B.B. Reid

Risk factors predictive of right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation.

Right ventricular failure (RVF) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation appears to be associated with increased mortality. However, the determination of which patients are at greater risk of developing postoperative RVF remains controversial and relatively unknown. We sought to determine the preoperative risk factors for the development of RVF after LVAD implantation. The data were obtained for 175 consecutive patients who had received an LVAD. RVF was defined by the need for inhaled nitric oxide for >/=48 hours or intravenous inotropes for >14 days and/or right ventricular assist device implantation. An RVF risk score was developed from the beta coefficients of the independent variables from a multivariate logistic regression model predicting RVF. Destination therapy (DT) was identified as the indication for LVAD implantation in 42% of our patients. RVF after LVAD occurred in 44% of patients (n = 77). The mortality rates for patients with RVF were significantly greater at 30, 180, and 365 days after implantation compared to patients with no RVF. By multivariate logistic regression analysis, 3 preoperative factors were significantly associated with RVF after LVAD implantation: (1) a preoperative need for intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation, (2) increased pulmonary vascular resistance, and (3) DT. The developed RVF risk score effectively stratified the risk of RV failure and death after LVAD implantation. In conclusion, given the progressively growing need for DT, the developed RVF risk score, derived from a population with a large percentage of DT patients, might lead to improved patient selection and help stratify patients who could potentially benefit from early right ventricular assist device implantation.

Pulsatility and the Risk of Nonsurgical Bleeding in Patients Supported With the Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device HeartMate II

Background—Bleeding is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Reduced pulsatility has been implicated as a contributing cause. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of different degrees of pulsatility on the incidence of nonsurgical bleeding. Methods and Results—The Utah Transplantation Affiliated Hospitals (U.T.A.H.) heart failure and transplant program databases were queried for patients with end-stage heart failure who required support with the continuous-flow LVAD HeartMate II (Thoratec Corp, Pleasanton, CA) between 2004 and 2012. Pulsatility was evaluated by means of the LVAD parameter pulsatility index (PI) and by the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve opening during the first 3 months of LVAD support. PI was analyzed as a continuous variable and also stratified according to tertiles of all the PI measurements during the study period (low PI: <4.6, intermediate PI: 4.6–5.2, and high PI: >5.2). Major nonsurgical bleeding associated with a decrease in hemoglobin ≥2 g/dL (in the absence of hemolysis) was the primary end point. A total of 134 patients (median age of 60 [interquartile range: 49–68] years, 78% men) were included. Major bleeding occurred in 33 (25%) patients (70% gastrointestinal, 21% epistaxis, 3% genitourinary, and 6% intracranial). In multivariable analysis, PI examined either as a categorical variable, low versus high PI (hazard ratio, 4.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.35–12.21; P=0.04), or as a continuous variable (hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.40–0.92; P=0.02) was associated with an increased risk of bleeding. Conclusions—Reduced pulsatility in patients supported with the continuous-flow LVAD HeartMate II is associated with an increased risk of nonsurgical bleeding, as evaluated by PI.

Magnitude and time course of changes induced by continuous-flow left ventricular assist device unloading in chronic heart failure: insights into cardiac recovery.

OBJECTIVES This study sought to prospectively investigate the longitudinal effects of continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) unloading on myocardial structure and systolic and diastolic function. BACKGROUND The magnitude, timeline, and sustainability of changes induced by continuous-flow LVAD on the structure and function of the failing human heart are unknown. METHODS Eighty consecutive patients with clinical characteristics consistent with chronic heart failure requiring implantation of a continuous-flow LVAD were prospectively enrolled. Serial echocardiograms (at 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12 months) and right heart catheterizations were performed after LVAD implant. Cardiac recovery was assessed on the basis of improvement in systolic and diastolic function indices on echocardiography that were sustained during LVAD turn-down studies. RESULTS After 6 months of LVAD unloading, 34% of patients had a relative LV ejection fraction increase above 50% and 19% of patients, both ischemic and nonischemic, achieved an LV ejection fraction ≥ 40%. LV systolic function improved as early as 30 days, the greatest degree of improvement was achieved by 6 months of mechanical unloading and persisted over the 1-year follow up. LV diastolic function parameters also improved as early as 30 days after LVAD unloading, and this improvement persisted over time. LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes decreased as early as 30 days after LVAD unloading (113 vs. 77 ml/m(2), p < 0.01, and 92 vs. 60 ml/m(2), p < 0.01, respectively). LV mass decreased as early as 30 days after LVAD unloading (114 vs. 95 g/m(2), p < 0.05) and continued to do so over the 1-year follow-up but did not reach values below the normal reference range, suggesting no atrophic remodeling after prolonged LVAD unloading. CONCLUSIONS Continuous-flow LVAD unloading induced in a subset of patients, both ischemic and nonischemic, early improvement in myocardial structure and systolic and diastolic function that was largely completed within 6 months, with no evidence of subsequent regression.

Cardiovascular Mortality Among Heart Transplant Recipients With Asymptomatic Antibody-Mediated or Stable Mixed Cellular and Antibody-Mediated Rejection

BACKGROUND Little has been reported on the clinical significance of asymptomatic antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) alone or mixed rejection (MR), defined as concurrent cellular rejection (CR) and AMR in heart transplantation. In this study, we examined whether a differential impact on cardiovascular mortality (CVM) existed when comparing asymptomatic AMR, to stable MR or CR. METHODS The Utah Transplantation Affiliated Hospitals (UTAH) Cardiac Transplant Program pathology database of all heart transplant recipients between 1985 and 2004 was queried. Patients were classified as cellular, antibody-mediated, or mixed rejectors based on their predominant pattern of rejection type in the first three months post-transplant. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were fit to each of the three groups and analyses were adjusted for age at the time of transplant, gender, and underlying primary cardiac disease. RESULTS Eight hundred and sixty nine heart transplant recipients qualified for analysis. Over the study period, patients with asymptomatic AMR or stable MR patterns had significantly worse CVM when compared to patients with stable CR pattern (AMR, 21.2%; MR, 18.0%; CR, 12.6%; AMR vs. CR, p = 0.009; MR vs. CR, p = 0.001). In contrast, CVM was comparable in patients with asymptomatic AMR or stable MR patterns (p = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS Asymptomatic or subclinical AMR and MR are clinically relevant, should be recognized, and deserve consideration for therapeutic intervention in hopes of avoiding adverse outcomes.

Impact of Mechanical Unloading on Microvasculature and Associated Central Remodeling Features of the Failing Human Heart

OBJECTIVES This study investigates alterations in myocardial microvasculature, fibrosis, and hypertrophy before and after mechanical unloading of the failing human heart. BACKGROUND Recent studies demonstrated the pathophysiologic importance and significant mechanistic links among microvasculature, fibrosis, and hypertrophy during the cardiac remodeling process. The effect of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) unloading on cardiac endothelium and microvasculature is unknown, and its influence on fibrosis and hypertrophy regression to the point of atrophy is controversial. METHODS Hemodynamic data and left ventricular tissue were collected from patients with chronic heart failure at LVAD implant and explant (n = 15) and from normal donors (n = 8). New advances in digital microscopy provided a unique opportunity for comprehensive whole-field, endocardium-to-epicardium evaluation for microvascular density, fibrosis, cardiomyocyte size, and glycogen content. Ultrastructural assessment was done with electron microscopy. RESULTS Hemodynamic data revealed significant pressure unloading with LVAD. This was accompanied by a 33% increase in microvascular density (p = 0.001) and a 36% decrease in microvascular lumen area (p = 0.028). We also identified, in agreement with these findings, ultrastructural and immunohistochemical evidence of endothelial cell activation. In addition, LVAD unloading significantly increased interstitial and total collagen content without any associated structural, ultrastructural, or metabolic cardiomyocyte changes suggestive of hypertrophy regression to the point of atrophy and degeneration. CONCLUSIONS The LVAD unloading resulted in increased microvascular density accompanied by increased fibrosis and no evidence of cardiomyocyte atrophy. These new insights into the effects of LVAD unloading on microvasculature and associated key remodeling features might guide future studies of unloading-induced reverse remodeling of the failing human heart.

End-of-life decision making and implementation in recipients of a destination left ventricular assist device

BACKGROUND The use of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) as destination therapy (DT) is increasing and has proven beneficial in prolonging survival and improving quality of life in select patients with end-stage heart failure. Nonetheless, end-of-life (EOL) issues are inevitable and how to approach them underreported. METHODS Our DT data registry was queried for eligible patients, defined as those individuals who actively participated in EOL decision making. The process from early EOL discussion to palliation and death was reviewed. We recorded the causes leading to EOL discussion, time from EOL decision to withdrawal and from withdrawal to death, and location. Primary caregivers were surveyed to qualify their experience and identify themes relevant to this process. RESULTS Between 1999 and 2009, 92 DT LVADs were implanted in 69 patients. Twenty patients qualified for inclusion (mean length of support: 833 days). A decrease in quality of life from new/worsening comorbidities usually prompted EOL discussion. Eleven patients died at home, 8 in the hospital and 1 in a nursing home. Time from EOL decision to LVAD withdrawal ranged from <1 day to 2 weeks and from withdrawal until death was <20 minutes in all cases. Palliative care was provided to all patients. Ongoing assistance from the healthcare team facilitated closure and ensured comfort at EOL. CONCLUSIONS With expanding indications and improved technology, more DT LVADs will be implanted and for longer durations, and more patients will face EOL issues. A multidisciplinary team approach with protocols involving DT patients and their families in EOL decision making allows for continuity of care and ensures dignity and comfort at EOL.

Improving outcomes with long-term “destination” therapy using left ventricular assist devices

OBJECTIVE Destination therapy experience using long-term left ventricular assist devices was analyzed relative to the benchmark Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure trial to evaluate the potential for improving outcomes with this groundbreaking therapy for advanced heart failure. METHODS The largest single-center experience with destination therapy in the United States (Utah Artificial Heart Program, LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT) was retrospectively analyzed. All destination therapy recipients (n = 23) presented with chronic, advanced heart failure, meeting indications for destination therapy adopted from the Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure trial. All received HeartMate left ventricular assist devices (Thoratec Corp, Pleasanton, Calif), with 87% receiving an improved XVE model. Advanced practice guidelines were implemented using a multidisciplinary approach. Survivals (Kaplan-Meier, log-rank analyses) and adverse events (Poisson regression) were compared with those of the Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure left ventricular assist device group (n = 68). RESULTS Survival in the destination therapy group was significantly increased (P = .007), with an overall reduction in mortality of 66%. The 2-year survival was 77% for destination therapy compared with 29% for the Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure left ventricular assist device group (P < .0001). The 1-year survival was 77% for destination therapy compared with the Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure left ventricular assist device rate of 52% (P = .036). Adverse events decreased by 38% (3.90 per patient-year in the destination therapy group compared with the Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure left ventricular assist device rate of 6.32). Factors related to severity of illness met Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure-like criteria for both groups. CONCLUSIONS This analysis provides evidence that long-term destination therapy can be improved well beyond the pioneering experience of the Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure trial. With continued evolution of devices, management, and patient selection, outcomes approaching those of heart transplantation may be possible.

Bridge to Recovery Understanding the Disconnect Between Clinical and Biological Outcomes

Left ventricular (LV) assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly used in everyday clinical practice either as a bridge for end-stage heart failure (HF) patients to heart transplantation or as a permanent (destination) therapy.1,2 Yet, there is still significant uncertainty about the consequences of this intervention both at the level of the detailed myocardial biology (ie, biological outcomes) and at the functional cardiovascular response of the patient at the organ level (ie, clinical outcomes). The LVAD patient population presents a series of significant advantages as far as research is concerned. First, LVAD therapy offers the ability to acquire paired human myocardial tissue at LVAD implantation and again on LVAD removal. The ability to obtain human tissue and the possibility for its serial examination before and after any therapeutic investigational therapy combined with LVADs provide an important opportunity for in-depth study of the changes in the structure and function of the diseased human heart caused by the specific investigational therapy. Second, this population represents a relatively safe investigational platform because the hemodynamic support provided by VADs makes these patients significantly less vulnerable to any arrhythmic3 or hemodynamic adverse events potentially associated with new aggressive investigational therapies. Third, the volumes of potential study subjects for these investigations (ie, patients who receive LVADs) are rapidly increasing; because of a lack of donor organs and incremental progress in device design and durability, the number of advanced HF patients with LVADs has been continuously increasing.1,2 These 3 research advantages create an ideal setting for various new HF therapies to test their potential efficacy in LVAD patients. Fourth, this population offers an opportunity to investigate the effects of the LVAD-induced removal of excess mechanical load, which drives the vicious cycle of myocardial remodeling and eventually leads to the clinical HF syndrome. …

Obesity and Left Ventricular Assist Device Driveline Exit Site Infection

Driveline exit site (DLES) infection is a persistent problem among the left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients. This study investigated the relationship between obesity and DLES infection. Records of LVAD patients at two institutions from January 1999 to January 2009 were queried. Results were analyzed using t tests. Those with LVAD support ≥90 days were included. The body mass index (BMI) of each patient was measured at the time of implant and at the conclusion of LVAD support or currently, if the patient was ongoing. Other data included preimplant age, ejection fraction, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, diabetes, New York Heart Association class, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, VO2 max, and inotrope therapy. The 118 patients who qualified for the study were placed in an infection group (n = 36) or in the control group (n = 82). Both groups had similar preimplant characteristics. Variables with differences statistically significant between the groups included duration of LVAD support, indication for support, device type, and BMI. Patients who developed DLES infections had a significantly higher BMI and continued weight gain over the course of LVAD therapy compared with the control group. Although this association requires further study, implications for clinical practice may include the provision of nutrition and exercise counseling for patients undergoing LVAD therapy, especially if overweight. These results may warrant increased measures to prevent and treat infection in the preimplant and postimplant periods.

Prior Human Leukocyte Antigen-Allosensitization and Left Ventricular Assist Device Type Affect Degree of Post-implantation Human Leukocyte Antigen-Allosensitization

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation before heart transplantation has been associated with formation of antibodies directed against human leukocyte antigens (HLA), often referred to as sensitization. This study investigated whether prior sensitization or LVAD type affected the degree of post-implantation sensitization. The records of consecutive HeartMate (HM) I and HM II LVAD patients were reviewed. Panel reactive antibody (PRA) was assessed before LVAD implantation and biweekly thereafter. Sensitization was defined as PRA > 10%, and high-degree sensitization was defined as PRA > 90%. An HM LVAD was implanted in 64 patients, and 11 received a HM II LVAD as a bridge to transplant. Ten HM I patients (16%) were sensitized before LVAD implantation (HM I-S), and 54 (84%) were not (HM I-Non-S). Nine HM I-S patients (90%) became highly sensitized (PRA > 90%) compared with 9 HM I-Non-S patients (16.7%; p < 0.001). The PRA remained elevated (> 90%) in 8 of the 9 (88.9%) highly sensitized HM I-S patients vs 5 of the 9 (55.6%) HM I-Non-S highly sensitized patients. The PRA levels in the rest of the HM I-S highly sensitized patients declined from 93% +/- 4% to 55% +/- 15% (p = 0.01). Among the 11 HM II patients, 1 (9%) was sensitized before LVAD implantation (PRA, 40%) and the PRA moderately increased to 80%. No other HM II patient became sensitized after implantation. Thus, 1 of 11 (9%) HM II patients became sensitized compared with 29 of 64 (45%) HM I patients (p = 0.04). Pre-sensitized patients are at higher risk for becoming and remaining highly HLA-allosensitized after LVAD implantation. The HeartMate II LVAD appears to cause less sensitization than HeartMate I.