal toxicity. Evidence of antitumor activity in resistant carcinomas warrants further clinical exploration of glufosfamide in phase II studies.

Phase II trial of the oral platinum complex JM216 in non-small-cell lung cancer: An EORTC early clinical studies group investigation

BACKGROUNDnJM216 is a new oral platinum complex with dose-limiting toxicity myelosuppression, now undergoing phase II evaluation.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnJM216 was evaluated as first line therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer. Seventeen patients received 120 mg/m2/day for five days repeated every three weeks.nnnRESULTSnToxicity was manageable, the commonest side-effects being nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, constipation and asthenia. Myelososuppression was generally grade < 2 and there were no cases of neutropenic sepsis or bleeding. Thirteen patients were fully evaluable for response. No sustained objective responses were reported. One patient was reported as stable disease had a partial response after three courses but was progressing again after four. An additional five patients had stable disease (46.2%).nnnCONCLUSIONSnAlthough some patients may have had useful palliation, JM216 did not appear to have significant antitumour activity in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic trial of the podophyllotoxin derivative NK611 administered as intravenous short infusion.

Background: NK611 is a novel podophyllotoxin derivative. Compared with etoposide, NK611 carries a dimethyl-amino group at the D-glucose moiety. The antitumor activity of NK611 showed to be equal or superior to etoposide in a variety of in vitro and in vivo tumor models. The aim of our present study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicities of NK611 administered as intravenous infusion over 30 min every 28 days.Patients and methods: 45 patients (7 female, 38 male; median age 54 [range 37–73]) were enrolled. In a first stage, NK611 was administered without hematopoietic growth factor support; in a second stage, G-CSF was used for further dose escalation. Toxicities were assessed using WHO-criteria.Results: Initially, the dose was escalated from 60 mg/m2 to 120 mg/m2. In a second patient cohort, doses were further escalated with G-CSF support with doses ranging from 140 mg/m2 to 250 mg/m2. Dose-limiting toxicities were granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia. Non-hematologic toxicities consisted of alopecia, mild nausea, and infection. Four partial responses were observed: two at 200 mg/m2 (pleural mesothelioma, response duration 7 months, and non-small cell lung cancer, response duration 13 months), and two at 250 mg/m2 (hepatocellular carcinoma, response duration 7 months, and non-small cell lung cancer, response duration 2 months). Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed in all patients. Using an open 3-compartment model, the terminal half-life (t1/2γ) was 14.7 ± 3.7 h. The AUC at 250 mg/m2 was determined to be 330 ± 147 μg/mlh, the plasma clearance of NK611 was 16.2 ± 8.2 ml/min · m2 and the Vss was 16.8 ± 3.3 l/m2. Protein binding of NK611 was 98.7%.Conclusion: the recommended dose for clinical Phase II studies is 120 mg/m2 without G-CSF support and 200 mg/m2 with G-CSF support.

Hyphenated techniques in anticancer drug monitoring. II. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry.

High-performance liquid chromatography has become the separation technique of choice for the monitoring of generally thermolabile anticancer agents. With the introduction of electrospray mass spectrometry, the coupling of liquid chromatogaphy and mass spectrometry has opened the way to widely and routinely applied anticancer drug monitoring. Real-time metabolism versus degradation can now be distinguished, since derivatization is no longer obligatory. This is important for the monitoring of the anabolic and catabolic pathways of the same agent, such as 5-fluorouracil. Detection limits almost equal to those obtained with capillary gas chromatography-mass spectrometry are realistic with the latest generation of mass spectrometers, enabling quantitative analysis of various anticancer agents and their metabolites down to the low ng/ml level. Furthermore, sample clean-up and chromatography can be downscaled markedly using the latest column technologies, such as the generally applied 10 cm x 2.8 mm I.D. RP 18 columns. The coupling of capillary electrophoresis to mass spectrometry is today far from a routine application in anticancer drug monitoring. Nevertheless, interesting applications have been reported and are selected for the present review.

Carzelesin phase II study in advanced breast, ovarian, colorectal, gastric, head and neck cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and malignant melanoma: A study of the EORTC early clinical studies group (ECSG)

Purpose: In a phaseu2009II trial, the activity of carzelesin, a cyclopropylpyrroloindole prodrug analog, was assessed. Patients and methods: Carzelesin was used as second- or third-line chemotherapy in patients with breast, ovarian, head and neck cancer and non-Hodgkins lymphoma, and as first-line chemotherapy in patients with colorectal and gastric cancer and melanoma. The drug was given as a bolus infusion at a 4-weekly dose of 150u2009μg/m2. A total of 140 patients were entered and a total of 285 courses were administered. Results: In general, the compound was well tolerated. Myelotoxicity was the most common toxicity. Grade 3 and 4 leukopenia was observed in 18.6% of the courses, neutropenia in 20.3%, thrombocytopenia in 16.2% and anemia in 8.7%. Double nadirs were seen in a total of 41 courses for neutrophils, in 40 for leukocytes and in 3 for platelets. Non-hematological toxicity was very mild. Only one partial response in a patient with melanoma was seen. Conclusions: At this dose and schedule carzelesin did not yield activity in the types of tumors studied.