Baptist Gallwitz

Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) dose-dependently stimulates glucagon secretion in healthy human subjects at euglycaemia

Aims/hypothesisIn the isolated perfused pancreas, gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) has been shown to enhance glucagon secretion at basal glucose concentrations, but in healthy humans no glucagonotropic effect of GIP has yet been reported. Therefore, we studied the effect of GIP on glucagon secretion under normoglycaemic conditions.MethodsTen healthy subjects (9 men, 1 woman; age 33±11; BMI 26.8±2.2xa0kg/m2) received three different doses of intravenous GIP (7, 20, and 60xa0pmol/kg body weight) and placebo. Venous blood samples were drawn over 30xa0min for glucagon and GIP concentrations (specific radioimmunoassays). In addition, 31 healthy subjects (16 men, 15 women; 42±11 years; BMI 24.4±2.7xa0kg/m2) were studied with 20xa0pmol GIP/kg. Statistics were done with RM-ANOVA and Duncans post hoc tests.ResultsGastric inhibitory polypeptide dose-dependently stimulated glucagon secretion (p=0.019) with a maximal increment after 10xa0min. Incremental glucagon concentrations (Δ10–0 min) were 0.1±0.7, 1.4±0.5, 2.4±0.5, and 3.4±0.8xa0pmol/l (for placebo and for 7, 20, and 60xa0pmol GIP/kg, respectively; p=0.017). After the injection of 20xa0pmol GIP/kg b.w. in 31 healthy subjects, glucagon concentrations increased over the baseline from 7.5±0.5 to 9.3±0.7xa0pmol/l (p=0.0082).Conclusions/interpretationGlucagon secretion is dose-dependently stimulated by GIP at basal glucose concentrations. The absence of a glucagonotropic GIP effect in previous studies could be due to the hyperglycaemic conditions used in these experiments. Our results underline differences between GIP and the glucagonostatic incretin GLP-1.

Glucagon-like peptide 1 abolishes the postprandial rise in triglyceride concentrations and lowers levels of non-esterified fatty acids in humans

Aims/hypothesisDiabetic dyslipidaemia contributes to the excess morbidity and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. Exogenous glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) lowers postprandial glycaemia predominantly by slowing gastric emptying. Therefore, the effects of GLP-1 on postprandial lipid levels and gastric emptying were assessed.Methods14 healthy male volunteers were studied with an i.v. infusion of GLP-1 (1.2xa0pmol kg−1 min−1) or placebo over 390xa0min in the fasting state. A solid test meal was served and gastric emptying was determined using a 13C-labelled sodium octanoate breath test. Venous blood was drawn frequently for measurement of glucose, insulin, C-peptide, glucagon, GLP-1, triglycerides and NEFA.ResultsGLP-1 administration lowered fasting and postprandial glycaemia (p<0.0001). Gastric emptying was delayed by GLP-1 compared with placebo (p<0.0001). During GLP-1 administration, insulin secretory responses were higher in the fasting state but lower after meal ingestion. After meal ingestion, triglyceride plasma levels increased by 0.33±0.14xa0mmol/l in the placebo experiments (p<0.0001). In contrast, the postprandial increase in triglyceride levels was completely abolished by GLP-1 (change in triglycerides, −0.023±0.045xa0mmol/l; p<0.05). During GLP-1 infusion, plasma concentrations of NEFA were suppressed by 39% in the fasting state (p<0.01) and by 31±5% after meal ingestion (p<0.01).Conclusions/interpretationGLP-1 improves postprandial lipidaemia, presumably as a result of delayed gastric emptying and insulin-mediated inhibition of lipolysis. Thus, by lowering both glucose and lipid concentrations, GLP-1 administration may reduce the cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Gastric inhibitory polypeptide : the neglected incretin revisited

After the ingestion of fat- and glucose-rich meals, gut hormones are secreted into the circulation in order to stimulate insulin secretion. This so-called incretin effect is primarily conferred by Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide (GIP). In contrast to GLP-1, GIP has lost most of its insulinotropic effect in type 2 diabetic patients. In addition to its main physiological role in the regulation of endocrine pancreatic secretion, GIP exerts various peripheral effects on adipose tissue and lipid metabolism, thereby leading to increased lipid deposition in the postprandial state. In some animal models, an influence on gastrointestinal functions has been described. However, such effects do not seem to play an important role in humans. During the last years, the major line of research has focussed on GLP-1, due to its promising potential for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, the physiological importance of GIP in the regulation of insulin secretion has been shown to even exceed that of GLP-1. Furthermore, work from various groups has provided evidence that GIP contributes to the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes to a considerable degree. Recent data with modified GIP analogues further suggested a possibility of therapeutic use in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Thus, it seems worthwhile to refocus on this important and-sometimes-neglected incretin hormone. The present work aims to review the physiological functions of GIP, to characterize its role in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes, and to discuss possible clinical applications and future perspectives in the light of new findings.

Glucagon-like peptide 1 as a regulator of food intake and body weight: therapeutic perspectives

After ingestion of carbohydrate- and fat-rich meals, the incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) is secreted from the L-cells in the distal put into the circulation. Its major physiological effect lies in a strongly glucose-dependent stimulation of insulin secretion from pancreatic B-cells. Furthermore, GLP-1 suppresses glucagon secretion, stimulates B-cell neogenesis as well as proinsulin biosynthesis and inhibits gastric emptying and acid secretion. Recently, GLP-1 could be shown to reduce caloric intake and to enhance satiety, most likely via specific receptors within the central nervous system, resulting in reduced weight gain in experimental animals. In nondiabetic and Type 2 diabetic human subjects, exogenous GLP-1 reduces hunger, caloric intake and body weight. Therefore, in addition to its well-characterized antidiabetogenic effect, the anorectic effect may offer GLP-1 a potential in the pharmacotherapy of obesity. It is still unknown whether the GLP-1 effect on caloric intake is sustained after long-term treatment. Furthermore, the exact mechanisms by which the peptide exerts its biological effects have not yet been clarified. Due to the rapid degradation of native GLP-1, its therapeutic application is limited by the short half-life. Therefore, suitable modes of administration are needed in order to reach stable plasma concentrations. The present review aims to describe the role of GLP-1 in the central regulation of feeding and to discuss its possible application in the pharmacotherapy of obesity.

Secretion of incretin hormones (GIP and GLP-1) and incretin effect after oral glucose in first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes.

AIMS/HYPOTHESISnSince insulin secretion in response to exogenous gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) is diminished not only in patients with type 2 diabetes, but also in their normal glucose-tolerant first-degree relatives, it was the aim to investigate the integrity of the entero-insular axis in such subjects.nnnMETHODSnSixteen first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes (4 male, 12 female, age 50+/-12 years, BMI 26.1+/-3.8 kg/m(2)) and 10 matched healthy controls (negative family history, 6 male, 4 female, 45+/-13 years, 26.1+/-4.2 kg/m(2)) were examined with an oral glucose load (75 g) and an isoglycaemic intravenous glucose infusion. Blood was drawn over 240 min for plasma glucose (glucose oxidase), insulin, C-peptide, GIP and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1; specific immunoassays).nnnRESULTSnThe pattern of glucose concentrations could precisely be copied by the intravenous glucose infusion (p=0.99). Insulin secretion was stimulated significantly more by oral as compared to intravenous glucose in both groups (p<0.0001). The percent contribution of the incretin effect was similar in both groups (C-peptide: 61.9+/-5.4 vs. 64.4+/-5.8%; p=0.77; insulin: 74.2+/-3.3 vs. 75.8+/-4.9; p=0.97; in first-degree relatives and controls, respectively). The individual responses of GIP and GLP-1 secretion were significantly correlated with each other (p=0.0003). The individual secretion of both GIP and GLP-1 was identified as a strong predictor of the integrated incremental insulin secretory responses as well as of the incretin effect.nnnCONCLUSION/INTERPRETATIONnDespite a lower insulin secretory response to exogenous GIP, incretin effects are similar in first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes and control subjects. This may be the result of a B cell secretory defect that affects stimulation by oral and intravenous glucose to a similar degree. Nevertheless, endogenous secretion of GIP and GLP-1 is a major determinant of insulin secretion after oral glucose.

Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 and Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide

Although the insulinotropic actions of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) have been known for almost 2 decades, the incretin hormones have not yet become available for clinical application. This can be explained by their unfavourable pharmacological properties. Both hormones are rapidly inactivated by the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP IV), yielding biologically inactive fragments. There have been several attempts to make use of the antidiabetogenic potential of the incretin hormones. Various analogues of GLP-1 and GIP have been generated in order to achieve resistance to DPP IV degradation. The natural GLP-1 receptor agonist exendin-4, found in the saliva of the Gila monster, has a longer biological half-life after subcutaneous injection than GLP-1, and inhibition of DPP IV using, for example, pyrrolidine derivatives provides elevated concentrations of intact, biologically active GIP and GLP-1 endogenously released from the gut. A continuous intravenous infusion of native GLP-1 for a limited time may be suitable in certain clinical situations. Numerous clinical studies are currently underway to evaluate these approaches. Therefore, an anti-diabetic treatment based on incretin hormones may become available within the next 5 years.

Glucagon-like peptide 2 improves intestinal wound healing through induction of epithelial cell migration in vitro-evidence for a TGF-β-mediated effect

Abstract Background/aims: In vitro studies suggest that glucagon-like peptide 2 (GLP-2), secreted from enteroendocrine cells in the gastrointestinal tract after food intake, is able to ameliorate mucosal injury in settings of human disease characterized by injury and dysfunction of the intestinal mucosal epithelium. We evaluated this potential of GLP-2 after epithelial trauma by using two in vitro models measuring intestinal epithelial cell proliferation and cell migration. Materials and methods: Injuries were induced in confluent monolayers of the small intestinal cells lines IEC-6 and IEC-18, as well as in the colonic cell lines Caco-2 and Colo 320. GLP-2 (50–500 nM) or other peptides were added to the media. Wound healing was investigated after 24 h by quantification of the number of cells migrating across the wound edge. Proliferation of cells was assessed by using photometric mitochondrial incorporation measurement of MTT (3-[4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide). Monoclonal TGF-β antibodies were added to wounded monolayers to examine whether the GLP-2-induced wound healing was TGF-β-mediated. Results: Migration assessments revealed a significant stimulation of GLP-2-induced migration in IEC-6 and IEC-18 monolayers compared to the placebo group. No effect was observed in the colon cancer cell lines Caco-2 and Colo 320. Results of the proliferation assays show a significant inhibition of proliferation by GLP-2 in small intestinal cell lines whereas a dose-dependent stimulation of proliferation in colonic epithelial cells was observed. Addition of neutralizing TGF-β1 antibodies to wounded IEC-6 and IEC-18 monolayers incubated with GLP-2 significantly reduced the number of migrating cells to the level of the placebo group. Conclusions: In our in vitro model, it was shown that the GLP-2-induced improvement of intestinal wound healing is TGF-β-mediated. These effects were predominant in the epithelium of the small intestine compared to colonic epithelium. Our findings provide further insight into mechanisms leading to GLP-2-induced mucosal wound healing. These results suggest that GLP-2 or analogues of this peptide may potentially be useful for the treatment of intestinal disorders characterized by injury and ineffective repair of the intestinal mucosa.

Similar Insulin Secretory Response to a Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide Bolus Injection at Euglycemia in First-Degree Relatives of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Control Subjects

Insulin secretion following the intravenous infusion of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) is diminished in patients with type 2 diabetes and at least a subgroup of their first-degree relatives at hyperglycemic clamp conditions. Therefore, we studied the effects of an intravenous bolus administration of GIP at normoglycemic conditions in the fasting state. Ten healthy control subjects were studied with an intravenous bolus administration of placebo, and of 7, 20, and 60 pmol GIP/kg body weight (BW), respectively. Forty-five first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes and 33 matched control subjects were studied with (1) a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and (2) an intravenous bolus injection of 20 pmol GIP/kg BW with blood samples drawn over 30 minutes for determination of plasma glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and GIP. Statistical analysis applied repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncans post hoc tests. Insulin secretion was stimulated after the administration of 20 and of 60 pmol GIP/kg BW in the dose-response experiments (P <.0001). GIP administration (20 pmol/kg BW) led to a significant rise of insulin and C-peptide concentrations in the first-degree relatives and control subjects (P <.0001), but there was difference between groups (P =.64 and P =.87, respectively). Also expressed as increments over baseline, no differences were apparent (Delta(insulin), 7.6 +/- 1.2 and 7.6 +/- 1.6 mU/L, P =.99; Delta(C-peptide), 0.35 +/- 0.06 and 0.38 +/- 0.08 ng/mL, P =.75). Integrated insulin and C-peptide responses after GIP administration significantly correlated with the respective insulin and C-peptide responses after glucose ingestion (insulin, r = 0.78, P <.0001; C-peptide, r = 0.35, P =.0015). We conclude that a reduced insulinotropic effect of GIP in first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes cannot be observed at euglycemia. Therefore, a reduced GIP-induced insulin secretion in patients with type 2 diabetes and their first-degree relatives at hyperglycemia is more likely due to a general defect of B-cell function than to a specific defect of the GIP action.

The reduction in hepatic insulin clearance after oral glucose is not mediated by Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP)

Since the C-peptide/insulin ratio is reduced after oral glucose ingestion, the incretin hormone gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) has been assumed to decrease hepatic insulin extraction. It was the aim of the present study to evaluate the effects of GIP on insulin extraction. Seventy-eight healthy subjects (27 male, 51 female, 43+/-11 years) were subjected to (a). an oral glucose tolerance test and (b). an intravenous injection of 20 pmol GIP/kg body weight, with capillary and venous blood samples collected over 30 min for insulin, C-peptide and GIP (specific immunoassays). Following GIP administration, plasma concentrations of total and intact GIP reached to peak levels of 80+/-7 and 54+/-5 pmol/l, respectively (p<0.0001). The rise in insulin after oral glucose and after intravenous GIP administration significantly exceeded the rise in C-peptide (p<0.0001). Estimating insulin extraction from the total integrated insulin and C-peptide concentrations (AUCs), only the oral glucose load (p<0.0001), but not the intravenous GIP administration (p=0.18) significantly reduced insulin clearance. Therefore, insulin clearance is reduced after an oral glucose load. This effect does not appear to be mediated by GIP.

Erratum to “Blood glucose control in healthy subject and patients receiving intravenous glucose infusion or total parenteral nutrition using glucagon-like peptide 1” [Regul Pept 118 (2004) 89–97]

Medizinische Universitats-Klinik, Knappschafts-Krankenhaus Bochum, Klinikum der Ruhr-Universitat Bochum, In der Schornau 23-25, D-44892 Bochum, Germany Medizinische Klinik 1, St. Josef-Hospital, Klinikum der Ruhr-Universitat Bochum, Gudrunstr. 56, D-44791 Bochum, Germany Diabeteszentrum Bad Lauterberg, Kirchberg 21, D-37431 Bad Lauterberg, Germany Chirurgische Klinik I, St. Josef-Hospital, Klinikum der Ruhr-Universitat Bochum, Gudrunstr. 56, D-44791 Bochum, Germany Department of Medical Physiology, Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark