Bao-Ping Zhu
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Bao-Ping Zhu.
BMC Public Health | 2018
Benon Kwesiga; Gerald Pande; Alex Riolexus Ario; Nazarius Mbona Tumwesigye; Joseph K. B. Matovu; Bao-Ping Zhu
BackgroundIn May 2015, a cholera outbreak that had lasted 3 months and infected over 100 people was reported in Kasese District, Uganda, where multiple cholera outbreaks had occurred previously. We conducted an investigation to identify the mode of transmission to guide control measures.MethodsWe defined a suspected case as onset of acute watery diarrhoea from 1 February 2015 onwards in a Kasese resident. A confirmed case was a suspected case with Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor, serotype Inaba cultured from a stool sample. We reviewed medical records to find cases. We conducted a case-control study to compare exposures among confirmed case-persons and asymptomatic controls, matched by village and age-group. We conducted environmental assessments. We tested water samples from the most affected area for total coliforms using the Most Probable Number (MPN) method.ResultsWe identified 183 suspected cases including 61 confirmed cases of Vibrio cholerae 01; serotype Inaba, with onset between February and July 2015. 2 case-persons died of cholera. The outbreak occurred in 80 villages and affected all age groups; the highest attack rate occurred in the 5–14 year age group (4.1/10,000). The outbreak started in Bwera Sub-County bordering the Democratic Republic of Congo and spread eastward through sustained community transmission. The first case-persons were involved in cross-border trading. The case-control study, which involved 49 confirmed cases and 201 controls, showed that 94% (46/49) of case-persons compared with 79% (160/201) of control-persons drank water without boiling or treatment (ORM-H=4.8, 95% CI: 1.3–18). Water collected from the two main sources, i.e., public pipes (consumed by 39% of case-persons and 38% of control-persons) or streams (consumed by 29% of case-persons and 24% control-persons) had high coliform counts, a marker of faecal contamination. Environmental assessment revealed evidence of open defecation along the streams. No food items were significantly associated with illness.ConclusionsThis prolonged, community-wide cholera outbreak was associated with drinking water contaminated by faecal matter and cross-border trading. We recommended rigorous disposal of patients’ faeces, chlorination of piped water, and boiling or treatment of drinking water. The outbreak stopped 6 weeks after these recommendations were implemented.
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene | 2017
Monica Musenero; Miriam Nanyunja; Immaculate Nabukenya; William Z. Lali; Christine Kihembo; Frank Kaharuza; Alex Riolexus Ario; Ben Masiira; Joseph K. B. Matovu; Bao-Ping Zhu; Gabriel K. Matwale; Issa Makumbi
AbstractPodoconiosis, a noninfectious elephantiasis, is a disabling neglected tropical disease. In August 2015, an elephantiasis case-cluster was reported in Kamwenge District, western Uganda. We investigated to identify the diseases nature and risk factors. We defined a suspected podoconiosis case as onset in a Kamwenge resident of bilateral asymmetrical lower limb swelling lasting ≥ 1 month, plus ≥ 1 of the following associated symptoms: skin itching, burning sensation, plantar edema, lymph ooze, prominent skin markings, rigid toes, or mossy papillomata. A probable case was a suspected case with negative microfilaria antigen immunochromatographic card test (ruling out filarial elephantiasis). We conducted active case-finding. In a case-control investigation, we tested the hypothesis that the disease was caused by prolonged foot skin exposure to irritant soils, using 40 probable case-persons and 80 asymptomatic village control-persons, individually matched by age and sex. We collected soil samples to characterize irritants. We identified 52 suspected (including 40 probable) cases with onset from 1980 to 2015. Prevalence rates increased with age; annual incidence (by reported onset of disease) was stable over time at 2.9/100,000. We found that 93% (37/40) of cases and 68% (54/80) of controls never wore shoes at work (Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio [ORMH] = 7.7; 95% [confidence interval] CI = 2.0-30); 80% (32/40) of cases and 49% (39/80) of controls never wore shoes at home (ORMH = 5.2; 95% CI = 1.8-15); and 70% (27/39) of cases and 44% (35/79) of controls washed feet at day end (versus immediately after work) (OR = 11; 95% CI = 2.1-56). Soil samples were characterized as rich black-red volcanic clays. In conclusion, this reported elephantiasis is podoconiosis associated with prolonged foot exposure to volcanic soil. We recommended foot hygiene and universal use of protective shoes.
