Bahaa Mokhtar
Cornell University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Bahaa Mokhtar.
Journal of Neurosurgery | 2009
Erico R. Cardoso; H. Ashamalla; Lijun Weng; Bahaa Mokhtar; Shamsah Ali; Mark Macedon; A. Guirguis
OBJECT The object of this study was to investigate the use of a minimally invasive technique for treating metastatic tumors of the vertebral body, aimed at relieving pain, preventing further tumor growth, and minimizing the adverse effects of systemic use of samarium-153 ((153)Sm). METHODS The procedure is performed in the same fashion as a kyphoplasty, using a unilateral extrapedicular approach under local anesthesia/mild general sedation, with the patient in the lateral decubitus position. The tumor is accessed as in a standard kyphoplasty. The side is chosen according to the location of the metastasis. Prior to inflation of the balloon the tumor is debulked by percutaneous curettage. Balloon inflation is carried out as per standard kyphoplasty in an attempt to create a larger space and reduce a possible kyphotic deformity. Three mCi of (153)Sm-EDTMP (ethylenediaminetetramethylenephosphonic acid) is then mixed with bone cement (polymethylmethacrylate) and injected into the void created by the balloon tamp. RESULTS Twenty-four procedures were performed in 19 patients. There was reliable and reproducible delivery of the radiolabeled (153)Sm-EDTMP to the metastatic site, without spillage. The procedure was safe. There were no procedure-related complications. There was no hematological toxicity with the low doses of (153)Sm used. Pain improved in all patients. The long-term results related to tumor control continue to be investigated. CONCLUSIONS Combined percutaneous debulking of confined vertebral metastases and administration of local (153)Sm is feasible and safe. Furthermore, this technique leads to immediate relief of cancer-related pain and may help prevent or slow down the progression of vertebral metastatic tumors.
Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment | 2007
H. Ashamalla; B. Zaki; Bahaa Mokhtar; L. Lewis; A. Lavaf; H. Nasr; F. Colella; D. Dosik; M. Krishnamurthy; N. Saad; A. Guriguis
Management of Malignant Gliomas continues to be a challenge. We prospectively studied the role of adding weekly Paclitaxel to Fractionated Stereotactic Radiation Therapy (FSRT) in the treatment of Malignant Gliomas. Twenty-three Glioblastoma Multiforme and two Anaplastic Astrocytoma were studied. Patients received 46 Gy at 2 Gy/fraction followed by a boost utilizing FSRT at a fraction of 2.5 Gy for 8 fractions. Paclitaxel is delivered concomitantly at 150 mg/m2 weekly for six cycles. Eighteen patients had pharmacokinetic assays of Paclitaxel levels. All patients were followed until death or for a maximum of 36 months. The overall survival of the whole group was 14 months. The median survival for RPA prognostic classes III, IV, V, and VI were 20, 14, 12, and 11 months. Higher survival (14 months) was noted in the subtherapeutic phenytoin level group compared to 10 months in the therapeutic group (P=0.271). No grade 4 CTCAE (version 3.0) toxicities were observed. Enhanced survival was demonstrated with gross tumor resection (20.8 months), KPS ≥80 (18.7 months) and age ≤60 years (27 months) as compared to subtotal resection or biopsy (12.1 months, P< 0.005), KPS ≤70 (10.8 months, P=0. 005) and older age > 60 (10.46 months, P=0.006), respectively. Our study suggests that: i) the use of weekly Paclitaxel and FSRT in Gliomas is well tolerated with a survival of 14 months; ii) the regimen resulted in improvement of survival of RPA classes IV, V, VI; and iii) the use of FSRT boost may be studied with other chemotherapeutic agents to see if superior results can be attained.
World journal of nuclear medicine | 2014
H. Ashamalla; Malcolm D. Mattes; A. Guirguis; Arifa Zaidi; Bahaa Mokhtar; Ajay Tejwani
18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has become increasingly relevant in the staging of head and neck cancers, but its prognostic value is controversial. The objective of this study was to evaluate different PET/CT parameters for their ability to predict response to therapy and survival in patients treated for head and neck cancer. A total of 28 consecutive patients with a variety of newly diagnosed head and neck cancers underwent PET/CT scanning at our institution before initiating definitive radiation therapy. All underwent a posttreatment PET/CT to gauge tumor response. Pretreatment PET/CT parameters calculated include the standardized uptake value (SUV) and the anatomical biological value (ABV), which is the product of SUV and greatest tumor diameter. Maximum and mean values were studied for both SUV and ABV, and correlated with response rate and survival. The mean pretreatment tumor ABVmax decreased from 35.5 to 7.9 (P = 0.0001). Of the parameters tested, only pretreatment ABVmax was significantly different among those patients with a complete response (CR) and incomplete response (22.8 vs. 65, respectively, P = 0.021). This difference was maximized at a cut-off ABVmax of 30 and those patients with ABVmax < 30 were significantly more likely to have a CR compared to those with ABVmax of ≥ 30 (93.8% vs. 50%, respectively, P = 0.023). The 5-year overall survival was 80% compared to 36%, respectively, (P = 0.028). Multivariate analysis confirmed that ABVmax was an independent prognostic factor. Our data supports the use of PET/CT, and specifically ABVmax, as a prognostic factor in head and neck cancer. Patients who have an ABVmax ≥ 30 were more likely to have a poor outcome with chemoradiation alone, and a more aggressive trimodality approach may be indicated in these patients.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2005
H. Ashamalla; Sameer Rafla; Kapila Parikh; Bahaa Mokhtar; Ganesh Goswami; Shravan Kambam; Hussain Abdel-Dayem; A. Guirguis; Pamela Ross; Alex Evola
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2007
H. Ashamalla; Adel Guirgius; Ewa Bieniek; Sameer Rafla; Alex Evola; Ganesh Goswami; Randall Oldroyd; Bahaa Mokhtar; Kapila Parikh
American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging | 2012
Ajay Tejwani; Amir Lavaf; Kapila Parikh; Bahaa Mokhtar; Uma Swamy; Joana Emmolo; A. Guirguis; H. Ashamalla
Brachytherapy | 2017
H. Ashamalla; A. Guirguis; Kyle McCool; Shauna McVorran; Malcolm D. Mattes; Daniel Metzger; Clara Oromendia; Karla V. Ballman; Bahaa Mokhtar; Mounzer Tchelebi; Evangelia Katsoulakis; Sameer Rafla
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2010
Ajay Tejwani; Amir Lavaf; Uma Swamy; J. Emmolo; A. Guirguis; Bahaa Mokhtar; Kapila Parikh; H. Ashamalla
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2018
J. Kodiyan; A. Guirguis; S.U. Din; Bahaa Mokhtar; M. Ashamalla; V. Soni; H. Ashamalla
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2017
M. Ashamalla; A. Guirguis; Bahaa Mokhtar; H. Ashamalla