B. Weber

Bevacizumab Combined With Chemotherapy for Platinum-Resistant Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: The AURELIA Open-Label Randomized Phase III Trial

PURPOSE In platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (OC), single-agent chemotherapy is standard. Bevacizumab is active alone and in combination. AURELIA is the first randomized phase III trial to our knowledge combining bevacizumab with chemotherapy in platinum-resistant OC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients had measurable/assessable OC that had progressed < 6 months after completing platinum-based therapy. Patients with refractory disease, history of bowel obstruction, or > two prior anticancer regimens were ineligible. After investigators selected chemotherapy (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, weekly paclitaxel, or topotecan), patients were randomly assigned to single-agent chemotherapy alone or with bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks or 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks) until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. Crossover to single-agent bevacizumab was permitted after progression with chemotherapy alone. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by RECIST. Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), safety, and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS The PFS hazard ratio (HR) after PFS events in 301 of 361 patients was 0.48 (95% CI, 0.38 to 0.60; unstratified log-rank P < .001). Median PFS was 3.4 months with chemotherapy alone versus 6.7 months with bevacizumab-containing therapy. RECIST ORR was 11.8% versus 27.3%, respectively (P = .001). The OS HR was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.66 to 1.08; P < .174; median OS, 13.3 v 16.6 months, respectively). Grade ≥ 2 hypertension and proteinuria were more common with bevacizumab. GI perforation occurred in 2.2% of bevacizumab-treated patients. CONCLUSION Adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy statistically significantly improved PFS and ORR; the OS trend was not significant. No new safety signals were observed.

Addition of epirubicin as a third drug to carboplatin-paclitaxel in first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a prospectively randomized gynecologic cancer intergroup trial by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Ovarian Cancer Study Group and the Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens.

PURPOSE Despite the progress that has been achieved, long-term survival rates in patients with advanced ovarian cancer are still disappointing. One attempt to improve results could be the addition of non-cross-resistant drugs to platinum-paclitaxel combination regimens. Anthracyclines were among the candidates for incorporation as a third drug into first-line regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a prospectively randomized phase III study comparing carboplatin-paclitaxel (TC; area under the curve 5/175 mg/m2, respectively) with epirubicin 60 mg/m2 added to the same combination (TEC) in previously untreated patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. All drugs were administered intravenously on day 1 of a 3-week schedule for a planned minimum of six courses. RESULTS Between November 1997 and February 2000, 1,282 patients were randomly assigned to receive either TC (635 patients) or TEC (647 patients), respectively. Grade 3/4 hematologic and some nonhematologic toxicities (nausea/emesis, mucositis, and infections) occurred significantly more frequently in the TEC arm. Accordingly, quality-of-life analysis showed inferiority of TEC versus TC. Median progression-free survival time was 18.4 months for the TEC arm and 17.9 months for the TC arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.95; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.07; P = .3342). Median overall survival time was 45.8 months for the TEC arm and 41.0 months for the TC arm (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.08; P = .3652). Similar nonsignificant differences were observed when strata were analyzed separately. CONCLUSION Addition of epirubicin to TC did not improve survival or time to treatment failure in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer; therefore, it cannot be recommended for clinical use in this population.

HER2 Status in Ovarian Carcinomas: A Multicenter GINECO Study of 320 Patients

Background Despite a typically good response to first-line combination chemotherapy, the prognosis for patients with advanced ovarian cancer remains poor because of acquired chemoresistance. The use of targeted therapies such as trastuzumab may potentially improve outcomes for patients with ovarian cancer. HER2 overexpression/amplification has been reported in ovarian cancer, but the exact percentage of HER2-positive tumors varies widely in the literature. In this study, HER2 gene status was evaluated in a large, multicentric series of 320 patients with advanced ovarian cancer, including 243 patients enrolled in a multicenter prospective clinical trial of paclitaxel/carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Methodology/Principal Findings The HER2 status of primary tumors and metastases was evaluated by both immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of paraffin-embedded tissue on conventional slides. The prognostic impact of HER2 expression was analyzed. HER2 gene was overexpressed and amplified in 6.6% of analyzed tumors. Despite frequent intratumoral heterogeneity, no statistically significant difference was detected between primary tumors and corresponding metastases. Conclusions/Significance Our results show that the decision algorithm usually used in breast cancer (IHC as a screening test, with equivocal results confirmed by FISH) is appropriate in ovarian cancer. In contrast to previous series, HER2-positive status did not influence outcome in the present study, possibly due to the fact that patients in our study received paclitaxel/carboplatin-based chemotherapy. This raises the question of whether HER2 status and paclitaxel sensitively are linked.

