B. Vandekerckhove

Characteristics of 2000 patients who visited a halitosis clinic

AIMS The aim of this paper was to analyse the aetiology and characteristics of 2000 patients who visited a multidisciplinary bad breath clinic in Leuven, Belgium and to correlate organoleptic ratings with portable device measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS The characteristics and aetiology of breath malodour of two thousand consecutive patients who visited a halitosis consultation were explored by means of a standard questionnaire and a clinical examination, including organoleptic scores provided by a trained and calibrated judge, and a portable bad breath detector (Halimeter). RESULTS Most patients came without referral and had complaints for several years (mean: 7 years, SD: 8 years). For 76% of the patients, an oral cause was found [tongue coating (43%), gingivitis/periodontitis (11%) or a combination of the two (18%)]. Pseudo-halitosis/halitophobia was diagnosed in 16% of the cases; and ear, nose and throat/extra-oral causes were found in 4% of the patients. Most patients had an organoleptic score <3 and a Halimeter value <240 p.p.b. CONCLUSIONS Even though it was observed that halitosis has a predominantly oral origin, a multidisciplinary approach remains necessary to identify ear, nose and throat or extra-oral pathologies and/or pseudo-halitosis/halitophobia.

Clinical reliability of non‐organoleptic oral malodour measurements

AIM Measurement of volatile sulphur compounds (VSC) by portable sulphur monitors (Halimeter, OralChroma) is a common practice for diagnosis of oral malodour. In this study, the clinical value of these devices was examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS Two hundred and eighty patients with bad breath complaints attending a halitosis consultation were enrolled. Organoleptic scores were given by a trained and calibrated judge, before measurement of the VSC levels (Halimeter, OralChroma), to avoid any bias. RESULTS Significant correlations were found between the organoleptic assessment, the Halimeter, and the OralChroma (R=0.74 for organoleptic versus Halimeter; 0.66 for organoleptic versus OralChroma; 0.63 for Halimeterversus OralChroma). The sensitivity and specificity (with regard to the organoleptic score) to detect patients with/without oral malodour for the Halimeter were 63% and 98%, respectively, and for the OralChroma 69% and 100% when using the cutoffs suggested by the manufacturer. By lowering these values, sensitivity could be improved without a significant decrease in specificity (both devices). CONCLUSIONS We concluded that the measurement of the VSC levels can be used as an adjunct to the organoleptic assessment. Thresholds should be revisited in order to improve their clinical utility. These devices can prove the absence of malodour in case of pseudo-halitosis.

27 Klinisch onderzoek bij ademgeur

Ademgeur komt bij meer dan de helft van de bevolking voor en dan vooral ’s morgens (Courtois, 1986). Een slecht riekende adem komt op alle leeftijden voor en even vaak bij mannen als bij vrouwen. Velen die te kampen hebben met ademgeur zijn zich er niet van bewust. De klachten worden dikwijls schuchter aangebracht door de omgeving, zodat ze tevens een bron vormen voor psychosociale problemen.