B. Bahoric
McGill University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by B. Bahoric.
European Urology | 2018
Abdenour Nabid; Nathalie Carrier; André-Guy Martin; Jean-Paul Bahary; Céline Lemaire; Sylvie Vass; B. Bahoric; Robert Archambault; François Vincent; Redouane Bettahar; Marie Duclos; Marie-Pierre Garant; Luis Souhami
BACKGROUND Long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with radiotherapy (RT) is a standard treatment for patients with localized high-risk prostate cancer (HRPC). However, the optimal duration of ADT is not yet defined. OBJECTIVE The aim of this superiority randomized trial was to compare outcomes of RT combined with either 36 or 18 mo of ADT. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS From October 2000 to January 2008, 630 patients with HRPC were randomized, 310 to pelvic and prostate RT combined with 36 mo (long arm) and 320 to the same RT with 18 mo (short arm) of ADT. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL) were primary end points. OS rates were compared with Cox Regression model and QoL data were analyzed through mixed linear model. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS With a median follow-up of 9.4 yr, 290 patients had died (147 long arm vs 143 short arm). The 5-yr OS rates (95% confidence interval) were 91% for long arm (88-95%) and 86% for short arm (83-90%), p=0.07. QoL analysis showed a significant difference (p<0.001) in six scales and 13 items favoring 18 mo ADT with two of them presenting a clinically relevant difference in mean scores of ≥10 points. CONCLUSIONS In localized HRPC, our results support that 36 mo is not superior to 18 mo of ADT. ADT combined with RT can potentially be reduced to 18 mo in selected men without compromising survival or QoL. Thus, 18 mo of ADT appears to represent a valid option in HRPC. PATIENT SUMMARY In this study, we report outcomes from high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy and either 36 or 18 mo of androgen deprivation therapy. There was no difference in survival between the two groups, with the 18-mo group experiencing a better quality of life.
Cancer Research | 2009
T. Niazi; S. Faria; Khalil Sultanem; K. Sabit; Thierry Muanza; B. Bahoric; A. Tayel; L. Sati; T. Vuong
The accurate rate of acute skin toxicity experienced by women undergoing adjuvant radiation therapy as part of Breast-Conservative Therapy (BCT) for early breast cancer is lacking in the literature. The limited available publications place the rate of grade II or higher at around 40-50%, while the rate of grade III moist desquamation is reported to be around 15-20%. In this prospective phase II study we evaluated the actual rate of acute skin toxicity in these patients and correlated that with patient characteristics.Material and method: Patients with breast separation of less than 25 cm were treated with Canadian hypofractionation regimen (42.4 Gy in 16 fractions) while patients with 25 cm or more were treated with the usual adjuvant breast fractionation (50 Gy in 25 fractions). As part of the institution9s standard of care all patients were advised to apply hydrating cream from day one of the radiation therapy (RT) (Glaxal Base and Aveeno were most commonly used). The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 (CTCAE) was used for grading of the acute skin toxicity. To avoid subjective interpretation of the CTCAE, Each patient was graded by two radiation oncologist at week 0 week 2, week 3, last day of treatment and 2 weeks after treatment completion. Univariant and multivariant analysis were performed to evaluate the contribution of patient characteristics to the toxicity.Results: At the time of this analysis 85 patients with a median age of 57 (range 33-80) have completed their adjuvant RT. Of these 72% received the hypofractionated regimen and 69% had an extra boost of 10 Gy in 4 fractions to the tumor bed either because of younger age (less than 60) or close margins. 37 patients (44%) received chemotherapy prior to RT and 30 patients (35%) were active smokers. The volume of the breast varied significantly among the patients, median volume of 729 cc (range 246-2271).Acute skin toxicity was 18% at 2 weeks with only 2 patients (3%) having grade II, 54% at 3 weeks with only 5 patients (6%) having grade II and 82% at the last day of the treatment with 18 patients (21%) having grade II or higher. Only 2 patients had grade III and no grade IV skin toxicity was observed. The rate of residual skin reaction at 2 weeks post RT was 41% with only 7% grade II and no grade III. Multivariant analysis associated hypofractionation with decreased acute skin reaction at the last day of the treatment, 100% vs. 71% (p=0.0204), and active smoking with delayed skin healing at 2 weeks post RT 25% vs. 52% (p=0.0373). There was no correlation between the volume of the breast and skin toxicity at any of the evaluation timelines.Conclusion: The actual rate of acute skin toxicity in women undergoing adjuvant radiation therapy for BCT is considerably overstated in medical literature. Hypofractionation is associated with decreased acute skin reaction and active smoking is correlated with delayed healing. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 4109.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2005
T. Niazi; Luis Souhami; L. Portelance; B. Bahoric; Lucy Gilbert; Gerald Stanimir
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2013
Abdenour Nabid; Nathalie Carrier; A.G. Martin; Jean-Paul Bahary; Luis Souhami; Marie Duclos; François Vincent; Sylvie Vass; B. Bahoric; Robert Archambault; Céline Lemaire
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2013
Abdenour Nabid; Nathalie Carrier; A.G. Martin; Jean-Paul Bahary; Luis Souhami; Marie Duclos; François Vincent; Sylvie Vass; B. Bahoric; Robert Archambault; Céline Lemaire
Gynecologic Oncology | 2005
Luis Souhami; Robert Corns; M. Duclos; L. Portelance; B. Bahoric; Gerald Stanimir
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2014
Abdenour Nabid; Nathalie Carrier; A.G. Martin; Jean-Paul Bahary; Luis Souhami; Marie Duclos; François Vincent; Sylvie Vass; B. Bahoric; Robert Archambault; Céline Lemaire
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2015
Abdenour Nabid; Nathalie Carrier; E. Vigneault; Luis Souhami; Céline Lemaire; Marc-André Brassard; B. Bahoric; Robert Archambault; François Vincent; Thu-Van Nguyen-Huynh
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2016
Abdenour Nabid; N. Carrier; E. Vigneault; Luis Souhami; Céline Lemaire; M.A. Brassard; B. Bahoric; R. Archambault; F. Vincent; T.V. Nguyen
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2014
Abdenour Nabid; N. Carrier; A.G. Martin; Jean-Paul Bahary; Luis Souhami; M. Duclos; F. Vincent; Sylvie Vass; B. Bahoric; R. Archambault; Céline Lemaire