Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where B.S. Kurko is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by B.S. Kurko.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2009

Erectile function durability following permanent prostate brachytherapy.

Al V. Taira; Gregory S. Merrick; Robert W. Galbreath; Wayne M. Butler; Kent E. Wallner; B.S. Kurko; Richard Anderson; Jonathan H. Lief

PURPOSE To evaluate long-term changes in erectile function following prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS This study included 226 patients with prostate cancer and preimplant erectile function assessed by the International Index of Erectile Function-6 (IIEF-6) who underwent brachytherapy in two prospective randomized trials between February 2001 and January 2003. Median follow-up was 6.4 years. Pre- and postbrachytherapy potency was defined as IIEF-6 > or = 13 without pharmacologic or mechanical support. The relationship among clinical, treatment, and dosimetric parameters and erectile function was examined. RESULTS The 7-year actuarial rate of potency preservation was 55.6% with median postimplant IIEF of 22 in potent patients. Potent patients were statistically younger (p = 0.014), had a higher preimplant IIEF (p < 0.001), were less likely to be diabetic (p = 0.002), and were more likely to report nocturnal erections (p = 0.008). Potency preservation in men with baseline IIEF scores of 29-30, 24-28, 18-23, and 13-17 were 75.5% vs. 73.6%, 51.7% vs. 44.8%, 48.0% vs. 40.0%, and 23.5% vs. 23.5% in 2004 vs. 2008. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, preimplant IIEF, hypertension, diabetes, prostate size, and brachytherapy dose to proximal penis strongly predicted for potency preservation. Impact of proximal penile dose was most pronounced for men with IIEF of 18-23 and aged 60-69. A significant minority of men who developed postimplant impotence ultimately regained erectile function. CONCLUSION Potency preservation and median IIEF scores following brachytherapy are durable. Thoughtful dose sparing of proximal penile structures and early penile rehabilitation may further improve these results.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2009

Electromagnetic Tracking of Intrafraction Prostate Displacement in Patients Externally Immobilized in the Prone Position

Nathan Bittner; Wayne M. Butler; Joshua L. Reed; B.C. Murray; B.S. Kurko; Kent E. Wallner; Gregory S. Merrick

PURPOSE To evaluate intrafraction prostate displacement among patients immobilized in the prone position using real-time monitoring of implanted radiofrequency transponders. METHODS AND MATERIALS The Calypso localization system was used to track prostate motion in patients receiving external beam radiation therapy (XRT) for prostate cancer. All patients were treated in the prone position and immobilized with a thermoplastic immobilization device. Real-time measurement of prostate displacement was recorded for each treatment fraction. These measurements were used to determine the duration and magnitude of displacement along the three directional axes. RESULTS The calculated centroid of the implanted transponders was offset from the treatment isocenter by >or=2 mm, >or=3 mm, and >or=4 mm for 38.0%, 13.9%, and 4.5% of the time. In the lateral dimension, the centroid was offset from the treatment isocenter by >or=2 mm, >or=3 mm, and >or=4 mm for 2.7%, 0.4%, and 0.06% of the time. In the superior-inferior dimension, the centroid was offset from the treatment isocenter by >or=2 mm, >or=3 mm, and >or=4 mm for 16.1%, 4.7%, and 1.5% of the time, respectively. In the anterior-posterior dimension, the centroid was offset from the treatment isocenter by >or=2 mm, >or=3 mm, and >or=4 mm for 13.4%, 3.0%, and 0.5% of the time. CONCLUSIONS Intrafraction prostate displacement in the prone position is comparable to that in the supine position. For patients with large girth, in whom the supine position may preclude accurate detection of implanted radiofrequency transponders, treatment in the prone position is a suitable alternative.


American Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2007

Dosimetry of an extracapsular anulus following permanent prostate brachytherapy.

Gregory S. Merrick; Wayne M. Butler; Kent E. Wallner; Zachariah A. Allen; B.S. Kurko; Richard Anderson; Robert Grammer; Robert W. Galbreath; Lawrence D. True; Edward Adamovich

Purpose:Recent studies have suggested that extracapsular brachytherapy treatment margins correlate with biochemical control. It is likely that volumetric geographic dosimetric parameters will be more robust than selected radial measurements. Accordingly, we evaluated extracapsular volumetric dosimetric parameters in low-risk patients. Materials and Methods:A total of 263 low-risk prostate cancer patients randomized to Pd-103 versus I-125 were implanted with a brachytherapy target volume consisting of the prostate with a 5-mm periprostatic margin. The median follow-up was 4.2 years. All patients were implanted at least 3 years prior to analysis. Within 2 hours of implantation, an axial CT was obtained for postimplant dosimetry. A 5-mm three-dimensional periprostatic anulus was constructed around the prostate and evaluated in its entirety and in 90° segments. Prostate and anular dosimetric parameters consisted of V100/V150/V200 and D90. Biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) was defined as a PSA ≤0.50 ng/mL after nadir. Results:The Pd-103 and I-125 arms were well-matched in terms of clinical, biochemical, and pathologic presentation. Six-year bPFS was 96.8% versus 99.2% for I-125 versus Pd-103 (P = 0.149). The most recent median posttreatment PSA was <0.04 ng/mL for both isotopes. No significant differences in postoperative anular doses were discerned between bPFS and failed patients. Conclusions:A postimplant 5-mm, three-dimensional periprostatic anulus provides substantial information regarding dosimetric coverage. However, with a median follow-up of 4.2 years, such volumetric and geographic parameters have not proven useful in predicting biochemical outcome in low-risk patients.


Practical radiation oncology | 2015

Effect of metal hip prosthesis on the accuracy of electromagnetic localization tracking

Nathan Bittner; Wayne M. Butler; B.S. Kurko; Gregory S. Merrick

PURPOSE To quantify the effect of metal hip prosthesis on the ability to track and localize electromagnetic transponders. METHODS AND MATERIALS Three Calypso Beacon (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) transponders were implanted into 2 prostate phantoms. The geometric center of the transponders were identified on computed tomography and set as the isocenter. With the phantom stationary on the treatment table and the tracking array 14-cm above the isocenter, data were acquired by the Calypso system at 10 Hz to establish the uncertainty in measurements. Transponder positional data were acquired with unilateral hip prostheses of different metallic compositions and then with bilateral hips placed at variable separation from the phantom. RESULTS Regardless of hip prosthesis composition, the average vector displacement in the presence of a unilateral prosthesis was <0.5 mm. The greatest contribution to overall vector displacement occurred in the lateral dimension. With bilateral hip prosthesis, the average vector displacement was 0.3 mm. The displacement in the lateral dimension was markedly reduced compared with a unilateral hip, suggesting that there was a countervailing effect with bilateral hip prosthesis. The greatest average vector displacement was 0.6 mm and occurred when bilateral hip prostheses were placed within 4 cm of the detector array. CONCLUSIONS Unilateral and bilateral hip prostheses did not have any meaningful effect on the ability to accurately track electromagnetic transponders implanted in a prostate phantom. At clinically realistic distances between the hip and detection array, the average tracking error is negligible.


Radiation Oncology | 2009

cExternal beam radiation results in minimal changes in post void residual urine volumes during the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer

Peter F. Orio; Gregory S. Merrick; Zachariah A. Allen; Wayne M. Butler; Kent E. Wallner; B.S. Kurko; Robert W. Galbreath

BackgroundTo evaluate the impact of external beam radiation therapy (XRT) on weekly ultrasound determined post-void residual (PVR) urine volumes in patients with prostate cancer.Methods125 patients received XRT for clinically localized prostate cancer. XRT was delivered to the prostate only (n = 66) or if the risk of lymph node involvement was greater than 10% to the whole pelvis followed by a prostate boost (n = 59). All patients were irradiated in the prone position in a custom hip-fix mobilization device with an empty bladder and rectum. PVR was obtained at baseline and weekly. Multiple clinical and treatment parameters were evaluated as predictors for weekly PVR changes.ResultsThe mean patient age was 73.9 years with a mean pre-treatment prostate volume of 53.3 cc, a mean IPSS of 11.3 and a mean baseline PVR of 57.6 cc. During treatment, PVR decreased from baseline in both cohorts with the absolute difference within the limits of accuracy of the bladder scanner. Alpha-blockers did not predict for a lower PVR during treatment. There was no significant difference in mean PVR urine volumes or differences from baseline in either the prostate only or pelvic radiation groups (p = 0.664 and p = 0.458, respectively). Patients with a larger baseline PVR (>40 cc) had a greater reduction in PVR, although the greatest reduction was seen between weeks one and three. Patients with a small PVR (<40 cc) had no demonstrable change throughout treatment.ConclusionProstate XRT results in clinically insignificant changes in weekly PVR volumes, suggesting that radiation induced bladder irritation does not substantially influence bladder residual urine volumes.


Urology | 2005

Statins, especially atorvastatin, may favorably influence clinical presentation and biochemical progression-free survival after brachytherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer

Mark A. Moyad; Gregory S. Merrick; Wayne M. Butler; Kent E. Wallner; Robert W. Galbreath; B.S. Kurko; Edward Adamovich


Urology | 2006

Efficacy of neoadjuvant bicalutamide and dutasteride as a cytoreductive regimen before prostate brachytherapy

Gregory S. Merrick; Wayne M. Butler; Kent E. Wallner; Robert W. Galbreath; Zachariah A. Allen; B.S. Kurko


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2003

Rectal function following brachytherapy: results of two prospective randomized trials

B.S. Kurko; Gregory S. Merrick; Wayne M. Butler; Kent E. Wallner; Robert W. Galbreath; S Cleavinger


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2010

Prostate Volume Changes Monitored during a Course of External Beam Radiation Therapy and for the Next Six Months using Electromagnetic Transponders

J. Park; Wayne M. Butler; Gregory S. Merrick; B.S. Kurko; Joshua L. Reed; B.C. Murray


Fuel and Energy Abstracts | 2010

Prostate Volume Changes Monitored during a Course of External Beam Radiation Therapy and for the Nex

Joon Y. Park; Wayne M. Butler; Gregory S. Merrick; B.S. Kurko; Jennifer L. Reed; B.C. Murray

Collaboration


Dive into the B.S. Kurko's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Wayne M. Butler

Wheeling Jesuit University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

B.C. Murray

Wheeling Jesuit University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joshua L. Reed

Wheeling Jesuit University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jonathan H. Lief

Wheeling Jesuit University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nathan Bittner

University of Washington Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge