Baolin Wang
Peking University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Baolin Wang.
Environmental Science & Technology | 2012
Guofeng Shen; Shu Tao; Siye Wei; Yinsong Zhang; Rong Wang; Baolin Wang; Wei Li; Huizhong Shen; Yao Huang; Chen Y; Han Y. H. Chen; Yu Yang; Wei Wang; Wen Wei; Wang X; Wen-Xiu Liu; Masse Simonich Sl
Biomass pellets are emerging as a cleaner alternative to traditional biomass fuels. The potential benefits of using biomass pellets include improving energy utilization efficiency and reducing emissions of air pollutants. To assess the environmental, climate, and health significance of replacing traditional fuels with biomass pellets, it is critical to measure the emission factors (EFs) of various pollutants from pellet burning. However, only a few field measurements have been conducted on the emissions of carbon monoxide (CO), particulate matter (PM), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from the combustion of pellets. In this study, pine wood and corn straw pellets were burned in a pellet burner (2.6 kW), and the EFs of CO, organic carbon, elemental carbon, PM, and PAHs (EF(CO), EF(OC), EF(EC), EF(PM), and EF(PAH)) were determined. The average EF(CO), EF(OC), EF(EC), and EF(PM) were 1520 ± 1170, 8.68 ± 11.4, 11.2 ± 8.7, and 188 ± 87 mg/MJ for corn straw pellets and 266 ± 137, 5.74 ± 7.17, 2.02 ± 1.57, and 71.0 ± 54.0 mg/MJ for pine wood pellets, respectively. Total carbonaceous carbon constituted 8 to 14% of the PM mass emitted. The measured values of EF(PAH) for the two pellets were 1.02 ± 0.64 and 0.506 ± 0.360 mg/MJ, respectively. The secondary side air supply in the pellet burner did not change the EFs of most pollutants significantly (p > 0.05). The only exceptions were EF(OC) and EF(PM) for pine wood pellets because of reduced combustion temperatures with the increased air supply. In comparison with EFs for the raw pine wood and corn straw, EF(CO), EF(OC), EF(EC), and EF(PM) for pellets were significantly lower than those for raw fuels (p < 0.05). However, the differences in EF(PAH) were not significant (p > 0.05). Based on the measured EFs and thermal efficiencies, it was estimated that 95, 98, 98, 88, and 71% reductions in the total emissions of CO, OC, EC, PM, and PAHs could be achieved by replacing the raw biomass fuels combusted in traditional cooking stoves with pellets burned in modern pellet burners.
Science of The Total Environment | 2016
Baolin Wang; Ying Liu; Min Shao; Sihua Lu; Ming Wang; Bin Yuan; ZhaoHeng Gong; Ling-Yan He; Limin Zeng; Min Hu; Yuanhang Zhang
Synchronized online measurements of gas- and particle- phase organics including non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHCs), oxygenated volatile organic compounds (OVOCs) and submicron organic matters (OM) were conducted in November 2010 at Heshan, Guangdong provincial supersite, China. Several biomass burning events were identified by using acetonitrile as a tracer, and enhancement ratios (EnRs) of organics to carbon monoxide (CO) obtained from this work generally agree with those from rice straw burning in previous studies. The influences of biomass burning on NMHCs, OVOCs and OM were explored by comparing biomass burning impacted plumes (BB plumes) and non-biomass burning plumes (non-BB plumes). A photochemical age-based parameterization method was used to characterize primary emission and chemical behavior of those three organic groups. The emission ratios (EmRs) of NMHCs, OVOCs and OM to CO increased by 27-71%, 34-55% and 67% in BB plumes, respectively, in comparison with non-BB plumes. The estimated formation rate of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) in BB plumes was found to be 24% faster than non-BB plumes. By applying the above emission ratios to the whole PRD, the annual emissions of VOCs and OM from open burning of crop residues would be 56.4 and 3.8Gg in 2010 in PRD, respectively.
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2012
Rong Wang; Shu Tao; Philippe Ciais; Huizhong Shen; Yining Huang; Han Chen; Guofeng Shen; Baolin Wang; Wei Li; Yinsong Zhang; Youyong Lu; Dan Zhu; Yuanchen Chen; Xianli Liu; Wei Wang; Xiaowei Wang; Wen-Xiu Liu; Bingxin Li; Shilong Piao
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2010
Baolin Wang; Min Shao; S. H. Lu; Bin Yuan; Y. Zhao; Maojun Wang; S. Q. Zhang; D. Wu
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2014
Maojun Wang; Min Shao; Wentai Chen; Sihua Lu; Yuhan Liu; Bin Yuan; Qiang Zhang; Chih-Chung Chang; Baolin Wang; L. M. Zeng; Min Hu; Yudong Yang; Yingruo Li
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2016
Zhaofeng Tan; Hendrik Fuchs; Keding Lu; Andreas Hofzumahaus; Birger Bohn; Sebastian Broch; Huabin Dong; Sebastian Gomm; Rolf Häseler; Ling-Yan He; F. Holland; Xin Li; Ying Liu; Sihua Lu; Franz Rohrer; Min Shao; Baolin Wang; Ming Wang; Yusheng Wu; Limin Zeng; Yinsong Zhang; Andreas Wahner; Yuanhang Zhang
Indoor Air | 2014
Xiaoli Duan; Baolin Wang; Xiuge Zhao; Guofeng Shen; Zhonghuan Xia; Nan Huang; Qiujing Jiang; Bin Lu; D. Xu; J. Fang; Shu Tao
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2011
Jin Zhang; Zhenqiang Xu; Guo-Yu Yang; Baolin Wang
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2016
Hendrik Fuchs; Zhaofeng Tan; Keding Lu; Birger Bohn; Sebastian Broch; Steven S. Brown; Huabin Dong; Sebastian Gomm; Rolf Häseler; Ling-Yan He; Andreas Hofzumahaus; F. Holland; Xin Li; Ying Liu; Sihua Lu; Kyung-Eun Min; Franz Rohrer; Min Shao; Baolin Wang; Ming Wang; Yusheng Wu; Limin Zeng; Yingson Zhang; Andreas Wahner; Yuanhang Zhang
The EGU General Assembly | 2016
Hendrik Fuchs; F. Holland; Xf Huang; Baolin Wang; Andreas Hofzumahaus; Franz Rohrer; Xin Li; Ming Wang; Birger Bohn; Andreas Wahner; Sebastian Broch; Yuanhang Zhang; Keding Lu; Ying Liu; Zhaofeng Tan; Min Shao; Rolf Häseler; Sebastian Gomm; Yusheng Wu