Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where B. Thorne is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by B. Thorne.


Radiology | 2014

Magnetically Assisted Remote-controlled Endovascular Catheter for Interventional MR Imaging: In Vitro Navigation at 1.5 T versus X-ray Fluoroscopy

Aaron D. Losey; Prasheel Lillaney; Alastair J. Martin; Daniel L. Cooke; Mark W. Wilson; B. Thorne; R. Sincic; Ronald L. Arenson; Maythem Saeed; Steven W. Hetts

PURPOSE To compare in vitro navigation of a magnetically assisted remote-controlled (MARC) catheter under real-time magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with manual navigation under MR imaging and standard x-ray guidance in endovascular catheterization procedures in an abdominal aortic phantom. MATERIALS AND METHODS The 2-mm-diameter custom clinical-grade microcatheter prototype with a solenoid coil at the distal tip was deflected with a foot pedal actuator used to deliver 300 mA of positive or negative current. Investigators navigated the catheter into branch vessels in a custom cryogel abdominal aortic phantom. This was repeated under MR imaging guidance without magnetic assistance and under conventional x-ray fluoroscopy. MR experiments were performed at 1.5 T by using a balanced steady-state free precession sequence. The mean procedure times and percentage success data were determined and analyzed with a linear mixed-effects regression analysis. RESULTS The catheter was clearly visible under real-time MR imaging. One hundred ninety-two (80%) of 240 turns were successfully completed with magnetically assisted guidance versus 144 (60%) of 240 turns with nonassisted guidance (P < .001) and 119 (74%) of 160 turns with standard x-ray guidance (P = .028). Overall mean procedure time was shorter with magnetically assisted than with nonassisted guidance under MR imaging (37 seconds ± 6 [standard error of the mean] vs 55 seconds ± 3, P < .001), and time was comparable between magnetically assisted and standard x-ray guidance (37 seconds ± 6 vs 44 seconds ± 3, P = .045). When stratified by angle of branch vessel, magnetic assistance was faster than nonassisted MR guidance at turns of 45°, 60°, and 75°. CONCLUSION In this study, a MARC catheter for endovascular navigation under real-time MR imaging guidance was developed and tested. For catheterization of branch vessels arising at large angles, magnetically assisted catheterization was faster than manual catheterization under MR imaging guidance and was comparable to standard x-ray guidance.


Radiology | 2015

New-Generation Laser-lithographed Dual-Axis Magnetically Assisted Remote-controlled Endovascular Catheter for Interventional MR Imaging: In Vitro Multiplanar Navigation at 1.5 T and 3 T versus X-ray Fluoroscopy

Parham Moftakhar; Prasheel Lillaney; Aaron D. Losey; Daniel L. Cooke; Alastair J. Martin; B. Thorne; Ronald L. Arenson; Maythem Saeed; Mark W. Wilson; Steven W. Hetts

PURPOSE To assess the feasibility of multiplanar vascular navigation with a new magnetically assisted remote-controlled (MARC) catheter with real-time magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 1.5 T and 3 T and to compare it with standard x-ray guidance in simulated endovascular catheterization procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS A 1.6-mm-diameter custom clinical-grade microcatheter prototype with lithographed double-saddle coils at the distal tip was deflected with real-time MR imaging. Two inexperienced operators and two experienced operators catheterized anteroposterior (celiac, superior mesenteric, and inferior mesenteric arteries) and mediolateral (renal arteries) branch vessels in a cryogel abdominal aortic phantom. This was repeated with conventional x-ray fluoroscopy by using clinical catheters and guidewires. Mean procedure times and percentage success data were analyzed with linear mixed-effects regression. RESULTS The MARC catheter tip was visible at 1.5 T and 3 T. Among inexperienced operators, MARC MR imaging guidance was not statistically different from x-ray guidance at 1.5 T (67% successful vessel selection turns with MR imaging vs 76% with x-ray guidance, P = .157) and at 3 T (75% successful turns with MR imaging vs 76% with x-ray guidance, P = .869). Experienced operators were more successful in catheterizing vessels with x-ray guidance (98% success within 60 seconds) than with 1.5-T (65%, P < .001) or 3-T (75%) MR imaging. Among inexperienced operators, mean procedure time was nearly equivalent by using MR imaging (31 seconds) and x-ray guidance (34 seconds, P = .436). Among experienced operators, catheterization was faster with x-ray guidance (20 seconds) compared with 1.5-T MR imaging (42 seconds, P < .001), but MARC guidance improved at 3 T (31 seconds). MARC MR imaging guidance at 3 T was not significantly different from x-ray guidance for the celiac (P = .755), superior mesenteric (P = .358), and inferior mesenteric (P = .065) arteries. CONCLUSION Multiplanar navigation with a new MARC catheter with real-time MR imaging at 1.5 T and 3 T is feasible and comparable to x-ray guidance for anteroposterior vessels at 3 T in a vascular phantom.


