B. V. Carlson
Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by B. V. Carlson.
Physical Review C | 2002
L. C. Chamon; B. V. Carlson; L. R. Gasques; D. Pereira; C. de Conti; M. A. G. Alvarez; M. S. Hussein; M. A. Cândido Ribeiro; E.S. Rossi; C. P. Silva
Extensive systematizations of theoretical and experimental nuclear densities and of optical potential strengths extracted from heavy-ion elastic scattering data analyses at low and intermediate energies are presented. The energy dependence of the nuclear potential is accounted for within a model based on the nonlocal nature of the interaction. The systematics indicates that the heavy-ion nuclear potential can be described in a simple global way through a double-folding shape, which basically depends only on the density of nucleons of the partners in the collision. The possibility of extracting information about the nucleon-nucleon interaction from the heavy-ion potential is investigated.
Physical Review C | 2014
M. Dutra; O. Lourenço; S. S. Avancini; B. V. Carlson; A. Delfino; D. P. Menezes; Constança Providência; S. Typel; J. R. Stone
Relativistic mean-field (RMF) models have been widely used in the study of many hadronic frameworks because of several important aspects not always present in nonrelativistic models, such as intrinsic Lorentz covariance, automatic inclusion of spin, appropriate saturation mechanism for nuclear matter, causality and, therefore, no problems related to superluminal speed of sound. With the aim of identifying the models which best satisfy well known properties of nuclear matter, we have analyzed
Physical Review C | 2000
J.H.O. Sales; P.U. Sauer; T. Frederico; B. V. Carlson
263
Nuclear Physics | 2002
E.S. Rossi; D. Pereira; L. C. Chamon; C.P. Silva; M. A. G. Alvarez; L. R. Gasques; J. Lubian; B. V. Carlson; C. de Conti
parameterizations of seven different types of RMF models under three different sets of constraints related to symmetric nuclear matter, pure neutron matter, symmetry energy, and its derivatives. One of these (SET1) is formed of the same constraints used in a recent work [M. Dutra et al., Phys. Rev. C 85, 035201 (2012)] in which we analyzed
Nuclear Physics | 2001
C.P. Silva; M. A. G. Alvarez; L. C. Chamon; D. Pereira; M.N. Rao; E.S. Rossi; L. R. Gasques; M.A.E. Santo; R. M. Anjos; J. Lubian; P.R.S. Gomes; C. Muri; B. V. Carlson; S. Kailas; A. Chatterjee; P. Singh; A. Shrivastava; K. Mahata; S. Santra
240
Nuclear Physics | 2004
T. Frederico; Jorge Henrique Sales; B. V. Carlson; P.U. Sauer
Skyrme parameterizations. The results pointed to
Journal of Physics G | 1989
T. Frederico; B. V. Carlson; R A Rego; M. S. Hussein
2
Physical Review C | 2013
S. R. Souza; B. V. Carlson; R. Donangelo; W. G. Lynch; M. B. Tsang
models consistent with all constraints. By using another set of constraints, namely, SET2a, formed by the updated versions of the previous one, we found
Physical Review C | 2001
D. T. de Paula; T. Aumann; L. F. Canto; B. V. Carlson; H. Emling; M. S. Hussein
4
Physics Letters B | 2017
B. V. Carlson; T. Frederico; M. S. Hussein
models approved simultaneously. Finally, in the third set, named SET2b, in which the values of the constraints are more restrictive, we found