The Pan African medical journal | 2018
Allen Eva Okullo; David Were Oguttu; Alex Riolexus Ario; Bao-Ping Zhu
Introduction : in September 2015, a cholera outbreak occurred in a village in Hoima District, western Uganda. The Ministry of Health assembled a rapid response team, with support by CDC, UNICEF and WHO, to investigate the outbreak, establish the Kaiso Cholera Treatment Center (KCTC), and implement control measures. The team identified 120 cholera cases (with 5 deaths) and determined that drinking contaminated water from the lakeshore caused this outbreak. We sought to determine the cost of investigating and controlling this outbreak, and compare it to a would-be simple preventive measure, constructing deep wells to provide cleaner water. Methods : we collected cost data, including personnel and material costs at KCTC, health facilities, Hoima District Health Office, Uganda Public Health Fellowship Program, UNICEF, CDC, and WHO. We defined direct cost of responding to this outbreak as expenditure on medications, medical equipment and supplies, utilities, and allowances and transport for responders; indirect cost included salary and other compensations for responders. We did not include difficult-to-measure costs such as vehicle depreciation, building maintenance, and loss of productivity to case-persons due to illness and deaths. The cost of constructing deep wells was quoted by a U.S.-based NGO. Results : the total cost incurred in investigating and controlling this outbreak was
The Pan African medical journal | 2018
Bao-Ping Zhu; Gerald Pande; Benon Kwesiga; Alex Riolexus Ario
71,769, including
The Pan African medical journal | 2018
Monica Okuga; David Were Oguttu; Allen Eva Okullo; Meeyoung Park; Charles Perry Ko; Joseph Asamoah Frimpong; Bao-Ping Zhu; Alex Riolexus Ario
21,059 in direct cost (
The Pan African medical journal | 2018
Alex Riolexus Ario; Fred Nsubuga; Lilian Bulage; Bao-Ping Zhu
19,225 for allowances and transportation,
Pan African Medical Journal Conference Proceedings | 2018
Steven Ndugwa Kabwama; Richard Mafigiri; Stephen Balinandi; Atek Kagirita; Alex Riolexus Ario; Bao-Ping Zhu
1,774 for medical equipment and supplies, and
Pan African Medical Journal Conference Proceedings | 2018
Annet Joselyn Atuhairwe; David Were Oguttu; Alex Riolexus Ario; Daniel Kadobera; Bao-Ping Zhu
60 for utilities), and
PLOS ONE | 2018
Gerald Pande; Benon Kwesiga; Godfrey Bwire; Peter Kalyebi; AlexArio Riolexus; Joseph K. B. Matovu; Fredrick Makumbi; Shaban Mugerwa; Joshua Musinguzi; Rhoda K. Wanyenze; Bao-Ping Zhu
50,620 in indirect cost (74,484 person-hours of salary and other compensations for responders). Conversely, constructing a deep well to provide cleaner water would cost approximately
The Pan African medical journal | 2017
Steven Ndugwa Kabwama; Richardson Mafigiri; Stephen Balinandi; Atek Kagirita; Alex Ario Riolexus; Bao-Ping Zhu
2500. Essentially, the total cost incurred in this outbreak would have been enough to construct 28 (=71769/2500) deep wells; even the direct cost only would have been enough to construct 8 (=21059/2500) deep wells. One such deep well would have prevented this outbreak and averted future waterborne outbreaks. Conclusion : a simple prevention measure such as constructing deep wells for village residents can be substantially cost-effective for preventing waterborne diseases such as cholera. We recommend that the government should proactively implement prevention measures for waterborne outbreaks whenever possible, instead of passively responding to these outbreaks.