Journal of Medical Devices-transactions of The Asme | 2014

Development and Validation of Endovascular Chemotherapy Filter Device for Removing High-Dose Doxorubicin: Preclinical Study

Anand S. Patel; Maythem Saeed; Erin J. Yee; Jeffrey K. Yang; Gregory J. Lam; Aaron D. Losey; Prasheel Lillaney; B. Thorne; Albert K. Chin; Sheena Malik; Mark W. Wilson; Xi C. Chen; Nitash P. Balsara; Steven W. Hetts

To develop a novel endovascular chemotherapy filter (CF) able to remove excess drug from the blood during intra-arterial chemotherapy delivery (IAC), thus preventing systemic toxicities and thereby enabling higher dose IAC. A flow circuit containing 2.5 mL of ion-exchange resin was constructed. Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 50 mg doxorubicin (Dox) was placed in the flow model with the hypothesis that doxorubicin would bind rapidly to resin. To simulate IAC, 50 mg of doxorubicin was infused over 10 min into the flow model containing resin. Similar testing was repeated with porcine serum. Doxorubicin concentrations were measured over 60 min and compared to controls (without resin). Single-pass experiments were also performed. Based on these experiments, an 18F CF was constructed with resin in its tip. In a pilot porcine study, the device was deployed under fluoroscopy. A control hepatic doxorubicin IAC model (no CF placed) was developed in another animal. A second CF device was created with a resin membrane and tested in the infrarenal inferior vena cava (IVC) of a swine. In the PBS model, resin bound 76% of doxorubicin in 10 min, and 92% in 30 min (P < 0.001). During IAC simulation, 64% of doxorubicin bound in 10 min and 96% in 60 min (P < 0.001). On average, 51% of doxorubicin concentration was reduced during each pass in single pass studies. In porcine serum, 52% of doxorubicin bound in 10 min, and 80% in 30 min (P < 0.05). CF device placement and administration of IAC were successful in three animals. No clot was present on the resin within the CF following the in vivo study. The infrarenal IVC swine study demonstrated promising results with up to 85% reduction in peak concentration by the CF device. An endovascular CF device was developed and shown feasible in vitro. An in vivo model was established with promising results supporting high-capacity rapid doxorubicin filtration from the blood that can be further evaluated in future studies.


Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery | 2014

O-016 Development and Validation of an Endovascular Chemotherapy Filter Device for Removing High-Dose Doxorubicin from the Blood: In Vivo Porcine Study

Anand S. Patel; A Chin; Jeffrey K. Yang; B. Thorne; Maythem Saeed; Mark W. Wilson; S Hetts

