B. J. Hering

Total Pancreatectomy and Islet Autotransplantation for Chronic Pancreatitis

BACKGROUND Total pancreatectomy (TP) with intraportal islet autotransplantation (IAT) can relieve pain and preserve β-cell mass in patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) when other therapies fail. We report on a >30-year single-center series. STUDY DESIGN Four hundred and nine patients (including 53 children, 5 to 18 years) with CP underwent TP-IAT from February 1977 to September 2011 (etiology: idiopathic, 41%; Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction/biliary, 9%; genetic, 14%; divisum, 17%; alcohol, 7%; and other, 12%; mean age was 35.3 years, 74% were female; 21% has earlier operations, including 9% Puestow procedure, 6% Whipple, 7% distal pancreatectomy, and 2% other). Islet function was classified as insulin independent for those on no insulin; partial, if known C-peptide positive or euglycemic on once-daily insulin; and insulin dependent if on standard basal-bolus diabetic regimen. A 36-item Short Form (SF-36) survey for quality of life was completed by patients before and in serial follow-up since 2007, with an integrated survey that was added in 2008. RESULTS Actuarial patient survival post TP-IAT was 96% in adults and 98% in children (1 year) and 89% and 98% (5 years). Complications requiring relaparotomy occurred in 15.9% and bleeding (9.5%) was the most common complication. IAT function was achieved in 90% (C-peptide >0.6 ng/mL). At 3 years, 30% were insulin independent (25% in adults, 55% in children) and 33% had partial function. Mean hemoglobin A1c was <7.0% in 82%. Earlier pancreas surgery lowered islet yield (2,712 vs 4,077/kg; p = 0.003). Islet yield (<2,500/kg [36%]; 2,501 to 5,000/kg [39%]; >5,000/kg [24%]) correlated with degree of function with insulin-independent rates at 3 years of 12%, 22%, and 72%, and rates of partial function 33%, 62%, and 24%. All patients had pain before TP-IAT and nearly all were on daily narcotics. After TP-IAT, 85% had pain improvement. By 2 years, 59% had ceased narcotics. All children were on narcotics before, 39% at follow-up; pain improved in 94%; and 67% became pain-free. In the SF-36 survey, there was significant improvement from baseline in all dimensions, including the Physical and Mental Component Summaries (p < 0.01), whether on narcotics or not. CONCLUSIONS TP can ameliorate pain and improve quality of life in otherwise refractory CP patients, even if narcotic withdrawal is delayed or incomplete because of earlier long-term use. IAT preserves meaningful islet function in most patients and substantial islet function in more than two thirds of patients, with insulin independence occurring in one quarter of adults and half the children.

Potent induction immunotherapy promotes long-term insulin independence after islet transplantation in type 1 diabetes.

The seemingly inexorable decline in insulin independence after islet transplant alone (ITA) has raised concern about its clinical utility. We hypothesized that induction immunosuppression therapy determines durability of insulin independence. We analyzed the proportion of insulin‐independent patients following final islet infusion in four groups of ITA recipients according to induction immunotherapy: University of Minnesota recipients given FcR nonbinding anti‐CD3 antibody alone or T cell depleting antibodies (TCDAb) and TNF‐α inhibition (TNF‐α‐i) (group 1; n = 29); recipients reported to the Collaborative Islet Transplant Registry (CITR) given TCDAb+TNF‐α‐i (group 2; n = 20); CITR recipients given TCDAb without TNF‐α‐i (group 3; n = 43); and CITR recipients given IL‐2 receptor antibodies (IL‐2RAb) alone (group 4; n = 177). Results were compared with outcomes in pancreas transplant alone (PTA) recipients reported to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (group 5; n = 677). The 5‐year insulin independence rates in group 1 (50%) and group 2 (50%) were comparable to outcomes in PTA (group 5: 52%; p>>0.05) but significantly higher than in group 3 (0%; p = 0.001) and group 4 (20%; p = 0.02). Induction immunosuppression was significantly associated with 5‐year insulin independence (p = 0.03), regardless of maintenance immunosuppression or other factors. These findings support potential for long‐term insulin independence after ITA using potent induction therapy, with anti‐CD3 Ab or TCDAb+TNF‐α‐i.

Engraftment of adult porcine islet xenografts in diabetic nonhuman primates through targeting of costimulation pathways

Recent advances in human allogeneic islet transplantation have established β‐cell replacement therapy as a potentially viable treatment option for individuals afflicted with Type 1 diabetes. Two recent successes, one involving neonatal porcine islet xenografts transplanted into diabetic rhesus macaques treated with a costimulation blockade‐based regimen and the other involving diabetic cynomolgus monkeys transplanted with adult porcine islet xenografts treated with an alternative multidrug immunosuppressive regimen have demonstrated the feasibility of porcine islet xenotransplantation in nonhuman primate models. In the current study, we assessed whether transplantation of adult porcine islet xenografts into pancreatectomized macaques, under the cover of a costimulation blockade‐based immunosuppressive regimen (CD28 and CD154 blockade), could correct hyperglycemia. Our findings suggest that the adult porcine islets transplanted into rhesus macaques receiving a costimulation blockade‐based regimen are not uniformly subject to hyperacute rejection, can engraft (2/5 recipients), and have the potential to provide sustained normoglycemia. These results provide further evidence to suggest that porcine islet xenotransplantation may be an attainable strategy to alleviate the islet supply crisis that is one of the principal obstacles to large‐scale application of islet replacement therapy in the treatment of Type 1 diabetes.

Distant processing of pancreas islets for autotransplantation following total pancreatectomy.

BACKGROUND Small duct chronic pancreatitis is associated with intractable pain and failure to thrive, usually unresponsive to conventional management approaches. Total pancreatectomy is considered after failure of medical intervention. The major morbidity following total pancreatectomy is diabetes mellitus with its associated complications. This adverse outcome can be mitigated through autotransplantation of islets recovered from the pancreatectomy specimen. This approach has been limited historically owing to the absence of an on-site islet processing facility. We present the results from 5 pancreatectomized patients whose islets were prepared 1,500 miles away. METHODS Five patients (4 women, 1 man, average age 42 years) who failed medical therapy and were not candidates for longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy underwent total/completion pancreatectomy (4 total, 1 completion) for intractable symptoms from idiopathic small duct chronic pancreatitis. The resected pancreata were preserved in ViaSpan solution and were transferred to an islet processing laboratory by commercial airliner and returned. The dispersed pancreatic islet tissue was infused into a portal vein tributary through an operatively placed catheter after systemic heparinization. RESULTS All 5 patients experienced complete relief from pancreatic pain; 2 had significant residual discomfort from underlying Crohns disease. Three of the 5 patients had minimal or no insulin requirement after autotransplantation (median follow-up of 23 months); 1 patient continued with glycemic control difficulties related to Crohns disease. One patient died 17 months following autotransplantation from an unrelated pneumonia. CONCLUSION Total pancreatectomy with autologous islet transplantation can offer patients with idiopathic small duct chronic pancreatitis pain relief without the sequelae of diabetes mellitus and can be performed without an on-site islet processing facility. All patients undergoing total/ completion pancreatectomy should be considered candidates for this procedure.

Human Islet Isolation for Autologous Transplantation: Comparison of Yield and Function Using SERVA/Nordmark Versus Roche Enzymes

Islet autotransplantation (IAT) is used to preserve as much insulin‐secretory capacity as possible in patients undergoing total pancreatectomy for painful chronic pancreatitis. The enzyme used to dissociate the pancreas is a critical determinant of islet yield, which is correlated with posttransplant function. Here, we present our experience with IAT procedures to compare islet product data using the new enzyme SERVA/Nordmark (SN group; n = 46) with the standard enzyme Liberase‐HI (LH group; n = 40). Total islet yields (mean ± standard deviation; 216 417 ± 79 278 islet equivalent [IEQ] in the LH group; 227 958 ± 58 544 IEQ in the SN group; p = 0.67) were similar. However, the percentage of embedded islets is higher in the SN group compared to the LH group. Significant differences were found in pancreas digestion time, dilution time, and digested pancreas weight between the two groups. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed the two groups differed in portal venous pressure changes. The incidence of graft function and insulin independence was not different between the two groups. The SN and LH enzymes are associated with similar outcomes for IAT. Further optimization of the collagenase/neutral protease ratio is necessary to reduce the number of embedded islets obtained when using the SN enzyme.

VIABLE ISLET DOSE BASED ON OXYGEN CONSUMPTION RATE PREDICTS CLINICAL ISLET AUTOTRANSPLANT OUTCOME: 2010

K.K. Papas1, M. Bellin1, D.E. Sutherland1, K. Mueller2, E.S. Avgoustiniatos1, A.N. Balamurugan3, P.R. Rozak1, G.L. Loganathan1, D. Qian4, J.C. Niland4, B.J. Hering1 1Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2Department Of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 3Surgery, Schulze Diabetes Institute, Minneapolis/MN/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 4Information Science, City of Hope, Duarte/CA/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Defective Glucagon Secretion During Hypoglycemia After Intrahepatic But Not Nonhepatic Islet Autotransplantation: Autoislets and Defective Glucagon Secretion

Defective glucagon secretion during hypoglycemia after islet transplantation has been reported in animals and humans with type 1 diabetes. To ascertain whether this is true of islets from nondiabetic humans, subjects with autoislet transplantation in the intrahepatic site only (TP/IAT‐H) or in intrahepatic plus nonhepatic (TP/IAT‐H+NH) sites were studied. Glucagon responses were examined during stepped hypoglycemic clamps. Glucagon and symptom responses during hypoglycemia were virtually absent in subjects who received islets in the hepatic site only (glucagon increment over baseline = 1 ± 6, pg/mL, mean ± SE, n = 9, p = ns; symptom score = 1 ± 1, p = ns). When islets were transplanted in both intrahepatic + nonhepatic sites, glucagon and symptom responses were not significantly different than Control Subjects (TP/IAT‐H + NH: glucagon increment = 54 ± 14, n = 5; symptom score = 7 ± 3; control glucagon increment = 67 ± 15, n = 5; symptom score = 8 ± 1). In contrast, glucagon responses to intravenous arginine were present in TP/IAT‐H recipients (TP/IAT: glucagon response = 37 ± 8, n = 7). Transplantation of a portion of the islets into a nonhepatic site should be seriously considered in TP/IAT to avoid posttransplant abnormalities in glucagon and symptom responses to hypoglycemia.

Metabolic Assessment Prior to Total Pancreatectomy and Islet Autotransplant: Utility, Limitations and Potential: Metabolic Assessment Prior to TPIAT

Islet autotransplant (IAT) may ameliorate postsurgical diabetes following total pancreatectomy (TP), but outcomes are dependent upon islet mass, which is unknown prior to pancreatectomy. We evaluated whether preoperative metabolic testing could predict islet isolation outcomes and thus improve assessment of TPIAT candidates. We examined the relationship between measures from frequent sample IV glucose tolerance tests (FSIVGTT) and mixed meal tolerance tests (MMTT) and islet mass in 60 adult patients, with multivariate logistic regression modeling to identify predictors of islet mass ≥2500 IEQ/kg. The acute C‐peptide response to glucose (ACRglu) and disposition index from FSIVGTT correlated modestly with the islet equivalents per kilogram body weight (IEQ/kg). Fasting and MMTT glucose levels and HbA1c correlated inversely with IEQ/kg (r values −0.33 to −0.40, p ≤ 0.05). In multivariate logistic regression modeling, normal fasting glucose (<100 mg/dL) and stimulated C‐peptide on MMTT ≥4 ng/mL were associated with greater odds of receiving an islet mass ≥2500 IEQ/kg (OR 0.93 for fasting glucose, CI 0.87–1.0; OR 7.9 for C‐peptide, CI 1.75–35.6). In conclusion, parameters obtained from FSIVGTT correlate modestly with islet isolation outcomes. Stimulated C‐peptide ≥4 ng/mL on MMTT conveyed eight times the odds of receiving ≥2500 IEQ/kg, a threshold associated with reasonable metabolic control postoperatively.

FACTORS AFFECTING TRANSPLANT OUTCOME IN DIABETIC NUDE MICE RECEIVING HUMAN, PORCINE, AND NON-HUMAN PRIMATE ISLETS: LESSONS FROM 328 TRANSPLANTATIONS: 3189

G.L. Loganathan1, D. Radosevich2, T. anazawa3, M. Graham4, K.K. Papas1, D.E. Sutherland1, B.J. Hering1, A.N. Balamurugan5 1Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2Surgery, University of Minneasota, Minneapolis/ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 3Surgery, Schulze Diabetes Institute, Minneapolis/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 4, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis/MN/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 5Surgery, Schulze Diabetes Institute, Minneapolis/MN/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

SEVERELY FIBROTIC PANCREATA FROM YOUNG PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC PANCREATITIS: EVIDENCE FOR DUCTAL NEOGENESIS OF ISLETS: 3182

A.N. Balamurugan1, T.D. O’Brien2, G.L. Loganathan3, M. Bellin3, T. anazawa4, K.K. Papas3, S. vickers1, B.J. Hering3, D.E. Sutherland3 1Surgery, Schulze Diabetes Institute, Minneapolis/MN/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnestoa, St. Paul/MN/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 3Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 4Surgery, Schulze Diabetes Institute, Minneapolis/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA