Ayaka Kinoshita

Standardized less invasive living donor hemihepatectomy using the hybrid method through a short upper midline incision.

BACKGROUND Recently, applications of less invasive liver surgery in living donor hepatectomy (LDH) have been reported. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a hybrid method with a midline incision for LDH. METHODS Hemihepatectomy using the hybrid method was performed in the fifteen most recent among 150 living donors who underwent surgery between 1997 and August 2011. Six donors underwent right hemihepatectomy and 9 underwent left hemihepatectomy. An 8-cm subxiphoid midline incision was created for hand assistance during liver mobilization and graft extraction. After sufficient mobilization of the liver, the hand-assist/extraction incision was extended to 12 cm for the right hemihepatectomy and 10 cm for a left hemihepatectomy. Encircling the hepatic veins and hilar dissection were performed under direct vision. Parenchymal transection was performed with the liver hanging maneuver. Bile duct division was performed after visualizing the planned transection point by encircling the bile duct using a radiopaque marker filament under real-time C-arm cholangiography. RESULTS All procedures were completed without any extra subcostal incision. All grafts were safely extracted through the 10-12-cm upper midline incision without mechanical injury. No donors required an allogeneic transfusion; all of them have returned to their preoperative activity levels. CONCLUSION LDH by the hybrid method with a short upper midline incision is a safe procedure.

Hybrid procedure in living donor liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND We have previously reported a hybrid procedure that uses a combination of laparoscopic mobilization of the liver and subsequent hepatectomy under direct vision in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We present the details of this hybrid procedure and the outcomes of the procedure. METHODS Between January 1997 and August 2014, 204 LDLTs were performed at Nagasaki University Hospital. Among them, 67 recent donors underwent hybrid donor hepatectomy. Forty-one donors underwent left hemihepatectomy, 25 underwent right hemihepatectomy, and 1 underwent posterior sectionectomy. First, an 8-cm subxiphoid midline incision was made; laparoscopic mobilization of the liver was then achieved with a hand-assist through the midline incision under the pneumoperitoneum. Thereafter, the incision was extended up to 12 cm for the right lobe and posterior sector graft and 10 cm left lobe graft procurement. Under direct vision, parenchymal transection was performed by means of the liver-hanging maneuver. The hybrid procedure for LDLT recipients was indicated only for selected cases with atrophic liver cirrhosis without a history of upper abdominal surgery, significant retroperitoneal collateral vessels, or hypertrophic change of the liver (n = 29). For total hepatectomy and splenectomy, the midline incision was sufficiently extended. RESULTS All of the hybrid donor hepatectomies were completed without an extra subcostal incision. No significant differences were observed in the blood loss or length of the operation compared with conventional open procedures. All of the donors have returned to their preoperative activity level, with fewer wound-related complaints compared with those treated with the use of the conventional open procedure. In recipients treated with the hybrid procedure, no clinically relevant drawbacks were observed compared with the recipients treated with a regular Mercedes-Benz-type incision. CONCLUSIONS Our hybrid procedure was safely conducted with the same quality as the conventional open procedure in both LDLT donors and recipients.

Self-assessment of postoperative scars in living liver donors.

The application of less invasive techniques for liver surgery in patients undergoing living donor hepatectomy (LDH) has been reported. The objective of this study was to evaluate physical status according to type of incision in donors.

A modified Foker’s technique for long gap esophageal atresia

External traction using the Foker’s technique enables elongation in the esophageal segments within days, and allows the primary repair of the long gap. This article presents our modified Foker’s technique which was easily applicable for long-gap esophageal atresia.

Preoperative simulation with a 3-dimensional printed solid model for one-step reconstruction of multiple hepatic veins during living donor liver transplantation

Meticulous preoperative volumetry of the partial liver graft is essential for both assessing the postoperative graft function and to ensure the donor safety in the field of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We herein report the case of a 53-year-old patient who underwent LDLT for hepatitis C virusinfected liver cirrhosis complicated with hepatocellular carcinoma. Preoperative 3D images were obtained using a 3D image analysis system to evaluate the graft volume and possible congested volume after implantation in LDLT, which revealed that a large middle hepatic vein drained a vast area in the right lobe. The extended left graft was considered to be small for size of the recipient, with an estimated congested area of 407 ml, which was equivalent to 39% of the donor’s liver volume in the remnant right lobe. We decided to use a right lobe graft with the middle hepatic vein, because the volume was considered to be sufficient. A preoperative contrast-enhanced CT scan revealed a distance of 2 cm between the donor’s right hepatic vein and middle hepatic vein at the estimated Cantlie line. Because of the location, we planned to use autologous portal vein Y-graft interposition for the hepatic venous anastomosis. Three-dimensional printed solid models of the donor’s right lobe graft and the Y-graft from the recipient’s portal vein were also made for preoperative simulation using the Vincent program. Based on the estimation, we were able to evaluate whether to reconstruct the middle hepatic vein tributaries or anomalous hepatic veins in LDLT. The 3D solid model was effective for preoperative simulation and planning, which made it easy to imagine the reconstructed shape of the anastomosis with appropriate spatial perception.