AURELIA: A randomized phase III trial evaluating bevacizumab (BEV) plus chemotherapy (CT) for platinum (PT)-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (OC).

LBA5002^ Background: In three phase III trials in OC (2 front line, 1 PT-sensitive recurrent), BEV + CT → BEV significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs CT alone. AURELIA is the first randomized trial of BEV in PT-resistant OC. METHODS Eligible patients (pts) had OC (measurable by RECIST 1.0 or assessable) that had progressed ≤6 mo after ≥4 cycles of PT-based therapy. Pts with refractory OC, history of bowel obstruction, or >2 prior anticancer regimens were ineligible. After CT selection by the investigator (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin [PLD], topotecan [TOP], or weekly paclitaxel [PAC]), pts were randomized to CT either alone or with BEV (10 mg/kg q2w or 15 mg/kg q3w depending on CT) until progression (PD), unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Pts in the CT-alone arm could cross over to BEV monotherapy at PD. The primary endpoint was PFS by RECIST. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival, safety, and quality of life. The design provided 80% power to detect a PFS hazard ratio (HR) of 0.7 with 2-sided log-rank test and α=0.05 after 247 events, assuming median PFS of 4.0 mo with CT and 5.7 mo with CT + BEV. RESULTS Between Oct 2009 and Apr 2011, 361 pts were randomized to receive selected CT (PLD: 126; PAC: 115; TOP: 120) alone or with BEV. Median follow-up after 301 PFS events was 13.5 mo. CONCLUSIONS In PT-resistant OC, BEV + CT provides statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS and ORR vs CT alone. Strict inclusion criteria minimized the incidence of BEV AEs. This is the first phase III trial in PT-resistant OC to show benefit with a targeted therapy and improved outcome with a combination vs monotherapy. [Table: see text].

Multicenter Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Therapy With Trastuzumab, Docetaxel, and Carboplatin for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2–Overexpressing Stage II or III Breast Cancer: Results of the GETN(A)-1 Trial

PURPOSE Trastuzumab plus chemotherapy has become the standard of care for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) -positive breast cancer. Trastuzumab-based preoperative systemic therapy (PST; neoadjuvant therapy) also appears promising, warranting further investigation. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with HER-2-positive, stage II/III, noninflammatory, operable breast cancer requiring a mastectomy (but who wanted to conserve the breast) received trastuzumab 4 mg/kg (day 1), followed by 2 mg/kg weekly, plus docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, and carboplatin (area under curve, 6) for six cycles before surgery. The primary end point was pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, determined from surgical specimens. RESULTS Seventy patients were enrolled. Most patients had clinical T2/T3 tumors (100%) or clinical N1/2 nodes (53%). Sixty-seven patients (96%) completed six cycles of therapy, one patient withdrew due to progressive disease, and two patients withdrew for toxicity. A complete or partial objective clinical response occurred in 95% of patients (85% and 10%, respectively). Surgery was breast conservative in 45 (64%) of 70 patients. In an intent-to-treat analysis, tumor and nodal pCR were seen in 27 (39%) of 70 patients. Centralized retrospective analysis of HER-2 status demonstrated a 43% pCR rate in the 24 of 56 confirmed HER-2-overexpressing (3+) and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization-positive tumors. Treatment was generally well tolerated. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were uncommon (2%). Two patients withdrew prematurely due to a transient, asymptomatic decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction. No symptomatic cardiac dysfunction occurred. CONCLUSION PST with trastuzumab plus docetaxel and carboplatin achieved promising efficacy, with a good pCR rate and favorable tolerability in stage II or III HER-2-positive breast cancer.

Phase III Trial of Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel With or Without Gemcitabine in First-Line Treatment of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

PURPOSE One attempt to improve long-term survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer was thought to be the addition of more non-cross-resistant drugs to platinum-paclitaxel combination regimens. Gemcitabine was among the candidates for a third drug. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a prospective, randomized, phase III, intergroup trial to compare carboplatin plus paclitaxel (TC; area under the curve [AUC] 5 and 175 mg/m(2), respectively) with the same combination and additional gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 (TCG) in previously untreated patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. TC was administered intravenously (IV) on day 1 every 21 days for a planned minimum of six courses. Gemcitabine was administered by IV on days 1 and 8 of each cycle in the TCG arm. RESULTS Between 2002 and 2004, 1,742 patients were randomly assigned; 882 and 860 patients received TC and TCG, respectively. Grades 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity and fatigue occurred more frequently in the TCG arm. Accordingly, quality-of-life analysis during chemotherapy showed a disadvantage in the TCG arm. Although objective response was slightly higher in the TCG arm, this did not translate into improved progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). Median PFS was 17.8 months for the TCG arm and 19.3 months for the TC arm (hazard ratio [HR], 1.18; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.32; P = .0044). Median OS was 49.5 for the TCG arm and 51.5 months for the TC arm (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.20; P = .5106). CONCLUSION The addition of gemcitabine to carboplatin plus paclitaxel increased treatment burden, reduced PFS time, and did not improve OS in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Therefore, we recommend no additional clinical use of TCG in this population.

Cetuximab, topotecan and cisplatin for the treatment of advanced cervical cancer: A phase II GINECO trial

OBJECTIVE Cisplatin (Cp) plus topotecan (Tc) is the first combination chemotherapy to demonstrate a survival advantage over cisplatin alone in advanced cervical cancer. Combining Cp and Tc with an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor such as cetuximab (Ce) may increase the activity of chemotherapy. METHODS Patients with advanced cervical squamous cell cancer or adenocarcinoma and at least one measurable target received intravenous Cp 50 mg/m(2) on day 1 plus Tc 0.75 mg/m(2)/day from days 1 to 3 every 3 weeks combined with Ce (initial dose of 400 mg/m(2) followed by subsequent weekly dose of 250 mg/m(2)). Objective response rate according to RECIST criteria was the primary end point; safety, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were secondary end points. RESULTS Between April and July 2007, 19 out of the 44 planned patients were accrued before the study was stopped early due to excessive toxicity. The most frequent adverse event was severe myelosuppression with grades 3-4 neutropenia (72%), grades 3-4 thrombocytopenia (61%), and grade 3 anemia (44.5%). The main grades 3-4 non-hematologic toxicities were infection (39%) and febrile neutropenia (28%), skin reactions (22%), renal toxicity (11%), and pulmonary embolism (11%). Five (28%) patients died during the treatment including 3 deaths related to treatment toxicity. Six (32%) evaluable patients achieved a partial response. The median times of PFS and OS were 172 and 220 days, respectively. CONCLUSION In this phase II trial, the combination Cp-Tc-Ce induced a high rate of serious adverse and/or fatal events at standard dose and schedule. Cetuximab plus platinum-based combination chemotherapy should be further explored with caution in the future in advanced cervix cancer.

A randomized clinical trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin followed by radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in patients with localized uterine sarcomas (SARCGYN study). A study of the French Sarcoma Group

BACKGROUND There is no proven benefit of adjuvant treatment of uterine sarcoma (US). SARCGYN phase III study compared adjuvant polychemotherapy followed by pelvic radiotherapy (RT) (arm A) versus RT alone (arm B) conducted to detect an increase ≥ 20% of 3-year PFS. METHODS Patients with FIGO stage ≤ III US, physiological age ≤ 65 years; chemotherapy: four cycles of doxorubicin 50 mg/m² d1, ifosfamide 3 g/m²/day d1-2, cisplatin 75 mg/m² d3, (API) + G-CSF q 3 weeks. Study was stopped because of lack of recruitment. RESULTS Eighty-one patients were included: 39 in arm A and 42 in arm B; 52 stage I, 16 stage II, 13 stage III; 53 leiomyosarcomas, 9 undifferenciated sarcomas, 19 carcinosarcomas. Gr 3-4 toxicity during API (/37 patients): thrombopenia (76%), febrile neutropenia (22%) with two toxic deaths; renal gr 3 (1 patient). After a median follow-up of 4.3 years, 41/81 patients recurred, 15 in arm A, 26 in arm B. The 3 years DFS is 55% in arm A, 41% in arm B (P = 0.048). The 3-year overall survival (OS) is 81% in arm A and 69% in arm B (P = 0.41). CONCLUSION API adjuvant CT statistically increases the 3 year-DFS of patients with US.

