B.T.T.M. van Rens
Wageningen University and Research Centre
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by B.T.T.M. van Rens.
Animal Reproduction Science | 2003
T. van der Lende; B.T.T.M. van Rens
The objective of this study was to investigate the timing of foetal mortality in gilts of a segregating F2 cross of Large White and Meishan pigs on the basis of the length distribution of mummified foetuses and the frequency of non-fresh stillborn piglets in order to establish whether critical periods for foetal mortality exist. All expelled conceptuses and placentae of 192 farrowing gilts with a normal health status were meticulously investigated to recover all mummified foetuses. The length of each mummified foetus was measured. The predicted number of foetuses present per gilt at the early foetal stage of gestation was calculated as the sum of numbers of mummified foetuses and non-fresh stillborn, fresh stillborn and liveborn piglets. Foetal loss was calculated as the sum of mummified foetuses and non-fresh stillborn piglets. The average foetal mortality rate per gilt was 8.7%. In total 162 mummified foetuses were found (average 0.84 per litter), ranging in length from 0.4 to 33.0 cm. This indicates a range in foetal age at death of approximately 35-100 days. Although mummified foetuses of all lengths within the above mentioned range were found, relatively many had a length of less than 4 cm or of 10-21 cm. The total number of non-fresh stillborn piglets (i.e. late foetal deaths) was 58 (average 0.30 per litter). It can be concluded that foetal mortality occurred in these gilts throughout the period from day 35 to term, with relatively high incidences at the early foetal stage (days 35-40), shortly after mid-pregnancy (days 55-75) and after approximately day 100 of gestation. These three periods coincide with reported periods of change in porcine placental growth.
Theriogenology | 2000
B.T.T.M. van Rens; W. Hazeleger; T. van der Lende
Estrus, endocrine changes during the periovulatory period, and components of litter size at Day 35/36 of pregnancy were studied in gilts with estrogen receptor genotype AA (AA gilts) or BB (BB gilts), in which the B allele is associated with a larger litter size. Neither estrus length nor estrous cycle length was affected by estrogen receptor genotype. No differences in periovulatory plasma LH, estrogen or progesterone profiles between the AA and BB gilts were detected. Furthermore, temporal aspects of these profiles were not different for both genotypes. Although the B allele is associated with a larger litter size, no differences in number of corpora lutea or number and percentage of vital Day 35/36 embryos were found in this study. This indicates that the difference in litter size is not due to differences in oocyte maturation, fertilization, implantation or embryonic survival, but is likely caused by a difference in fetal survival. Thus, uterine capacity might be different for both genotypes. The available uterine space per embryo seems to be the same for both genotypes, as is endometrial folding of uterine surface area. However, a difference in placental size was found. Embryos of BB gilts had significantly longer placentae than embryos of AA gilts. These results suggest a higher chance for placental insufficiency in AA gilts, leading to the expected higher fetal mortality compared with the BB gilts. The difference in placental size might have been related to a difference in the timing of embryonic mortality.
Theriogenology | 2000
B.T.T.M. van Rens; T. van der Lende
Fetuses from gilts with estrogen receptor (ESR) genotype AA (AA-AA and AA-AB) and BB (BB-AB and BB-BB) were compared at Day 35/36 of pregnancy, to examine whether fetal ESR genotype nested within maternal ESR genotype would affect fetal traits. Furthermore the relation of fetal body weight and fetal heart weight to various placental traits were evaluated relative to ESR genotype. Fetal and placental weight and length, and implantation surface area were not affected by fetal ESR genotype nested within maternal ESR genotype. Fetal weight was related similarly to placental length, placental weight, and implantation surface area: up to a certain threshold value (40 cm, 40 g and 250 cm2, respectively), an increase in the trait was associated with an increase of fetal weight. Thereafter, fetal weight did not change anymore. Thus, at Day 35/36 of pregnancy porcine fetuses seem to have a maximum growth potential. The percentage of AA-AA fetuses that had not reached this maximum growth potential was larger than of the other three genotype combinations studied, and therefore a higher subsequent fetal mortality may be expected in this group. Hearts of AA-AB fetuses were significantly heavier than those of BB-AB and BB-BB fetuses and tended to be heavier than those of AA-AA fetuses. The reason for this hypertrophy is unclear, but might be related to a difference in placental vascularity. Heart weight of fetuses from BB gilts increased with fetal weight, while heart weights of fetuses from AA gilts did not. Heart weight increased with an increase of placental length and implantation surface area up to 51 cm and 437 cm2, respectively, and thereafter decreased again. For BB-AB fetuses a similar relation was found between heart weight and placental weight, while heart weight of the other three genotype combinations remained unaffected as placental weight increased. The fetus and placenta are continuously changing during early pregnancy, therefore different mechanisms may change the demands for cardiac output. However, keeping in mind that placental size and blood volume are relatively large, placental vascularity and vascular development may play a major role. Therefore, further research on heart size, placental size and vascularity, relative to ESR genotype, is recommended.
Theriogenology | 2005
A. van Dijk; B.T.T.M. van Rens; T. van der Lende; M.A.M. Taverne
Journal of Animal Science | 2005
B.T.T.M. van Rens; G. de Koning; R. Bergsma; T. van der Lende
Journal of Animal Science | 2004
T.K. Soboleva; A.B. Pleasants; B.T.T.M. van Rens; T. van der Lende; A.J. Peterson
Archive | 2000
T. van der Lende; B.T.T.M. van Rens; J.I. Leenhouwers
Archive | 2000
T. van der Lende; B.T.T.M. van Rens
Vegetable Crops Research Bulletin | 2005
T. van der Lende; B.T.T.M. van Rens
Archive | 2005
A. van Dijk; B.T.T.M. van Rens; T. van der Lende; M.A.M. Taverne