B. Hulsegge

Longissimus muscle transcriptome profiles related to carcass and meat quality traits in fresh meat Pietrain carcasses

High quality pork is consumed as fresh meat, whereas other carcasses are used in the processing industry. Meat quality is determined measuring technical muscle variables. The objective of this research was to investigate the molecular regulatory mechanisms underlying meat quality differences of pork originating from genetically different Piétrain boars. Piétrain boars were approved for high meat quality using a DNA marker panel. Other Piétrain boars were indicated as average. Both groups produced litters in similar Piétrain sows. The LM were sampled from 9 carcasses produced by approved boars and 8 carcasses of average boars. Total RNA was isolated, and an equal portion of each sample was pooled to make a reference sample representing the mean of all samples. Each sample was hybridized on microarrays against the reference in duplicate using a dye swaps design. After normalization and subtraction of 2 times the background, only genes expressed in at least 5 carcasses were analyzed. For all analyses the mean of the M-values relative to the reference (i.e., fold change), were used. Sixteen genes showed significant linear or quadratic associations between gene expression and meat color (Minolta a* value, Minolta L* value, reflection, pH 24 h) after Bonferroni correction. All these genes had expression levels similar to the reference in all carcasses. Studying association between gene expression levels and meat quality using only genes with expression statistically differing from the reference in at least 5 carcasses revealed 29 more genes associating with the technological meat quality variables, again with meat color as a main trait. These associations were not significant after Bonferroni correction and explained less of the phenotypic variation in the traits. Bioinformatics analyses with The Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) using the list of genes with more than 2-fold changed expression level revealed that these genes were mainly found in muscle-specific processes, protein complexes, and oxygen transport, and located to muscle-specific cellular localizations. Pathway analysis using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database revealed pathways related to protein metabolism, cellular proliferation, signaling, and adipose development differing between the 2 groups of carcasses. Approved meat carcasses showed less variation in gene expression. The results highlight biological molecular mechanisms underlying the differences between the high meat quality approved and average boars.

Selection of SNP from 50K and 777K arrays to predict breed of origin in cattle.

Reliable breed assignment can be performed with SNP. Currently, high density SNP chips are available with large numbers of SNP from which the most informative SNP can be selected for breed assignment. Several methods have been published to select the most informative SNP to distinguish among breeds. In this study, we evaluated Delta, Wrights FST, and Weir and Cockerhams FST, and extended these methods by adding a rule to avoid selection of sets of SNP in high linkage disequilibrium (LD) providing the same information. The SNP that had a r2 value>0.3 with any of the SNP already selected were discarded. The different selection methods were evaluated for both the 50K SNP and 777K Bovine BeadChip. Animals from 4 cattle breeds (989 Holstein Friesian, 97 Groningen White headed, 137 Meuse-Rhine-Yssel, and 64 Dutch Friesian) were genotyped. After editing 30,447 and 452,525 SNP were available for the 50K and 777K SNP chip, respectively. All selection methods showed that only a small set of SNP is needed to differentiate among the 4 Dutch cattle breeds, whereas comparison of the selection methods showed only small differences. In general, the 777K performed marginally better than the 50K BeadChip, especially at higher confidence thresholds. The rule to avoid selection of SNP in high LD reduced the required number of SNP to achieve correct breed assignment. The Global Weir and Cockerhams FST performed marginally better than other selection methods. There was little overlap in the SNP selected from the 2 BeadChips, whereas the number of SNP selected was about the same.

A Pathway Analysis Tool for Analyzing Microarray Data of Species with Low Physiological Information

Pathway information provides insight into the biological processes underlying microarray data. Pathway information is widely available for humans and laboratory animals in databases through the internet, but less for other species, for example, livestock. Many software packages use species-specific gene IDs that cannot handle genomics data from other species. We developed a species-independent method to search pathways databases to analyse microarray data. Three PERL scripts were developed that use the names of the genes on the microarray. (1) Add synonyms of gene names by searching the Gene Ontology (GO) database. (2) Search the Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database for pathway information using this GO-enriched gene list. (3) Combine the pathway data with the microarray data and visualize the results using color codes indicating regulation. To demonstrate the power of the method, we used a previously reported chicken microarray experiment investigating line-specific reactions to Salmonella infection as an example.

Conservation priorities for the different lines of Dutch Red and White Friesian cattle change when relationships with other breeds are taken into account

From a genetic point of view, the selection of breeds and animals within breeds for conservation in a national gene pool can be based on a maximum diversity strategy. This implies that priority is given to conservation of breeds and animals that diverge most and overlap of conserved diversity is minimized. This study investigated the genetic diversity in the Dutch Red and White Friesian (DFR) cattle breed and its contribution to the total genetic diversity in the pool of the Dutch dairy breeds. All Dutch cattle breeds are clearly distinct, except for Dutch Friesian breed (DF) and DFR and have their own specific genetic identity. DFR has a small but unique contribution to the total genetic diversity of Dutch cattle breeds and is closely related to the Dutch Friesian breed. Seven different lines are distinguished within the DFR breed and all contribute to the diversity of the DFR breed. Two lines show the largest contributions to the genetic diversity in DFR. One of these lines comprises unique diversity both within the breed and across all cattle breeds. The other line comprises unique diversity for the DFR but overlaps with the Holstein Friesian breed. There seems to be no necessity to conserve the other five lines separately, because their level of differentiation is very low. This study illustrates that, when taking conservation decisions for a breed, it is worthwhile to take into account the population structure of the breed itself and the relationships with other breeds.