B. Chignon-Sicard

The radial forearm free flap: a review of microsurgical options

The radial forearm free flap, highly regarded in head and neck reconstructive surgery, is known to be one of the most reliable and versatile flaps. The microsurgery is usually easy to perform due to large vessels and a long pedicle; the double superficial and deep venous networks allow many microsurgical options. The sensory nerve coaptation, still debated for weight-bearing foot reconstruction and its sensory restoration, has recently undergone technical refinements. The authors review the microsurgical options for microvascular anastomosis and for sensory restoration.

Luxations et fractures-luxations périlunaires du carpe, étude rétrospective d'une série de 14 cas

OBJECTIVES We report a retrospective series of 14 dislocations or perilunate fracture-dislocations. The results of our series are compared with the data of the literature and we discuss epidemiology, types of lesions, surgical treatment, complications and prognosis of this pathology. METHODS The series included seven pure dislocations and seven fracture-dislocations including three trans-scapho-lunate forms (including one Fentons syndrome). The displacement of all these lesions was posterior. The mean age was 35 years. Sixty-four percent were manual workers. All 14 patients had undergone surgical treatment through a dorsal approach in the first seven days following the injury. They were reviewed clinically and radiologically with a mean follow-up of 25 months. RESULTS The average Cooney functional score was 72/100 with two excellent, six good, four fair and two poor results. Average flexion-extension motion arc was 74%, the grip strength was 77% compared to the other wrist. Persistent wrist pain was almost constant. One carpal instability was observed and one patient required a four-corner arthrodesis for SLAC wrist. Eighty-five percent of all patients were employed at least. CONCLUSIONS Early diagnosis and anatomical reduction can provide satisfactory functional results. Emergency surgical treatment is required. We prefer a dorsal approach and we do not perform primary closed reductions.

Les asymétries constitutionnelles en chirurgie d’augmentation mammaire esthétique : incidence, satisfaction et applications chirurgicales

INTRODUCTION The clinically observable, constitutional breast asymmetries are frequent and physiological in the general population. Although there has been a preponderance of literature concerning breast augmentation, a conspicuous lack of data exists regarding the preoperative breast and chest wall asymmetries seen in the patient seeking consultation for aesthetic breast augmentation. These asymmetries can lead to postoperative dissatisfaction in patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS An independent plastic surgeon analysed the data of 200 patients who had a primary aesthetic breast augmentation. The mean follow-up was 36 months. All patients had pre- and postoperative standardized pictures of the anterior chest wall. The clinical examination was achieved using an original evaluation form. Patients were also asked to fill an exhaustive satisfaction form. Breasts and chest wall asymmetries were diagnosed by clinical examination and photographic analysis. Mastopexy-augmentations, breast reconstructions, breast malformations (tuberous breasts and Poland syndrome) and patients with incomplete data were excluded from the study. Stastical analysis was done using SPSS software version 15. RESULTS There were 77% of chest wall and breast asymmetries and 69,5% of breasts asymmetries (26,5% of breast mound volume asymmetry and 62,5% of shape asymmetry). An isolated chest wall asymmetry was found in 17% of patients. Scoliosis was the main cause of asymmetry (52,9% of chest wall asymmetries) as it is often associated with chest wall rotation, chest wall depression, submammary depression or rib asymmetry. Patients often noticed an asymmetry postoperatively (28%). Among the patients complaining from a postoperative asymmetry, 83,3% had a constitutional breast or chest wall asymmetry. Asymmetry was the third cause of dissatisfaction and the third argument for revision surgery (after volume dissatisfaction and ptosis). Thirty per cent of patients asking for a surgical revision and 35.3% of unsatisfied patients complained about asymmetry, which was preoperative in 83.3% of cases. CONCLUSION The asymmetry rate of our study is compared with the others studies found in the literature. In the daily practice, asymmetry can be diagnosed by a complete clinical examination and standardized chest wall pictures. Patients with constitutional asymmetry should be educated, helping to increase postoperative satisfaction. The authors propose and discuss a surgical pattern for the handling of the different types of asymmetries in breast augmentation.

Double breast contour in primary aesthetic breast augmentation: incidence, prevention and treatment.

The goal of this study was to define the incidence of double breast contour in primary aesthetic breast augmentation and to analyze its risk factors. An independent plastic surgeon analyzed the data of 200 patients who had a primary aesthetic breast augmentation with silicone gel implant and with a minimum 12-month follow-up. All patients had pre and postoperative standardized photography. Mastopexy-augmentations, breast reconstructions, breast malformations (tuberous breasts and Poland syndrome), and patients with incomplete data were excluded from the study. Assessment was achieved using an original standardized evaluation form (preoperative breast morphology, surgical options, postoperative aesthetic results). Patients were also asked to complete an exhaustive satisfaction form. A double breast contour was assessed clinically using Massihas classification. The mean follow-up was 36 months. The double breast contour incidence was 7%. All of them were type I (the so called waterfall deformity). There was no type II (double inframammary crease). They were minor for 6.5% and major for 0.5%. They were related to a preoperative breast ptosis, subpectoral placement, and implant upper malposition. The rate of the type I was 10.5% of submuscular augmentation and 15% of preoperative breast ptosis. A double breast contour was primitive for 6% and secondary for 1% (pregnancy and breast-feeding postaugmentation). It was bilateral for 4.5% (3 cases of upper malposition, 1 case of medial malposition, 2 cases of pregnancy with breast-feeding postaugmentation and 1 patient refused a mastopexy-augmentation). It was unilateral for 2.5% related to a preoperative breast asymmetry with ptosis asymmetry and skin quality asymmetry. The satisfaction rate in the group “double contour” (14 patients) was 85.7% (vs. 91.9%). One patient had revision surgery (upper malposition). These types of deformities are fundamentally different with consideration on their clinical aspects, physiopathogeny, prevention and treatment. Type I major risk factor is subpectoral augmentation of ptotic breasts (with medium to bad skin quality and loses muscle to gland attachments). The muscle at the inferior pole of the breast is a “brake” preventing implant to fill the envelope. This risk is increased with implant malposition, constitutional ptosis asymmetry with symmetrical implant placement and selection of an insufficient implant projection or dimensions. This deformity can be avoided with selection of a subglandular or dual plane (type II or III) placement, a sufficient implant volume or projection and anatomic prosthesis. Type II is related to a lowering of a well-defined submammary fold more commonly in constricted and dens glandular breasts. This deformity can be avoided with respecting the inframammary fold, radial incisions on the glands posterior surface, and selection of anatomic implants.

Article originalLuxations et fractures-luxations périlunaires du carpe, étude rétrospective d’une série de 14 casPerilunate dislocations and fracture-dislocations of the wrist, a review of 14 cases

OBJECTIVES We report a retrospective series of 14 dislocations or perilunate fracture-dislocations. The results of our series are compared with the data of the literature and we discuss epidemiology, types of lesions, surgical treatment, complications and prognosis of this pathology. METHODS The series included seven pure dislocations and seven fracture-dislocations including three trans-scapho-lunate forms (including one Fentons syndrome). The displacement of all these lesions was posterior. The mean age was 35 years. Sixty-four percent were manual workers. All 14 patients had undergone surgical treatment through a dorsal approach in the first seven days following the injury. They were reviewed clinically and radiologically with a mean follow-up of 25 months. RESULTS The average Cooney functional score was 72/100 with two excellent, six good, four fair and two poor results. Average flexion-extension motion arc was 74%, the grip strength was 77% compared to the other wrist. Persistent wrist pain was almost constant. One carpal instability was observed and one patient required a four-corner arthrodesis for SLAC wrist. Eighty-five percent of all patients were employed at least. CONCLUSIONS Early diagnosis and anatomical reduction can provide satisfactory functional results. Emergency surgical treatment is required. We prefer a dorsal approach and we do not perform primary closed reductions.

Prise en charge des amputations traumatiques de l’oreille : revue de la littérature

Traumatic ear amputation (TEA) is a complete avulsion of a part or of the total auricular tissue. TEA are rare (only 74 cases have been described in the literature) and their handling is complex. The surgeons objective is to obtain the best cosmetic result without demolishing the auricular area in order to allow future ear reconstruction in case of replantation failure. Many techniques of ear replantation have been described in the literature during the last 30 years: microsurgical replantation, pocket techniques and reattachment techniques. Microsurgical replantation should be achieved every time it is possible. When it is not possible, the surgeon can choose between ear reattachment and a pocket technique according to two clinical features: the size of the amputated part and the involvement of the ear lobe. Ear reattachment can be achieved when the amputated part is smaller than 15 mm or when amputation involves the earlobe. Pocket techniques, which are appropriate for the replantation of the auricular cartilage, can be used when the amputated part is bigger than 15 mm and does not comprise the earlobe.

Étude de la rétraction cutanée appliquée à la prise en charge des tumeurs cutanées. Cartographie du corps humain

SUBJECT Skin, the main organ of the human body, is equipped with own biomechanical characteristics, highly variable depending on intra-individual factors (location, weight status, dermatological diseases…) and interindividual (age, sex…). Despite some recent cutometric studies, our review of the literature shows that there is no currently reliable analytical model representing the biomechanical behavior of the skin. Yet, this is a central issue in dermatology surgery, especially in the treatment of skin tumors, for the proper observance of surgical margins. PATIENTS AND METHODS We studied prospectively on 75 resection specimens (about 71 patient(s)), for the treatment of skin lesions tumor suspicious or known malignant or benign. Room dimensions were measured before and 5 minutes after excision, leading us to calculate a ratio of retraction of the skin surface. This retraction was correlated with age, gender, tumor type, and anatomic location of the site of excision. RESULTS The power of retraction of the skin varies significantly by region of the body. It is maximum in the upper limb (hand excluded) and in the cervical region. At the cephalic region, skin of the ear and periorbital skin have capacities of important early retraction. Unlike the lower limb (foot excluded), the back skin of the nose and face appear to be a minimum of shrinkage. Age also seems to change on that capacity shrinkage, sex would have no influence. CONCLUSION Our study confirms the variations in the ability of skin retraction based on a number of factors. In dermato-oncology, that power retraction could cause significant differences between clinical surgical margins and final pathologist margins. We believe it must be taken into account by the couple surgeon-pathologist, especially in the context of invasive and/or recurrent tumors.

Article originalÉtude de la rétraction cutanée appliquée à la prise en charge des tumeurs cutanées. Cartographie du corps humainStudy of skin retraction applied to the treatment of skin tumors. Mapping of the human body

SUBJECT Skin, the main organ of the human body, is equipped with own biomechanical characteristics, highly variable depending on intra-individual factors (location, weight status, dermatological diseases…) and interindividual (age, sex…). Despite some recent cutometric studies, our review of the literature shows that there is no currently reliable analytical model representing the biomechanical behavior of the skin. Yet, this is a central issue in dermatology surgery, especially in the treatment of skin tumors, for the proper observance of surgical margins. PATIENTS AND METHODS We studied prospectively on 75 resection specimens (about 71 patient(s)), for the treatment of skin lesions tumor suspicious or known malignant or benign. Room dimensions were measured before and 5 minutes after excision, leading us to calculate a ratio of retraction of the skin surface. This retraction was correlated with age, gender, tumor type, and anatomic location of the site of excision. RESULTS The power of retraction of the skin varies significantly by region of the body. It is maximum in the upper limb (hand excluded) and in the cervical region. At the cephalic region, skin of the ear and periorbital skin have capacities of important early retraction. Unlike the lower limb (foot excluded), the back skin of the nose and face appear to be a minimum of shrinkage. Age also seems to change on that capacity shrinkage, sex would have no influence. CONCLUSION Our study confirms the variations in the ability of skin retraction based on a number of factors. In dermato-oncology, that power retraction could cause significant differences between clinical surgical margins and final pathologist margins. We believe it must be taken into account by the couple surgeon-pathologist, especially in the context of invasive and/or recurrent tumors.

The infraorbital artery: Clinical relevance in esthetic medicine and identification of danger zones of the midface

BACKGROUND Over the past decade, cosmetic injections of dermal fillers or fat have become a popular procedure in facial rejuvenation in an overconsuming society. However, complications such as arterial embolism and occlusion can occur even with experienced injectors, especially in high-risks zones namely the glabella, the nasal dorsum or the nasolabial fold. The aim of this study was to define the vascular danger zones of the infraorbital area in order to provide guidelines helping avoid them. MATERIALS AND METHODS The infraorbital artery, its main branches and their anastomoses with neighbouring vessels were studied in 18 fresh cadavers. Mimetic injections of inked hyaluronic acid were performed in the infraorbital area in the interest of analyzing its distribution and to determine potential vascular risks towards the infraorbital artery and its branches. RESULTS The infraorbital artery and its branches were located in common injection regions and anastomosed to the supratrochlear artery, the dorsal nasal artery and the angular artery through the nasal branch of the infraorbital artery. Two danger zones could be depicted: injections can be risky when performed too superficially in the midcheek area, and likewise risky when performed in a periosteal layer in infraorbital hollow or tear-trough correction, because of an obvious possibility of retrograde embolism. CONCLUSION The infraorbital artery can be involved in anatomic mechanism of arterial occlusion, further blindness and stroke, among the related neighbouring arteries. Based on the findings of this study, injections to the periosteum layer in tear-trough correction and above the periosteum on the zygomatic arch is not advised.