Ayşe A. Küçükdeveci

The development and psychometric assessment of the Turkish version of the Nottingham Health Profile.

The Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) is a widely used measure of perceived health status. The aim of the present study was to adapt the NHP for use in Turkey and to test its psychometric properties. Following translation and testing for its face and content validity, 50 patients with osteoarthritis were interviewed on two occasions. Each interview included administration of the NHP and the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), a measure of functional disability. Test-retest reliability of the new version was satisfactory and comparable with other available language versions. As predicted, high correlations were found between the HAQ and the physical mobility, pain and energy level sections of the NHP and low correlations between the HAQ and emotional reactions, social isolation and sleep, confirming the construct validity of the NHP. It is concluded that the adaptation of the NHP into Turkish was successful but that additional studies are required to assess its suitability for use with other patient populations and its equivalence to other language versions of the measure.

Effects of ankle-foot orthoses on hemiparetic gait

Objective: Ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) are widely used to provide optimal ambulation in people with hemiplegia. In this study we evaluated the mechanical effects of metallic and plastic AFOs on severely hemiparetic stroke patients. Methods: Twelve hemiparetic patients were analysed on a Vicon 370 Motion Analysis System. Spatiotemporal, kinematic and kinetic parameters were measured. Results: The two types of orthoses generally had similar positive effects on hemiplegic gait parameters, increasing cadence, walking speed, single and double step length, ankle dorsiflexion angle at heel strike and swing. The metallic AFO was better at increasing the ankle dorsiflexion angle than the plastic AFO. Conclusion: Hemiplegic gait was improved by both orthoses. However, metallic AFOs provided better stabilization of the ankle, allowing improved heel strike and push-off.

Adaptation of the Functional Independence Measure for use in Turkey

Objective: To adapt the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) for use in Turkey and to assess its validity and reliability. Design: After the translation procedure, reliability was assessed using internal consistency, inter-rater reliability (kappa) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Construct validity was tested by association with impairments and by fit of data to the Rasch model. Setting: The study was undertaken in an inpatient rehabilitation unit of the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ankara. Subjects: Consecutive stroke (n = 51) and spinal cord injury (SCI) (n = 62) patients admitted for rehabilitation over a period of three years were assessed at admission and discharge. Results: Internal consistency was good for stroke, and for SCI. The level of agreement between two raters was sufficient with kappa levels of above 0.48 for SCI and above 0.44 for stroke. Minimum ICC found was 0.90. Construct validity showed expected associations with the impairment scales. However, Rasch analysis showed that bladder and bowel items compromise unidimensionality in the motor scale. Conclusion: Adaptation of the FIM has been successful and it can be used in Turkey as long as the limitations are recognized.

Adaptation of the modified Barthel Index for use in physical medicine and rehabilitation in Turkey.

The aim of this study was to adapt the modified Barthel Index for Turkey and to determine its reliability and validity. After the translation procedure, 50 stroke patients and 50 spinal cord injury patients, undergoing inpatient rehabilitation were assessed by the newly adapted index at admission and discharge. Reliability was tested using internal consistency, inter-rater reliability and the intra-class correlation coefficient. Construct validity was assessed by association with impairments (Brunnstrom motor stages in stroke, American Spinal Injury Association motor/sensory scores and impairment scale in spinal cord injury) and by Rasch analysis. Internal consistency was good at 0.93 for stroke, and 0.88 for spinal cord injury. The level of agreement between two raters was sufficient with Kappa levels of above 0.5 for spinal cord injury and above 0.6 for stroke. Intra-class correlation coefficients were 0.99 and 0.77 for stroke and spinal cord injury, respectively. The newly adapted index showed expected associations with the impairment scales, confirming its construct validity. However, Rasch analysis showed that bladder and bowel items compromise unidimensionality. In conclusion, adaptation of the modified Barthel Index has been successful and it can be used in Turkey as long as its limitations are recognized.

Validation of the Turkish version of the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire for use in low back pain

Study Design. A reliability and validity study of a previously translated version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). Objectives. To validate the Turkish version of the RMDQ for use in low back pain. Summary of Background Data. Clinical and epidemiologic research related to low back pain in the Turkish population would be facilitated by the availability of well-established outcome measures. Methods. A total of 81 outpatients with low back pain, 64 of whom were followed up on a second occasion, were assessed by the RMDQ. Reliability was assessed using internal consistency and the intraclass correlation coefficient. Internal construct validity was assessed by Rasch analysis; external construct validity was assessed by association with pain and spinal movement. Responsiveness was tested by both the nonparametric and parametric effect sizes. Results. Internal consistency of the RMDQ is found to be adequate (>0.85) at both times, with high intraclass correlation coefficient also at both time points. Internal construct validity of the scale is good, indicating a single underlying construct. Expected associations with pain confirm external construct validity. There is little evidence of differential item functioning. The scale is at the ordinal level. Responsiveness of the RMDQ is good and greater than observed change in spinal movement. Conclusions. The RMDQ is a robust unidimensional ordinal measure, largely free of differential item functioning, which works well in the Turkish population. Nonparametric effect sizes of ordinal scales are found to overestimate or underestimate the true effect size depending on the nature of the scale and the distribution of patients at baseline.

Rehabilitation of stroke patients: clinical profile and functional outcome.

