B Kulzer

Prevention of Diabetes Self-Management Program (PREDIAS): Effects on Weight, Metabolic Risk Factors, and Behavioral Outcomes

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of the group program PREDIAS for diabetes prevention. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS PREDIAS consists of 12 lessons and aims at lifestyle modification. The control group received written information about diabetes prevention. In this study, a total of 182 persons with an elevated diabetes risk participated (aged 56.3 ± 10.1 years, 43% female, and BMI 31.5 ± 5.3 kg/m2). RESULTS After 12 months, weight loss was significantly higher (P = 0.001) in PREDIAS than in the control group (−3.8 ± 5.2 vs. −1.4 ± 4.09 kg). There were also significant effects (P = 0.001) on fasting glucose (control group 1.8 ± 13.1 mg/dl vs. PREDIAS −4.3 ± 11.3 mg/dl), duration of physical activity per week (control group 17.9 ± 63.8 min vs. PREDIAS 46.6 ± 95.5 min; P = 0.03), and eating behavior. CONCLUSIONS PREDIAS significantly modified lifestyle factors associated with an elevated diabetes risk.

Psychosocial Factors and Diabetes Mellitus: Evidence-Based Treatment Guidelines

The aim of this project was to develop evidence-based guidelines regarding psychosocial aspects of diabetes mellitus in an effort to help the clinician bridge the gap between research and practice. Recommendations address the following topics: patient education, behavioural medicine, and psychiatric disorders of particular relevance to diabetes: depression, anxiety disorders, eating disorders, and dependence on alcohol and nicotine. The present guidelines were developed through an interdisciplinary process of consensus according to the specifications of evidence-based medicine and are recognized by the German Diabetes Association and the German College for Psychosomatic Medicine as their official guidelines.

The effect of an education programme (HyPOS) to treat hypoglycaemia problems in patients with type 1 diabetes

In a randomized, prospective multi‐centre trial, the effect of a specific training programme (HyPOS) for patients with hypoglycaemia problems was compared with a control group (CG), receiving a standardized education programme aiming at avoidance of hypoglycaemia by optimization of insulin therapy.

Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in an onset cohort of adults with type 1 diabetes

Previous studies indicate a high prevalence of psychiatric disorders in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus. The aim of our study was to determine if newly diagnosed adults with type 1 diabetes already have an elevated rate of psychiatric disorders at the beginning of their physical illness.

Current Trends in Continuous Glucose Monitoring

The market introduction of systems for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) some 15 years ago did not immediately revolutionize the treatment of diabetes; however, for a given group of patients, it would almost be inconceivable nowadays to imagine life without CGM. One day the development of insulin pumps together with CGM could culminate in an artificial pancreas system. The performance of the glucose sensors used for glucose measurement in the interstitial fluid in the subcutaneous tissue and the algorithms employed to analyze these data have improved so much over the past decade that current CGM systems by far outperform those of the first generations. This commentary discusses a number of aspects about what we have learned since CGM systems entered the market and what current trends exist in their usage. Some of these are major hurdles facing a more widespread usage of CGM.

The effect of an education programme (MEDIAS 2 ICT) involving intensive insulin treatment for people with type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE In a randomized, multi-centre trial, the effect of an education programme (MEDIAS 2 ICT) involving intensive insulin treatment for people with type 2 diabetes was compared with an established education programme as an active comparator condition (ACC). METHODS We investigated whether MEDIAS 2 ICT was non-inferior to ACC in overall glycaemic control. Secondary outcomes were the diabetes-related distress, diabetes knowledge, quality of life, self-care behavior, lipids, blood pressure and weight. RESULTS 186 subjects were randomized. After a six month follow-up the mean HbA1c decrease was 0.37% (from 8.2±1.1% to 7.8±1.5%) in the ACC and 0.63% (from 8.5±1.5% to 7.9±1.2%) in MEDIAS 2 ICT. The mean difference between both groups was -0.26% (95% CI -0.63 to -0.14) in favor of MEDIAS 2 ICT. This result was within the predefined limit for non-inferiority. Diabetes-related distress was significantly more reduced in MEDIAS 2 ICT (-3.4±7.1) than in ACC (0.4±9.0; p=0.31). CONCLUSION MEDIAS 2 ICT is as effective in lowering HbA1c as previously established education programmes, but showed superiority in reducing diabetes-related distress. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS MEDIAS 2 ICT provides an alternative for education of people with type 2 diabetes treated by multiple injection therapy.

What Are the Next Steps in Continuous Glucose Monitoring

The development of glucose sensors for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is likely still in its early days. A number of novel approaches—along with many attempts to improve current CGM systems—are in development. The next generation of glucose sensors (NGGS) will also enable, for example, reliable glucose measurement in the low glycemic range. NGGS systems represent an important step forward for closed-loop systems. This commentary discusses a number of aspects that are relevant in this context.

Short-Term Effects on Patient Satisfaction of Continuous Glucose Monitoring with the GlucoDay with Real-Time and Retrospective Access to Glucose Values: A Crossover Study

BACKGROUND This randomized crossover trial examines the effect of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) with real-time access (RTA) to glucose data versus CGM with a retrospective analysis (RA) of glucose data regarding satisfaction with CGM and other patient-reported outcomes. METHODS Participants used the CGM device (GlucoDay, Menarini Diagnostics, Florence, Italy) twice. In one study phase, patients were allowed RTA to, and in the other phase RA of, current glucose values. The order of these two conditions was randomized. At baseline and after the first and second trials, subjects completed questionnaires (Continuous Glucose Monitoring Satisfaction Scale) about perceived satisfaction with CGM. They also completed the Problem Areas in Diabetes Questionnaire, a state anxiety scale (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory), and a depression scale (Center of Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale). RESULTS Fifty patients with type 1 diabetes (41.7 +/- 12.3 years old, diabetes duration of 14.75 +/- 11.9 years, 48% female, hemoglobin A1c 8.1 +/- 1.5%, years of education 10.3 +/- 2.1 years) participated in this study. At baseline patients perceived CGM as rather advantageous, but after RA and RTA the perceived benefits were reduced (baseline, 101.0 +/- 16.0; RA, 95.7 +/- 20.2; RTA, 93.6 +/- 22.8; P < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference between RA and RTA. Also, there was no significant effect on diabetes-related distress or state anxiety, but a positive effect on depression scores. CONCLUSIONS There was no specific, significant, negative or positive effect of RA versus RTA on satisfaction with CGM. Exposing patients with type 1 diabetes to their current glucose values does not seem to have a specific negative impact on the appraisal of CGM or more generic patient-reported outcomes.

Interferences and Limitations in Blood Glucose Self-Testing An Overview of the Current Knowledge

In general, patients with diabetes performing self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) can strongly rely on the accuracy of measurement results. However, various factors such as application errors, extreme environmental conditions, extreme hematocrit values, or medication interferences may potentially falsify blood glucose readings. Incorrect blood glucose readings may lead to treatment errors, for example, incorrect insulin dosing. Therefore, the diabetes team as well as the patients should be well informed about limitations in blood glucose testing. The aim of this publication is to review the current knowledge on limitations and interferences in blood glucose testing with the perspective of their clinical relevance.

Diabetes and Depression - A Burdensome Co-morbidity

1. Head of Research, Research Institute of the Diabetes Academy, Mergentheim; 2. Head of Psychosocial Care, Diabetes Centre, Mergentheim Diabetes and Depression Depression is a frequent co-morbid condition in people with diabetes. A meta-analysis of 42 studies demonstrated that 31% of patients with diabetes described themselves as having elevated depressive symptoms compared with 14% of those without diabetes. A clinical depression diagnosis based on standardised criteria defined by the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision (ICD-10) or the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM IV) occurred in 11.4% of patients with diabetes, whereas the prevalence in people without diabetes was 5%.1 In clinical care settings this means that out of 100 patients with diabetes, approximately 11‐12 meet the diagnostic criteria for clinical depression and another 20 have mild or subthreshold depression. Thus, approximately every third patient with diabetes is affected by depression or elevated depressive symptoms. The reasons for this close association between diabetes and depression are not yet fully understood. Below we will discuss three possible explanations.