B. de Keizer

Systematic review and meta-analysis on the diagnostic performance of FDG-PET/CT in detecting bone marrow involvement in newly diagnosed Hodgkin lymphoma: is bone marrow biopsy still necessary?

BACKGROUND This study aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze published data on the diagnostic performance of (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in detecting bone marrow involvement in newly diagnosed Hodgkin lymphoma, and to determine whether FDG-PET/CT can replace blind bone marrow biopsy (BMB) in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS The PubMed/Medline and Embase databases were systematically searched for relevant studies. Methodological quality of each study was assessed. Sensitivities and specificities of FDG-PET/CT in individual studies were calculated and underwent meta-analysis with a random effects model. A summary receiver operating characteristic curve (sROC) was constructed with the Moses-Shapiro-Littenberg method. The weighted summary proportion of FDG-PET/CT-negative patients with a positive BMB among all cases was calculated under the fixed effects model. RESULTS Nine eligible studies, comprising a total of 955 patients with newly diagnosed Hodgkin lymphoma, were included. Overall, the studies were of moderate methodological quality. The sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET/CT for the detection of bone marrow involvement ranged from 87.5% to 100% and from 86.7% to 100%, respectively, with pooled estimates of 96.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 93.0% to 99.0%] and 99.7% (95% CI 98.9% to 100%), respectively. The area under the sROC curve was 0.9860. The weighted summary proportion of FDG-PET/CT-negative patients with a positive BMB among all cases was 1.1% (95% CI 0.6% to 2.0%). CONCLUSION Although the methodological quality of studies that were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis was moderate, the current evidence suggests that FDG-PET/CT may be an appropriate method to replace BMB in newly diagnosed Hodgkin lymphoma.

Fixed dosage of 131I for remnant ablation in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma without pre-ablative diagnostic 131I scintigraphy.

Differentiated thyroid cancer is treated by (near) total thyroidectomy followed by radioiodine (131I) ablation of the residual active tissue in the thyroid bed. Controversy remains concerning the use and the dose of pre-ablative diagnostic 131I scintigraphy. This study was designed to assess the efficacy of thyroid ablation by high-dose 131I without pre-ablative diagnostic 131I scintigraphy. Ninety-three patients were treated with (near) total thyroidectomy and with a high ablative dose of 131I (3700-7400 MBq). A pre-ablative 131I diagnostic scintigram was not performed. To assess the efficacy of the treatment, all patients were studied with a diagnostic 131I scintigram and with thyroglobulin plasma assays 1 year later after withdrawal of L-thyroxine for 4-6 weeks. The main criterion for a successful ablation was the absence of thyroid bed activity. An additional criterion was a thyroglobulin value of <10 μg·l−1. Successful ablation according to the main criterion was obtained in 88% of patients. Forty patients (43%) showed no neck uptake and had undetectable serum thyroglobulin. Twenty-two patients (25%) had serum thyroglobulin concentrations between 1 and 10 μg·−1. Twenty-six patients (27%) had thyroglobulin >10 μg·l−1, 19 patients showing residual thyroid uptake or metastatic lesions. We conclude that high-dose radioiodine ablation without prior diagnostic scintigraphy results in a high rate of successful ablation, preventing repeat 131I treatment.

Differential FDG-PET Uptake Patterns in Uninfected and Infected Central Prosthetic Vascular Grafts

OBJECTIVE (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) scanning has been suggested as a means to detect vascular graft infections. However, little is known about the typical FDG uptake patterns associated with synthetic vascular graft implantation. The aim of the present study was to compare uninfected and infected central vascular grafts in terms of various parameters used to interpret PET images. METHODS From 2007 through 2013, patients in whom a FDG-PET scan was performed for any indication after open or endovascular central arterial prosthetic reconstruction were identified. Graft infection was defined as the presence of clinical or biochemical signs of graft infection with positive cultures or based on a combination of clinical, biochemical, and imaging parameters (other than PET scan data). All other grafts were deemed uninfected. PET images were analyzed using maximum systemic uptake value (SUVmax), tissue to background ratio (TBR), visual grading scale (VGS), and focality of FDG uptake (focal or homogenous). RESULTS Twenty-seven uninfected and 32 infected grafts were identified. Median SUVmax was 3.3 (interquartile range [IQR] 2.0-4.2) for the uninfected grafts and 5.7 for the infected grafts (IQR 2.2-7.8). Mean TBR was 2.0 (IQR 1.4-2.5) and 3.2 (IQR 1.5-3.5), respectively. On VGS, 44% of the uninfected and 72% of the infected grafts were judged as a high probability for infection. Homogenous FDG uptake was noted in 74% of the uninfected and 31% of the infected grafts. Uptake patterns of uninfected and infected grafts showed a large overlap for all parameters. CONCLUSION The patterns of FDG uptake for uninfected vascular grafts largely overlap with those of infected vascular grafts. This questions the value of these individual FDG-PET-CT parameters in identifying infected grafts.

High Negative Predictive Value (NPV) Of Undetectable TSH Stimulated Tg For Disease Recurrence In Both Low And High Risk Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

The extend, intensity and timing of the follow-up of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients remains unclear. Recent studies identified an undetectable TSH stimulated Tg measurement after one year as a prognostic factor for the risk of recurrence during further follow-up, thereby further dividing patients based on risk for recurrence. Because patients experience their disease on an emotional basis rather than related to actual disease severity, follow-up should be targeted to detect recurrence without ‘over-investigating’ patients. The aim of our study was to investigate the recurrence rate in high and low risk patients with DTC and the need for repeated (TSH stimulated) Tg measurement. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 264 DTC patients with absent Tg-Ab and identified the patients with persistent/ recurrent disease. We compared recurrence rates between patients with and without detectable TSH-stimulated Thyroglobulin levels. Results: Recurrence rate was significantly higher in patients with positive stimulated Tg measurement within one year after treatment (p<0.001) While the negative predictive value (NPV) of an undectectable Tg was 0.97 for both high and low risk patients. The percentage of high risk patients with undetectable Tg after one year however is significantly lower compared to low risk patients. Conclusion: Recurrence rates for patients with undectable TSH stimulated Tg one year after initial diagnosis is very low and identical for low and high risk patients. Therefore it seems sensible to discharge patients from a strict specialist follow-up regime.

Detection of distant interval metastases after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer with 18F-FDG PET(/CT): a systematic review and meta-analysis

Restaging after neoadjuvant therapy aims to reduce the number of patients undergoing esophagectomy in case of distant (interval) metastases. The aim of this study is to systematically review and meta-analyze the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) and 18F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of distant interval metastases after neoadjuvant therapy in patients with esophageal cancer. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane library were systematically searched. The analysis included diagnostic studies reporting on the detection of distant interval metastases with 18F-FDG PET(/CT) in patients with esophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant therapy and both baseline staging and restaging after neoadjuvant therapy with 18F-FDG PET(/CT) imaging. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients in whom distant interval metastases were detected by 18F-FDG PET(/CT) as confirmed by pathology or clinical follow-up (i.e. true positives). The secondary outcome measure was the proportion of patients in whom 18F-FDG PET(/CT) restaging was false positive for distant interval metastases (i.e. false positives). Risk of bias and applicability concerns were assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Random-effect models were used to estimate pooled outcomes and examine potential sources of heterogeneity. Fourteen studies were included comprising a total of 1,110 patients who received baseline staging with 18F-FDG PET(/CT) imaging of whom 1,001 (90%) underwent restaging with 18F-FDG PET(/CT) imaging. Studies were generally of moderate quality. The pooled proportion of patients in whom true distant interval metastases were detected by 18F-FDG PET(/CT) restaging was 8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5-13%). The pooled proportion of patients in whom false positive distant findings were detected by 18F-FDG PET(/CT) restaging was 5% (95% CI: 3-9%). In conclusion,18F-FDG PET(/CT) restaging after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer detects true distant interval metastases in 8% of patients. Therefore, 18F-FDG PET(/CT) restaging can considerably impact on treatment decision-making. However, false positive distant findings occur in 5% of patients at restaging with 18F-FDG PET(/CT), underlining the need for pathological confirmation of suspected lesions.