Rehabilitation of stroke patients: clinical profile and functional outcome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80:250–255. ObjectiveTo describe the nature of functional recovery of 67 Turkish survivors of first-episode stroke who were referred for inpatient rehabilitation and to identify the variables that best predict discharge functional status of these patients. DesignA retrospective, descriptive study of the demographic and clinical profile and the functional status of patients with first-episode stroke. ResultsThe mean age was 60 (11.8, SD) yr, and 35.8% were men. The mean onset-admission interval and length of stay were 62.9 and 97.1 days, respectively. The mean functional status score, as measured by the FIM™ instrument, at the time of admission was 75 compared with 86.7 at the time of discharge, showing a mean improvement of 11.7. Although rehabilitation gains were similar for the right- and left-side involved groups, patients with right-side paresis had lower FIM scores at the time of admission than did the left-side involved group. Significant predictors of functional status at the time of discharge were admission functional status score and onset-admission interval. ConclusionKnowledge of these predictors can contribute to more appropriate treatment and discharge planning.

Adaptation and validation of the Turkish version of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of Life Scale

Abstract Objective. The aim of this study was to adapt the Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of Life (RAQoL) questionnaire for use in Turkey and to test its reliability and validity. Methods. The translation process included the recent guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation. Reliability of the Turkish RAQoL was assessed by internal consistency and test-retest reliability, internal construct validity by Rasch analysis, and external construct validity by associations with impairments, disability, and general health status. Cross-cultural validity was tested through analysis of differential item functioning (DIF) by comparison with data from the UK version of the RAQoL. Results. Reliability of the adapted version was good, with high internal consistency (Cronbachs alpha 0.95 and 0.96 at times 1 and 2, respectively) and test-retest reliability (Spearmans rho 0.874). Internal construct validity was confirmed by excellent fit to the Rasch model (mean item fit 0.236, SD 1.113) and external construct validity by expected associations. The DIF for culture was found in four items. Conclusions. Adaptation of the RAQoL for use in Turkey was successful. The instrument can be used in both national and international studies for cross-cultural comparison with the UK, as long as adjustments are made for the few items displaying DIF for culture.

Validation of the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule II (WHODAS-II) in patients with osteoarthritis

The objective of this study is to test the reliability and validity of WHODAS-II (Turkish version) for the assessment of disability in patients with osteoarthritis. This study is designed as follows: the internal construct validity of WHODAS-II in patients with knee osteoarthritis was assessed by Rasch analysis, and external construct validity by association with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP); reliability was tested by internal consistency, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and test–retest ICC. Our study presents the results of 225 outpatients assessed with mean age 58.4 years (SD 11.1) of whom 80.9% were female. Cronbach’s α, ICC, and test–retest ICC values for the six subscales of WHODAS-II varied between 0.71 and 0.94, 0.71 and 0.94, and 0.87 and 0.97, respectively. Rasch analysis of WHODAS-II indicated that after adjustment for local dependency, satisfactory fit was achieved. Two separate ‘activities’ and ‘participation’ components could also be identified. External construct validity of the scale was confirmed with expected correlations with WOMAC and NHP. This study concludes that WHODAS-II provides a reliable and valid health status instrument for measuring disability and components of ‘activities’ and ‘participation’ in patients with osteoarthritis. Thus, it provides the opportunity to model the consequences of disease according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework.

PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE MINI-MENTAL STATE EXAMINATION IN PATIENTS WITH ACQUIRED BRAIN INJURY IN TURKEY

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the psychometric properties of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in patients with acquired brain injury in Turkey. METHODS A total of 207 patients with acquired brain injury were assessed. Reliability was tested by internal consistency and the person separation index; internal construct validity by Rasch analysis; external construct validity by correlation with cognitive disability; and cross-cultural validity by differential item functioning analysis compared with Italian MMSE data. RESULTS Reliability was adequate with a Cronbachs alpha of 0.75 and person separation index of 0.76. After collapsing some categories, and adjustment for differential item functioning, internal construct validity was supported by fit of the data to Rasch model. Differential item functioning for culture was found in 2 items and after adjustment, data could be pooled between Turkey and Italy. External construct validity was supported by expected associations. CONCLUSION The Turkish version of the Mini-Mental State Examination can be used as a cognitive screening tool in acquired brain injury. Cross-cultural validity between Italy and Turkey is supported, given appropriate adjustment for differential item functioning. However, shortfalls in reliability at the individual level, as well as the presence of differential item functioning suggest that a better instrument should be developed to screen for cognitive deficits following acquired brain injury.

Preliminary study to evaluate the validity of the mini-mental state examination in a normal population in Turkey.

Although the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is widely used in clinical practice, normative scores for a healthy population have not been documented in Turkey. The aim in this study was to validate the MMSE in a healthy population and to provide normal scores. Internal construct validity of the Turkish version of MMSE among a preliminary sample of 406 normal people was assessed by Rasch unidimensional measurement model. Scores of the normal sample varied according to age and education but not according to sex. The data derived from this sample showed poor fit to the Rasch model (mean item fit, −2.082, SD 3.022). Only four of 11 items met model expectations. There was also differential item functioning by education and age for most items. Thus the internal construct validity of the Turkish MMSE in a normative sample could not be demonstrated by Rasch analysis. The scale failed modern psychometric criteria for scalability. We would therefore suggest other large normative MMSE data sets to be tested in terms of internal construct validity. If these findings are replicated, the validity of MMSE norms and their consequent use in clinical practice should be reconsidered.