The Impact of Treated Bacterial Infections within One Month before Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Adults

BACKGROUND The impact of treated preoperative bacterial infections on the outcome of living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is not well defined. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of pre-transplant bacterial infections within one month before LDLT and their impact on the post-transplant morbidity and mortality. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the records of 50 adult LDLT recipients between January 2009 and October 2011. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they had episodes of bacterial infections within one month before LDLT. RESULTS There were 20 patients who required antimicrobial therapy for pre-transplant infections. The pre-transplant infections comprised urinary tract infections (35%), cholangitis (10%), pneumonia (10%), bacteremia (5%), spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (5%), acute sinusitis (5%), subcutaneous abscess (5%), and empirical treatment (25%). Patients with pre-transplant infections had higher Child-Pugh scores [median, 11 vs. 9.5, P<0.05] and model for end-stage liver disease scores [median, 17.5 vs. 14, P<0.05] compared with the other patients. There were no correlations between the pathogens involved in the pre-transplant infections and those involved in post-transplant infections. The incidence of post-transplant infections was higher in the pre-transplant infection group within one week after LDLT, but was almost the same within one month after LDLT. The one-year survival rates were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS Although pre-transplant infections are associated with a high risk of postoperative bacterial infection shortly after LDLT, they did not affect the short-term outcome when they had been appropriately treated before transplantation.

Evaluation of immune function under conversion from Prograf to Advagraf in living donor liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND Although some reports have shown the safety and efficacy of conversion from Prograf to Advagraf in liver transplantation, there have been no reports showing the change of immune function after conversion. The aim of this study is not only to analyze the safety and efficacy of conversion from Prograf to Advagraf, but also to evaluate the immune function using the ImmuKnow assay. MATERIAL AND METHODS Of the 168 living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) patients, 21 recipients whose liver function was stable after discharge in outpatient clinic and who agreed to conversion from Prograf to Advagraf were enrolled in this study. Liver, renal, and immune functions were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS There were no significant differences in liver and renal function after conversion from Prograf to Advagraf. The intracellular adenosine triphosphate levels before and after conversion were 263±157 and 256±133 ng/ml, respectively, and there was also no significant difference in immune function. None of the recipients showed adverse effects, rejection, or severe infection during the study. It should be further noted that none of the recipients had to increase the dose of Advagraf, while five of 21 recipients (24%) were able to reduce the dose of Advagraf during this study. CONCLUSIONS Conversion from Prograf to Advagraf in LDLT can be performed safely and effectively without affecting liver, renal, and immune function.

Up-regulated extracellular matrix components and inflammatory chemokines may impair the regeneration of cholestatic liver.

Although the healthy liver is known to have high regenerative potential, poor liver regeneration under pathological conditions remains a substantial problem. We investigated the key molecules that impair the regeneration of cholestatic liver. C57BL/6 mice were randomly subjected to partial hepatectomy and bile duct ligation (PH+BDL group, n = 16), partial hepatectomy only (PH group, n = 16), or sham operation (Sham group, n = 16). The liver sizes and histological findings were similar in the PH and sham groups 14 days after operation. However, compared with those in the sham group, the livers in mice in the PH+BDL group had a smaller size, a lower cell proliferative activity, and more fibrotic tissue 14 days after the operation, suggesting the insufficient regeneration of the cholestatic liver. Pathway-focused array analysis showed that many genes were up- or down-regulated over 1.5-fold in both PH+BDL and PH groups at 1, 3, 7, and 14 days after treatment. Interestingly, more genes that were functionally related to the extracellular matrix and inflammatory chemokines were found in the PH+BDL group than in the PH group at 7 and 14 days after treatment. Our data suggest that up-regulated extracellular matrix components and inflammatory chemokines may impair the regeneration of cholestatic liver.

Efficiency of herbal medicine Dai-kenchu-to on portal blood flow in rat models

Introduction To clarify the influence of Dai-Kenchu-To (DKT) on portal blood flow (PBF), PBF was continuously measured with Doppler ultrasound. Methods Normal liver rats were divided into a DKT 90 mg/kg, DKT 270 mg/kg administered group, and control, while cirrhotic liver rats were divided into a DKT-LC 90 mg/kg administered group and Control-LC. The PBF was measured after the administration of either DKT or water for 60 min by laser Doppler flowmetry system. Results The PBF in the DKT 90 increased approximately 10 min after DKT was administrated, and elevated levels were maintained for approximately 10 min. A comparison of the increase in PBF by the calculating the area under the curve (AUC) revealed that flow was significantly higher in the DKT 90 compared to either the control or the DKT 270 (p < 0.05). The cirrhotic liver group showed stable PBF in both the DKT-LC and Control-LC. The AUC, revealed no significant difference between the DKT-LC and Control-LC. Discussion DKT induced an increase in PBF in normal livers; however, its effects were insufficient to increase PBF in the cirrhotic livers. No increase in the portal blood flow in the cirrhotic liver rats was probably the result of the cirrhotic liver, which had fibrotic change, and, therefore, may not have had sufficient compliance to accept the increasing blood flow volume from the intestinal tract. Conclusion We suggested DKT has the potential to protect the liver by increasing PBF when the liver has either normal or mild to moderate dysfunction.

Post-operative complications requiring hospitalization more than one yr after living donor liver transplantation

The long‐term outcomes after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) have not been clearly established. This retrospective study assessed long‐term outcomes after LDLT through reviewing complications requiring hospitalization more than one yr after engraftment.