Purpose A novel disposable endovascular chemotherapy filter (CF) device was developed to remove excess doxorubicin (Dox) from the blood during intra-arterial chemotherapy delivery to prevent systemic toxicities. Previous proof-of-concept established the capacity of the filter to bind Dox in swine serum in vitro. In this study, CF navigation, deployment and in vivo Dox binding was evaluated in the porcine inferior vena cava (IVC). Materials and methods An 18 Fr CF device was constructed with an ion-exchange membrane attached to an expandable 28 mm diameter Nitinol frame. Under X-ray fluoroscopy and contrast venography, the CF was percutaneously introduced via the internal jugular vein and deployed in the porcine infrarenal IVC. 50 mg of Dox (2 mg/ml) was injected over 10 min in the IVC below the CF device. Venous catheters with tips proximal and distal to the CF device in the infrarenal IVC obtained pressures and blood samples for Dox concentrations over 90 min across the CF device membrane. Results The CF device was successfully introduced and deployed in the infrarenal IVC in vivo. Visualization under X-ray fluoroscopy verified the proper placement and mechanical expansion of the Nitinol framework. In a 90 min study, the device was biocompatible, not leading to hemodynamic disturbances: pressure measurements taken throughout the experiment yielded a max gradient of 17 mmHg across the CF membrane. Venography demonstrated non-flow-limiting thrombus associated with the CF device after 90 min of deployment (swine were not heparinized). Significant Dox binding was noted with an 85%, 74%, and 83% decrease in relative pre- versus post-filter Dox concentrations at times 3, 10, and 30 min, respectively after Dox injection. Conclusion: We developed a biocompatible CF device that can be safely introduced, deployed, and removed from the IVC in vivo. The CF device demonstrated significant Dox binding, and could serve as a platform technology in drug therapy to allow for higher regional doses of drug while limiting systemic toxicity. In future in vivo experiments, animals or the CF device itself may be heparinized in order to prevent thrombosis. When fully developed, indications for this device could include head and neck cancer, with the device deployed in the superior vena cava or internal jugular veins during selective IA chemotherapy. Disclosures A. Patel: 1; C; NIH-NCI. 4; C; ChemoFilter. A. Chin: 1; C; NIH-NCI. 4; C; ChemoFilter. J. Yang: None. B. Thorne: None. M. Saeed: None. M. Wilson: 1; C; NIH-NIBIB, NIH-NCI. 4; C; ChemoFilter. S. Hetts: 1; C; NIH-NIBIB, NIH-NCI, Siemens, Covidien. 2; C; Stryker, Penumbra, Silk Road Medical, Medina Medical. 4; C; ChemoFilter, Medina Medical, DriftCoast.


Radiology | 2016

Endovascular MR-guided Renal Embolization by Using a Magnetically Assisted Remote-controlled Catheter System

Prasheel Lillaney; Jeffrey K. Yang; Aaron D. Losey; Alastair J. Martin; Daniel L. Cooke; B. Thorne; David C. Barry; Andrew Chu; Carol Stillson; Loi Do; Ronald L. Arenson; Maythem Saeed; Mark W. Wilson; Steven W. Hetts

Purpose To assess the feasibility of a magnetically assisted remote-controlled (MARC) catheter system under magnetic resonance (MR) imaging guidance for performing a simple endovascular procedure (ie, renal artery embolization) in vivo and to compare with x-ray guidance to determine the value of MR imaging guidance and the specific areas where the MARC system can be improved. Materials and Methods In concordance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee protocol, in vivo renal artery navigation and embolization were tested in three farm pigs (mean weight 43 kg ± 2 [standard deviation]) under real-time MR imaging at 1.5 T. The MARC catheter device was constructed by using an intramural copper-braided catheter connected to a laser-lithographed saddle coil at the distal tip. Interventionalists controlled an in-room cart that delivered electrical current to deflect the catheter in the MR imager. Contralateral kidneys were similarly embolized under x-ray guidance by using standard clinical catheters and guidewires. Changes in renal artery flow and perfusion were measured before and after embolization by using velocity-encoded and perfusion MR imaging. Catheter navigation times, renal parenchymal perfusion, and renal artery flow rates were measured for MR-guided and x-ray-guided embolization procedures and are presented as means ± standard deviation in this pilot study. Results Embolization was successful in all six kidneys under both x-ray and MR imaging guidance. Mean catheterization time with MR guidance was 93 seconds ± 56, compared with 60 seconds ± 22 for x-ray guidance. Mean changes in perfusion rates were 4.9 au/sec ± 0.8 versus 4.6 au/sec ± 0.6, and mean changes in renal flow rate were 2.1 mL/min/g ± 0.2 versus 1.9 mL/min/g ± 0.2 with MR imaging and x-ray guidance, respectively. Conclusion The MARC catheter system is feasible for renal artery catheterization and embolization under real-time MR imaging in vivo, and quantitative physiologic measures under MR imaging guidance were similar to those measured under x-ray guidance, suggesting that the MARC catheter system could be used for endovascular procedures with interventional MR imaging. (©) RSNA, 2016.


Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery | 2014

O-018 Magnetically Assisted Remote-controlled Endovascular Catheter for Interventional MRI: In Vitro Navigation at 1.5 T versus X-ray Fluoroscopy

S Hetts; Aaron D. Losey; Prasheel Lillaney; Daniel L. Cooke; B. Thorne; Maythem Saeed; Ronald L. Arenson; Mark W. Wilson

Purpose To advance the field of endovascular interventional MRI, which could allow real-time assessment of brain tissue viability during acute ischemic stroke interventions, we have developed a prototype MRI compatible magnetically assisted remote controlled catheter (MARC). We sought to compare navigation of a MARC catheter under real-time MRI with manual navigation under MRI and standard x-ray guidance in endovascular catheterization procedures in vitro. Materials and Methods A custom clinical-grade micro catheter prototype with a solenoid coil at the distal tip was deflected with a foot pedal actuator used to deliver current of 300 mA. Investigators navigated the catheter into branch vessels in a cryogel abdominal aortic phantom. This was repeated under MR imaging guidance without magnetic assistance and under conventional x-ray fluoroscopy. MR experiments were performed at 1.5T using a balanced steady-state free precession sequence. The mean procedure times and percentage catheterization success data were determined and analyzed with a linear mixed-effects regression analysis. Results The catheter was clearly visible under real-time MRI. One hundred ninety-two (80%) of 240 turns were successfully completed with magnetically assisted guidance versus 144 (60%) of 240 turns with non-assisted guidance (P = 0.001) and 119 (74%) of 160 turns with standard X-ray guidance (P = 0.028). Mean procedure time was shorter with magnetically assisted than with non-assisted guidance under MRI (37 seconds vs 55 seconds, P = 0.001), and time was similar between magnetically assisted and standard x-ray guidance (37 seconds vs 44 seconds, P = 0.045). When stratified by angle of branch vessel, magnetic assistance was faster than nonassisted MRI guidance at turns of 45°, 60°, and 75°. Conclusion In this study, a MARC catheter for endovascular navigation under real-time MRI guidance was developed and tested. For catheterization of branch vessels arising at large angles, magnetically assisted catheterization was faster than manual catheterization under MR imaging guidance and was comparable to standard x-ray guidance. This represents a significant advance in MRI guided catheterization and brings the performance of MRI guided stroke interventions closer to clinical reality. Disclosures S. Hetts: 1; C; NIH-NIBIB, NIH-NCI, Siemens, Covidien. 2; C; Stryker, Penumbra, Silk Road Medical, Medina Medical. 4; C; Medina Medical, ChemoFilter. A. Losey: None. P. Lillaney: None. D. Cooke: 1; C; Siemens. 4; C; Viket. B. Thorne: None. M. Saeed: None. R. Arenson: None. M. Wilson: None.


Archive | 2016

Filtration devices and methods related thereto

Bridget F. Kilbride; B. Thorne; Steven W. Hetts; Vitaliy L. Rayz


Archive | 2016

Dispositifs de filtration et procédés associés

Bridget F. Kilbride; B. Thorne; Steven W. Hetts; Vitaliy L. Rayz


Archive | 2016

r enal embolization by Using a Magnetically assisted r emote

Prasheel Lillaney; Jeffrey K. Yang; Aaron D. Losey; Alastair J. Martin; Daniel L. Cooke; B. Thorne; David C. Barry; Carol Stillson; Ronald L. Arenson; Mark W. Wilson; Steven W. Hetts


Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology | 2016

A comparison of catheters and guidewires in interventional MRI: an MRI safe guidewire, a magnetically assisted remote controlled catheter, and x-ray guidance

Jeffrey K. Yang; Andre M. Cote; Caroline D. Jordan; Aaron D. Losey; Alastair J. Martin; B. Thorne; Jay F. Yu; Sravani Kondapavulur; Mark W. Wilson; S Hetts

Collaboration


Dive into the B. Thorne's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark W. Wilson

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Aaron D. Losey

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Maythem Saeed

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S Hetts

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge