Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where B. Levesy is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by B. Levesy.


ieee symposium on fusion engineering | 2013

Final design and start of manufacture of the ITER Vacuum Vessel ports

Y. Utin; A. Alekseev; C. Sborchia; C.H. Choi; Hee Jae Ahn; V. Barabash; J. Davis; S. Fabritsiev; F. Geli; B. Giraud; C. Jun; K. Ioki; H. Kim; E. Kuzmin; R. Le Barbier; B. Levesy; J.-M. Martinez; C. Park; E. Privalova; J.W. Sa; P.V. Savrukhin; X. Wang

The ITER Vacuum Vessel (VV) features upper, equatorial and lower ports. Although the port design has been overall completed in the past, the design of some remaining interfaces was still in progress and has been finalized now. As the ITER construction phase has started, the procurement of the VV ports has been launched. The VV upper ports will be procured by the Russian Federation DA, while the equatorial and lower ports will be procured by the Korean DA. The main industrial suppliers were selected and development of the manufacturing design is in progress now. Since the VV is classified at nuclear level N2, design and manufacture of its components are to be compliant with the French code RCC-MR and regulations of nuclear pressure equipment in France. These regulations make a strong impact to the port design and manufacturing process, which is in progress now.


ieee symposium on fusion engineering | 2013

Management of the ITER configuration towards construction phase

I. Kuehn; J.J. Cordier; S. Chiocchio; Romaric Darbour; Miikka Kotamaki; B. Levesy; Laurent Patisson; J. Reich; S. Sweeney

Control of the engineering data describing the physical configuration of the machine is a key factor for performing construction activities in time and within costs. This will allow minimizing the risk of future changes, the identification of all missing items and will ensure that the interfaces among different systems remain stable. Thus, the main priority for the Central Integration and Engineering directorate in ITER was to achieve a well described, reviewed and stable definition of the reference configuration. This requires not only that design of all systems is sufficiently detailed to ensure that all key safety and performance requirements have been satisfied, but also that all integration issues among the different systems have been identified and solved.


ieee symposium on fusion engineering | 2015

Integration of diagnostics on ITER

M. Walsh; P. Andrew; R. Barnsley; L. Bertalot; R. Bouhamou; L. Caplat; Natalia Casal; G. Counsell; M. Dapena; M.F.M. de Bock; J. M. Drevon; T. Fang; R. Feder; Julio Guirao; T. Giacomin; R. Gianella; P. Gitton; J. Govindrajan; M. Keane; I. Keuhn; Y. Ma; M. von Hellermann; K. Itami; D. Johnson; V. Kumar; H. G. Lee; B. Levesy; A. Martin; P. Maquet; R. O'Connor

Diagnostics play a very important role in the modern Tokamak where optimum performance is essential. To achieve this, the device must be equipped with reliable and robust sensors and instrumentation that allow the operation envelope to be fully explored. Development of these diagnostics to maintain this reliability is necessary. Further to the development, the systems must be integrated in a way that maintains their performance while simultaneously satisfying the key requirements needed for safety and tokamak operation. ITER will have 50 diagnostics; almost all of which are utilized primarily for the real-time operation of the tokamak. While there is still much work to do, to date, significant progress has been made in the development of these systems. The work load for the developments is shared across all the ITER partners. This paper focuses on the challenges for the integration of the systems.


Fusion Engineering and Design | 2014

Status of ITER TBM port plug conceptual design and analyses

Byoung Yoon Kim; Flavien Sabourin; M. Merola; L.M. Giancarli; R. Villari; P.A. Di Maio; F. Lucca; Matteo Marconi; B. Levesy


Fusion Engineering and Design | 2016

Progress and challenges of the ITER TBM Program from the IO perspective

L.M. Giancarli; V. Barabash; D.J. Campbell; S. Chiocchio; J.J. Cordier; A. Dammann; G. Dell’Orco; Joëlle Elbez-Uzan; J.M. Fourneron; J.P. Friconneau; M. Gasparotto; Markus Iseli; C.-Y. Jung; Byoung-Yoon Kim; D. Lazarov; B. Levesy; M. Loughlin; M. Merola; J.-C. Nevière; R. Pascal; W. Ring; I. Schneiderova; Scott Willms; A. Siarras; W. Shu; J.A. Snipes; J.G. van der Laan


Fusion Engineering and Design | 2011

Cask and plug handling system design in port cell

J.P. Martins; J.P. Friconneau; Eros Gabellini; Delphine Keller; B. Levesy; Anna Selvi; A. Tesini; Y. Utin; Julien Wagrez


Fusion Engineering and Design | 2015

Shutdown dose rates at ITER equatorial ports considering radiation cross-talk from torus cryopump lower port

Rafael Juarez; Raul Pampin; B. Levesy; F. Moro; Alejandro Suarez; J. Sanz


Fusion Engineering and Design | 2013

The ITER divertor pumping system, design evolution, simplification and performance

Robert Pearce; Alexander Antipenkov; Bastien Boussier; Stephan Bryan; Matthias Dremel; B. Levesy; Christian Mayaux; Michael Wykes


Fusion Engineering and Design | 2013

Progress of ITER vacuum vessel

K. Ioki; A. Bayon; C.H. Choi; E. Daly; S. Dani; J. Davis; B. Giraud; Y. Gribov; C. Hamlyn-Harris; C. Jun; B. Levesy; B.C. Kim; E. Kuzmin; R. Le Barbier; J.-M. Martinez; H. Pathak; J. Preble; J.W. Sa; A. Terasawa; Yu. Utin; X. Wang


Fusion Engineering and Design | 2013

Main maintenance operations for Test Blanket Systems in ITER TBM port cells

R. Pascal; Pierre Cortes; J.P. Friconneau; L.M. Giancarli; Krishan Kumar Gotewal; Markus Iseli; Byoung-Yoon Kim; B. Levesy; J.P. Martins; M. Merola; J.-C. Nevière; Laurent Patisson; A. Siarras; A. Tesini

Collaboration


Dive into the B. Levesy's collaboration.

Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge