B.M. van Ineveld
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by B.M. van Ineveld.
British Journal of Cancer | 1999
J. Fracheboud; H.J. de Koning; Petra M. M. Beemsterboer; R. Boer; A.L.M. Verbeek; J.H.C.L. Hendriks; B.M. van Ineveld; M.J.M. Broeders; A.E. de Bruyn; P.J. van der Maas
The nationwide breast cancer screening programme in The Netherlands for women aged 50–69 started in 1989. In our study we assessed the occurrence and stage distribution of interval cancers in women screened during 1990–1993. Records of 0.84 million screened women were linked to the regional cancer registries yielding a follow-up of at least 2.5 years. Age-adjusted incidence rates and relative (proportionate) incidences per tumour size including ductal carcinoma in-situ were calculated for screen-detected and interval cancers, and cancers in not (yet) screened women, comparing them with published data from the UK regions North West and East Anglia. In total 1527 interval cancers were identified: 0.95 and 0.99 per 1000 woman-years of follow-up in the 2-year interval after initial and subsequent screens respectively. In the first year after initial screening interval cancers amounted to 27% (26% after subsequent screens) of underlying incidence, and in the second year to 52% (55%). Generally, interval cancers had a more favourable tumour size distribution than breast cancer in not (yet) screened women. The Dutch programme detected relatively less (favourable) invasive cancers in initial screens than the UK programme, whereas the number of interval cancers confirms UK findings. Measures should be considered to improve the detection of small invasive cancers and to reduce false-negative rates, even if this will lead to increasing referral rates.
British Journal of Cancer | 1992
H.J. de Koning; B.M. van Ineveld; J.C.J.M. de Haes; G.J. van Oortmarssen; J.G.M. Klijn; P.J. van der Maas
In discussions on breast cancer screening, much attention has been focussed on the possible morbidity generated by screening. Favourable effects like the prevention of advanced disease seem underestimated, probably because quantification is that difficult. To analyse the amount of care and treatment given to women with advanced breast cancer, we report on patients followed from first recurrence until death using patient files and national sources. A random sample of 60 female cases from computerised registries of two cancer centres and a sample of 20 cases from a non-computerised hospital registry was taken. A total of 68 patient files were sufficiently documented. A woman with advanced breast cancer is estimated to have a 39% loss in utility compared to a healthy woman (range 27-45%). Hormonal treatment is the main modality during 14 and chemotherapy during 4 months. Total medical cost from diagnosis of advanced disease until death amounts to 17,100 US dollars, or 21,000 when including extramural cost. The effect of breast cancer screening by preventing the occurrence of advanced disease is quantified. The resulting gain in quality of life contributes 70% of the total gain in quality of life. In the long run, almost half of the annual cost of screening will be offset by savings in the cost for advanced disease. Only the changes in palliative surgery and/or radiotherapy will be small in contrast to primary treatment changes. Besides the mortality reduction, screening is justified by the improvements in quality of life and cost savings for women prevented from reaching advanced disease.
European Journal of Cancer | 2001
M van Agthoven; B.M. van Ineveld; M. de Boer; Charles R. Leemans; Paul Knegt; G.B Snow; Ca Uyl-de Groot
We retrospectively calculated the costs of head and neck oncology for reimbursement purposes. This analysis was based on 854 head and neck cancer patients treated between 1994 and 1996 in two major Dutch university hospitals. To anticipate future care costs, costs of required improvements in the quality of care were added. Costs of diagnosis, treatment and 2 years of follow-up of patients with a primary tumour were (euro) 21 858. For patients with a recurrent tumour, this amount was (euro) 27 629. The costs of 10 years of follow-up were (euro) 423 after discounting and correction for survival. In total, average costs per new patient were (euro) 31 829, which covered discounted costs of treating the primary tumour, costs of treating recurrent tumours in 40% of all patients and the costs of 10 years of follow-up. Costs of improving the quality of care were estimated to be (euro) 1598 per new patient.
British Journal of Cancer | 1990
H.J. de Koning; G.J. van Oortmarssen; B.M. van Ineveld; P.J. van der Maas
Breast cancer screening is generally accepted as an effective means of reducing breast cancer mortality in post-menopausal women. In this analysis the impact of nationwide screening on clinical medicine and the effects for the women involved are quantified. Effect estimates are based on results from screening trials in Utrecht (DOM-project) and Nijmegen, and on bi-annual screening of women aged 50-70. The consequences for health care are based on generally accepted assessment and treatment policies. The number of assessment procedures for non-palpable lesions will increase by 12% per year in the build-up period, and will remain slightly higher. The total number of biopsies in a real population is expected to decrease. Screening will lead to a shift in primary treatment modalities, as 15% of mastectomies will be replaced by breast conserving therapy. The temporary increase in the demand for primary treatment in the first years will be followed by a decrease in the demand for treating women with advanced disease. Favourable effects outweigh the inevitable unfavourable effects, with high quality screening and an appropriate invitation system. Breast cancer screening can also be recommended after considering other consequences than mortality reduction.
Journal of Hematotherapy & Stem Cell Research | 2001
Ca Uyl-de Groot; J. Gelderblom-den Hartog; Peter C. Huijgens; R. Willemze; B.M. van Ineveld
The aim of the study was to calculate the costs in various places of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients less than 65 years old, who were treated for newly diagnosed AML were included. The cost analysis distinguished between diagnosis, treatment, follow-up (maximum of 2 years), and treatment of relapse. The treatment period was divided into remission induction and consolidation treatment, harvest of bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood stem cells, and transplantation. The costs of diagnosis amounted to
Archive | 1993
H.J. de Koning; J. D. F. Habbema; B.M. van Ineveld; G.J. van Oortmarssen
3,167 (1995 US
The Breast | 2001
Jacques Fracheboud; H.J. de Koning; R. Boer; Johanna H. Groenewoud; A.L.M. Verbeek; Mireille J. M. Broeders; B.M. van Ineveld; J.H.C.L. Hendriks; A.E. de Bruyn; Roland Holland; P.J. van der Maas
). Remission-induction treatments cost on average
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 2007
Johanna H. Groenewoud; J.D.M. Otten; J. Fracheboud; Gerrit Draisma; B.M. van Ineveld; Roland Holland; A.L.M. Verbeek; H.J. de Koning
46,387 and harvest of bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells costs
Archive | 1990
H.J. de Koning; B.M. van Ineveld; G.J. van Oortmarssen; R. Boer; H. J. A. Collette; A.L.M. Verbeek; A.E. de Bruyn; H. M. E. van Agt; J.C.J.M. de Haes; L. van der Zwan; Marc A. Koopmanschap; J. J. M. Deurenberg; J. D. F. Habbema; P.J. van der Maas
6,491. The costs of the transplantation varied between
European Journal of Cancer | 1997
Mgh Groener; B.M. van Ineveld; G Byttebier; F.F.H. Rutten
25,531 and