Weekly paclitaxel as a single agent or in combination with carboplatin or weekly topotecan in patients with resistant ovarian cancer: the CARTAXHY randomized phase II trial from Groupe d’Investigateurs Nationaux pour l’Etude des Cancers Ovariens (GINECO)

BACKGROUND Platinum rechallenge or weekly topotecan in combination have not been evaluated in randomized trials for resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC). METHODS Patients with ROC after first- or second-line treatment including a platinum and taxane and progression within 6 months were randomized to weekly paclitaxel (wP, 80 mg/m(2)/week) alone or in combination with carboplatin (C, area under the curve of 5 mg/ml/min every 4 weeks) or weekly topotecan (wT, 3 mg/m(2)/week). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) comparing wP and combination therapy. RESULTS Patients (n = 165) received a median three cycles in each arm. Nonhematologic toxicity was not different, except increased hypersensitivity reactions with wP + C. Grade 3-4 hematologic toxic effects with wP, wP + C, and wP + wT, respectively, were neutropenia in 13%, 54%, and 42%; febrile neutropenia in 0%, 4%, and 5%; and anemia in 6%, 19%, and 29%. Response rates were 35%, 37%, and 39%, and median PFS times were 3.7, 4.8, and 5.4 months, respectively. PFS was not significantly different among the treatment arms [hazard ratio (HR) 0.922; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.765-1.111; P = 0.46] or between monotherapy and combination therapy (HR 0.951; 95% CI 0.686-1.318; P = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS Combination chemotherapy in platinum-resistant ROC was more toxic than weekly paclitaxel and did not significantly prolong PFS.

Tamoxifen Adjuvant Treatment Duration in Early Breast Cancer: Initial Results of a Randomized Study Comparing Short-Term Treatment With Long-Term Treatment

PURPOSE In 1986, The Fédération Nationale desCentres de Lutte Contre le Cancer Breast Group initiated a multicenter randomized trial to assess the usefulness of long-term adjuvant tamoxifen treatment. Short-term adjuvant tamoxifen treatment was to be compared with life long adjuvant tamoxifen treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients who were disease-free after 2 to 3 years of adjuvant tamoxifen treatment were eligible for the trial. From September 1986 to May 1995, 3,793 patients were randomized from France, Belgium, and Argentina. A total of 1,882 patients stopped tamoxifen (short-term group), and 1,911 patients were to continue tamoxifen for life (long-term group) at the same dose as previously prescribed. The protocol was modified in February 1997, limiting tamoxifen treatment to 10 years after randomization, thus giving a comparison between a 2- to 3-year treatment and a 12- to 13-year treatment. To date, the median duration of tamoxifen treatment is 30 months in the short-term group, and 70 months in the long-term group. RESULTS Overall, longer tamoxifen treatment induced a 23% reduction in relapse rates, leading to a 7-year disease-free survival rate of 78%, compared with 72% in the shorter-treatment group. In contrast, overall survival did not differ between the two groups, with a 79% overall survival rate in both groups. This improvement in disease-free survival could be observed in node-positive patients (P: =.001); however, it was not found in node-negative patients. Prolonged tamoxifen treatment corresponded to a significant increase in disease-free survival in estrogen receptor-positive patients (P: =.03) as well as in estrogen receptor-negative patients (P: =.05). Furthermore, longer treatment reduced contralateral breast cancers and did not increase the number of endometrial cancers. CONCLUSION Although no survival advantage was noted, patients did benefit from longer tamoxifen treatment over 3 years and had significantly better disease-free survival compared with patients who stopped hormonal treatment. Long-term follow-up is needed to assess these results. Most patients in the long-term group are still receiving treatment. Comparison of results as time passes will enable conclusions to be made on the value of long-term treatment over 5 years compared with 2 to 3 years.